Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze

Autores
Ferreyra, Diego Julián
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The Hegel-Deleuze relation has usually been considered as one of opposition, because of Deleuze´s explicit anti-Hegelian statements. This article refutes the main conceptual grounds to this opposition: the critique of the negative and of the circle of return. It aims to present the possibilities offered by considering the Hegel-Deleuze relation as a problematic, productive one. "Hegel-Deleuze" would be a relation prior to the supposed terms. To achieve this, we bind them through the concept of Idea. This traditional concept of philosophy, which crowns the Hegelian system (also known as absolute idealism), appears in a key position in Deleuze´s Difference and Repetition. It allows Deleuze to consider thought not as an image of the external reality or the condition of possible experience, but as the genetic principle of real experience. Even if Deleuze accuses Hegel of positing his Idea as the ground for the eternal repetition of the same, this article proposes to interpret it as the source of creation of a reality always different from itself.
Fil: Ferreyra, Diego Julián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
Hegel
Deleuze
Idea
Philosophy of relations
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195908

id CONICETDig_e15c6b291dfc17bb81d3e09ad4122ed9
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195908
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Ideas, from Hegel to DeleuzeFerreyra, Diego JuliánHegelDeleuzeIdeaPhilosophy of relationshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The Hegel-Deleuze relation has usually been considered as one of opposition, because of Deleuze´s explicit anti-Hegelian statements. This article refutes the main conceptual grounds to this opposition: the critique of the negative and of the circle of return. It aims to present the possibilities offered by considering the Hegel-Deleuze relation as a problematic, productive one. "Hegel-Deleuze" would be a relation prior to the supposed terms. To achieve this, we bind them through the concept of Idea. This traditional concept of philosophy, which crowns the Hegelian system (also known as absolute idealism), appears in a key position in Deleuze´s Difference and Repetition. It allows Deleuze to consider thought not as an image of the external reality or the condition of possible experience, but as the genetic principle of real experience. Even if Deleuze accuses Hegel of positing his Idea as the ground for the eternal repetition of the same, this article proposes to interpret it as the source of creation of a reality always different from itself.Fil: Ferreyra, Diego Julián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaTaylor & Francis2012-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/195908Ferreyra, Diego Julián; Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze; Taylor & Francis; Comparative and Continental Philosophy; 4; 1; 7-2012; 93-1041757-0638CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1558/ccp.v4i1.93info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1558/ccp.v4i1.93info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:57:02Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195908instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:57:02.717CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze
title Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze
spellingShingle Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze
Ferreyra, Diego Julián
Hegel
Deleuze
Idea
Philosophy of relations
title_short Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze
title_full Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze
title_fullStr Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze
title_full_unstemmed Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze
title_sort Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ferreyra, Diego Julián
author Ferreyra, Diego Julián
author_facet Ferreyra, Diego Julián
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Hegel
Deleuze
Idea
Philosophy of relations
topic Hegel
Deleuze
Idea
Philosophy of relations
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The Hegel-Deleuze relation has usually been considered as one of opposition, because of Deleuze´s explicit anti-Hegelian statements. This article refutes the main conceptual grounds to this opposition: the critique of the negative and of the circle of return. It aims to present the possibilities offered by considering the Hegel-Deleuze relation as a problematic, productive one. "Hegel-Deleuze" would be a relation prior to the supposed terms. To achieve this, we bind them through the concept of Idea. This traditional concept of philosophy, which crowns the Hegelian system (also known as absolute idealism), appears in a key position in Deleuze´s Difference and Repetition. It allows Deleuze to consider thought not as an image of the external reality or the condition of possible experience, but as the genetic principle of real experience. Even if Deleuze accuses Hegel of positing his Idea as the ground for the eternal repetition of the same, this article proposes to interpret it as the source of creation of a reality always different from itself.
Fil: Ferreyra, Diego Julián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description The Hegel-Deleuze relation has usually been considered as one of opposition, because of Deleuze´s explicit anti-Hegelian statements. This article refutes the main conceptual grounds to this opposition: the critique of the negative and of the circle of return. It aims to present the possibilities offered by considering the Hegel-Deleuze relation as a problematic, productive one. "Hegel-Deleuze" would be a relation prior to the supposed terms. To achieve this, we bind them through the concept of Idea. This traditional concept of philosophy, which crowns the Hegelian system (also known as absolute idealism), appears in a key position in Deleuze´s Difference and Repetition. It allows Deleuze to consider thought not as an image of the external reality or the condition of possible experience, but as the genetic principle of real experience. Even if Deleuze accuses Hegel of positing his Idea as the ground for the eternal repetition of the same, this article proposes to interpret it as the source of creation of a reality always different from itself.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195908
Ferreyra, Diego Julián; Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze; Taylor & Francis; Comparative and Continental Philosophy; 4; 1; 7-2012; 93-104
1757-0638
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195908
identifier_str_mv Ferreyra, Diego Julián; Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze; Taylor & Francis; Comparative and Continental Philosophy; 4; 1; 7-2012; 93-104
1757-0638
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1558/ccp.v4i1.93
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1558/ccp.v4i1.93
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269436315172864
score 13.13397