Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze
- Autores
- Ferreyra, Diego Julián
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The Hegel-Deleuze relation has usually been considered as one of opposition, because of Deleuze´s explicit anti-Hegelian statements. This article refutes the main conceptual grounds to this opposition: the critique of the negative and of the circle of return. It aims to present the possibilities offered by considering the Hegel-Deleuze relation as a problematic, productive one. "Hegel-Deleuze" would be a relation prior to the supposed terms. To achieve this, we bind them through the concept of Idea. This traditional concept of philosophy, which crowns the Hegelian system (also known as absolute idealism), appears in a key position in Deleuze´s Difference and Repetition. It allows Deleuze to consider thought not as an image of the external reality or the condition of possible experience, but as the genetic principle of real experience. Even if Deleuze accuses Hegel of positing his Idea as the ground for the eternal repetition of the same, this article proposes to interpret it as the source of creation of a reality always different from itself.
Fil: Ferreyra, Diego Julián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina - Materia
-
Hegel
Deleuze
Idea
Philosophy of relations - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195908
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_e15c6b291dfc17bb81d3e09ad4122ed9 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195908 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Ideas, from Hegel to DeleuzeFerreyra, Diego JuliánHegelDeleuzeIdeaPhilosophy of relationshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The Hegel-Deleuze relation has usually been considered as one of opposition, because of Deleuze´s explicit anti-Hegelian statements. This article refutes the main conceptual grounds to this opposition: the critique of the negative and of the circle of return. It aims to present the possibilities offered by considering the Hegel-Deleuze relation as a problematic, productive one. "Hegel-Deleuze" would be a relation prior to the supposed terms. To achieve this, we bind them through the concept of Idea. This traditional concept of philosophy, which crowns the Hegelian system (also known as absolute idealism), appears in a key position in Deleuze´s Difference and Repetition. It allows Deleuze to consider thought not as an image of the external reality or the condition of possible experience, but as the genetic principle of real experience. Even if Deleuze accuses Hegel of positing his Idea as the ground for the eternal repetition of the same, this article proposes to interpret it as the source of creation of a reality always different from itself.Fil: Ferreyra, Diego Julián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaTaylor & Francis2012-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/195908Ferreyra, Diego Julián; Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze; Taylor & Francis; Comparative and Continental Philosophy; 4; 1; 7-2012; 93-1041757-0638CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1558/ccp.v4i1.93info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1558/ccp.v4i1.93info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:57:02Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195908instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:57:02.717CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze |
title |
Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze |
spellingShingle |
Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze Ferreyra, Diego Julián Hegel Deleuze Idea Philosophy of relations |
title_short |
Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze |
title_full |
Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze |
title_fullStr |
Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze |
title_sort |
Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Ferreyra, Diego Julián |
author |
Ferreyra, Diego Julián |
author_facet |
Ferreyra, Diego Julián |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Hegel Deleuze Idea Philosophy of relations |
topic |
Hegel Deleuze Idea Philosophy of relations |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The Hegel-Deleuze relation has usually been considered as one of opposition, because of Deleuze´s explicit anti-Hegelian statements. This article refutes the main conceptual grounds to this opposition: the critique of the negative and of the circle of return. It aims to present the possibilities offered by considering the Hegel-Deleuze relation as a problematic, productive one. "Hegel-Deleuze" would be a relation prior to the supposed terms. To achieve this, we bind them through the concept of Idea. This traditional concept of philosophy, which crowns the Hegelian system (also known as absolute idealism), appears in a key position in Deleuze´s Difference and Repetition. It allows Deleuze to consider thought not as an image of the external reality or the condition of possible experience, but as the genetic principle of real experience. Even if Deleuze accuses Hegel of positing his Idea as the ground for the eternal repetition of the same, this article proposes to interpret it as the source of creation of a reality always different from itself. Fil: Ferreyra, Diego Julián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina |
description |
The Hegel-Deleuze relation has usually been considered as one of opposition, because of Deleuze´s explicit anti-Hegelian statements. This article refutes the main conceptual grounds to this opposition: the critique of the negative and of the circle of return. It aims to present the possibilities offered by considering the Hegel-Deleuze relation as a problematic, productive one. "Hegel-Deleuze" would be a relation prior to the supposed terms. To achieve this, we bind them through the concept of Idea. This traditional concept of philosophy, which crowns the Hegelian system (also known as absolute idealism), appears in a key position in Deleuze´s Difference and Repetition. It allows Deleuze to consider thought not as an image of the external reality or the condition of possible experience, but as the genetic principle of real experience. Even if Deleuze accuses Hegel of positing his Idea as the ground for the eternal repetition of the same, this article proposes to interpret it as the source of creation of a reality always different from itself. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195908 Ferreyra, Diego Julián; Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze; Taylor & Francis; Comparative and Continental Philosophy; 4; 1; 7-2012; 93-104 1757-0638 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195908 |
identifier_str_mv |
Ferreyra, Diego Julián; Ideas, from Hegel to Deleuze; Taylor & Francis; Comparative and Continental Philosophy; 4; 1; 7-2012; 93-104 1757-0638 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1558/ccp.v4i1.93 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1558/ccp.v4i1.93 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Taylor & Francis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269436315172864 |
score |
13.13397 |