Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia

Autores
Campbell, Hamish A.; Beyer, Hawthorne L.; Dennis, Todd E.; Dwyer, Ross G.; Forester, James D.; Fukuda, Yusuke; Lynch, Catherine; Hindell, Mark A.; Menke, Norbert; Morales, Juan Manuel; Richardson, Craig; Rodgers, Essie; Taylor, Graeme; Watts, Matt E.; Westcott, David A.
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~ 500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8% of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.
Fil: Campbell, Hamish A.. University of New England; Australia
Fil: Beyer, Hawthorne L. . University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Dennis, Todd E.. The University Of Auckland; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Dwyer, Ross G. . University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Forester, James D.. University Of Minnesota; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fukuda, Yusuke . Department of Land Resource Management; Australia
Fil: Lynch, Catherine . Arid Recovery; Australia
Fil: Hindell, Mark A. . University Of Tasmania; Australia
Fil: Menke, Norbert . Queensland Department of Science, Information, Technology, Innovation and the Arts; Australia
Fil: Morales, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche. Laboratorio de Ecotono; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Richardson, Craig . Department of the Environment; Australia
Fil: Rodgers, Essie. University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Taylor, Graeme . Department of Conservation; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Watts, Matt E. . University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Westcott, David A.. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Australia
Materia
Biotelemetry
Wildlife Tracking
Inter-Disciplinary
Movement Ecology
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/12260

id CONICETDig_de58ad5c9200e770fa42977e7015afb5
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/12260
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in AustralasiaCampbell, Hamish A.Beyer, Hawthorne L. Dennis, Todd E.Dwyer, Ross G. Forester, James D.Fukuda, Yusuke Lynch, Catherine Hindell, Mark A. Menke, Norbert Morales, Juan ManuelRichardson, Craig Rodgers, EssieTaylor, Graeme Watts, Matt E. Westcott, David A.BiotelemetryWildlife TrackingInter-DisciplinaryMovement Ecologyhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~ 500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8% of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.Fil: Campbell, Hamish A.. University of New England; AustraliaFil: Beyer, Hawthorne L. . University Of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Dennis, Todd E.. The University Of Auckland; Nueva ZelandaFil: Dwyer, Ross G. . University Of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Forester, James D.. University Of Minnesota; Estados UnidosFil: Fukuda, Yusuke . Department of Land Resource Management; AustraliaFil: Lynch, Catherine . Arid Recovery; AustraliaFil: Hindell, Mark A. . University Of Tasmania; AustraliaFil: Menke, Norbert . Queensland Department of Science, Information, Technology, Innovation and the Arts; AustraliaFil: Morales, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche. Laboratorio de Ecotono; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; ArgentinaFil: Richardson, Craig . Department of the Environment; AustraliaFil: Rodgers, Essie. University Of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Taylor, Graeme . Department of Conservation; Nueva ZelandaFil: Watts, Matt E. . University Of Queensland; AustraliaFil: Westcott, David A.. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; AustraliaElsevier Science2015-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/12260Campbell, Hamish A.; Beyer, Hawthorne L. ; Dennis, Todd E.; Dwyer, Ross G. ; Forester, James D.; et al.; Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia; Elsevier Science; Science Of The Total Environment; 534; 11-2015; 79-840048-9697enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.089info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969715001114info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:36:23Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/12260instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:36:23.626CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia
title Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia
spellingShingle Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia
Campbell, Hamish A.
Biotelemetry
Wildlife Tracking
Inter-Disciplinary
Movement Ecology
title_short Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia
title_full Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia
title_fullStr Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia
title_full_unstemmed Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia
title_sort Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Campbell, Hamish A.
Beyer, Hawthorne L.
Dennis, Todd E.
Dwyer, Ross G.
Forester, James D.
Fukuda, Yusuke
Lynch, Catherine
Hindell, Mark A.
Menke, Norbert
Morales, Juan Manuel
Richardson, Craig
Rodgers, Essie
Taylor, Graeme
Watts, Matt E.
Westcott, David A.
author Campbell, Hamish A.
author_facet Campbell, Hamish A.
Beyer, Hawthorne L.
Dennis, Todd E.
Dwyer, Ross G.
Forester, James D.
Fukuda, Yusuke
Lynch, Catherine
Hindell, Mark A.
Menke, Norbert
Morales, Juan Manuel
Richardson, Craig
Rodgers, Essie
Taylor, Graeme
Watts, Matt E.
Westcott, David A.
author_role author
author2 Beyer, Hawthorne L.
Dennis, Todd E.
Dwyer, Ross G.
Forester, James D.
Fukuda, Yusuke
Lynch, Catherine
Hindell, Mark A.
Menke, Norbert
Morales, Juan Manuel
Richardson, Craig
Rodgers, Essie
Taylor, Graeme
Watts, Matt E.
Westcott, David A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Biotelemetry
Wildlife Tracking
Inter-Disciplinary
Movement Ecology
topic Biotelemetry
Wildlife Tracking
Inter-Disciplinary
Movement Ecology
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~ 500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8% of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.
Fil: Campbell, Hamish A.. University of New England; Australia
Fil: Beyer, Hawthorne L. . University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Dennis, Todd E.. The University Of Auckland; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Dwyer, Ross G. . University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Forester, James D.. University Of Minnesota; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fukuda, Yusuke . Department of Land Resource Management; Australia
Fil: Lynch, Catherine . Arid Recovery; Australia
Fil: Hindell, Mark A. . University Of Tasmania; Australia
Fil: Menke, Norbert . Queensland Department of Science, Information, Technology, Innovation and the Arts; Australia
Fil: Morales, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universitario Bariloche. Laboratorio de Ecotono; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Richardson, Craig . Department of the Environment; Australia
Fil: Rodgers, Essie. University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Taylor, Graeme . Department of Conservation; Nueva Zelanda
Fil: Watts, Matt E. . University Of Queensland; Australia
Fil: Westcott, David A.. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation; Australia
description The presence and movements of organisms both reflect and influence the distribution of ecological resources in space and time. The monitoring of animal movement by telemetry devices is being increasingly used to inform management of marine, freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems. Here, we brought together academics, and environmental managers to determine the extent of animal movement research in the Australasian region, and assess the opportunities and challenges in the sharing and reuse of these data. This working group was formed under the Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS), whose overall aim was to facilitate trans-organisational and transdisciplinary synthesis. We discovered that between 2000 and 2012 at least 501 peer-reviewed scientific papers were published that report animal location data collected by telemetry devices from within the Australasian region. Collectively, this involved the capture and electronic tagging of 12 656 animals. The majority of studies were undertaken to address specific management questions; rarely were these data used beyond their original intent. We estimate that approximately half (~ 500) of all animal telemetry projects undertaken remained unpublished, a similar proportion were not discoverable via online resources, and less than 8.8% of all animals tagged and tracked had their data stored in a discoverable and accessible manner. Animal telemetry data contain a wealth of information about how animals and species interact with each other and the landscapes they inhabit. These data are expensive and difficult to collect and can reduce survivorship of the tagged individuals, which implies an ethical obligation to make the data available to the scientific community. This is the first study to quantify the gap between telemetry devices placed on animals and findings/data published, and presents methods for improvement. Instigation of these strategies will enhance the cost-effectiveness of the research and maximise its impact on the management of natural resources.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/12260
Campbell, Hamish A.; Beyer, Hawthorne L. ; Dennis, Todd E.; Dwyer, Ross G. ; Forester, James D.; et al.; Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia; Elsevier Science; Science Of The Total Environment; 534; 11-2015; 79-84
0048-9697
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/12260
identifier_str_mv Campbell, Hamish A.; Beyer, Hawthorne L. ; Dennis, Todd E.; Dwyer, Ross G. ; Forester, James D.; et al.; Finding our way: on the sharing and reuse of animal telemetry data in Australasia; Elsevier Science; Science Of The Total Environment; 534; 11-2015; 79-84
0048-9697
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.089
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969715001114
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782004575600640
score 12.982451