The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism

Autores
Penelas, Federico Carlos
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In Knowledge in a Social World1 Alvin Goldman distinguishes between two complementary areas of epistemology: individualistic epistemology and social epistemology. The former focuses on the conditions under which an individual is capable of acquiring knowledge by himself, with no need of interacting with others. The latter examines the conditions of cognitive exchange between individuals, along with the epistemic undertakings carried on by social groups. Meanwhile, in Knowledge by Agreement2 , Martin Kush claims that the first of these areas is a dead philosophical goal, since all knowledge must be understood in communitarian terms. I want to emphasize that, even when these perspectives show a significant difference in focus, both are in need of an account of the concept of epistemic community. It is usually pointed out that the lack of conceptual accuracy regarding it is a characteristic deficit of perspectives that merge epistemology into sociology or politics. Goldman’s acknowledgment of the need of a social epistemology, even when it is located within a general frame that keeps positioning perception (object of study of an individualistic epistemology) as the basis of the cognitive undertaking, accounts for the unavoidability in contemporary epistemology of the urge of answering the question of “what is an epistemic community?”
Fil: Penelas, Federico Carlos. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
Materia
Comunidad epistémica
Conversacionalismo
Creencia performativa
Rorty
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/200478

id CONICETDig_ddc220607401f0c3ce08ac059cfa3879
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/200478
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian ConversationalismPenelas, Federico CarlosComunidad epistémicaConversacionalismoCreencia performativaRortyhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In Knowledge in a Social World1 Alvin Goldman distinguishes between two complementary areas of epistemology: individualistic epistemology and social epistemology. The former focuses on the conditions under which an individual is capable of acquiring knowledge by himself, with no need of interacting with others. The latter examines the conditions of cognitive exchange between individuals, along with the epistemic undertakings carried on by social groups. Meanwhile, in Knowledge by Agreement2 , Martin Kush claims that the first of these areas is a dead philosophical goal, since all knowledge must be understood in communitarian terms. I want to emphasize that, even when these perspectives show a significant difference in focus, both are in need of an account of the concept of epistemic community. It is usually pointed out that the lack of conceptual accuracy regarding it is a characteristic deficit of perspectives that merge epistemology into sociology or politics. Goldman’s acknowledgment of the need of a social epistemology, even when it is located within a general frame that keeps positioning perception (object of study of an individualistic epistemology) as the basis of the cognitive undertaking, accounts for the unavoidability in contemporary epistemology of the urge of answering the question of “what is an epistemic community?”Fil: Penelas, Federico Carlos. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; ArgentinaCentral-European Pragmatist Forum2012-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/200478Penelas, Federico Carlos; The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism; Central-European Pragmatist Forum; Pragmatism Today; 3; 1; 5-2012; 98-1101338-27991338-2799CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pragmatismtoday.eu/index.php?id=archivesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pragmatismtoday.eu/summer2012/Penelas-The_Idea_of_Epistemic_Community_from_The_Standpoint_of_Rortian_Conversationalism.pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:33:42Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/200478instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:33:43.292CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism
title The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism
spellingShingle The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism
Penelas, Federico Carlos
Comunidad epistémica
Conversacionalismo
Creencia performativa
Rorty
title_short The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism
title_full The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism
title_fullStr The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism
title_full_unstemmed The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism
title_sort The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Penelas, Federico Carlos
author Penelas, Federico Carlos
author_facet Penelas, Federico Carlos
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Comunidad epistémica
Conversacionalismo
Creencia performativa
Rorty
topic Comunidad epistémica
Conversacionalismo
Creencia performativa
Rorty
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In Knowledge in a Social World1 Alvin Goldman distinguishes between two complementary areas of epistemology: individualistic epistemology and social epistemology. The former focuses on the conditions under which an individual is capable of acquiring knowledge by himself, with no need of interacting with others. The latter examines the conditions of cognitive exchange between individuals, along with the epistemic undertakings carried on by social groups. Meanwhile, in Knowledge by Agreement2 , Martin Kush claims that the first of these areas is a dead philosophical goal, since all knowledge must be understood in communitarian terms. I want to emphasize that, even when these perspectives show a significant difference in focus, both are in need of an account of the concept of epistemic community. It is usually pointed out that the lack of conceptual accuracy regarding it is a characteristic deficit of perspectives that merge epistemology into sociology or politics. Goldman’s acknowledgment of the need of a social epistemology, even when it is located within a general frame that keeps positioning perception (object of study of an individualistic epistemology) as the basis of the cognitive undertaking, accounts for the unavoidability in contemporary epistemology of the urge of answering the question of “what is an epistemic community?”
Fil: Penelas, Federico Carlos. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas. - Sociedad Argentina de Análisis Filosófico. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
description In Knowledge in a Social World1 Alvin Goldman distinguishes between two complementary areas of epistemology: individualistic epistemology and social epistemology. The former focuses on the conditions under which an individual is capable of acquiring knowledge by himself, with no need of interacting with others. The latter examines the conditions of cognitive exchange between individuals, along with the epistemic undertakings carried on by social groups. Meanwhile, in Knowledge by Agreement2 , Martin Kush claims that the first of these areas is a dead philosophical goal, since all knowledge must be understood in communitarian terms. I want to emphasize that, even when these perspectives show a significant difference in focus, both are in need of an account of the concept of epistemic community. It is usually pointed out that the lack of conceptual accuracy regarding it is a characteristic deficit of perspectives that merge epistemology into sociology or politics. Goldman’s acknowledgment of the need of a social epistemology, even when it is located within a general frame that keeps positioning perception (object of study of an individualistic epistemology) as the basis of the cognitive undertaking, accounts for the unavoidability in contemporary epistemology of the urge of answering the question of “what is an epistemic community?”
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/200478
Penelas, Federico Carlos; The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism; Central-European Pragmatist Forum; Pragmatism Today; 3; 1; 5-2012; 98-110
1338-2799
1338-2799
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/200478
identifier_str_mv Penelas, Federico Carlos; The Idea of Epistemic Community From the Standpoint of Rortian Conversationalism; Central-European Pragmatist Forum; Pragmatism Today; 3; 1; 5-2012; 98-110
1338-2799
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pragmatismtoday.eu/index.php?id=archives
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pragmatismtoday.eu/summer2012/Penelas-The_Idea_of_Epistemic_Community_from_The_Standpoint_of_Rortian_Conversationalism.pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/msword
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Central-European Pragmatist Forum
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Central-European Pragmatist Forum
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613038544519168
score 13.070432