The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change
- Autores
- Robert, Veronica; Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo; Lerena, Octavio
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Different studies have tried to find a common thread that places different evolutionary and neo-Schumpeterian contributions to economic change under one umbrella. The complexity approach can account for a set of attributes that evolutionary economics has been considering, as decentralized interaction, heterogeneous agents, bounded rationality, networks of linkages, non-linear dynamics, divergent paths, disequilibrium and emergent properties. In this regard, the complexity approach could be a theoretical and conceptual starting point that allows the integration of different contributions (Davis, 2008; Fontana, 2013). In this article, we attempt to show that complexity can also be useful to point out the profound differences between evolutionary strands. This paper analyzes how the ontological evolutionary assumptions of complexity are emphasized with different intensity by different groups of representative contributions of evolutionary economics. We propose that these differences reflect deeper issues related to two major concerns of economic theory: coordination and order vs. transformation and change of economic systems (Dosi and Orsenigo 1988). In this context, the hypothesis of the article is that complexity acts as an umbrella and at the same time as a differentiating criterion of different strands within evolutionary economics, since their ontological assumptions relate differentially to these two concerns. Using a bibliometric methodology, we identify a set of representative contributions for five strands of evolutionary economics. Additionally, we analyze how the various dimensions and attributes of complexity ontology are emphasized unevenly by each group of contributions. To show the differences, we quote fragments from contributions corresponding to the dimensions and attributes of the complexity and use a set of nonparametric tests to corroborate the significance of the differences in the frequency in which these references appear. The results show that, while groups concerned with coordination are focused on heterogeneity and networks assumptions, groups concerned with transformation stress path dependence and divergent dynamics. Emergent properties are common to all of them.
Fil: Robert, Veronica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; Argentina
Fil: Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Industria; Argentina
Fil: Lerena, Octavio. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Industria; Argentina - Materia
-
Complexity
Coordination
Economic Change
Evolutionary Theory
Neo-Schumpeterian - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72099
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_dcd576eb2b3ab2158a6aaad383a5dd7c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72099 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic changeRobert, VeronicaYoguel, Gabriel LeopoldoLerena, OctavioComplexityCoordinationEconomic ChangeEvolutionary TheoryNeo-Schumpeterianhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Different studies have tried to find a common thread that places different evolutionary and neo-Schumpeterian contributions to economic change under one umbrella. The complexity approach can account for a set of attributes that evolutionary economics has been considering, as decentralized interaction, heterogeneous agents, bounded rationality, networks of linkages, non-linear dynamics, divergent paths, disequilibrium and emergent properties. In this regard, the complexity approach could be a theoretical and conceptual starting point that allows the integration of different contributions (Davis, 2008; Fontana, 2013). In this article, we attempt to show that complexity can also be useful to point out the profound differences between evolutionary strands. This paper analyzes how the ontological evolutionary assumptions of complexity are emphasized with different intensity by different groups of representative contributions of evolutionary economics. We propose that these differences reflect deeper issues related to two major concerns of economic theory: coordination and order vs. transformation and change of economic systems (Dosi and Orsenigo 1988). In this context, the hypothesis of the article is that complexity acts as an umbrella and at the same time as a differentiating criterion of different strands within evolutionary economics, since their ontological assumptions relate differentially to these two concerns. Using a bibliometric methodology, we identify a set of representative contributions for five strands of evolutionary economics. Additionally, we analyze how the various dimensions and attributes of complexity ontology are emphasized unevenly by each group of contributions. To show the differences, we quote fragments from contributions corresponding to the dimensions and attributes of the complexity and use a set of nonparametric tests to corroborate the significance of the differences in the frequency in which these references appear. The results show that, while groups concerned with coordination are focused on heterogeneity and networks assumptions, groups concerned with transformation stress path dependence and divergent dynamics. Emergent properties are common to all of them.Fil: Robert, Veronica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; ArgentinaFil: Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Industria; ArgentinaFil: Lerena, Octavio. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Industria; ArgentinaSpringer2017-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/72099Robert, Veronica; Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo; Lerena, Octavio; The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change; Springer; Journal Of Evolutionary Economics; 27; 4; 9-2017; 761-7930936-9937CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00191-017-0512-xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00191-017-0512-xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:34:00Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/72099instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:34:00.566CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change |
title |
The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change |
spellingShingle |
The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change Robert, Veronica Complexity Coordination Economic Change Evolutionary Theory Neo-Schumpeterian |
title_short |
The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change |
title_full |
The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change |
title_fullStr |
The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change |
title_full_unstemmed |
The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change |
title_sort |
The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Robert, Veronica Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo Lerena, Octavio |
author |
Robert, Veronica |
author_facet |
Robert, Veronica Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo Lerena, Octavio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo Lerena, Octavio |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Complexity Coordination Economic Change Evolutionary Theory Neo-Schumpeterian |
topic |
Complexity Coordination Economic Change Evolutionary Theory Neo-Schumpeterian |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Different studies have tried to find a common thread that places different evolutionary and neo-Schumpeterian contributions to economic change under one umbrella. The complexity approach can account for a set of attributes that evolutionary economics has been considering, as decentralized interaction, heterogeneous agents, bounded rationality, networks of linkages, non-linear dynamics, divergent paths, disequilibrium and emergent properties. In this regard, the complexity approach could be a theoretical and conceptual starting point that allows the integration of different contributions (Davis, 2008; Fontana, 2013). In this article, we attempt to show that complexity can also be useful to point out the profound differences between evolutionary strands. This paper analyzes how the ontological evolutionary assumptions of complexity are emphasized with different intensity by different groups of representative contributions of evolutionary economics. We propose that these differences reflect deeper issues related to two major concerns of economic theory: coordination and order vs. transformation and change of economic systems (Dosi and Orsenigo 1988). In this context, the hypothesis of the article is that complexity acts as an umbrella and at the same time as a differentiating criterion of different strands within evolutionary economics, since their ontological assumptions relate differentially to these two concerns. Using a bibliometric methodology, we identify a set of representative contributions for five strands of evolutionary economics. Additionally, we analyze how the various dimensions and attributes of complexity ontology are emphasized unevenly by each group of contributions. To show the differences, we quote fragments from contributions corresponding to the dimensions and attributes of the complexity and use a set of nonparametric tests to corroborate the significance of the differences in the frequency in which these references appear. The results show that, while groups concerned with coordination are focused on heterogeneity and networks assumptions, groups concerned with transformation stress path dependence and divergent dynamics. Emergent properties are common to all of them. Fil: Robert, Veronica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Instituto de Altos Estudios Sociales; Argentina Fil: Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Industria; Argentina Fil: Lerena, Octavio. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento. Instituto de Industria; Argentina |
description |
Different studies have tried to find a common thread that places different evolutionary and neo-Schumpeterian contributions to economic change under one umbrella. The complexity approach can account for a set of attributes that evolutionary economics has been considering, as decentralized interaction, heterogeneous agents, bounded rationality, networks of linkages, non-linear dynamics, divergent paths, disequilibrium and emergent properties. In this regard, the complexity approach could be a theoretical and conceptual starting point that allows the integration of different contributions (Davis, 2008; Fontana, 2013). In this article, we attempt to show that complexity can also be useful to point out the profound differences between evolutionary strands. This paper analyzes how the ontological evolutionary assumptions of complexity are emphasized with different intensity by different groups of representative contributions of evolutionary economics. We propose that these differences reflect deeper issues related to two major concerns of economic theory: coordination and order vs. transformation and change of economic systems (Dosi and Orsenigo 1988). In this context, the hypothesis of the article is that complexity acts as an umbrella and at the same time as a differentiating criterion of different strands within evolutionary economics, since their ontological assumptions relate differentially to these two concerns. Using a bibliometric methodology, we identify a set of representative contributions for five strands of evolutionary economics. Additionally, we analyze how the various dimensions and attributes of complexity ontology are emphasized unevenly by each group of contributions. To show the differences, we quote fragments from contributions corresponding to the dimensions and attributes of the complexity and use a set of nonparametric tests to corroborate the significance of the differences in the frequency in which these references appear. The results show that, while groups concerned with coordination are focused on heterogeneity and networks assumptions, groups concerned with transformation stress path dependence and divergent dynamics. Emergent properties are common to all of them. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/72099 Robert, Veronica; Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo; Lerena, Octavio; The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change; Springer; Journal Of Evolutionary Economics; 27; 4; 9-2017; 761-793 0936-9937 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/72099 |
identifier_str_mv |
Robert, Veronica; Yoguel, Gabriel Leopoldo; Lerena, Octavio; The ontology of complexity and the neo-Schumpeterian evolutionary theory of economic change; Springer; Journal Of Evolutionary Economics; 27; 4; 9-2017; 761-793 0936-9937 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00191-017-0512-x info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00191-017-0512-x |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613049537789952 |
score |
13.070432 |