"Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV"
- Autores
- Soares, Lucas
- Año de publicación
- 2015
- Idioma
- español castellano
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In "Republic" 436a-c Plato introduces, for the first time, the problematic postulate of the tripartition of the species-functions of the soul to pass on to justify it by starting from the so-called "Principle of conflict" or ""of the impossibility of opposites". To reach this point in the dialogue, we will firstly place this passage in the conceptual architecture of the work, taking the topic of "stasis" (sedition, revolt, civil war) as the thread for the reconstruction of the argumentative sequence that leads into the psychological model of the parts in conflict. We actually start from the hypothesis that Plato gets to the tripartition of the soul from the evidence that in the psychological reality of the individual there exists a "stasis" that is produced in the soul due to injustice, contrasting to the concord and friendship that is a result of justice. On the basis of the psychological model of the parts in conflict, the psycho-political objective looked for in "Republic", points to the achievement of the psychic unity as a condition for the political unity; since Plato's political objective is to make citizens become better, which can only be reached through an improvement of the individual soul. Through the topic of "stasis" and the lexis of the conflict that derives from it, we uphold that Plato intends to prove not only the political and tripartite constitution of the soul, but first and foremost the priority that the psychic tripartition holds over the political order.
Fil: Soares, Lucas. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
Stásis
Alma
Psicología
Política - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42503
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_d859d35f6880ab07ca07b0b4569a8c07 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42503 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
"Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV"Soares, LucasStásisAlmaPsicologíaPolíticahttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In "Republic" 436a-c Plato introduces, for the first time, the problematic postulate of the tripartition of the species-functions of the soul to pass on to justify it by starting from the so-called "Principle of conflict" or ""of the impossibility of opposites". To reach this point in the dialogue, we will firstly place this passage in the conceptual architecture of the work, taking the topic of "stasis" (sedition, revolt, civil war) as the thread for the reconstruction of the argumentative sequence that leads into the psychological model of the parts in conflict. We actually start from the hypothesis that Plato gets to the tripartition of the soul from the evidence that in the psychological reality of the individual there exists a "stasis" that is produced in the soul due to injustice, contrasting to the concord and friendship that is a result of justice. On the basis of the psychological model of the parts in conflict, the psycho-political objective looked for in "Republic", points to the achievement of the psychic unity as a condition for the political unity; since Plato's political objective is to make citizens become better, which can only be reached through an improvement of the individual soul. Through the topic of "stasis" and the lexis of the conflict that derives from it, we uphold that Plato intends to prove not only the political and tripartite constitution of the soul, but first and foremost the priority that the psychic tripartition holds over the political order.Fil: Soares, Lucas. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaBibliopolis2015-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/42503Soares, Lucas; "Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV"; Bibliopolis; Elenchos (Napoli); 35; 2; 4-2015; 251-2680392-7342CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://bibliopolis.it/shop/elenchos-2014-2/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:52:50Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42503instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:52:51.114CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
"Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV" |
title |
"Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV" |
spellingShingle |
"Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV" Soares, Lucas Stásis Alma Psicología Política |
title_short |
"Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV" |
title_full |
"Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV" |
title_fullStr |
"Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV" |
title_full_unstemmed |
"Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV" |
title_sort |
"Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV" |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Lucas |
author |
Soares, Lucas |
author_facet |
Soares, Lucas |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Stásis Alma Psicología Política |
topic |
Stásis Alma Psicología Política |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In "Republic" 436a-c Plato introduces, for the first time, the problematic postulate of the tripartition of the species-functions of the soul to pass on to justify it by starting from the so-called "Principle of conflict" or ""of the impossibility of opposites". To reach this point in the dialogue, we will firstly place this passage in the conceptual architecture of the work, taking the topic of "stasis" (sedition, revolt, civil war) as the thread for the reconstruction of the argumentative sequence that leads into the psychological model of the parts in conflict. We actually start from the hypothesis that Plato gets to the tripartition of the soul from the evidence that in the psychological reality of the individual there exists a "stasis" that is produced in the soul due to injustice, contrasting to the concord and friendship that is a result of justice. On the basis of the psychological model of the parts in conflict, the psycho-political objective looked for in "Republic", points to the achievement of the psychic unity as a condition for the political unity; since Plato's political objective is to make citizens become better, which can only be reached through an improvement of the individual soul. Through the topic of "stasis" and the lexis of the conflict that derives from it, we uphold that Plato intends to prove not only the political and tripartite constitution of the soul, but first and foremost the priority that the psychic tripartition holds over the political order. Fil: Soares, Lucas. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
In "Republic" 436a-c Plato introduces, for the first time, the problematic postulate of the tripartition of the species-functions of the soul to pass on to justify it by starting from the so-called "Principle of conflict" or ""of the impossibility of opposites". To reach this point in the dialogue, we will firstly place this passage in the conceptual architecture of the work, taking the topic of "stasis" (sedition, revolt, civil war) as the thread for the reconstruction of the argumentative sequence that leads into the psychological model of the parts in conflict. We actually start from the hypothesis that Plato gets to the tripartition of the soul from the evidence that in the psychological reality of the individual there exists a "stasis" that is produced in the soul due to injustice, contrasting to the concord and friendship that is a result of justice. On the basis of the psychological model of the parts in conflict, the psycho-political objective looked for in "Republic", points to the achievement of the psychic unity as a condition for the political unity; since Plato's political objective is to make citizens become better, which can only be reached through an improvement of the individual soul. Through the topic of "stasis" and the lexis of the conflict that derives from it, we uphold that Plato intends to prove not only the political and tripartite constitution of the soul, but first and foremost the priority that the psychic tripartition holds over the political order. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-04 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42503 Soares, Lucas; "Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV"; Bibliopolis; Elenchos (Napoli); 35; 2; 4-2015; 251-268 0392-7342 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42503 |
identifier_str_mv |
Soares, Lucas; "Stasis" del alma y psicologización de la política en "República IV"; Bibliopolis; Elenchos (Napoli); 35; 2; 4-2015; 251-268 0392-7342 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
spa |
language |
spa |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://bibliopolis.it/shop/elenchos-2014-2/ |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Bibliopolis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Bibliopolis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269186367160320 |
score |
13.13397 |