When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation

Autores
Fressoli, Juan Mariano; Arond, Elisa; Abrol, Dinesh; Smith, Adrian; Ely, Adrian; Dias, Rafael
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Grassroots innovation movements (GIMs) can be regarded as initiators or advocates of alternative pathways of innovation. Sometimes these movements engage with more established science, technology and innovation (STI) institutions and development agencies in pursuit of their goals. In this paper, we argue that an important aspect to encounters between GIMs and mainstream STI institutions is the negotiation of different framings of grassroots innovation and development of policy models for inclusive innovation. These encounters can result in two different modes of engagement by GIMs; what we call insertion and mobilization. We illustrate and discuss these interrelated notions of framings and modes of engagement by drawing on three case studies of GIMs: the Social Technologies Network in Brazil, and the Honey Bee Network and People's Science Movements in India. The cases highlight that inclusion in the context of GIMs is not an unproblematic, smooth endeavour, and involves diverse interpretations and framings, which shape what and who gets included or excluded. Within the context of increasing policy interest, the analysis of encounters between GIMs and STI institutions can offer important lessons for the design of models of inclusive innovation and development.
Fil: Fressoli, Juan Mariano. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Arond, Elisa. Clark University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Abrol, Dinesh. Jawaharlal Nehru University; India
Fil: Smith, Adrian. University of Sussex; Reino Unido
Fil: Ely, Adrian. University of Sussex; Reino Unido
Fil: Dias, Rafael. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Brasil
Materia
Grassroots Innovation
Inclusive Innovation
Social Movements
Innovation Policy
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/35690
Acceder
id CONICETDig_d7e7ad2b856661ab715bc58c6fe29cce
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/35690
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovationFressoli, Juan MarianoArond, ElisaAbrol, DineshSmith, AdrianEly, AdrianDias, RafaelGrassroots InnovationInclusive InnovationSocial MovementsInnovation Policyhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Grassroots innovation movements (GIMs) can be regarded as initiators or advocates of alternative pathways of innovation. Sometimes these movements engage with more established science, technology and innovation (STI) institutions and development agencies in pursuit of their goals. In this paper, we argue that an important aspect to encounters between GIMs and mainstream STI institutions is the negotiation of different framings of grassroots innovation and development of policy models for inclusive innovation. These encounters can result in two different modes of engagement by GIMs; what we call insertion and mobilization. We illustrate and discuss these interrelated notions of framings and modes of engagement by drawing on three case studies of GIMs: the Social Technologies Network in Brazil, and the Honey Bee Network and People's Science Movements in India. The cases highlight that inclusion in the context of GIMs is not an unproblematic, smooth endeavour, and involves diverse interpretations and framings, which shape what and who gets included or excluded. Within the context of increasing policy interest, the analysis of encounters between GIMs and STI institutions can offer important lessons for the design of models of inclusive innovation and development.Fil: Fressoli, Juan Mariano. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Arond, Elisa. Clark University; Estados UnidosFil: Abrol, Dinesh. Jawaharlal Nehru University; IndiaFil: Smith, Adrian. University of Sussex; Reino UnidoFil: Ely, Adrian. University of Sussex; Reino UnidoFil: Dias, Rafael. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; BrasilTaylor & Francis2014-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/35690Fressoli, Juan Mariano; Arond, Elisa; Abrol, Dinesh; Smith, Adrian; Ely, Adrian; et al.; When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation; Taylor & Francis; Innovation and Development; 4; 2; 6-2014; 277-2922157-930XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/2157930X.2014.921354info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/2157930X.2014.921354info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:45:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/35690instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:45:25.342CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation
title When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation
spellingShingle When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation
Fressoli, Juan Mariano
Grassroots Innovation
Inclusive Innovation
Social Movements
Innovation Policy
title_short When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation
title_full When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation
title_fullStr When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation
title_full_unstemmed When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation
title_sort When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fressoli, Juan Mariano
Arond, Elisa
Abrol, Dinesh
Smith, Adrian
Ely, Adrian
Dias, Rafael
author Fressoli, Juan Mariano
author_facet Fressoli, Juan Mariano
Arond, Elisa
Abrol, Dinesh
Smith, Adrian
Ely, Adrian
Dias, Rafael
author_role author
author2 Arond, Elisa
Abrol, Dinesh
Smith, Adrian
Ely, Adrian
Dias, Rafael
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Grassroots Innovation
Inclusive Innovation
Social Movements
Innovation Policy
topic Grassroots Innovation
Inclusive Innovation
Social Movements
Innovation Policy
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Grassroots innovation movements (GIMs) can be regarded as initiators or advocates of alternative pathways of innovation. Sometimes these movements engage with more established science, technology and innovation (STI) institutions and development agencies in pursuit of their goals. In this paper, we argue that an important aspect to encounters between GIMs and mainstream STI institutions is the negotiation of different framings of grassroots innovation and development of policy models for inclusive innovation. These encounters can result in two different modes of engagement by GIMs; what we call insertion and mobilization. We illustrate and discuss these interrelated notions of framings and modes of engagement by drawing on three case studies of GIMs: the Social Technologies Network in Brazil, and the Honey Bee Network and People's Science Movements in India. The cases highlight that inclusion in the context of GIMs is not an unproblematic, smooth endeavour, and involves diverse interpretations and framings, which shape what and who gets included or excluded. Within the context of increasing policy interest, the analysis of encounters between GIMs and STI institutions can offer important lessons for the design of models of inclusive innovation and development.
Fil: Fressoli, Juan Mariano. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Departamento de Ciencias Sociales. Instituto de Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia y la Tecnología; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Arond, Elisa. Clark University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Abrol, Dinesh. Jawaharlal Nehru University; India
Fil: Smith, Adrian. University of Sussex; Reino Unido
Fil: Ely, Adrian. University of Sussex; Reino Unido
Fil: Dias, Rafael. Universidade Estadual de Campinas; Brasil
description Grassroots innovation movements (GIMs) can be regarded as initiators or advocates of alternative pathways of innovation. Sometimes these movements engage with more established science, technology and innovation (STI) institutions and development agencies in pursuit of their goals. In this paper, we argue that an important aspect to encounters between GIMs and mainstream STI institutions is the negotiation of different framings of grassroots innovation and development of policy models for inclusive innovation. These encounters can result in two different modes of engagement by GIMs; what we call insertion and mobilization. We illustrate and discuss these interrelated notions of framings and modes of engagement by drawing on three case studies of GIMs: the Social Technologies Network in Brazil, and the Honey Bee Network and People's Science Movements in India. The cases highlight that inclusion in the context of GIMs is not an unproblematic, smooth endeavour, and involves diverse interpretations and framings, which shape what and who gets included or excluded. Within the context of increasing policy interest, the analysis of encounters between GIMs and STI institutions can offer important lessons for the design of models of inclusive innovation and development.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/35690
Fressoli, Juan Mariano; Arond, Elisa; Abrol, Dinesh; Smith, Adrian; Ely, Adrian; et al.; When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation; Taylor & Francis; Innovation and Development; 4; 2; 6-2014; 277-292
2157-930X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/35690
identifier_str_mv Fressoli, Juan Mariano; Arond, Elisa; Abrol, Dinesh; Smith, Adrian; Ely, Adrian; et al.; When grassroots innovation movements encounter mainstream institutions: implications for models of inclusive innovation; Taylor & Francis; Innovation and Development; 4; 2; 6-2014; 277-292
2157-930X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/2157930X.2014.921354
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/2157930X.2014.921354
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614494130536448
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares