Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations

Autores
Husereau, Don; Drummond, Michael; Augustovski, Federico Ariel; de Bekker Grob, Esther; Briggs, Andrew H.; Carswell, Chris; Caulley, Lisa; Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn; Greenberg, Dan; Loder, Elizabeth; Mauskopf, Josephine; Mullins, C. Daniel; Petrou, Stavros; Pwu, Raoh Fang; Staniszewska, Sophie
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc.). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer-reviewed journals, as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.
Fil: Husereau, Don. University of Ottawa; Canadá
Fil: Drummond, Michael. University of York; Reino Unido
Fil: Augustovski, Federico Ariel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; Argentina
Fil: de Bekker Grob, Esther. Erasmus University Rotterdam; Países Bajos
Fil: Briggs, Andrew H.. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Reino Unido
Fil: Carswell, Chris. No especifíca;
Fil: Caulley, Lisa. University of Ottawa; Canadá
Fil: Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn. State University of Utah; Estados Unidos
Fil: Greenberg, Dan. Ben Gurion University of the Negev; Israel
Fil: Loder, Elizabeth. Harvard Medical School; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mauskopf, Josephine. No especifíca;
Fil: Mullins, C. Daniel. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Petrou, Stavros. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Pwu, Raoh Fang. No especifíca;
Fil: Staniszewska, Sophie. University of Warwick Medical School; Reino Unido
Materia
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC EVALUATION
GUIDANCE
METHODS
REPORTING
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/216280

id CONICETDig_d5541fc3f98236e79cdfac60c86bd239
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/216280
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluationsHusereau, DonDrummond, MichaelAugustovski, Federico Arielde Bekker Grob, EstherBriggs, Andrew H.Carswell, ChrisCaulley, LisaChaiyakunapruk, NathornGreenberg, DanLoder, ElizabethMauskopf, JosephineMullins, C. DanielPetrou, StavrosPwu, Raoh FangStaniszewska, SophieCOST-BENEFIT ANALYSISECONOMIC EVALUATIONGUIDANCEMETHODSREPORTINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc.). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer-reviewed journals, as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.Fil: Husereau, Don. University of Ottawa; CanadáFil: Drummond, Michael. University of York; Reino UnidoFil: Augustovski, Federico Ariel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; ArgentinaFil: de Bekker Grob, Esther. Erasmus University Rotterdam; Países BajosFil: Briggs, Andrew H.. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Reino UnidoFil: Carswell, Chris. No especifíca;Fil: Caulley, Lisa. University of Ottawa; CanadáFil: Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn. State University of Utah; Estados UnidosFil: Greenberg, Dan. Ben Gurion University of the Negev; IsraelFil: Loder, Elizabeth. Harvard Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Mauskopf, Josephine. No especifíca;Fil: Mullins, C. Daniel. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Petrou, Stavros. University of Oxford; Reino UnidoFil: Pwu, Raoh Fang. No especifíca;Fil: Staniszewska, Sophie. University of Warwick Medical School; Reino UnidoCambridge University Press2022-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/216280Husereau, Don; Drummond, Michael; Augustovski, Federico Ariel; de Bekker Grob, Esther; Briggs, Andrew H.; et al.; Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations; Cambridge University Press; International Journal Of Technology Assessment In Health Care; 38; 1; 1-2022; 1-70266-4623CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S0266462321001732info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:50:48Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/216280instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:50:48.706CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
title Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
spellingShingle Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
Husereau, Don
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC EVALUATION
GUIDANCE
METHODS
REPORTING
title_short Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
title_full Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
title_fullStr Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
title_full_unstemmed Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
title_sort Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Husereau, Don
Drummond, Michael
Augustovski, Federico Ariel
de Bekker Grob, Esther
Briggs, Andrew H.
Carswell, Chris
Caulley, Lisa
Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
Greenberg, Dan
Loder, Elizabeth
Mauskopf, Josephine
Mullins, C. Daniel
Petrou, Stavros
Pwu, Raoh Fang
Staniszewska, Sophie
author Husereau, Don
author_facet Husereau, Don
Drummond, Michael
Augustovski, Federico Ariel
de Bekker Grob, Esther
Briggs, Andrew H.
Carswell, Chris
Caulley, Lisa
Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
Greenberg, Dan
Loder, Elizabeth
Mauskopf, Josephine
Mullins, C. Daniel
Petrou, Stavros
Pwu, Raoh Fang
Staniszewska, Sophie
author_role author
author2 Drummond, Michael
Augustovski, Federico Ariel
de Bekker Grob, Esther
Briggs, Andrew H.
Carswell, Chris
Caulley, Lisa
Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn
Greenberg, Dan
Loder, Elizabeth
Mauskopf, Josephine
Mullins, C. Daniel
Petrou, Stavros
Pwu, Raoh Fang
Staniszewska, Sophie
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC EVALUATION
GUIDANCE
METHODS
REPORTING
topic COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
ECONOMIC EVALUATION
GUIDANCE
METHODS
REPORTING
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc.). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer-reviewed journals, as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.
Fil: Husereau, Don. University of Ottawa; Canadá
Fil: Drummond, Michael. University of York; Reino Unido
Fil: Augustovski, Federico Ariel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública. Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria. Centro de Investigaciones en Epidemiología y Salud Pública; Argentina
Fil: de Bekker Grob, Esther. Erasmus University Rotterdam; Países Bajos
Fil: Briggs, Andrew H.. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Reino Unido
Fil: Carswell, Chris. No especifíca;
Fil: Caulley, Lisa. University of Ottawa; Canadá
Fil: Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn. State University of Utah; Estados Unidos
Fil: Greenberg, Dan. Ben Gurion University of the Negev; Israel
Fil: Loder, Elizabeth. Harvard Medical School; Estados Unidos
Fil: Mauskopf, Josephine. No especifíca;
Fil: Mullins, C. Daniel. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Petrou, Stavros. University of Oxford; Reino Unido
Fil: Pwu, Raoh Fang. No especifíca;
Fil: Staniszewska, Sophie. University of Warwick Medical School; Reino Unido
description Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, as well as the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as health care, public health, education, social care, etc.). This summary article presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist and recommendations for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer-reviewed journals, as well as the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. However, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, as there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/216280
Husereau, Don; Drummond, Michael; Augustovski, Federico Ariel; de Bekker Grob, Esther; Briggs, Andrew H.; et al.; Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations; Cambridge University Press; International Journal Of Technology Assessment In Health Care; 38; 1; 1-2022; 1-7
0266-4623
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/216280
identifier_str_mv Husereau, Don; Drummond, Michael; Augustovski, Federico Ariel; de Bekker Grob, Esther; Briggs, Andrew H.; et al.; Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations; Cambridge University Press; International Journal Of Technology Assessment In Health Care; 38; 1; 1-2022; 1-7
0266-4623
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S0266462321001732
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269054467833856
score 13.13397