Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries
- Autores
- Berardo, Alfredo Ramiro; Scholz, John T.
- Año de publicación
- 2010
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Policy actors seek network contacts to improve individual payoffs in the institutional collective action dilemmas endemic to fragmented policy arenas. The risk hypothesis argues that actors seek bridging relationships (well-connected, popular partners that maximize their access to information) when cooperation involves low risks, but seek bonding relationships (transitive, reciprocal relationships that maximize credibility) when risks of defection increase. We test this hypothesis in newly developing policy arenas expected to favor relationships that resolve low-risk dilemmas. A stochastic actor-based model for network evolution estimated with survey data from 1999 and 2001 in 10 U.S. estuaries finds that actors do tend to select popular actors as partners, which presumably creates a centralized bridging structure capable of efficient information transmission for coordinating policies even without any government mandate. Actors also seek reciprocal bonding relationships supportive of small joint projects and quickly learn whether or not to trust their partners.
Fil: Berardo, Alfredo Ramiro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. University of Arizona; Estados Unidos
Fil: Scholz, John T.. Florida State University; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
Networks
Risk
Coordination
Cooperation - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/187688
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_ce1757898bc36931fb79d912e90b025e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/187688 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuariesBerardo, Alfredo RamiroScholz, John T.NetworksRiskCoordinationCooperationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Policy actors seek network contacts to improve individual payoffs in the institutional collective action dilemmas endemic to fragmented policy arenas. The risk hypothesis argues that actors seek bridging relationships (well-connected, popular partners that maximize their access to information) when cooperation involves low risks, but seek bonding relationships (transitive, reciprocal relationships that maximize credibility) when risks of defection increase. We test this hypothesis in newly developing policy arenas expected to favor relationships that resolve low-risk dilemmas. A stochastic actor-based model for network evolution estimated with survey data from 1999 and 2001 in 10 U.S. estuaries finds that actors do tend to select popular actors as partners, which presumably creates a centralized bridging structure capable of efficient information transmission for coordinating policies even without any government mandate. Actors also seek reciprocal bonding relationships supportive of small joint projects and quickly learn whether or not to trust their partners.Fil: Berardo, Alfredo Ramiro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. University of Arizona; Estados UnidosFil: Scholz, John T.. Florida State University; Estados UnidosWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2010-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/187688Berardo, Alfredo Ramiro; Scholz, John T.; Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; American Journal Of Political Science; 54; 3; 7-2010; 632-6490092-58531540-5907CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:57:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/187688instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:57:47.282CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries |
title |
Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries |
spellingShingle |
Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries Berardo, Alfredo Ramiro Networks Risk Coordination Cooperation |
title_short |
Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries |
title_full |
Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries |
title_fullStr |
Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries |
title_sort |
Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Berardo, Alfredo Ramiro Scholz, John T. |
author |
Berardo, Alfredo Ramiro |
author_facet |
Berardo, Alfredo Ramiro Scholz, John T. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Scholz, John T. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Networks Risk Coordination Cooperation |
topic |
Networks Risk Coordination Cooperation |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Policy actors seek network contacts to improve individual payoffs in the institutional collective action dilemmas endemic to fragmented policy arenas. The risk hypothesis argues that actors seek bridging relationships (well-connected, popular partners that maximize their access to information) when cooperation involves low risks, but seek bonding relationships (transitive, reciprocal relationships that maximize credibility) when risks of defection increase. We test this hypothesis in newly developing policy arenas expected to favor relationships that resolve low-risk dilemmas. A stochastic actor-based model for network evolution estimated with survey data from 1999 and 2001 in 10 U.S. estuaries finds that actors do tend to select popular actors as partners, which presumably creates a centralized bridging structure capable of efficient information transmission for coordinating policies even without any government mandate. Actors also seek reciprocal bonding relationships supportive of small joint projects and quickly learn whether or not to trust their partners. Fil: Berardo, Alfredo Ramiro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba; Argentina. University of Arizona; Estados Unidos Fil: Scholz, John T.. Florida State University; Estados Unidos |
description |
Policy actors seek network contacts to improve individual payoffs in the institutional collective action dilemmas endemic to fragmented policy arenas. The risk hypothesis argues that actors seek bridging relationships (well-connected, popular partners that maximize their access to information) when cooperation involves low risks, but seek bonding relationships (transitive, reciprocal relationships that maximize credibility) when risks of defection increase. We test this hypothesis in newly developing policy arenas expected to favor relationships that resolve low-risk dilemmas. A stochastic actor-based model for network evolution estimated with survey data from 1999 and 2001 in 10 U.S. estuaries finds that actors do tend to select popular actors as partners, which presumably creates a centralized bridging structure capable of efficient information transmission for coordinating policies even without any government mandate. Actors also seek reciprocal bonding relationships supportive of small joint projects and quickly learn whether or not to trust their partners. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/187688 Berardo, Alfredo Ramiro; Scholz, John T.; Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; American Journal Of Political Science; 54; 3; 7-2010; 632-649 0092-5853 1540-5907 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/187688 |
identifier_str_mv |
Berardo, Alfredo Ramiro; Scholz, John T.; Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; American Journal Of Political Science; 54; 3; 7-2010; 632-649 0092-5853 1540-5907 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613725981507584 |
score |
13.070432 |