Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences

Autores
Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel; Godo, Lluis; Simari, Gerardo
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Many real-world applications of intelligent systems involve solving planning problems of different nature, oftentimes in dynamic environments and having to deal with potentially contradictory information, leading to what is commonly known as epistemic planning. In this context, defeasible argumentation is a powerful tool that has been developed for over three decades as a practical mechanism that allows for flexible handling of preferences and explainable reasoning. In this article, we first motivate the need to develop argumentationbased epistemic planning frameworks that can be leveraged in real-world applications, describe the related literature, and then provide an overview of a recently-proposed approach to incorporate defeasible argumentation and preferences into automated planning processes. In particular, the framework incorporates conditional expressions to select and change priorities regarding information upon which plans are constructed. We describe its main properties, analyze its strengths and limitations using an illustrative use case, and discuss several future research directions that can be taken to further develop it.
Fil: Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias de la Administración; Argentina
Fil: Godo, Lluis. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Instituto de Investigacion En Inteligencia Artificial.; España
Fil: Simari, Gerardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina
Materia
Planning
Defeasible argumentation
Preferences
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/278859
Acceder
id CONICETDig_cc1d3a8095926726dd4ad335e7f9da5f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/278859
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with PreferencesTeze, Juan Carlos LionelGodo, LluisSimari, GerardoPlanningDefeasible argumentationPreferenceshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Many real-world applications of intelligent systems involve solving planning problems of different nature, oftentimes in dynamic environments and having to deal with potentially contradictory information, leading to what is commonly known as epistemic planning. In this context, defeasible argumentation is a powerful tool that has been developed for over three decades as a practical mechanism that allows for flexible handling of preferences and explainable reasoning. In this article, we first motivate the need to develop argumentationbased epistemic planning frameworks that can be leveraged in real-world applications, describe the related literature, and then provide an overview of a recently-proposed approach to incorporate defeasible argumentation and preferences into automated planning processes. In particular, the framework incorporates conditional expressions to select and change priorities regarding information upon which plans are constructed. We describe its main properties, analyze its strengths and limitations using an illustrative use case, and discuss several future research directions that can be taken to further develop it.Fil: Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias de la Administración; ArgentinaFil: Godo, Lluis. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Instituto de Investigacion En Inteligencia Artificial.; EspañaFil: Simari, Gerardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; ArgentinaCollege Publications2025-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/278859Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel; Godo, Lluis; Simari, Gerardo; Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences; College Publications; Journal of Applied Logics; 12; 3; 3-2025; 787-8232631-98102631-9829CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/ifcolog/?00071info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-01-14T13:02:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/278859instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-01-14 13:02:46.929CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences
title Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences
spellingShingle Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences
Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel
Planning
Defeasible argumentation
Preferences
title_short Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences
title_full Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences
title_fullStr Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences
title_full_unstemmed Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences
title_sort Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel
Godo, Lluis
Simari, Gerardo
author Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel
author_facet Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel
Godo, Lluis
Simari, Gerardo
author_role author
author2 Godo, Lluis
Simari, Gerardo
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Planning
Defeasible argumentation
Preferences
topic Planning
Defeasible argumentation
Preferences
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Many real-world applications of intelligent systems involve solving planning problems of different nature, oftentimes in dynamic environments and having to deal with potentially contradictory information, leading to what is commonly known as epistemic planning. In this context, defeasible argumentation is a powerful tool that has been developed for over three decades as a practical mechanism that allows for flexible handling of preferences and explainable reasoning. In this article, we first motivate the need to develop argumentationbased epistemic planning frameworks that can be leveraged in real-world applications, describe the related literature, and then provide an overview of a recently-proposed approach to incorporate defeasible argumentation and preferences into automated planning processes. In particular, the framework incorporates conditional expressions to select and change priorities regarding information upon which plans are constructed. We describe its main properties, analyze its strengths and limitations using an illustrative use case, and discuss several future research directions that can be taken to further develop it.
Fil: Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Facultad de Ciencias de la Administración; Argentina
Fil: Godo, Lluis. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas. Instituto de Investigacion En Inteligencia Artificial.; España
Fil: Simari, Gerardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación. Instituto de Ciencias e Ingeniería de la Computación; Argentina
description Many real-world applications of intelligent systems involve solving planning problems of different nature, oftentimes in dynamic environments and having to deal with potentially contradictory information, leading to what is commonly known as epistemic planning. In this context, defeasible argumentation is a powerful tool that has been developed for over three decades as a practical mechanism that allows for flexible handling of preferences and explainable reasoning. In this article, we first motivate the need to develop argumentationbased epistemic planning frameworks that can be leveraged in real-world applications, describe the related literature, and then provide an overview of a recently-proposed approach to incorporate defeasible argumentation and preferences into automated planning processes. In particular, the framework incorporates conditional expressions to select and change priorities regarding information upon which plans are constructed. We describe its main properties, analyze its strengths and limitations using an illustrative use case, and discuss several future research directions that can be taken to further develop it.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/278859
Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel; Godo, Lluis; Simari, Gerardo; Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences; College Publications; Journal of Applied Logics; 12; 3; 3-2025; 787-823
2631-9810
2631-9829
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/278859
identifier_str_mv Teze, Juan Carlos Lionel; Godo, Lluis; Simari, Gerardo; Defeasible Argumentation-based Epistemic Planning with Preferences; College Publications; Journal of Applied Logics; 12; 3; 3-2025; 787-823
2631-9810
2631-9829
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.collegepublications.co.uk/ifcolog/?00071
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv College Publications
publisher.none.fl_str_mv College Publications
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1854322277641879552
score 13.113929

Publicaciones similares