Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics
- Autores
- Jost, John T.; Langer, Melanie; Badaan, Vivienne; Azevedo, Flávio; Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel; Ungaretti, Joaquín; Hennes, Erin P.
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- It is commonly assumed that political attitudes are driven by self-interest and that poor people heavily favor policies aimed at redistributing wealth. This assumption fails to explain the popularity of economic conservatism and the degree of support for the capitalist system. Such outcomes are typically explained by the suggestion that most poor people believe they will become rich one day. In a representative sample of low-income Americans, we observed that less than one-fourth were optimistic about their economic prospects. Those respondents who believed that they would become rich one day were no more likely to endorse the legitimacy of the system and no more supportive of conservative ideology or the Republican Party, compared to those who did not believe they would become rich. From a system justification perspective, we propose that people are motivated to defend the social systems on which they depend, and this confers a psychological advantage to conservative ideology. Providing ideological support for the status quo serves epistemic motives to reduce uncertainty, existential motives to reduce threat, and relational motives to share reality with members of mainstream society. We summarize evidence from the United States, Argentina, Lebanon, and other countries bearing on these propositions—including a survey administered shortly before the 2016 U.S. Presidential election—and discuss political implications of system justification motivation.
Fil: Jost, John T.. University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Langer, Melanie. University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Badaan, Vivienne. University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Azevedo, Flávio. Universitat Zu Köln; Alemania
Fil: Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; Argentina
Fil: Ungaretti, Joaquín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; Argentina
Fil: Hennes, Erin P.. Purdue University; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
POLITICAL IDEOLOGY
LIBERALISM
CONSERVATISM
ECONOMIC INEQUALITY - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42850
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_c84ef8d52e6cfaa37f7ddecca80c8e94 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42850 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politicsJost, John T.Langer, MelanieBadaan, VivienneAzevedo, FlávioEtchezahar, Edgardo DanielUngaretti, JoaquínHennes, Erin P.POLITICAL IDEOLOGYLIBERALISMCONSERVATISMECONOMIC INEQUALITYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5It is commonly assumed that political attitudes are driven by self-interest and that poor people heavily favor policies aimed at redistributing wealth. This assumption fails to explain the popularity of economic conservatism and the degree of support for the capitalist system. Such outcomes are typically explained by the suggestion that most poor people believe they will become rich one day. In a representative sample of low-income Americans, we observed that less than one-fourth were optimistic about their economic prospects. Those respondents who believed that they would become rich one day were no more likely to endorse the legitimacy of the system and no more supportive of conservative ideology or the Republican Party, compared to those who did not believe they would become rich. From a system justification perspective, we propose that people are motivated to defend the social systems on which they depend, and this confers a psychological advantage to conservative ideology. Providing ideological support for the status quo serves epistemic motives to reduce uncertainty, existential motives to reduce threat, and relational motives to share reality with members of mainstream society. We summarize evidence from the United States, Argentina, Lebanon, and other countries bearing on these propositions—including a survey administered shortly before the 2016 U.S. Presidential election—and discuss political implications of system justification motivation.Fil: Jost, John T.. University of New York; Estados UnidosFil: Langer, Melanie. University of New York; Estados UnidosFil: Badaan, Vivienne. University of New York; Estados UnidosFil: Azevedo, Flávio. Universitat Zu Köln; AlemaniaFil: Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; ArgentinaFil: Ungaretti, Joaquín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; ArgentinaFil: Hennes, Erin P.. Purdue University; Estados UnidosAmerican Psychological Association2017-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/42850Jost, John T.; Langer, Melanie; Badaan, Vivienne; Azevedo, Flávio; Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel; et al.; Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics; American Psychological Association; Translational Issues in Psychological Science; 3; 3; 9-2017; 1-262332-21362332-2179CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-48712-001info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1037/tps0000127info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42850instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:29.715CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics |
title |
Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics |
spellingShingle |
Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics Jost, John T. POLITICAL IDEOLOGY LIBERALISM CONSERVATISM ECONOMIC INEQUALITY |
title_short |
Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics |
title_full |
Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics |
title_fullStr |
Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics |
title_sort |
Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Jost, John T. Langer, Melanie Badaan, Vivienne Azevedo, Flávio Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel Ungaretti, Joaquín Hennes, Erin P. |
author |
Jost, John T. |
author_facet |
Jost, John T. Langer, Melanie Badaan, Vivienne Azevedo, Flávio Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel Ungaretti, Joaquín Hennes, Erin P. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Langer, Melanie Badaan, Vivienne Azevedo, Flávio Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel Ungaretti, Joaquín Hennes, Erin P. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
POLITICAL IDEOLOGY LIBERALISM CONSERVATISM ECONOMIC INEQUALITY |
topic |
POLITICAL IDEOLOGY LIBERALISM CONSERVATISM ECONOMIC INEQUALITY |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
It is commonly assumed that political attitudes are driven by self-interest and that poor people heavily favor policies aimed at redistributing wealth. This assumption fails to explain the popularity of economic conservatism and the degree of support for the capitalist system. Such outcomes are typically explained by the suggestion that most poor people believe they will become rich one day. In a representative sample of low-income Americans, we observed that less than one-fourth were optimistic about their economic prospects. Those respondents who believed that they would become rich one day were no more likely to endorse the legitimacy of the system and no more supportive of conservative ideology or the Republican Party, compared to those who did not believe they would become rich. From a system justification perspective, we propose that people are motivated to defend the social systems on which they depend, and this confers a psychological advantage to conservative ideology. Providing ideological support for the status quo serves epistemic motives to reduce uncertainty, existential motives to reduce threat, and relational motives to share reality with members of mainstream society. We summarize evidence from the United States, Argentina, Lebanon, and other countries bearing on these propositions—including a survey administered shortly before the 2016 U.S. Presidential election—and discuss political implications of system justification motivation. Fil: Jost, John T.. University of New York; Estados Unidos Fil: Langer, Melanie. University of New York; Estados Unidos Fil: Badaan, Vivienne. University of New York; Estados Unidos Fil: Azevedo, Flávio. Universitat Zu Köln; Alemania Fil: Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; Argentina Fil: Ungaretti, Joaquín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; Argentina Fil: Hennes, Erin P.. Purdue University; Estados Unidos |
description |
It is commonly assumed that political attitudes are driven by self-interest and that poor people heavily favor policies aimed at redistributing wealth. This assumption fails to explain the popularity of economic conservatism and the degree of support for the capitalist system. Such outcomes are typically explained by the suggestion that most poor people believe they will become rich one day. In a representative sample of low-income Americans, we observed that less than one-fourth were optimistic about their economic prospects. Those respondents who believed that they would become rich one day were no more likely to endorse the legitimacy of the system and no more supportive of conservative ideology or the Republican Party, compared to those who did not believe they would become rich. From a system justification perspective, we propose that people are motivated to defend the social systems on which they depend, and this confers a psychological advantage to conservative ideology. Providing ideological support for the status quo serves epistemic motives to reduce uncertainty, existential motives to reduce threat, and relational motives to share reality with members of mainstream society. We summarize evidence from the United States, Argentina, Lebanon, and other countries bearing on these propositions—including a survey administered shortly before the 2016 U.S. Presidential election—and discuss political implications of system justification motivation. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42850 Jost, John T.; Langer, Melanie; Badaan, Vivienne; Azevedo, Flávio; Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel; et al.; Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics; American Psychological Association; Translational Issues in Psychological Science; 3; 3; 9-2017; 1-26 2332-2136 2332-2179 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42850 |
identifier_str_mv |
Jost, John T.; Langer, Melanie; Badaan, Vivienne; Azevedo, Flávio; Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel; et al.; Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics; American Psychological Association; Translational Issues in Psychological Science; 3; 3; 9-2017; 1-26 2332-2136 2332-2179 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-48712-001 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1037/tps0000127 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Psychological Association |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Psychological Association |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269097695379456 |
score |
13.13397 |