Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics

Autores
Jost, John T.; Langer, Melanie; Badaan, Vivienne; Azevedo, Flávio; Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel; Ungaretti, Joaquín; Hennes, Erin P.
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
It is commonly assumed that political attitudes are driven by self-interest and that poor people heavily favor policies aimed at redistributing wealth. This assumption fails to explain the popularity of economic conservatism and the degree of support for the capitalist system. Such outcomes are typically explained by the suggestion that most poor people believe they will become rich one day. In a representative sample of low-income Americans, we observed that less than one-fourth were optimistic about their economic prospects. Those respondents who believed that they would become rich one day were no more likely to endorse the legitimacy of the system and no more supportive of conservative ideology or the Republican Party, compared to those who did not believe they would become rich. From a system justification perspective, we propose that people are motivated to defend the social systems on which they depend, and this confers a psychological advantage to conservative ideology. Providing ideological support for the status quo serves epistemic motives to reduce uncertainty, existential motives to reduce threat, and relational motives to share reality with members of mainstream society. We summarize evidence from the United States, Argentina, Lebanon, and other countries bearing on these propositions—including a survey administered shortly before the 2016 U.S. Presidential election—and discuss political implications of system justification motivation.
Fil: Jost, John T.. University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Langer, Melanie. University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Badaan, Vivienne. University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Azevedo, Flávio. Universitat Zu Köln; Alemania
Fil: Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; Argentina
Fil: Ungaretti, Joaquín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; Argentina
Fil: Hennes, Erin P.. Purdue University; Estados Unidos
Materia
POLITICAL IDEOLOGY
LIBERALISM
CONSERVATISM
ECONOMIC INEQUALITY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42850

id CONICETDig_c84ef8d52e6cfaa37f7ddecca80c8e94
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42850
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politicsJost, John T.Langer, MelanieBadaan, VivienneAzevedo, FlávioEtchezahar, Edgardo DanielUngaretti, JoaquínHennes, Erin P.POLITICAL IDEOLOGYLIBERALISMCONSERVATISMECONOMIC INEQUALITYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5It is commonly assumed that political attitudes are driven by self-interest and that poor people heavily favor policies aimed at redistributing wealth. This assumption fails to explain the popularity of economic conservatism and the degree of support for the capitalist system. Such outcomes are typically explained by the suggestion that most poor people believe they will become rich one day. In a representative sample of low-income Americans, we observed that less than one-fourth were optimistic about their economic prospects. Those respondents who believed that they would become rich one day were no more likely to endorse the legitimacy of the system and no more supportive of conservative ideology or the Republican Party, compared to those who did not believe they would become rich. From a system justification perspective, we propose that people are motivated to defend the social systems on which they depend, and this confers a psychological advantage to conservative ideology. Providing ideological support for the status quo serves epistemic motives to reduce uncertainty, existential motives to reduce threat, and relational motives to share reality with members of mainstream society. We summarize evidence from the United States, Argentina, Lebanon, and other countries bearing on these propositions—including a survey administered shortly before the 2016 U.S. Presidential election—and discuss political implications of system justification motivation.Fil: Jost, John T.. University of New York; Estados UnidosFil: Langer, Melanie. University of New York; Estados UnidosFil: Badaan, Vivienne. University of New York; Estados UnidosFil: Azevedo, Flávio. Universitat Zu Köln; AlemaniaFil: Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; ArgentinaFil: Ungaretti, Joaquín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; ArgentinaFil: Hennes, Erin P.. Purdue University; Estados UnidosAmerican Psychological Association2017-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/42850Jost, John T.; Langer, Melanie; Badaan, Vivienne; Azevedo, Flávio; Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel; et al.; Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics; American Psychological Association; Translational Issues in Psychological Science; 3; 3; 9-2017; 1-262332-21362332-2179CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-48712-001info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1037/tps0000127info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/42850instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:29.715CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics
title Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics
spellingShingle Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics
Jost, John T.
POLITICAL IDEOLOGY
LIBERALISM
CONSERVATISM
ECONOMIC INEQUALITY
title_short Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics
title_full Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics
title_fullStr Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics
title_full_unstemmed Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics
title_sort Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Jost, John T.
Langer, Melanie
Badaan, Vivienne
Azevedo, Flávio
Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel
Ungaretti, Joaquín
Hennes, Erin P.
author Jost, John T.
author_facet Jost, John T.
Langer, Melanie
Badaan, Vivienne
Azevedo, Flávio
Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel
Ungaretti, Joaquín
Hennes, Erin P.
author_role author
author2 Langer, Melanie
Badaan, Vivienne
Azevedo, Flávio
Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel
Ungaretti, Joaquín
Hennes, Erin P.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv POLITICAL IDEOLOGY
LIBERALISM
CONSERVATISM
ECONOMIC INEQUALITY
topic POLITICAL IDEOLOGY
LIBERALISM
CONSERVATISM
ECONOMIC INEQUALITY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv It is commonly assumed that political attitudes are driven by self-interest and that poor people heavily favor policies aimed at redistributing wealth. This assumption fails to explain the popularity of economic conservatism and the degree of support for the capitalist system. Such outcomes are typically explained by the suggestion that most poor people believe they will become rich one day. In a representative sample of low-income Americans, we observed that less than one-fourth were optimistic about their economic prospects. Those respondents who believed that they would become rich one day were no more likely to endorse the legitimacy of the system and no more supportive of conservative ideology or the Republican Party, compared to those who did not believe they would become rich. From a system justification perspective, we propose that people are motivated to defend the social systems on which they depend, and this confers a psychological advantage to conservative ideology. Providing ideological support for the status quo serves epistemic motives to reduce uncertainty, existential motives to reduce threat, and relational motives to share reality with members of mainstream society. We summarize evidence from the United States, Argentina, Lebanon, and other countries bearing on these propositions—including a survey administered shortly before the 2016 U.S. Presidential election—and discuss political implications of system justification motivation.
Fil: Jost, John T.. University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Langer, Melanie. University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Badaan, Vivienne. University of New York; Estados Unidos
Fil: Azevedo, Flávio. Universitat Zu Köln; Alemania
Fil: Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; Argentina
Fil: Ungaretti, Joaquín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Saavedra 15. Centro Interdisciplinario de Investigaciones en Psicología Matemática y Experimental Dr. Horacio J. A. Rimoldi; Argentina
Fil: Hennes, Erin P.. Purdue University; Estados Unidos
description It is commonly assumed that political attitudes are driven by self-interest and that poor people heavily favor policies aimed at redistributing wealth. This assumption fails to explain the popularity of economic conservatism and the degree of support for the capitalist system. Such outcomes are typically explained by the suggestion that most poor people believe they will become rich one day. In a representative sample of low-income Americans, we observed that less than one-fourth were optimistic about their economic prospects. Those respondents who believed that they would become rich one day were no more likely to endorse the legitimacy of the system and no more supportive of conservative ideology or the Republican Party, compared to those who did not believe they would become rich. From a system justification perspective, we propose that people are motivated to defend the social systems on which they depend, and this confers a psychological advantage to conservative ideology. Providing ideological support for the status quo serves epistemic motives to reduce uncertainty, existential motives to reduce threat, and relational motives to share reality with members of mainstream society. We summarize evidence from the United States, Argentina, Lebanon, and other countries bearing on these propositions—including a survey administered shortly before the 2016 U.S. Presidential election—and discuss political implications of system justification motivation.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42850
Jost, John T.; Langer, Melanie; Badaan, Vivienne; Azevedo, Flávio; Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel; et al.; Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics; American Psychological Association; Translational Issues in Psychological Science; 3; 3; 9-2017; 1-26
2332-2136
2332-2179
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/42850
identifier_str_mv Jost, John T.; Langer, Melanie; Badaan, Vivienne; Azevedo, Flávio; Etchezahar, Edgardo Daniel; et al.; Ideology and the limits of self-interest: System justification motivation and conservative advantages in mass politics; American Psychological Association; Translational Issues in Psychological Science; 3; 3; 9-2017; 1-26
2332-2136
2332-2179
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-48712-001
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1037/tps0000127
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Psychological Association
publisher.none.fl_str_mv American Psychological Association
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269097695379456
score 13.13397