The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump

Autores
Tozzi, María Verónica
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Shapin and Shaffer´s book offers a socio-historical approach that highlights the inseparable relationship between the processes of producing "true" knowledge and the constitution of the epistemic community that produces and legitimates that knowledge and takes responsibility for it. Such legitimacy and authority are being discredited by phenomena characterized under the label of “post-truth.” The authors present their book as a study that characterizes the debate between Boyle’s “experimentalism” and Hobbes’s demonstrative method, as a response to the problem of assent and social order in the context of the Monarchical Restoration following the Civil War. I find an opportunity to reflect on the foundations of the acceptance of knowledge provided by the natural and social sciences in the current context of the post-truth phenomenon. The strategy is to follow our authors in the issue that has guided their research: How does a (scientific) community that works tirelessly to produce consensus around knowledge describe the knowledge achieved as given, rather than produced? The book reveals an interweaving between truth and trust. This will lead us to discourage dichotomies such as the given and the constructed, individualism-holism, fact-value, and move toward a consideration of “epistemic responsibility” within a communal framework.
Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
TRUST
TRUTH
POST TRUTH
SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/265607

id CONICETDig_c6169dd05486d9e7d60c80884665b00e
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/265607
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air PumpTozzi, María VerónicaTRUSTTRUTHPOST TRUTHSOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Shapin and Shaffer´s book offers a socio-historical approach that highlights the inseparable relationship between the processes of producing "true" knowledge and the constitution of the epistemic community that produces and legitimates that knowledge and takes responsibility for it. Such legitimacy and authority are being discredited by phenomena characterized under the label of “post-truth.” The authors present their book as a study that characterizes the debate between Boyle’s “experimentalism” and Hobbes’s demonstrative method, as a response to the problem of assent and social order in the context of the Monarchical Restoration following the Civil War. I find an opportunity to reflect on the foundations of the acceptance of knowledge provided by the natural and social sciences in the current context of the post-truth phenomenon. The strategy is to follow our authors in the issue that has guided their research: How does a (scientific) community that works tirelessly to produce consensus around knowledge describe the knowledge achieved as given, rather than produced? The book reveals an interweaving between truth and trust. This will lead us to discourage dichotomies such as the given and the constructed, individualism-holism, fact-value, and move toward a consideration of “epistemic responsibility” within a communal framework.Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas. Departamento de Historia2025-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/zipapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/265607Tozzi, María Verónica; The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas. Departamento de Historia; Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; 5-2025; 1-152526-2270CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/59965info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:46:07Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/265607instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:46:07.662CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump
title The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump
spellingShingle The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump
Tozzi, María Verónica
TRUST
TRUTH
POST TRUTH
SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY
title_short The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump
title_full The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump
title_fullStr The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump
title_full_unstemmed The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump
title_sort The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Tozzi, María Verónica
author Tozzi, María Verónica
author_facet Tozzi, María Verónica
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv TRUST
TRUTH
POST TRUTH
SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY
topic TRUST
TRUTH
POST TRUTH
SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Shapin and Shaffer´s book offers a socio-historical approach that highlights the inseparable relationship between the processes of producing "true" knowledge and the constitution of the epistemic community that produces and legitimates that knowledge and takes responsibility for it. Such legitimacy and authority are being discredited by phenomena characterized under the label of “post-truth.” The authors present their book as a study that characterizes the debate between Boyle’s “experimentalism” and Hobbes’s demonstrative method, as a response to the problem of assent and social order in the context of the Monarchical Restoration following the Civil War. I find an opportunity to reflect on the foundations of the acceptance of knowledge provided by the natural and social sciences in the current context of the post-truth phenomenon. The strategy is to follow our authors in the issue that has guided their research: How does a (scientific) community that works tirelessly to produce consensus around knowledge describe the knowledge achieved as given, rather than produced? The book reveals an interweaving between truth and trust. This will lead us to discourage dichotomies such as the given and the constructed, individualism-holism, fact-value, and move toward a consideration of “epistemic responsibility” within a communal framework.
Fil: Tozzi, María Verónica. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Shapin and Shaffer´s book offers a socio-historical approach that highlights the inseparable relationship between the processes of producing "true" knowledge and the constitution of the epistemic community that produces and legitimates that knowledge and takes responsibility for it. Such legitimacy and authority are being discredited by phenomena characterized under the label of “post-truth.” The authors present their book as a study that characterizes the debate between Boyle’s “experimentalism” and Hobbes’s demonstrative method, as a response to the problem of assent and social order in the context of the Monarchical Restoration following the Civil War. I find an opportunity to reflect on the foundations of the acceptance of knowledge provided by the natural and social sciences in the current context of the post-truth phenomenon. The strategy is to follow our authors in the issue that has guided their research: How does a (scientific) community that works tirelessly to produce consensus around knowledge describe the knowledge achieved as given, rather than produced? The book reveals an interweaving between truth and trust. This will lead us to discourage dichotomies such as the given and the constructed, individualism-holism, fact-value, and move toward a consideration of “epistemic responsibility” within a communal framework.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/265607
Tozzi, María Verónica; The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas. Departamento de Historia; Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; 5-2025; 1-15
2526-2270
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/265607
identifier_str_mv Tozzi, María Verónica; The Social Value of the Trust-Truth bond in a Post-Truth Era. Revisiting Leviathan and Air Pump; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas. Departamento de Historia; Transversal: International Journal for the Historiography of Science; 5-2025; 1-15
2526-2270
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/transversal/article/view/59965
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/zip
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas. Departamento de Historia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas. Departamento de Historia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268775337951232
score 13.13397