The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth

Autores
Barry, Amadou; Bottasso, Oscar Adelmo; Vicco, Miguel Hernán
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The sociologist Robert Merton postulated that science is a concept used in order to denote the set of methods used to verify the truth of knowledge. Science is to go beyond empiricism, and try to make real hypothetical concepts (or check their shortcomings). In this line, Pierre Louis introduced the numerical method to achieve scientific ‘verification’ of the medical practice – “As to different methods of treatment, it is possible for us to assure ourselves of the superiority of one or other [. . . ] by enquiring if under these circumstances, a greater number of individuals have been cured by one means than another. Here again it is necessary to count. And it is, in great part at least, because hitherto this method has been not at all, or rarely been employed, that the science of therapeutics is so uncertain” [1]. The principal objective pursued through this method was to avoid treatments whose efficacies were not really proven...
Fil: Barry, Amadou. University of Bamako; Malí
Fil: Bottasso, Oscar Adelmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Inmunología Clinica y Experimental de Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Instituto de Inmunología Clinica y Experimental de Rosario; Argentina
Fil: Vicco, Miguel Hernán. Universidad Nacional del Litoral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
ANTIVACCINES
POST TRUTH
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
PUBLIC HEALTH
VACCINES
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/149469
Acceder
id CONICETDig_6d5824aaad11325f44b961999d592e28
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/149469
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truthBarry, AmadouBottasso, Oscar AdelmoVicco, Miguel HernánANTIVACCINESPOST TRUTHPREVENTIVE MEDICINEPUBLIC HEALTHVACCINEShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3The sociologist Robert Merton postulated that science is a concept used in order to denote the set of methods used to verify the truth of knowledge. Science is to go beyond empiricism, and try to make real hypothetical concepts (or check their shortcomings). In this line, Pierre Louis introduced the numerical method to achieve scientific ‘verification’ of the medical practice – “As to different methods of treatment, it is possible for us to assure ourselves of the superiority of one or other [. . . ] by enquiring if under these circumstances, a greater number of individuals have been cured by one means than another. Here again it is necessary to count. And it is, in great part at least, because hitherto this method has been not at all, or rarely been employed, that the science of therapeutics is so uncertain” [1]. The principal objective pursued through this method was to avoid treatments whose efficacies were not really proven...Fil: Barry, Amadou. University of Bamako; MalíFil: Bottasso, Oscar Adelmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Inmunología Clinica y Experimental de Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Instituto de Inmunología Clinica y Experimental de Rosario; ArgentinaFil: Vicco, Miguel Hernán. Universidad Nacional del Litoral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFuture Medicine2019-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/149469Barry, Amadou; Bottasso, Oscar Adelmo; Vicco, Miguel Hernán; The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth; Future Medicine; Immunotherapy; 11; 1; 1-2019; 7-91750-743XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2217/imt-2018-0062info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/10.2217/imt-2018-0062info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T12:06:45Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/149469instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 12:06:46.155CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth
title The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth
spellingShingle The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth
Barry, Amadou
ANTIVACCINES
POST TRUTH
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
PUBLIC HEALTH
VACCINES
title_short The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth
title_full The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth
title_fullStr The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth
title_full_unstemmed The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth
title_sort The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Barry, Amadou
Bottasso, Oscar Adelmo
Vicco, Miguel Hernán
author Barry, Amadou
author_facet Barry, Amadou
Bottasso, Oscar Adelmo
Vicco, Miguel Hernán
author_role author
author2 Bottasso, Oscar Adelmo
Vicco, Miguel Hernán
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ANTIVACCINES
POST TRUTH
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
PUBLIC HEALTH
VACCINES
topic ANTIVACCINES
POST TRUTH
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
PUBLIC HEALTH
VACCINES
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The sociologist Robert Merton postulated that science is a concept used in order to denote the set of methods used to verify the truth of knowledge. Science is to go beyond empiricism, and try to make real hypothetical concepts (or check their shortcomings). In this line, Pierre Louis introduced the numerical method to achieve scientific ‘verification’ of the medical practice – “As to different methods of treatment, it is possible for us to assure ourselves of the superiority of one or other [. . . ] by enquiring if under these circumstances, a greater number of individuals have been cured by one means than another. Here again it is necessary to count. And it is, in great part at least, because hitherto this method has been not at all, or rarely been employed, that the science of therapeutics is so uncertain” [1]. The principal objective pursued through this method was to avoid treatments whose efficacies were not really proven...
Fil: Barry, Amadou. University of Bamako; Malí
Fil: Bottasso, Oscar Adelmo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario. Instituto de Inmunología Clinica y Experimental de Rosario. Universidad Nacional de Rosario. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Instituto de Inmunología Clinica y Experimental de Rosario; Argentina
Fil: Vicco, Miguel Hernán. Universidad Nacional del Litoral; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description The sociologist Robert Merton postulated that science is a concept used in order to denote the set of methods used to verify the truth of knowledge. Science is to go beyond empiricism, and try to make real hypothetical concepts (or check their shortcomings). In this line, Pierre Louis introduced the numerical method to achieve scientific ‘verification’ of the medical practice – “As to different methods of treatment, it is possible for us to assure ourselves of the superiority of one or other [. . . ] by enquiring if under these circumstances, a greater number of individuals have been cured by one means than another. Here again it is necessary to count. And it is, in great part at least, because hitherto this method has been not at all, or rarely been employed, that the science of therapeutics is so uncertain” [1]. The principal objective pursued through this method was to avoid treatments whose efficacies were not really proven...
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/149469
Barry, Amadou; Bottasso, Oscar Adelmo; Vicco, Miguel Hernán; The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth; Future Medicine; Immunotherapy; 11; 1; 1-2019; 7-9
1750-743X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/149469
identifier_str_mv Barry, Amadou; Bottasso, Oscar Adelmo; Vicco, Miguel Hernán; The importance of being scientifically cautious when criticizing the administration of vaccines: "Retracted"' post truth; Future Medicine; Immunotherapy; 11; 1; 1-2019; 7-9
1750-743X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2217/imt-2018-0062
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/10.2217/imt-2018-0062
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Future Medicine
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Future Medicine
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782427249246208
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares