Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students

Autores
Ventura, Ana Clara; Moscoloni, Nora Ana Maria
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Knowledge of learning styles can enhance the ability of teachers to build on student experiences and construct new learning opportunities. This cross-sectional study examines the learning styles preferences of undergraduate Argentinean students and the differences in their learning styles according to Field of Study and Academics Years using Index of Learning Styles©. The sample consisted of 304 students from Psychology and Engineering enrolled on First, Third and Fifth Years. Results suggested that students in early years at university adopted learning styles that were similar to each other irrespective of main academic discipline. However, learning styles of students in upper division courses tended to be related to the Field of Study. Engineering students were found to be more Sensing, Active and Visual learners; whereas Psychology students preferred the opposite styles. In regard to Academic Years in Psychology, Fifth Year students were more Intuitive, Reflective, Verbal and Global than First Year students. Furthermore, Engineering Fifth Year students have consolidated Sensing, Visual and Sequential styles. Besides, this group showed greater Active preferences than the Engineering First Year students. These findings confirmed the hypothesis of educational specialization based on the association between learning styles and Fields of Study; these educational implications are discussed.
Fil: Ventura, Ana Clara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Moscoloni, Nora Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; Argentina
Materia
FELDER-SILVERMAN LEARNING STYLES MODEL
TEACHING
STYLISTIC SPECIALIZATION
HIGHER EDUCATION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/57771

id CONICETDig_c583c1e62bd436fea3fbe8269afeae9f
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/57771
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate StudentsVentura, Ana ClaraMoscoloni, Nora Ana MariaFELDER-SILVERMAN LEARNING STYLES MODELTEACHINGSTYLISTIC SPECIALIZATIONHIGHER EDUCATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Knowledge of learning styles can enhance the ability of teachers to build on student experiences and construct new learning opportunities. This cross-sectional study examines the learning styles preferences of undergraduate Argentinean students and the differences in their learning styles according to Field of Study and Academics Years using Index of Learning Styles©. The sample consisted of 304 students from Psychology and Engineering enrolled on First, Third and Fifth Years. Results suggested that students in early years at university adopted learning styles that were similar to each other irrespective of main academic discipline. However, learning styles of students in upper division courses tended to be related to the Field of Study. Engineering students were found to be more Sensing, Active and Visual learners; whereas Psychology students preferred the opposite styles. In regard to Academic Years in Psychology, Fifth Year students were more Intuitive, Reflective, Verbal and Global than First Year students. Furthermore, Engineering Fifth Year students have consolidated Sensing, Visual and Sequential styles. Besides, this group showed greater Active preferences than the Engineering First Year students. These findings confirmed the hypothesis of educational specialization based on the association between learning styles and Fields of Study; these educational implications are discussed.Fil: Ventura, Ana Clara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; ArgentinaFil: Moscoloni, Nora Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; ArgentinaEngineering & Technology Publishing2015-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/57771Ventura, Ana Clara; Moscoloni, Nora Ana Maria; Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students; Engineering & Technology Publishing; International Journal of Learning and Teaching; 1; 2; 1-12-2015; 88-932377-28912377-2905CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.ijlt.org/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=118&id=501info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.18178/ijlt.1.2.88-93info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:45:45Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/57771instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:45:45.652CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students
title Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students
spellingShingle Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students
Ventura, Ana Clara
FELDER-SILVERMAN LEARNING STYLES MODEL
TEACHING
STYLISTIC SPECIALIZATION
HIGHER EDUCATION
title_short Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students
title_full Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students
title_fullStr Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students
title_full_unstemmed Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students
title_sort Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Ventura, Ana Clara
Moscoloni, Nora Ana Maria
author Ventura, Ana Clara
author_facet Ventura, Ana Clara
Moscoloni, Nora Ana Maria
author_role author
author2 Moscoloni, Nora Ana Maria
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv FELDER-SILVERMAN LEARNING STYLES MODEL
TEACHING
STYLISTIC SPECIALIZATION
HIGHER EDUCATION
topic FELDER-SILVERMAN LEARNING STYLES MODEL
TEACHING
STYLISTIC SPECIALIZATION
HIGHER EDUCATION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Knowledge of learning styles can enhance the ability of teachers to build on student experiences and construct new learning opportunities. This cross-sectional study examines the learning styles preferences of undergraduate Argentinean students and the differences in their learning styles according to Field of Study and Academics Years using Index of Learning Styles©. The sample consisted of 304 students from Psychology and Engineering enrolled on First, Third and Fifth Years. Results suggested that students in early years at university adopted learning styles that were similar to each other irrespective of main academic discipline. However, learning styles of students in upper division courses tended to be related to the Field of Study. Engineering students were found to be more Sensing, Active and Visual learners; whereas Psychology students preferred the opposite styles. In regard to Academic Years in Psychology, Fifth Year students were more Intuitive, Reflective, Verbal and Global than First Year students. Furthermore, Engineering Fifth Year students have consolidated Sensing, Visual and Sequential styles. Besides, this group showed greater Active preferences than the Engineering First Year students. These findings confirmed the hypothesis of educational specialization based on the association between learning styles and Fields of Study; these educational implications are discussed.
Fil: Ventura, Ana Clara. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte; Argentina
Fil: Moscoloni, Nora Ana Maria. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Rosario; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Rosario; Argentina
description Knowledge of learning styles can enhance the ability of teachers to build on student experiences and construct new learning opportunities. This cross-sectional study examines the learning styles preferences of undergraduate Argentinean students and the differences in their learning styles according to Field of Study and Academics Years using Index of Learning Styles©. The sample consisted of 304 students from Psychology and Engineering enrolled on First, Third and Fifth Years. Results suggested that students in early years at university adopted learning styles that were similar to each other irrespective of main academic discipline. However, learning styles of students in upper division courses tended to be related to the Field of Study. Engineering students were found to be more Sensing, Active and Visual learners; whereas Psychology students preferred the opposite styles. In regard to Academic Years in Psychology, Fifth Year students were more Intuitive, Reflective, Verbal and Global than First Year students. Furthermore, Engineering Fifth Year students have consolidated Sensing, Visual and Sequential styles. Besides, this group showed greater Active preferences than the Engineering First Year students. These findings confirmed the hypothesis of educational specialization based on the association between learning styles and Fields of Study; these educational implications are discussed.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/57771
Ventura, Ana Clara; Moscoloni, Nora Ana Maria; Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students; Engineering & Technology Publishing; International Journal of Learning and Teaching; 1; 2; 1-12-2015; 88-93
2377-2891
2377-2905
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/57771
identifier_str_mv Ventura, Ana Clara; Moscoloni, Nora Ana Maria; Learning Styles and Disciplinary Differences: A Cross-Sectional Study of Undergraduate Students; Engineering & Technology Publishing; International Journal of Learning and Teaching; 1; 2; 1-12-2015; 88-93
2377-2891
2377-2905
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.ijlt.org/index.php?m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=118&id=501
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.18178/ijlt.1.2.88-93
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Engineering & Technology Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Engineering & Technology Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082967610327040
score 13.22299