Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence
- Autores
- Nelson, Tammie; Fernández Alberti, Sebastián; Roitberg, Adrián; Tretiak, Sergei
- Año de publicación
- 2013
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Within the fewest switches surface hopping (FSSH) formulation, a swarm of independent trajectories is propagated and the equations of motion for the quantum coefficients are evolved coherently along each independent nuclear trajectory. That is, the phase factors, or quantum amplitudes, are retained. At a region of strong coupling, a trajectory can branch into multiple wavepackets. Directly following a hop, the two wavepackets remain in a region of nonadiabatic coupling and continue exchanging population. After these wavepackets have sufficiently separated in phase space, they should begin to evolve independently from one another, the process known as decoherence. Decoherence is not accounted for in the standard surface hopping algorithm and leads to internal inconsistency. FSSH is designed to ensure that at any time, the fraction of classical trajectories evolving on each quantum state is equal to the average quantum probability for that state. However, in many systems this internal consistency requirement is violated. Treating decoherence is an inherent problem that can be addressed by implementing some form of decoherence correction to the standard FSSH algorithm. In this study, we have implemented two forms of the instantaneous decoherence procedure where coefficients are reinitialized following hops. We also test the energy-based decoherence correction (EDC) scheme proposed by Granucci et al. and a related version where the form of the decoherence time is taken from Truhlar's Coherent Switching with Decay of Mixing method. The sensitivity of the EDC results to changes in parameters is also evaluated. The application of these computationally inexpensive ad hoc methods is demonstrated in the simulation of nonradiative relaxation in two conjugated oligomer systems, specifically poly-phenylene vinylene and poly-phenylene ethynylene. We find that methods that have been used successfully for treating small systems do not necessarily translate to large polyatomic systems and their success depends on the particular system under study.
Fil: Nelson, Tammie. Los Alamos National Laboratory; Estados Unidos
Fil: Fernández Alberti, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Roitberg, Adrián. University of Florida; Estados Unidos
Fil: Tretiak, Sergei. Los Alamos National Laboratory; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
Nonadiabatic
Molecular dynamic - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/24714
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_c4877e4682d1796dfc06301889c315cd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/24714 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic DecoherenceNelson, TammieFernández Alberti, SebastiánRoitberg, AdriánTretiak, SergeiNonadiabaticMolecular dynamichttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Within the fewest switches surface hopping (FSSH) formulation, a swarm of independent trajectories is propagated and the equations of motion for the quantum coefficients are evolved coherently along each independent nuclear trajectory. That is, the phase factors, or quantum amplitudes, are retained. At a region of strong coupling, a trajectory can branch into multiple wavepackets. Directly following a hop, the two wavepackets remain in a region of nonadiabatic coupling and continue exchanging population. After these wavepackets have sufficiently separated in phase space, they should begin to evolve independently from one another, the process known as decoherence. Decoherence is not accounted for in the standard surface hopping algorithm and leads to internal inconsistency. FSSH is designed to ensure that at any time, the fraction of classical trajectories evolving on each quantum state is equal to the average quantum probability for that state. However, in many systems this internal consistency requirement is violated. Treating decoherence is an inherent problem that can be addressed by implementing some form of decoherence correction to the standard FSSH algorithm. In this study, we have implemented two forms of the instantaneous decoherence procedure where coefficients are reinitialized following hops. We also test the energy-based decoherence correction (EDC) scheme proposed by Granucci et al. and a related version where the form of the decoherence time is taken from Truhlar's Coherent Switching with Decay of Mixing method. The sensitivity of the EDC results to changes in parameters is also evaluated. The application of these computationally inexpensive ad hoc methods is demonstrated in the simulation of nonradiative relaxation in two conjugated oligomer systems, specifically poly-phenylene vinylene and poly-phenylene ethynylene. We find that methods that have been used successfully for treating small systems do not necessarily translate to large polyatomic systems and their success depends on the particular system under study.Fil: Nelson, Tammie. Los Alamos National Laboratory; Estados UnidosFil: Fernández Alberti, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Roitberg, Adrián. University of Florida; Estados UnidosFil: Tretiak, Sergei. Los Alamos National Laboratory; Estados UnidosAmerican Institute of Physics2013-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/24714Nelson, Tammie; Fernández Alberti, Sebastián; Roitberg, Adrián; Tretiak, Sergei; Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence; American Institute of Physics; Journal of Chemical Physics; 138; 6-2013; 224111-2241240021-9606CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.4809568info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1063/1.4809568info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:50:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/24714instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:50:38.201CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence |
title |
Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence |
spellingShingle |
Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence Nelson, Tammie Nonadiabatic Molecular dynamic |
title_short |
Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence |
title_full |
Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence |
title_fullStr |
Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence |
title_sort |
Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Nelson, Tammie Fernández Alberti, Sebastián Roitberg, Adrián Tretiak, Sergei |
author |
Nelson, Tammie |
author_facet |
Nelson, Tammie Fernández Alberti, Sebastián Roitberg, Adrián Tretiak, Sergei |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fernández Alberti, Sebastián Roitberg, Adrián Tretiak, Sergei |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Nonadiabatic Molecular dynamic |
topic |
Nonadiabatic Molecular dynamic |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Within the fewest switches surface hopping (FSSH) formulation, a swarm of independent trajectories is propagated and the equations of motion for the quantum coefficients are evolved coherently along each independent nuclear trajectory. That is, the phase factors, or quantum amplitudes, are retained. At a region of strong coupling, a trajectory can branch into multiple wavepackets. Directly following a hop, the two wavepackets remain in a region of nonadiabatic coupling and continue exchanging population. After these wavepackets have sufficiently separated in phase space, they should begin to evolve independently from one another, the process known as decoherence. Decoherence is not accounted for in the standard surface hopping algorithm and leads to internal inconsistency. FSSH is designed to ensure that at any time, the fraction of classical trajectories evolving on each quantum state is equal to the average quantum probability for that state. However, in many systems this internal consistency requirement is violated. Treating decoherence is an inherent problem that can be addressed by implementing some form of decoherence correction to the standard FSSH algorithm. In this study, we have implemented two forms of the instantaneous decoherence procedure where coefficients are reinitialized following hops. We also test the energy-based decoherence correction (EDC) scheme proposed by Granucci et al. and a related version where the form of the decoherence time is taken from Truhlar's Coherent Switching with Decay of Mixing method. The sensitivity of the EDC results to changes in parameters is also evaluated. The application of these computationally inexpensive ad hoc methods is demonstrated in the simulation of nonradiative relaxation in two conjugated oligomer systems, specifically poly-phenylene vinylene and poly-phenylene ethynylene. We find that methods that have been used successfully for treating small systems do not necessarily translate to large polyatomic systems and their success depends on the particular system under study. Fil: Nelson, Tammie. Los Alamos National Laboratory; Estados Unidos Fil: Fernández Alberti, Sebastián. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Roitberg, Adrián. University of Florida; Estados Unidos Fil: Tretiak, Sergei. Los Alamos National Laboratory; Estados Unidos |
description |
Within the fewest switches surface hopping (FSSH) formulation, a swarm of independent trajectories is propagated and the equations of motion for the quantum coefficients are evolved coherently along each independent nuclear trajectory. That is, the phase factors, or quantum amplitudes, are retained. At a region of strong coupling, a trajectory can branch into multiple wavepackets. Directly following a hop, the two wavepackets remain in a region of nonadiabatic coupling and continue exchanging population. After these wavepackets have sufficiently separated in phase space, they should begin to evolve independently from one another, the process known as decoherence. Decoherence is not accounted for in the standard surface hopping algorithm and leads to internal inconsistency. FSSH is designed to ensure that at any time, the fraction of classical trajectories evolving on each quantum state is equal to the average quantum probability for that state. However, in many systems this internal consistency requirement is violated. Treating decoherence is an inherent problem that can be addressed by implementing some form of decoherence correction to the standard FSSH algorithm. In this study, we have implemented two forms of the instantaneous decoherence procedure where coefficients are reinitialized following hops. We also test the energy-based decoherence correction (EDC) scheme proposed by Granucci et al. and a related version where the form of the decoherence time is taken from Truhlar's Coherent Switching with Decay of Mixing method. The sensitivity of the EDC results to changes in parameters is also evaluated. The application of these computationally inexpensive ad hoc methods is demonstrated in the simulation of nonradiative relaxation in two conjugated oligomer systems, specifically poly-phenylene vinylene and poly-phenylene ethynylene. We find that methods that have been used successfully for treating small systems do not necessarily translate to large polyatomic systems and their success depends on the particular system under study. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/24714 Nelson, Tammie; Fernández Alberti, Sebastián; Roitberg, Adrián; Tretiak, Sergei; Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence; American Institute of Physics; Journal of Chemical Physics; 138; 6-2013; 224111-224124 0021-9606 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/24714 |
identifier_str_mv |
Nelson, Tammie; Fernández Alberti, Sebastián; Roitberg, Adrián; Tretiak, Sergei; Nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics: treatment of electronic Decoherence; American Institute of Physics; Journal of Chemical Physics; 138; 6-2013; 224111-224124 0021-9606 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.4809568 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1063/1.4809568 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Institute of Physics |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Institute of Physics |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269043089735680 |
score |
13.13397 |