Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method

Autores
Fontana, Juan Manuel; Pan, Zhaoxing; Sazonov, Edward S.; McCrory, Megan A.; Thomas, J. Graham; McGrane, Kelli S.; Marden, Tyson; Higgins, Janine A.
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake. Method: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: (1) weighed food record; (2) photographic food record; (3) diet diary; and (4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method. Results: Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake (p = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility vs. the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4), which was better than that for the diet diary [RC = 79.6 (55.5, 103.3)] but not as repeatable as the photographic method [RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)]. Conclusion: Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data.
Fil: Fontana, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Pan, Zhaoxing. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sazonov, Edward S.. University of Alabama; Estados Unidos
Fil: McCrory, Megan A.. Boston University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Thomas, J. Graham. University Brown; Estados Unidos
Fil: McGrane, Kelli S.. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Fil: Marden, Tyson. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Fil: Higgins, Janine A.. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Materia
DIET DIARY
DIETARY INTAKE
FOOD RECORD
PHOTOGRAPH
PRECISION
REPRODUCIBILITY
SENSOR
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/141983

id CONICETDig_c48115dc31833b1a1f32bb016730b8bf
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/141983
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor MethodFontana, Juan ManuelPan, ZhaoxingSazonov, Edward S.McCrory, Megan A.Thomas, J. GrahamMcGrane, Kelli S.Marden, TysonHiggins, Janine A.DIET DIARYDIETARY INTAKEFOOD RECORDPHOTOGRAPHPRECISIONREPRODUCIBILITYSENSORhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake. Method: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: (1) weighed food record; (2) photographic food record; (3) diet diary; and (4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method. Results: Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake (p = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility vs. the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4), which was better than that for the diet diary [RC = 79.6 (55.5, 103.3)] but not as repeatable as the photographic method [RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)]. Conclusion: Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data.Fil: Fontana, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Pan, Zhaoxing. University of Colorado; Estados UnidosFil: Sazonov, Edward S.. University of Alabama; Estados UnidosFil: McCrory, Megan A.. Boston University; Estados UnidosFil: Thomas, J. Graham. University Brown; Estados UnidosFil: McGrane, Kelli S.. University of Colorado; Estados UnidosFil: Marden, Tyson. University of Colorado; Estados UnidosFil: Higgins, Janine A.. University of Colorado; Estados UnidosFrontiers Media2020-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/141983Fontana, Juan Manuel; Pan, Zhaoxing; Sazonov, Edward S.; McCrory, Megan A.; Thomas, J. Graham; et al.; Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Nutrition; 7; 7-2020; 1-62296-861XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnut.2020.00099/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fnut.2020.00099info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:47:11Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/141983instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:47:11.986CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
title Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
spellingShingle Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
Fontana, Juan Manuel
DIET DIARY
DIETARY INTAKE
FOOD RECORD
PHOTOGRAPH
PRECISION
REPRODUCIBILITY
SENSOR
title_short Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
title_full Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
title_fullStr Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
title_sort Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Fontana, Juan Manuel
Pan, Zhaoxing
Sazonov, Edward S.
McCrory, Megan A.
Thomas, J. Graham
McGrane, Kelli S.
Marden, Tyson
Higgins, Janine A.
author Fontana, Juan Manuel
author_facet Fontana, Juan Manuel
Pan, Zhaoxing
Sazonov, Edward S.
McCrory, Megan A.
Thomas, J. Graham
McGrane, Kelli S.
Marden, Tyson
Higgins, Janine A.
author_role author
author2 Pan, Zhaoxing
Sazonov, Edward S.
McCrory, Megan A.
Thomas, J. Graham
McGrane, Kelli S.
Marden, Tyson
Higgins, Janine A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DIET DIARY
DIETARY INTAKE
FOOD RECORD
PHOTOGRAPH
PRECISION
REPRODUCIBILITY
SENSOR
topic DIET DIARY
DIETARY INTAKE
FOOD RECORD
PHOTOGRAPH
PRECISION
REPRODUCIBILITY
SENSOR
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake. Method: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: (1) weighed food record; (2) photographic food record; (3) diet diary; and (4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method. Results: Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake (p = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility vs. the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4), which was better than that for the diet diary [RC = 79.6 (55.5, 103.3)] but not as repeatable as the photographic method [RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)]. Conclusion: Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data.
Fil: Fontana, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Pan, Zhaoxing. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sazonov, Edward S.. University of Alabama; Estados Unidos
Fil: McCrory, Megan A.. Boston University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Thomas, J. Graham. University Brown; Estados Unidos
Fil: McGrane, Kelli S.. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Fil: Marden, Tyson. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Fil: Higgins, Janine A.. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
description Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake. Method: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: (1) weighed food record; (2) photographic food record; (3) diet diary; and (4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method. Results: Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake (p = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility vs. the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4), which was better than that for the diet diary [RC = 79.6 (55.5, 103.3)] but not as repeatable as the photographic method [RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)]. Conclusion: Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/141983
Fontana, Juan Manuel; Pan, Zhaoxing; Sazonov, Edward S.; McCrory, Megan A.; Thomas, J. Graham; et al.; Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Nutrition; 7; 7-2020; 1-6
2296-861X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/141983
identifier_str_mv Fontana, Juan Manuel; Pan, Zhaoxing; Sazonov, Edward S.; McCrory, Megan A.; Thomas, J. Graham; et al.; Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Nutrition; 7; 7-2020; 1-6
2296-861X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnut.2020.00099/full
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fnut.2020.00099
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers Media
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844614515097862144
score 13.070432