Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method
- Autores
- Fontana, Juan Manuel; Pan, Zhaoxing; Sazonov, Edward S.; McCrory, Megan A.; Thomas, J. Graham; McGrane, Kelli S.; Marden, Tyson; Higgins, Janine A.
- Año de publicación
- 2020
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake. Method: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: (1) weighed food record; (2) photographic food record; (3) diet diary; and (4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method. Results: Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake (p = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility vs. the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4), which was better than that for the diet diary [RC = 79.6 (55.5, 103.3)] but not as repeatable as the photographic method [RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)]. Conclusion: Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data.
Fil: Fontana, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud; Argentina
Fil: Pan, Zhaoxing. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sazonov, Edward S.. University of Alabama; Estados Unidos
Fil: McCrory, Megan A.. Boston University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Thomas, J. Graham. University Brown; Estados Unidos
Fil: McGrane, Kelli S.. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Fil: Marden, Tyson. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos
Fil: Higgins, Janine A.. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
DIET DIARY
DIETARY INTAKE
FOOD RECORD
PHOTOGRAPH
PRECISION
REPRODUCIBILITY
SENSOR - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/141983
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_c48115dc31833b1a1f32bb016730b8bf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/141983 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor MethodFontana, Juan ManuelPan, ZhaoxingSazonov, Edward S.McCrory, Megan A.Thomas, J. GrahamMcGrane, Kelli S.Marden, TysonHiggins, Janine A.DIET DIARYDIETARY INTAKEFOOD RECORDPHOTOGRAPHPRECISIONREPRODUCIBILITYSENSORhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake. Method: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: (1) weighed food record; (2) photographic food record; (3) diet diary; and (4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method. Results: Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake (p = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility vs. the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4), which was better than that for the diet diary [RC = 79.6 (55.5, 103.3)] but not as repeatable as the photographic method [RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)]. Conclusion: Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data.Fil: Fontana, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud; ArgentinaFil: Pan, Zhaoxing. University of Colorado; Estados UnidosFil: Sazonov, Edward S.. University of Alabama; Estados UnidosFil: McCrory, Megan A.. Boston University; Estados UnidosFil: Thomas, J. Graham. University Brown; Estados UnidosFil: McGrane, Kelli S.. University of Colorado; Estados UnidosFil: Marden, Tyson. University of Colorado; Estados UnidosFil: Higgins, Janine A.. University of Colorado; Estados UnidosFrontiers Media2020-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/141983Fontana, Juan Manuel; Pan, Zhaoxing; Sazonov, Edward S.; McCrory, Megan A.; Thomas, J. Graham; et al.; Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Nutrition; 7; 7-2020; 1-62296-861XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnut.2020.00099/fullinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fnut.2020.00099info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:47:11Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/141983instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:47:11.986CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method |
title |
Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method |
spellingShingle |
Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method Fontana, Juan Manuel DIET DIARY DIETARY INTAKE FOOD RECORD PHOTOGRAPH PRECISION REPRODUCIBILITY SENSOR |
title_short |
Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method |
title_full |
Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method |
title_fullStr |
Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method |
title_sort |
Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Fontana, Juan Manuel Pan, Zhaoxing Sazonov, Edward S. McCrory, Megan A. Thomas, J. Graham McGrane, Kelli S. Marden, Tyson Higgins, Janine A. |
author |
Fontana, Juan Manuel |
author_facet |
Fontana, Juan Manuel Pan, Zhaoxing Sazonov, Edward S. McCrory, Megan A. Thomas, J. Graham McGrane, Kelli S. Marden, Tyson Higgins, Janine A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pan, Zhaoxing Sazonov, Edward S. McCrory, Megan A. Thomas, J. Graham McGrane, Kelli S. Marden, Tyson Higgins, Janine A. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
DIET DIARY DIETARY INTAKE FOOD RECORD PHOTOGRAPH PRECISION REPRODUCIBILITY SENSOR |
topic |
DIET DIARY DIETARY INTAKE FOOD RECORD PHOTOGRAPH PRECISION REPRODUCIBILITY SENSOR |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake. Method: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: (1) weighed food record; (2) photographic food record; (3) diet diary; and (4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method. Results: Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake (p = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility vs. the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4), which was better than that for the diet diary [RC = 79.6 (55.5, 103.3)] but not as repeatable as the photographic method [RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)]. Conclusion: Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data. Fil: Fontana, Juan Manuel. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto para el Desarrollo Agroindustrial y de la Salud; Argentina Fil: Pan, Zhaoxing. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos Fil: Sazonov, Edward S.. University of Alabama; Estados Unidos Fil: McCrory, Megan A.. Boston University; Estados Unidos Fil: Thomas, J. Graham. University Brown; Estados Unidos Fil: McGrane, Kelli S.. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos Fil: Marden, Tyson. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos Fil: Higgins, Janine A.. University of Colorado; Estados Unidos |
description |
Objective: No data currently exist on the reproducibility of photographic food records compared to diet diaries, two commonly used methods to measure dietary intake. Our aim was to examine the reproducibility of diet diaries, photographic food records, and a novel electronic sensor, consisting of counts of chews and swallows using wearable sensors and video analysis, for estimating energy intake. Method: This was a retrospective analysis of data from a previous study, in which 30 participants (15 female), aged 29 ± 12 y and having a BMI of 27.9 ± 5.5, consumed three identical meals on different days. Four different methods were used to estimate total mass and energy intake on each day: (1) weighed food record; (2) photographic food record; (3) diet diary; and (4) novel mathematical model based on counts of chews and swallows (CCS models) obtained via the use of electronic sensors and video monitoring system. The study staff conducted weighed food records for all meals, took pre- and post-meal photographs, and ensured that diet diaries were completed by participants at the end of each meal. All methods were compared against the weighed food record, which was used as the reference method. Results: Reproducibility was significantly different between the diet diary and photographic food record for total energy intake (p = 0.004). The photographic record had greater reproducibility vs. the diet diary for all parameters measured. For total energy intake, the novel sensor method exhibited good reproducibility (repeatability coefficient (RC) of 59.9 (45.9, 70.4), which was better than that for the diet diary [RC = 79.6 (55.5, 103.3)] but not as repeatable as the photographic method [RC = 43.4 (32.1, 53.9)]. Conclusion: Photographic food records offer superior precision to the diet diary and, therefore, would be valuable for longitudinal studies with repeated measures of dietary intake. A novel electronic sensor also shows promise for the collection of longitudinal dietary intake data. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/141983 Fontana, Juan Manuel; Pan, Zhaoxing; Sazonov, Edward S.; McCrory, Megan A.; Thomas, J. Graham; et al.; Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Nutrition; 7; 7-2020; 1-6 2296-861X CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/141983 |
identifier_str_mv |
Fontana, Juan Manuel; Pan, Zhaoxing; Sazonov, Edward S.; McCrory, Megan A.; Thomas, J. Graham; et al.; Reproducibility of Dietary Intake Measurement From Diet Diaries, Photographic Food Records, and a Novel Sensor Method; Frontiers Media; Frontiers in Nutrition; 7; 7-2020; 1-6 2296-861X CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnut.2020.00099/full info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.3389/fnut.2020.00099 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Frontiers Media |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614515097862144 |
score |
13.070432 |