Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of...

Autores
Bermejo Sánchez, Eva; Cuevas, Lourdes; Amar, Emmanuelle; Bianca, Sebastiano; Bianchi, Fabrizio; Botto, Lorenzo; Canfield, Mark A.; Castilla, Eduardo Enrique; Clementi, Maurizio; Cocchi, Guido; Landau, Danielle; Leoncini, Emanuele; Li, Zhu; Lowry, R. Brian; Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo; Mutchinick, Osvaldo M.; Rissmann, Anke; Ritvanen, Annukka; Scarano, Gioacchino; Siffel, Csaba; Szabova, Elena; Martínez Frías, María Luisa
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Epidemiologic data on phocomelia are scarce. This study presents an epidemiologic analysis of the largest series of phocomelia cases known to date. Data were provided by 19 birth defect surveillance programs, all members of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Depending on the program, data corresponded to a period from 1968 through 2006. A total of 22,740,933 live births, stillbirths and, for some programs, elective terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (ETOPFA) were monitored. After a detailed review of clinical data, only true phocomelia cases were included. Descriptive data are presented and additional analyses compared isolated cases with those with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), excluding syndromes. We also briefly compared congenital anomalies associated with nonsyndromic phocomelia with those presented with amelia, another rare severe congenital limb defect. A total of 141 phocomelia cases registered gave an overall total prevalence of 0.62 per 100,000 births (95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.73). Three programs (Australia Victoria, South America ECLAMC, Italy North East) had significantly different prevalence estimates. Most cases (53.2%) had isolated phocomelia, while 9.9% had syndromes. Most nonsyndromic cases were monomelic (55.9%), with an excess of left (64.9%) and upper limb (64.9%) involvement. Most nonsyndromic cases (66.9%) were live births; most isolated cases (57.9%) weighed more than 2,499g; most MCA (60.7%) weighed less than 2,500g, and were more likely stillbirths (30.8%) or ETOPFA (15.4%) than isolated cases. The most common associated defects were musculoskeletal, cardiac, and intestinal. Epidemiological differences between phocomelia and amelia highlighted possible differences in their causes.
Fil: Bermejo Sánchez, Eva. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras; España. Instituto de Salud Carlos III; España
Fil: Cuevas, Lourdes. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras; España. Instituto de Salud Carlos III; España
Fil: Amar, Emmanuelle. Rhone-alps Registry Of Birth Defects Remera; Francia
Fil: Bianca, Sebastiano. Centro Di Consulenza Genetica E Di Teratologia Della Riproduzione; Italia
Fil: Bianchi, Fabrizio. Centro di Consulenza Genetica e di Teratologia della Riproduzione; Italia
Fil: Botto, Lorenzo. University of Utah Health Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Canfield, Mark A.. Texas Department Of State Health Services; Estados Unidos
Fil: Castilla, Eduardo Enrique. Fundación Oswaldo Cruz; Brasil. Centro de Educación Medica E Invest.clinicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Clementi, Maurizio. Università di Padova; Italia
Fil: Cocchi, Guido. Universidad de Bologna; Italia
Fil: Landau, Danielle. Soroka University Medical Center; Israel
Fil: Leoncini, Emanuele. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; Italia
Fil: Li, Zhu. Peking University Health Science Center; China
Fil: Lowry, R. Brian. Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System; Canadá
Fil: Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; Italia
Fil: Mutchinick, Osvaldo M.. Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición Salvador Zubiran; México
Fil: Rissmann, Anke. Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg; Alemania
Fil: Ritvanen, Annukka. National Institute For Health And Welfare; Finlandia
Fil: Scarano, Gioacchino. General Hospital “G. Rummo” Benevento; Italia
Fil: Siffel, Csaba. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Estados Unidos
Fil: Szabova, Elena. Slovak Medical University; Eslovaquia
Fil: Martínez Frías, María Luisa. Instituto de Salud Carlos III; España. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras; España. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; España
Materia
EPIDEMIOLOGY
FREQUENCY
ICBDSR
PHOCOMELIA
PREVALENCE
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195593

id CONICETDig_c34fde02c5e0f0cc77b95945e9c73e72
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195593
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literatureBermejo Sánchez, EvaCuevas, LourdesAmar, EmmanuelleBianca, SebastianoBianchi, FabrizioBotto, LorenzoCanfield, Mark A.Castilla, Eduardo EnriqueClementi, MaurizioCocchi, GuidoLandau, DanielleLeoncini, EmanueleLi, ZhuLowry, R. BrianMastroiacovo, PierpaoloMutchinick, Osvaldo M.Rissmann, AnkeRitvanen, AnnukkaScarano, GioacchinoSiffel, CsabaSzabova, ElenaMartínez Frías, María LuisaEPIDEMIOLOGYFREQUENCYICBDSRPHOCOMELIAPREVALENCEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Epidemiologic data on phocomelia are scarce. This study presents an epidemiologic analysis of the largest series of phocomelia cases known to date. Data were provided by 19 birth defect surveillance programs, all members of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Depending on the program, data corresponded to a period from 1968 through 2006. A total of 22,740,933 live births, stillbirths and, for some programs, elective terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (ETOPFA) were monitored. After a detailed review of clinical data, only true phocomelia cases were included. Descriptive data are presented and additional analyses compared isolated cases with those with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), excluding syndromes. We also briefly compared congenital anomalies associated with nonsyndromic phocomelia with those presented with amelia, another rare severe congenital limb defect. A total of 141 phocomelia cases registered gave an overall total prevalence of 0.62 per 100,000 births (95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.73). Three programs (Australia Victoria, South America ECLAMC, Italy North East) had significantly different prevalence estimates. Most cases (53.2%) had isolated phocomelia, while 9.9% had syndromes. Most nonsyndromic cases were monomelic (55.9%), with an excess of left (64.9%) and upper limb (64.9%) involvement. Most nonsyndromic cases (66.9%) were live births; most isolated cases (57.9%) weighed more than 2,499g; most MCA (60.7%) weighed less than 2,500g, and were more likely stillbirths (30.8%) or ETOPFA (15.4%) than isolated cases. The most common associated defects were musculoskeletal, cardiac, and intestinal. Epidemiological differences between phocomelia and amelia highlighted possible differences in their causes.Fil: Bermejo Sánchez, Eva. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras; España. Instituto de Salud Carlos III; EspañaFil: Cuevas, Lourdes. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras; España. Instituto de Salud Carlos III; EspañaFil: Amar, Emmanuelle. Rhone-alps Registry Of Birth Defects Remera; FranciaFil: Bianca, Sebastiano. Centro Di Consulenza Genetica E Di Teratologia Della Riproduzione; ItaliaFil: Bianchi, Fabrizio. Centro di Consulenza Genetica e di Teratologia della Riproduzione; ItaliaFil: Botto, Lorenzo. University of Utah Health Sciences; Estados UnidosFil: Canfield, Mark A.. Texas Department Of State Health Services; Estados UnidosFil: Castilla, Eduardo Enrique. Fundación Oswaldo Cruz; Brasil. Centro de Educación Medica E Invest.clinicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Clementi, Maurizio. Università di Padova; ItaliaFil: Cocchi, Guido. Universidad de Bologna; ItaliaFil: Landau, Danielle. Soroka University Medical Center; IsraelFil: Leoncini, Emanuele. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; ItaliaFil: Li, Zhu. Peking University Health Science Center; ChinaFil: Lowry, R. Brian. Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System; CanadáFil: Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; ItaliaFil: Mutchinick, Osvaldo M.. Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición Salvador Zubiran; MéxicoFil: Rissmann, Anke. Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg; AlemaniaFil: Ritvanen, Annukka. National Institute For Health And Welfare; FinlandiaFil: Scarano, Gioacchino. General Hospital “G. Rummo” Benevento; ItaliaFil: Siffel, Csaba. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Estados UnidosFil: Szabova, Elena. Slovak Medical University; EslovaquiaFil: Martínez Frías, María Luisa. Instituto de Salud Carlos III; España. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras; España. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; EspañaWiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.2011-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/195593Bermejo Sánchez, Eva; Cuevas, Lourdes; Amar, Emmanuelle; Bianca, Sebastiano; Bianchi, Fabrizio; et al.; Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature; Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.; American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars In Medical Genetics; 157; 4; 8-2011; 305-3201552-4868CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajmg.c.30320info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/ajmg.c.30320info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:45:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195593instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:45:30.237CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature
title Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature
spellingShingle Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature
Bermejo Sánchez, Eva
EPIDEMIOLOGY
FREQUENCY
ICBDSR
PHOCOMELIA
PREVALENCE
title_short Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature
title_full Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature
title_fullStr Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature
title_sort Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bermejo Sánchez, Eva
Cuevas, Lourdes
Amar, Emmanuelle
Bianca, Sebastiano
Bianchi, Fabrizio
Botto, Lorenzo
Canfield, Mark A.
Castilla, Eduardo Enrique
Clementi, Maurizio
Cocchi, Guido
Landau, Danielle
Leoncini, Emanuele
Li, Zhu
Lowry, R. Brian
Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
Mutchinick, Osvaldo M.
Rissmann, Anke
Ritvanen, Annukka
Scarano, Gioacchino
Siffel, Csaba
Szabova, Elena
Martínez Frías, María Luisa
author Bermejo Sánchez, Eva
author_facet Bermejo Sánchez, Eva
Cuevas, Lourdes
Amar, Emmanuelle
Bianca, Sebastiano
Bianchi, Fabrizio
Botto, Lorenzo
Canfield, Mark A.
Castilla, Eduardo Enrique
Clementi, Maurizio
Cocchi, Guido
Landau, Danielle
Leoncini, Emanuele
Li, Zhu
Lowry, R. Brian
Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
Mutchinick, Osvaldo M.
Rissmann, Anke
Ritvanen, Annukka
Scarano, Gioacchino
Siffel, Csaba
Szabova, Elena
Martínez Frías, María Luisa
author_role author
author2 Cuevas, Lourdes
Amar, Emmanuelle
Bianca, Sebastiano
Bianchi, Fabrizio
Botto, Lorenzo
Canfield, Mark A.
Castilla, Eduardo Enrique
Clementi, Maurizio
Cocchi, Guido
Landau, Danielle
Leoncini, Emanuele
Li, Zhu
Lowry, R. Brian
Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo
Mutchinick, Osvaldo M.
Rissmann, Anke
Ritvanen, Annukka
Scarano, Gioacchino
Siffel, Csaba
Szabova, Elena
Martínez Frías, María Luisa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv EPIDEMIOLOGY
FREQUENCY
ICBDSR
PHOCOMELIA
PREVALENCE
topic EPIDEMIOLOGY
FREQUENCY
ICBDSR
PHOCOMELIA
PREVALENCE
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Epidemiologic data on phocomelia are scarce. This study presents an epidemiologic analysis of the largest series of phocomelia cases known to date. Data were provided by 19 birth defect surveillance programs, all members of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Depending on the program, data corresponded to a period from 1968 through 2006. A total of 22,740,933 live births, stillbirths and, for some programs, elective terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (ETOPFA) were monitored. After a detailed review of clinical data, only true phocomelia cases were included. Descriptive data are presented and additional analyses compared isolated cases with those with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), excluding syndromes. We also briefly compared congenital anomalies associated with nonsyndromic phocomelia with those presented with amelia, another rare severe congenital limb defect. A total of 141 phocomelia cases registered gave an overall total prevalence of 0.62 per 100,000 births (95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.73). Three programs (Australia Victoria, South America ECLAMC, Italy North East) had significantly different prevalence estimates. Most cases (53.2%) had isolated phocomelia, while 9.9% had syndromes. Most nonsyndromic cases were monomelic (55.9%), with an excess of left (64.9%) and upper limb (64.9%) involvement. Most nonsyndromic cases (66.9%) were live births; most isolated cases (57.9%) weighed more than 2,499g; most MCA (60.7%) weighed less than 2,500g, and were more likely stillbirths (30.8%) or ETOPFA (15.4%) than isolated cases. The most common associated defects were musculoskeletal, cardiac, and intestinal. Epidemiological differences between phocomelia and amelia highlighted possible differences in their causes.
Fil: Bermejo Sánchez, Eva. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras; España. Instituto de Salud Carlos III; España
Fil: Cuevas, Lourdes. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras; España. Instituto de Salud Carlos III; España
Fil: Amar, Emmanuelle. Rhone-alps Registry Of Birth Defects Remera; Francia
Fil: Bianca, Sebastiano. Centro Di Consulenza Genetica E Di Teratologia Della Riproduzione; Italia
Fil: Bianchi, Fabrizio. Centro di Consulenza Genetica e di Teratologia della Riproduzione; Italia
Fil: Botto, Lorenzo. University of Utah Health Sciences; Estados Unidos
Fil: Canfield, Mark A.. Texas Department Of State Health Services; Estados Unidos
Fil: Castilla, Eduardo Enrique. Fundación Oswaldo Cruz; Brasil. Centro de Educación Medica E Invest.clinicas; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Clementi, Maurizio. Università di Padova; Italia
Fil: Cocchi, Guido. Universidad de Bologna; Italia
Fil: Landau, Danielle. Soroka University Medical Center; Israel
Fil: Leoncini, Emanuele. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; Italia
Fil: Li, Zhu. Peking University Health Science Center; China
Fil: Lowry, R. Brian. Alberta Congenital Anomalies Surveillance System; Canadá
Fil: Mastroiacovo, Pierpaolo. Centre of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research; Italia
Fil: Mutchinick, Osvaldo M.. Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición Salvador Zubiran; México
Fil: Rissmann, Anke. Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg; Alemania
Fil: Ritvanen, Annukka. National Institute For Health And Welfare; Finlandia
Fil: Scarano, Gioacchino. General Hospital “G. Rummo” Benevento; Italia
Fil: Siffel, Csaba. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Estados Unidos
Fil: Szabova, Elena. Slovak Medical University; Eslovaquia
Fil: Martínez Frías, María Luisa. Instituto de Salud Carlos III; España. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras; España. Universidad Complutense de Madrid; España
description Epidemiologic data on phocomelia are scarce. This study presents an epidemiologic analysis of the largest series of phocomelia cases known to date. Data were provided by 19 birth defect surveillance programs, all members of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research. Depending on the program, data corresponded to a period from 1968 through 2006. A total of 22,740,933 live births, stillbirths and, for some programs, elective terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly (ETOPFA) were monitored. After a detailed review of clinical data, only true phocomelia cases were included. Descriptive data are presented and additional analyses compared isolated cases with those with multiple congenital anomalies (MCA), excluding syndromes. We also briefly compared congenital anomalies associated with nonsyndromic phocomelia with those presented with amelia, another rare severe congenital limb defect. A total of 141 phocomelia cases registered gave an overall total prevalence of 0.62 per 100,000 births (95% confidence interval: 0.52-0.73). Three programs (Australia Victoria, South America ECLAMC, Italy North East) had significantly different prevalence estimates. Most cases (53.2%) had isolated phocomelia, while 9.9% had syndromes. Most nonsyndromic cases were monomelic (55.9%), with an excess of left (64.9%) and upper limb (64.9%) involvement. Most nonsyndromic cases (66.9%) were live births; most isolated cases (57.9%) weighed more than 2,499g; most MCA (60.7%) weighed less than 2,500g, and were more likely stillbirths (30.8%) or ETOPFA (15.4%) than isolated cases. The most common associated defects were musculoskeletal, cardiac, and intestinal. Epidemiological differences between phocomelia and amelia highlighted possible differences in their causes.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195593
Bermejo Sánchez, Eva; Cuevas, Lourdes; Amar, Emmanuelle; Bianca, Sebastiano; Bianchi, Fabrizio; et al.; Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature; Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.; American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars In Medical Genetics; 157; 4; 8-2011; 305-320
1552-4868
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195593
identifier_str_mv Bermejo Sánchez, Eva; Cuevas, Lourdes; Amar, Emmanuelle; Bianca, Sebastiano; Bianchi, Fabrizio; et al.; Phocomelia: A worldwide descriptive epidemiologic study in a large series of cases from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and overview of the literature; Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.; American Journal Of Medical Genetics Part C-seminars In Medical Genetics; 157; 4; 8-2011; 305-320
1552-4868
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ajmg.c.30320
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1002/ajmg.c.30320
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley-liss, div John Wiley & Sons Inc.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083554922987520
score 13.22299