Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning

Autores
Linder, Jodell E.; Plachco, Tatyana E.; Libster, Romina Paula; Miller, E. Kathryn
Año de publicación
2015
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Human rhinoviruses (RV) are associated with the majority of viral respiratory illnesses in infants, children and adults. Over the last several years, researchers have begun to sequence the many different species and strains of RV in order to determine if certain species were associated with increased disease severity. There are a variety of techniques employed to prepare samples for sequencing. One method utilizes plasmid-cloning, which is expensive and takes several hours to complete. Recently, some investigators have instead used direct sequencing to sequence RV strains, allowing for omission of the time- and labor-intensive cloning step. This study formally compares and contrasts the sequencing results obtained from plasmid-cloning and direct Sanger sequencing of a 500 base pair PCR product covering the VP4/VP2 region of RV. A slightly longer sequence (by 65 base pairs on average) was obtained when specimens were plasmid-cloned, and the sequences were 86% similar. After trimming the extra base pairs from the cloned sequences, the sequences were 99.7% identical. Overall success of directly sequencing samples was similar to that of cloning, 5% on average failed for each technique. Therefore, in many instances, directly sequencing samples may be considered in lieu of the more expensive and time-consuming plasmid-cloning technique.
Fil: Linder, Jodell E.. Vanderbilt University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Plachco, Tatyana E.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría ; Argentina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital Materno Infantil “Ramón Sardá”; Argentina
Fil: Libster, Romina Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; Argentina
Fil: Miller, E. Kathryn. Vanderbilt University; Estados Unidos
Materia
Clone
Plasmid
Rhinovirus
Rv
Rv-C
Sequencing
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/37730

id CONICETDig_c1f431271957fd8966d8b4ec5c807fbd
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/37730
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloningLinder, Jodell E.Plachco, Tatyana E.Libster, Romina PaulaMiller, E. KathrynClonePlasmidRhinovirusRvRv-CSequencinghttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Human rhinoviruses (RV) are associated with the majority of viral respiratory illnesses in infants, children and adults. Over the last several years, researchers have begun to sequence the many different species and strains of RV in order to determine if certain species were associated with increased disease severity. There are a variety of techniques employed to prepare samples for sequencing. One method utilizes plasmid-cloning, which is expensive and takes several hours to complete. Recently, some investigators have instead used direct sequencing to sequence RV strains, allowing for omission of the time- and labor-intensive cloning step. This study formally compares and contrasts the sequencing results obtained from plasmid-cloning and direct Sanger sequencing of a 500 base pair PCR product covering the VP4/VP2 region of RV. A slightly longer sequence (by 65 base pairs on average) was obtained when specimens were plasmid-cloned, and the sequences were 86% similar. After trimming the extra base pairs from the cloned sequences, the sequences were 99.7% identical. Overall success of directly sequencing samples was similar to that of cloning, 5% on average failed for each technique. Therefore, in many instances, directly sequencing samples may be considered in lieu of the more expensive and time-consuming plasmid-cloning technique.Fil: Linder, Jodell E.. Vanderbilt University; Estados UnidosFil: Plachco, Tatyana E.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría ; Argentina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital Materno Infantil “Ramón Sardá”; ArgentinaFil: Libster, Romina Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Miller, E. Kathryn. Vanderbilt University; Estados UnidosElsevier Science2015-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/37730Linder, Jodell E.; Plachco, Tatyana E.; Libster, Romina Paula; Miller, E. Kathryn; Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning; Elsevier Science; Journal of Virological Methods; 211; 1-2015; 64-690166-0934CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093414003759info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.09.020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:42:37Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/37730instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:42:38.25CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning
title Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning
spellingShingle Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning
Linder, Jodell E.
Clone
Plasmid
Rhinovirus
Rv
Rv-C
Sequencing
title_short Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning
title_full Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning
title_fullStr Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning
title_full_unstemmed Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning
title_sort Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Linder, Jodell E.
Plachco, Tatyana E.
Libster, Romina Paula
Miller, E. Kathryn
author Linder, Jodell E.
author_facet Linder, Jodell E.
Plachco, Tatyana E.
Libster, Romina Paula
Miller, E. Kathryn
author_role author
author2 Plachco, Tatyana E.
Libster, Romina Paula
Miller, E. Kathryn
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Clone
Plasmid
Rhinovirus
Rv
Rv-C
Sequencing
topic Clone
Plasmid
Rhinovirus
Rv
Rv-C
Sequencing
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Human rhinoviruses (RV) are associated with the majority of viral respiratory illnesses in infants, children and adults. Over the last several years, researchers have begun to sequence the many different species and strains of RV in order to determine if certain species were associated with increased disease severity. There are a variety of techniques employed to prepare samples for sequencing. One method utilizes plasmid-cloning, which is expensive and takes several hours to complete. Recently, some investigators have instead used direct sequencing to sequence RV strains, allowing for omission of the time- and labor-intensive cloning step. This study formally compares and contrasts the sequencing results obtained from plasmid-cloning and direct Sanger sequencing of a 500 base pair PCR product covering the VP4/VP2 region of RV. A slightly longer sequence (by 65 base pairs on average) was obtained when specimens were plasmid-cloned, and the sequences were 86% similar. After trimming the extra base pairs from the cloned sequences, the sequences were 99.7% identical. Overall success of directly sequencing samples was similar to that of cloning, 5% on average failed for each technique. Therefore, in many instances, directly sequencing samples may be considered in lieu of the more expensive and time-consuming plasmid-cloning technique.
Fil: Linder, Jodell E.. Vanderbilt University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Plachco, Tatyana E.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría ; Argentina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital Materno Infantil “Ramón Sardá”; Argentina
Fil: Libster, Romina Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; Argentina
Fil: Miller, E. Kathryn. Vanderbilt University; Estados Unidos
description Human rhinoviruses (RV) are associated with the majority of viral respiratory illnesses in infants, children and adults. Over the last several years, researchers have begun to sequence the many different species and strains of RV in order to determine if certain species were associated with increased disease severity. There are a variety of techniques employed to prepare samples for sequencing. One method utilizes plasmid-cloning, which is expensive and takes several hours to complete. Recently, some investigators have instead used direct sequencing to sequence RV strains, allowing for omission of the time- and labor-intensive cloning step. This study formally compares and contrasts the sequencing results obtained from plasmid-cloning and direct Sanger sequencing of a 500 base pair PCR product covering the VP4/VP2 region of RV. A slightly longer sequence (by 65 base pairs on average) was obtained when specimens were plasmid-cloned, and the sequences were 86% similar. After trimming the extra base pairs from the cloned sequences, the sequences were 99.7% identical. Overall success of directly sequencing samples was similar to that of cloning, 5% on average failed for each technique. Therefore, in many instances, directly sequencing samples may be considered in lieu of the more expensive and time-consuming plasmid-cloning technique.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/37730
Linder, Jodell E.; Plachco, Tatyana E.; Libster, Romina Paula; Miller, E. Kathryn; Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning; Elsevier Science; Journal of Virological Methods; 211; 1-2015; 64-69
0166-0934
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/37730
identifier_str_mv Linder, Jodell E.; Plachco, Tatyana E.; Libster, Romina Paula; Miller, E. Kathryn; Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning; Elsevier Science; Journal of Virological Methods; 211; 1-2015; 64-69
0166-0934
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093414003759
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.09.020
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Science
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782114563883008
score 12.982451