Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning
- Autores
- Linder, Jodell E.; Plachco, Tatyana E.; Libster, Romina Paula; Miller, E. Kathryn
- Año de publicación
- 2015
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Human rhinoviruses (RV) are associated with the majority of viral respiratory illnesses in infants, children and adults. Over the last several years, researchers have begun to sequence the many different species and strains of RV in order to determine if certain species were associated with increased disease severity. There are a variety of techniques employed to prepare samples for sequencing. One method utilizes plasmid-cloning, which is expensive and takes several hours to complete. Recently, some investigators have instead used direct sequencing to sequence RV strains, allowing for omission of the time- and labor-intensive cloning step. This study formally compares and contrasts the sequencing results obtained from plasmid-cloning and direct Sanger sequencing of a 500 base pair PCR product covering the VP4/VP2 region of RV. A slightly longer sequence (by 65 base pairs on average) was obtained when specimens were plasmid-cloned, and the sequences were 86% similar. After trimming the extra base pairs from the cloned sequences, the sequences were 99.7% identical. Overall success of directly sequencing samples was similar to that of cloning, 5% on average failed for each technique. Therefore, in many instances, directly sequencing samples may be considered in lieu of the more expensive and time-consuming plasmid-cloning technique.
Fil: Linder, Jodell E.. Vanderbilt University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Plachco, Tatyana E.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría ; Argentina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital Materno Infantil “Ramón Sardá”; Argentina
Fil: Libster, Romina Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; Argentina
Fil: Miller, E. Kathryn. Vanderbilt University; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
Clone
Plasmid
Rhinovirus
Rv
Rv-C
Sequencing - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/37730
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_c1f431271957fd8966d8b4ec5c807fbd |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/37730 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloningLinder, Jodell E.Plachco, Tatyana E.Libster, Romina PaulaMiller, E. KathrynClonePlasmidRhinovirusRvRv-CSequencinghttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Human rhinoviruses (RV) are associated with the majority of viral respiratory illnesses in infants, children and adults. Over the last several years, researchers have begun to sequence the many different species and strains of RV in order to determine if certain species were associated with increased disease severity. There are a variety of techniques employed to prepare samples for sequencing. One method utilizes plasmid-cloning, which is expensive and takes several hours to complete. Recently, some investigators have instead used direct sequencing to sequence RV strains, allowing for omission of the time- and labor-intensive cloning step. This study formally compares and contrasts the sequencing results obtained from plasmid-cloning and direct Sanger sequencing of a 500 base pair PCR product covering the VP4/VP2 region of RV. A slightly longer sequence (by 65 base pairs on average) was obtained when specimens were plasmid-cloned, and the sequences were 86% similar. After trimming the extra base pairs from the cloned sequences, the sequences were 99.7% identical. Overall success of directly sequencing samples was similar to that of cloning, 5% on average failed for each technique. Therefore, in many instances, directly sequencing samples may be considered in lieu of the more expensive and time-consuming plasmid-cloning technique.Fil: Linder, Jodell E.. Vanderbilt University; Estados UnidosFil: Plachco, Tatyana E.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría ; Argentina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital Materno Infantil “Ramón Sardá”; ArgentinaFil: Libster, Romina Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; ArgentinaFil: Miller, E. Kathryn. Vanderbilt University; Estados UnidosElsevier Science2015-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/37730Linder, Jodell E.; Plachco, Tatyana E.; Libster, Romina Paula; Miller, E. Kathryn; Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning; Elsevier Science; Journal of Virological Methods; 211; 1-2015; 64-690166-0934CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093414003759info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.09.020info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:42:37Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/37730instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:42:38.25CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning |
| title |
Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning |
| spellingShingle |
Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning Linder, Jodell E. Clone Plasmid Rhinovirus Rv Rv-C Sequencing |
| title_short |
Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning |
| title_full |
Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning |
| title_fullStr |
Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning |
| title_sort |
Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Linder, Jodell E. Plachco, Tatyana E. Libster, Romina Paula Miller, E. Kathryn |
| author |
Linder, Jodell E. |
| author_facet |
Linder, Jodell E. Plachco, Tatyana E. Libster, Romina Paula Miller, E. Kathryn |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Plachco, Tatyana E. Libster, Romina Paula Miller, E. Kathryn |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Clone Plasmid Rhinovirus Rv Rv-C Sequencing |
| topic |
Clone Plasmid Rhinovirus Rv Rv-C Sequencing |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Human rhinoviruses (RV) are associated with the majority of viral respiratory illnesses in infants, children and adults. Over the last several years, researchers have begun to sequence the many different species and strains of RV in order to determine if certain species were associated with increased disease severity. There are a variety of techniques employed to prepare samples for sequencing. One method utilizes plasmid-cloning, which is expensive and takes several hours to complete. Recently, some investigators have instead used direct sequencing to sequence RV strains, allowing for omission of the time- and labor-intensive cloning step. This study formally compares and contrasts the sequencing results obtained from plasmid-cloning and direct Sanger sequencing of a 500 base pair PCR product covering the VP4/VP2 region of RV. A slightly longer sequence (by 65 base pairs on average) was obtained when specimens were plasmid-cloned, and the sequences were 86% similar. After trimming the extra base pairs from the cloned sequences, the sequences were 99.7% identical. Overall success of directly sequencing samples was similar to that of cloning, 5% on average failed for each technique. Therefore, in many instances, directly sequencing samples may be considered in lieu of the more expensive and time-consuming plasmid-cloning technique. Fil: Linder, Jodell E.. Vanderbilt University; Estados Unidos Fil: Plachco, Tatyana E.. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital de Pediatría ; Argentina. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Hospital Materno Infantil “Ramón Sardá”; Argentina Fil: Libster, Romina Paula. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Fundación para la Investigación en Infectología Infantil; Argentina Fil: Miller, E. Kathryn. Vanderbilt University; Estados Unidos |
| description |
Human rhinoviruses (RV) are associated with the majority of viral respiratory illnesses in infants, children and adults. Over the last several years, researchers have begun to sequence the many different species and strains of RV in order to determine if certain species were associated with increased disease severity. There are a variety of techniques employed to prepare samples for sequencing. One method utilizes plasmid-cloning, which is expensive and takes several hours to complete. Recently, some investigators have instead used direct sequencing to sequence RV strains, allowing for omission of the time- and labor-intensive cloning step. This study formally compares and contrasts the sequencing results obtained from plasmid-cloning and direct Sanger sequencing of a 500 base pair PCR product covering the VP4/VP2 region of RV. A slightly longer sequence (by 65 base pairs on average) was obtained when specimens were plasmid-cloned, and the sequences were 86% similar. After trimming the extra base pairs from the cloned sequences, the sequences were 99.7% identical. Overall success of directly sequencing samples was similar to that of cloning, 5% on average failed for each technique. Therefore, in many instances, directly sequencing samples may be considered in lieu of the more expensive and time-consuming plasmid-cloning technique. |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-01 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/37730 Linder, Jodell E.; Plachco, Tatyana E.; Libster, Romina Paula; Miller, E. Kathryn; Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning; Elsevier Science; Journal of Virological Methods; 211; 1-2015; 64-69 0166-0934 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/37730 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Linder, Jodell E.; Plachco, Tatyana E.; Libster, Romina Paula; Miller, E. Kathryn; Sequencing human rhinoviruses: Direct sequencing versus plasmid cloning; Elsevier Science; Journal of Virological Methods; 211; 1-2015; 64-69 0166-0934 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166093414003759 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.09.020 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1846782114563883008 |
| score |
12.982451 |