Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy

Autores
Orensanz, Martín
Año de publicación
2020
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Even though Quentin Meillassoux's philosophy is still in the making, to use Graham Harman's (2015) expression, it has garnered sufficient attention to become the topic of an ever-growing body of specialized literature. Here we wish to make a contribution in that direction. We offer an examination of Meillassoux's definition of philosophy as "the invention of strange forms of argumentation”. We compare and contrast this definition to the one that has been offered by Deleuze & Guattari in What is Philosophy? We then provide an example of his metaphilosophy by evaluating his potential to become a philosophical heir to Alain Badiou. We explain why this may be the case, highlighting features of a situation that we will name "the Continental Expectation”, and then linking that situation to the contents of Meillassoux's philosophy.
Fil: Orensanz, Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Biología. Laboratorio de Zoonosis Parasitarias; Argentina
Materia
SPECULATIVE REALISM
QUENTIN MEILLASSOUX
METAPHILOSOPHY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/174525
Acceder
id CONICETDig_bc49c7481e07474dc3066c95f61ceb9c
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/174525
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of PhilosophyOrensanz, MartínSPECULATIVE REALISMQUENTIN MEILLASSOUXMETAPHILOSOPHYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6Even though Quentin Meillassoux's philosophy is still in the making, to use Graham Harman's (2015) expression, it has garnered sufficient attention to become the topic of an ever-growing body of specialized literature. Here we wish to make a contribution in that direction. We offer an examination of Meillassoux's definition of philosophy as "the invention of strange forms of argumentation”. We compare and contrast this definition to the one that has been offered by Deleuze & Guattari in What is Philosophy? We then provide an example of his metaphilosophy by evaluating his potential to become a philosophical heir to Alain Badiou. We explain why this may be the case, highlighting features of a situation that we will name "the Continental Expectation”, and then linking that situation to the contents of Meillassoux's philosophy.Fil: Orensanz, Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Biología. Laboratorio de Zoonosis Parasitarias; ArgentinaOpen Humanities Press2020-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/174525Orensanz, Martín; Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy; Open Humanities Press; Cosmos and History; 16; 1; 3-2020; 271-2971832-9101CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/828info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:06:58Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/174525instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:06:58.67CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy
title Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy
spellingShingle Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy
Orensanz, Martín
SPECULATIVE REALISM
QUENTIN MEILLASSOUX
METAPHILOSOPHY
title_short Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy
title_full Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy
title_fullStr Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy
title_full_unstemmed Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy
title_sort Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Orensanz, Martín
author Orensanz, Martín
author_facet Orensanz, Martín
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SPECULATIVE REALISM
QUENTIN MEILLASSOUX
METAPHILOSOPHY
topic SPECULATIVE REALISM
QUENTIN MEILLASSOUX
METAPHILOSOPHY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Even though Quentin Meillassoux's philosophy is still in the making, to use Graham Harman's (2015) expression, it has garnered sufficient attention to become the topic of an ever-growing body of specialized literature. Here we wish to make a contribution in that direction. We offer an examination of Meillassoux's definition of philosophy as "the invention of strange forms of argumentation”. We compare and contrast this definition to the one that has been offered by Deleuze & Guattari in What is Philosophy? We then provide an example of his metaphilosophy by evaluating his potential to become a philosophical heir to Alain Badiou. We explain why this may be the case, highlighting features of a situation that we will name "the Continental Expectation”, and then linking that situation to the contents of Meillassoux's philosophy.
Fil: Orensanz, Martín. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mar del Plata; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Biología. Laboratorio de Zoonosis Parasitarias; Argentina
description Even though Quentin Meillassoux's philosophy is still in the making, to use Graham Harman's (2015) expression, it has garnered sufficient attention to become the topic of an ever-growing body of specialized literature. Here we wish to make a contribution in that direction. We offer an examination of Meillassoux's definition of philosophy as "the invention of strange forms of argumentation”. We compare and contrast this definition to the one that has been offered by Deleuze & Guattari in What is Philosophy? We then provide an example of his metaphilosophy by evaluating his potential to become a philosophical heir to Alain Badiou. We explain why this may be the case, highlighting features of a situation that we will name "the Continental Expectation”, and then linking that situation to the contents of Meillassoux's philosophy.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/174525
Orensanz, Martín; Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy; Open Humanities Press; Cosmos and History; 16; 1; 3-2020; 271-297
1832-9101
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/174525
identifier_str_mv Orensanz, Martín; Strange Forms of Argumentation: On Meillassoux's Definition of Philosophy; Open Humanities Press; Cosmos and History; 16; 1; 3-2020; 271-297
1832-9101
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/828
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Open Humanities Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Open Humanities Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269984242270208
score 12.885934

Publicaciones similares