Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2

Autores
Mie, Fabian Gustavo; Berrón, Manuel
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The main concern of this paper is the problem of method in De Caelo (Book 2 and some related treatises), which has been recently invigorated by the supposition of Aristotle’s acceptance of two standards of justification. Whereas the φυσικῶς argument comes close to demonstrative knowledge, the εὐλόγως argument relies on more general assumptions and allegedly points towards argumentative justification (sometimes associated with dialectic). With a view to better understanding how empirical criteria for theories, teleological principles, and the resolution of difficulties are laid down to provide as much causal explanations as possible, we take side here in the debate about the very purpose of Aristotle’s using of justification by argument in scientific contexts. Our main claim is that although only reasonable proofs can be worked out in empirically underdetermined domains, this in no way amounts to endorsing an alternative to the norms of inquiry Aristotle upholds in natural science.
Fil: Mie, Fabian Gustavo. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina
Fil: Berrón, Manuel. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina
Materia
DE CAELO
ARGUMENTS
CAUSAL EXPLANATION
INQUIRY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/212269
Acceder
id CONICETDig_bc2d784b3720ccac3888283ec76bbca8
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/212269
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2Mie, Fabian GustavoBerrón, ManuelDE CAELOARGUMENTSCAUSAL EXPLANATIONINQUIRYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The main concern of this paper is the problem of method in De Caelo (Book 2 and some related treatises), which has been recently invigorated by the supposition of Aristotle’s acceptance of two standards of justification. Whereas the φυσικῶς argument comes close to demonstrative knowledge, the εὐλόγως argument relies on more general assumptions and allegedly points towards argumentative justification (sometimes associated with dialectic). With a view to better understanding how empirical criteria for theories, teleological principles, and the resolution of difficulties are laid down to provide as much causal explanations as possible, we take side here in the debate about the very purpose of Aristotle’s using of justification by argument in scientific contexts. Our main claim is that although only reasonable proofs can be worked out in empirically underdetermined domains, this in no way amounts to endorsing an alternative to the norms of inquiry Aristotle upholds in natural science.Fil: Mie, Fabian Gustavo. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; ArgentinaFil: Berrón, Manuel. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; ArgentinaUniversidade de Sao Paulo2022-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/212269Mie, Fabian Gustavo; Berrón, Manuel; Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Journal of Ancient Philosophy; 16; 1; 4-2022; 51-871981-94711981-9498CONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/196693info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v16i1p51-87info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:28:12Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/212269instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:28:13.182CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2
title Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2
spellingShingle Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2
Mie, Fabian Gustavo
DE CAELO
ARGUMENTS
CAUSAL EXPLANATION
INQUIRY
title_short Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2
title_full Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2
title_fullStr Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2
title_full_unstemmed Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2
title_sort Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mie, Fabian Gustavo
Berrón, Manuel
author Mie, Fabian Gustavo
author_facet Mie, Fabian Gustavo
Berrón, Manuel
author_role author
author2 Berrón, Manuel
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DE CAELO
ARGUMENTS
CAUSAL EXPLANATION
INQUIRY
topic DE CAELO
ARGUMENTS
CAUSAL EXPLANATION
INQUIRY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The main concern of this paper is the problem of method in De Caelo (Book 2 and some related treatises), which has been recently invigorated by the supposition of Aristotle’s acceptance of two standards of justification. Whereas the φυσικῶς argument comes close to demonstrative knowledge, the εὐλόγως argument relies on more general assumptions and allegedly points towards argumentative justification (sometimes associated with dialectic). With a view to better understanding how empirical criteria for theories, teleological principles, and the resolution of difficulties are laid down to provide as much causal explanations as possible, we take side here in the debate about the very purpose of Aristotle’s using of justification by argument in scientific contexts. Our main claim is that although only reasonable proofs can be worked out in empirically underdetermined domains, this in no way amounts to endorsing an alternative to the norms of inquiry Aristotle upholds in natural science.
Fil: Mie, Fabian Gustavo. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina
Fil: Berrón, Manuel. Universidad Nacional del Litoral. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales del Litoral; Argentina
description The main concern of this paper is the problem of method in De Caelo (Book 2 and some related treatises), which has been recently invigorated by the supposition of Aristotle’s acceptance of two standards of justification. Whereas the φυσικῶς argument comes close to demonstrative knowledge, the εὐλόγως argument relies on more general assumptions and allegedly points towards argumentative justification (sometimes associated with dialectic). With a view to better understanding how empirical criteria for theories, teleological principles, and the resolution of difficulties are laid down to provide as much causal explanations as possible, we take side here in the debate about the very purpose of Aristotle’s using of justification by argument in scientific contexts. Our main claim is that although only reasonable proofs can be worked out in empirically underdetermined domains, this in no way amounts to endorsing an alternative to the norms of inquiry Aristotle upholds in natural science.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/212269
Mie, Fabian Gustavo; Berrón, Manuel; Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Journal of Ancient Philosophy; 16; 1; 4-2022; 51-87
1981-9471
1981-9498
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/212269
identifier_str_mv Mie, Fabian Gustavo; Berrón, Manuel; Argumentos y Explicaciones en De Caelo 2; Universidade de Sao Paulo; Journal of Ancient Philosophy; 16; 1; 4-2022; 51-87
1981-9471
1981-9498
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.revistas.usp.br/filosofiaantiga/article/view/196693
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.11606/issn.1981-9471.v16i1p51-87
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Sao Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Sao Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082744805752832
score 13.221938

Publicaciones similares