Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion
- Autores
- Pérez García, Juan M.; Morant, Jon; Arrondo, Eneko; Sebastián González, Esther; Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin; Santangeli, Andrea; Margalida, Antoni; Sánchez Zapata, José A.; Blanco, Guillermo; Donázar, José A.; Carrete, Martina; Serrano, David
- Año de publicación
- 2022
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- There is broad consensus that increasing the use of renewable energies is effective to mitigate the global climate crisis. However, the development of renewables may carry environmental impacts, and their expansion could accelerate biodiversity loss (1). However, Dunnett et al. (2) haverecently estimated a minimal overlap between renewable energy expansion and important conservation areas (ICAs; i.e., protected areas, key biodiversity areas, wildernessareas) (sensu ref. 2), suggesting that these infrastructures would not significantly affect biodiversity conservation if properly planned and regulated. Assessing the impacts of renewables on biodiversity only in terms of their spatial overlap with ICAs ignores that these impacts on species and functional groups are asymmetric. Long-lived species are highly vulnerable to the loss of specific habitats or to nonnatural mortality, and these factors should be considered when studying conflicts between renewables and biodiversity (3). For instance, one of the most concerning impacts of wind farms, which have dramatically multiplied worldwide in recent years (Fig. 1 A and B), is the nonnatural mortality of highly mobile flying species, such as birds (4) and bats (5), due to collisions with turbines (Fig. 1 C and D). Many of these species spend a large part of their life cycle outside ICAs (6, 7), where mortality caused by infrastructures can extirpate populations at regional scales and even within ICAs (8). Consequently, thinking that we canrely only on ICAs for the protection of these species is very risky and may obscure the real magnitude of the threat posed by renewable energy development.
Fil: Pérez García, Juan M.. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España
Fil: Morant, Jon. Aranzadi Sciences Society; España
Fil: Arrondo, Eneko. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España
Fil: Sebastián González, Esther. Universidad de Alicante; España
Fil: Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina
Fil: Santangeli, Andrea. University of Helsinki; Finlandia. University of Cape Town; Sudáfrica
Fil: Margalida, Antoni. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha; España
Fil: Sánchez Zapata, José A.. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España
Fil: Blanco, Guillermo. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales; España
Fil: Donázar, José A.. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España
Fil: Carrete, Martina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Pablo de Olavide; España
Fil: Serrano, David. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España - Materia
-
CONSERVATION
WIND FARMS
ENERGY
BIRDS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/205675
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_bb6bfc8cb392d4bb53f8b3a9ae991ed1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/205675 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansionPérez García, Juan M.Morant, JonArrondo, EnekoSebastián González, EstherLambertucci, Sergio AgustinSantangeli, AndreaMargalida, AntoniSánchez Zapata, José A.Blanco, GuillermoDonázar, José A.Carrete, MartinaSerrano, DavidCONSERVATIONWIND FARMSENERGYBIRDShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1There is broad consensus that increasing the use of renewable energies is effective to mitigate the global climate crisis. However, the development of renewables may carry environmental impacts, and their expansion could accelerate biodiversity loss (1). However, Dunnett et al. (2) haverecently estimated a minimal overlap between renewable energy expansion and important conservation areas (ICAs; i.e., protected areas, key biodiversity areas, wildernessareas) (sensu ref. 2), suggesting that these infrastructures would not significantly affect biodiversity conservation if properly planned and regulated. Assessing the impacts of renewables on biodiversity only in terms of their spatial overlap with ICAs ignores that these impacts on species and functional groups are asymmetric. Long-lived species are highly vulnerable to the loss of specific habitats or to nonnatural mortality, and these factors should be considered when studying conflicts between renewables and biodiversity (3). For instance, one of the most concerning impacts of wind farms, which have dramatically multiplied worldwide in recent years (Fig. 1 A and B), is the nonnatural mortality of highly mobile flying species, such as birds (4) and bats (5), due to collisions with turbines (Fig. 1 C and D). Many of these species spend a large part of their life cycle outside ICAs (6, 7), where mortality caused by infrastructures can extirpate populations at regional scales and even within ICAs (8). Consequently, thinking that we canrely only on ICAs for the protection of these species is very risky and may obscure the real magnitude of the threat posed by renewable energy development.Fil: Pérez García, Juan M.. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; EspañaFil: Morant, Jon. Aranzadi Sciences Society; EspañaFil: Arrondo, Eneko. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; EspañaFil: Sebastián González, Esther. Universidad de Alicante; EspañaFil: Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; ArgentinaFil: Santangeli, Andrea. University of Helsinki; Finlandia. University of Cape Town; SudáfricaFil: Margalida, Antoni. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha; EspañaFil: Sánchez Zapata, José A.. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; EspañaFil: Blanco, Guillermo. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales; EspañaFil: Donázar, José A.. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaFil: Carrete, Martina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Pablo de Olavide; EspañaFil: Serrano, David. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; EspañaNational Academy of Sciences2022-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/205675Pérez García, Juan M.; Morant, Jon; Arrondo, Eneko; Sebastián González, Esther; Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin; et al.; Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion; National Academy of Sciences; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America; 119; 33; 8-2022; 1-20027-84241091-6490CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2204505119info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1073/pnas.2204505119info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:05:44Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/205675instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:05:44.585CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion |
title |
Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion |
spellingShingle |
Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion Pérez García, Juan M. CONSERVATION WIND FARMS ENERGY BIRDS |
title_short |
Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion |
title_full |
Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion |
title_fullStr |
Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion |
title_full_unstemmed |
Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion |
title_sort |
Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Pérez García, Juan M. Morant, Jon Arrondo, Eneko Sebastián González, Esther Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin Santangeli, Andrea Margalida, Antoni Sánchez Zapata, José A. Blanco, Guillermo Donázar, José A. Carrete, Martina Serrano, David |
author |
Pérez García, Juan M. |
author_facet |
Pérez García, Juan M. Morant, Jon Arrondo, Eneko Sebastián González, Esther Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin Santangeli, Andrea Margalida, Antoni Sánchez Zapata, José A. Blanco, Guillermo Donázar, José A. Carrete, Martina Serrano, David |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Morant, Jon Arrondo, Eneko Sebastián González, Esther Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin Santangeli, Andrea Margalida, Antoni Sánchez Zapata, José A. Blanco, Guillermo Donázar, José A. Carrete, Martina Serrano, David |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CONSERVATION WIND FARMS ENERGY BIRDS |
topic |
CONSERVATION WIND FARMS ENERGY BIRDS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
There is broad consensus that increasing the use of renewable energies is effective to mitigate the global climate crisis. However, the development of renewables may carry environmental impacts, and their expansion could accelerate biodiversity loss (1). However, Dunnett et al. (2) haverecently estimated a minimal overlap between renewable energy expansion and important conservation areas (ICAs; i.e., protected areas, key biodiversity areas, wildernessareas) (sensu ref. 2), suggesting that these infrastructures would not significantly affect biodiversity conservation if properly planned and regulated. Assessing the impacts of renewables on biodiversity only in terms of their spatial overlap with ICAs ignores that these impacts on species and functional groups are asymmetric. Long-lived species are highly vulnerable to the loss of specific habitats or to nonnatural mortality, and these factors should be considered when studying conflicts between renewables and biodiversity (3). For instance, one of the most concerning impacts of wind farms, which have dramatically multiplied worldwide in recent years (Fig. 1 A and B), is the nonnatural mortality of highly mobile flying species, such as birds (4) and bats (5), due to collisions with turbines (Fig. 1 C and D). Many of these species spend a large part of their life cycle outside ICAs (6, 7), where mortality caused by infrastructures can extirpate populations at regional scales and even within ICAs (8). Consequently, thinking that we canrely only on ICAs for the protection of these species is very risky and may obscure the real magnitude of the threat posed by renewable energy development. Fil: Pérez García, Juan M.. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España Fil: Morant, Jon. Aranzadi Sciences Society; España Fil: Arrondo, Eneko. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España Fil: Sebastián González, Esther. Universidad de Alicante; España Fil: Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Patagonia Norte. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente. Universidad Nacional del Comahue. Centro Regional Universidad Bariloche. Instituto de Investigaciones en Biodiversidad y Medioambiente; Argentina Fil: Santangeli, Andrea. University of Helsinki; Finlandia. University of Cape Town; Sudáfrica Fil: Margalida, Antoni. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España. Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha; España Fil: Sánchez Zapata, José A.. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España Fil: Blanco, Guillermo. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales; España Fil: Donázar, José A.. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España Fil: Carrete, Martina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Pablo de Olavide; España Fil: Serrano, David. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas; España |
description |
There is broad consensus that increasing the use of renewable energies is effective to mitigate the global climate crisis. However, the development of renewables may carry environmental impacts, and their expansion could accelerate biodiversity loss (1). However, Dunnett et al. (2) haverecently estimated a minimal overlap between renewable energy expansion and important conservation areas (ICAs; i.e., protected areas, key biodiversity areas, wildernessareas) (sensu ref. 2), suggesting that these infrastructures would not significantly affect biodiversity conservation if properly planned and regulated. Assessing the impacts of renewables on biodiversity only in terms of their spatial overlap with ICAs ignores that these impacts on species and functional groups are asymmetric. Long-lived species are highly vulnerable to the loss of specific habitats or to nonnatural mortality, and these factors should be considered when studying conflicts between renewables and biodiversity (3). For instance, one of the most concerning impacts of wind farms, which have dramatically multiplied worldwide in recent years (Fig. 1 A and B), is the nonnatural mortality of highly mobile flying species, such as birds (4) and bats (5), due to collisions with turbines (Fig. 1 C and D). Many of these species spend a large part of their life cycle outside ICAs (6, 7), where mortality caused by infrastructures can extirpate populations at regional scales and even within ICAs (8). Consequently, thinking that we canrely only on ICAs for the protection of these species is very risky and may obscure the real magnitude of the threat posed by renewable energy development. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/205675 Pérez García, Juan M.; Morant, Jon; Arrondo, Eneko; Sebastián González, Esther; Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin; et al.; Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion; National Academy of Sciences; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America; 119; 33; 8-2022; 1-2 0027-8424 1091-6490 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/205675 |
identifier_str_mv |
Pérez García, Juan M.; Morant, Jon; Arrondo, Eneko; Sebastián González, Esther; Lambertucci, Sergio Agustin; et al.; Priority areas for conservation alone are not a good proxy for predicting the impact of renewable energy expansion; National Academy of Sciences; Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of The United States of America; 119; 33; 8-2022; 1-2 0027-8424 1091-6490 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2204505119 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1073/pnas.2204505119 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
National Academy of Sciences |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
National Academy of Sciences |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613897173073920 |
score |
13.070432 |