Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests
- Autores
- Prieto Torres, David Alexander; Nori, Javier; Rojas Soto Octavio R
- Año de publicación
- 2018
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Neotropical dry forests (NDF) are widely distributed and possess important levels of species richness and endemism; however, they are considered a highly endangered ecosystem. Today, the protected areas network (PAs) located within NDF covers <10% of the total forests' extent; and it's still unknown if PAs adequately represent its biodiversity. Thus, we selected 695 bird species associated to NDF and used ZONATION software to assess the species distribution's representativeness within the PAs network. Additionally, we defined priority conservation areas to strategically expand the current PAs considering the most important human pressures. Current PAs cover only 8.4% of NDF and represent on average ~10% of the total distribution of avifauna inhabiting these forests. Approximately 19% of NDF's birds possess <5% of their distribution represented in PAs, from which ~13% have <1% of their ranges protected. Further, ~77% of the most-priority species (i.e. with restricted range and categorized as threatened) possess <10% of their distribution protected. However, our results pointed out great possibilities to improve the picture. By considering our prioritization, the protection coverage would increase to 17% to match the Aichi targets and would substantially increase the representativeness values, covering on average >36% the ranges of all species and, particularly, 62% for the most-priority species. Priority conservation areas identified are mainly distributed in Peru (23.1%), Brazil (21.3%), Ecuador (18.8%), and Bolivia (11.4%). Our novel results represent an important step to guide future establishment of new and efficient conservation areas across the NDF.
Fil: Prieto Torres, David Alexander. Instituto de Ecología. Laboratorio de Bioclimatología. Red de Biología Evolutiva; México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma. Facultad de Ciencias. Departamento de Biología Evolutiva. Museo de Zoología; México
Fil: Nori, Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; Argentina
Fil: Rojas Soto Octavio R. Instituto de Ecología. Laboratorio de Bioclimatología. Red de Biología Evolutiva; México - Materia
-
CONSERVATION POLICY
ECOSYSTEM DIVERSITY
PROTECTED AREAS
SPECIE DISTRIBUTION MODELS
SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90662
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_d8471a0dafc3ad4d99df53c0f8ebdd01 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90662 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forestsPrieto Torres, David AlexanderNori, JavierRojas Soto Octavio RCONSERVATION POLICYECOSYSTEM DIVERSITYPROTECTED AREASSPECIE DISTRIBUTION MODELSSYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Neotropical dry forests (NDF) are widely distributed and possess important levels of species richness and endemism; however, they are considered a highly endangered ecosystem. Today, the protected areas network (PAs) located within NDF covers <10% of the total forests' extent; and it's still unknown if PAs adequately represent its biodiversity. Thus, we selected 695 bird species associated to NDF and used ZONATION software to assess the species distribution's representativeness within the PAs network. Additionally, we defined priority conservation areas to strategically expand the current PAs considering the most important human pressures. Current PAs cover only 8.4% of NDF and represent on average ~10% of the total distribution of avifauna inhabiting these forests. Approximately 19% of NDF's birds possess <5% of their distribution represented in PAs, from which ~13% have <1% of their ranges protected. Further, ~77% of the most-priority species (i.e. with restricted range and categorized as threatened) possess <10% of their distribution protected. However, our results pointed out great possibilities to improve the picture. By considering our prioritization, the protection coverage would increase to 17% to match the Aichi targets and would substantially increase the representativeness values, covering on average >36% the ranges of all species and, particularly, 62% for the most-priority species. Priority conservation areas identified are mainly distributed in Peru (23.1%), Brazil (21.3%), Ecuador (18.8%), and Bolivia (11.4%). Our novel results represent an important step to guide future establishment of new and efficient conservation areas across the NDF.Fil: Prieto Torres, David Alexander. Instituto de Ecología. Laboratorio de Bioclimatología. Red de Biología Evolutiva; México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma. Facultad de Ciencias. Departamento de Biología Evolutiva. Museo de Zoología; MéxicoFil: Nori, Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; ArgentinaFil: Rojas Soto Octavio R. Instituto de Ecología. Laboratorio de Bioclimatología. Red de Biología Evolutiva; MéxicoElsevier2018-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/90662Prieto Torres, David Alexander; Nori, Javier; Rojas Soto Octavio R; Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests; Elsevier; Biological Conservation; 228; 12-2018; 205-2140006-3207CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006320718304075info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.025info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:52:11Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/90662instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:52:11.404CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests |
title |
Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests |
spellingShingle |
Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests Prieto Torres, David Alexander CONSERVATION POLICY ECOSYSTEM DIVERSITY PROTECTED AREAS SPECIE DISTRIBUTION MODELS SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING |
title_short |
Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests |
title_full |
Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests |
title_fullStr |
Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests |
title_sort |
Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Prieto Torres, David Alexander Nori, Javier Rojas Soto Octavio R |
author |
Prieto Torres, David Alexander |
author_facet |
Prieto Torres, David Alexander Nori, Javier Rojas Soto Octavio R |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nori, Javier Rojas Soto Octavio R |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
CONSERVATION POLICY ECOSYSTEM DIVERSITY PROTECTED AREAS SPECIE DISTRIBUTION MODELS SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING |
topic |
CONSERVATION POLICY ECOSYSTEM DIVERSITY PROTECTED AREAS SPECIE DISTRIBUTION MODELS SYSTEMATIC CONSERVATION PLANNING |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Neotropical dry forests (NDF) are widely distributed and possess important levels of species richness and endemism; however, they are considered a highly endangered ecosystem. Today, the protected areas network (PAs) located within NDF covers <10% of the total forests' extent; and it's still unknown if PAs adequately represent its biodiversity. Thus, we selected 695 bird species associated to NDF and used ZONATION software to assess the species distribution's representativeness within the PAs network. Additionally, we defined priority conservation areas to strategically expand the current PAs considering the most important human pressures. Current PAs cover only 8.4% of NDF and represent on average ~10% of the total distribution of avifauna inhabiting these forests. Approximately 19% of NDF's birds possess <5% of their distribution represented in PAs, from which ~13% have <1% of their ranges protected. Further, ~77% of the most-priority species (i.e. with restricted range and categorized as threatened) possess <10% of their distribution protected. However, our results pointed out great possibilities to improve the picture. By considering our prioritization, the protection coverage would increase to 17% to match the Aichi targets and would substantially increase the representativeness values, covering on average >36% the ranges of all species and, particularly, 62% for the most-priority species. Priority conservation areas identified are mainly distributed in Peru (23.1%), Brazil (21.3%), Ecuador (18.8%), and Bolivia (11.4%). Our novel results represent an important step to guide future establishment of new and efficient conservation areas across the NDF. Fil: Prieto Torres, David Alexander. Instituto de Ecología. Laboratorio de Bioclimatología. Red de Biología Evolutiva; México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma. Facultad de Ciencias. Departamento de Biología Evolutiva. Museo de Zoología; México Fil: Nori, Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales. Instituto de Diversidad y Ecología Animal; Argentina Fil: Rojas Soto Octavio R. Instituto de Ecología. Laboratorio de Bioclimatología. Red de Biología Evolutiva; México |
description |
Neotropical dry forests (NDF) are widely distributed and possess important levels of species richness and endemism; however, they are considered a highly endangered ecosystem. Today, the protected areas network (PAs) located within NDF covers <10% of the total forests' extent; and it's still unknown if PAs adequately represent its biodiversity. Thus, we selected 695 bird species associated to NDF and used ZONATION software to assess the species distribution's representativeness within the PAs network. Additionally, we defined priority conservation areas to strategically expand the current PAs considering the most important human pressures. Current PAs cover only 8.4% of NDF and represent on average ~10% of the total distribution of avifauna inhabiting these forests. Approximately 19% of NDF's birds possess <5% of their distribution represented in PAs, from which ~13% have <1% of their ranges protected. Further, ~77% of the most-priority species (i.e. with restricted range and categorized as threatened) possess <10% of their distribution protected. However, our results pointed out great possibilities to improve the picture. By considering our prioritization, the protection coverage would increase to 17% to match the Aichi targets and would substantially increase the representativeness values, covering on average >36% the ranges of all species and, particularly, 62% for the most-priority species. Priority conservation areas identified are mainly distributed in Peru (23.1%), Brazil (21.3%), Ecuador (18.8%), and Bolivia (11.4%). Our novel results represent an important step to guide future establishment of new and efficient conservation areas across the NDF. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90662 Prieto Torres, David Alexander; Nori, Javier; Rojas Soto Octavio R; Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests; Elsevier; Biological Conservation; 228; 12-2018; 205-214 0006-3207 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/90662 |
identifier_str_mv |
Prieto Torres, David Alexander; Nori, Javier; Rojas Soto Octavio R; Identifying priority conservation areas for birds associated to endangered Neotropical dry forests; Elsevier; Biological Conservation; 228; 12-2018; 205-214 0006-3207 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0006320718304075 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.025 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613601906655232 |
score |
13.070432 |