Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment
- Autores
- Corsano, Gabriela; Montagna, Jorge Marcelo; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto; Aguirre, Pio Antonio
- Año de publicación
- 2006
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- This paper presents a tool for the generation and evaluation of different alternatives of product production. The importance of this approach lies in the integration of synthesis, design, operation, and scheduling decisions. When simultaneously approached, these decisions allow consideration of the relationships and effects between critical elements of the problem that are usually analyzed sequentially. Two different scenarios are modeled in order to evaluate and select which production process is convenient to develop: multipurpose plant and multiplant complex with single-product batch plants. The methodology is illustrated by an industrially motivated case study involving the production of three products: torula yeast, bakery yeast, and brandy. According to different production conditions, both scenarios are solved, and the analysis and conclusions with regards to the most favorable production scheme are reported.
Fil: Corsano, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina
Fil: Montagna, Jorge Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina
Fil: Iribarren, Oscar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina
Fil: Aguirre, Pio Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina - Materia
-
DESIGN AND SCHEDULING
MULTIPRODUCT BATCH PLANT
MULTISITE PRODUCTION PLANTS
OPTIMIZATION - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/127715
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_ba34e8ed59b1678945143daed9dd640d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/127715 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessmentCorsano, GabrielaMontagna, Jorge MarceloIribarren, Oscar AlbertoAguirre, Pio AntonioDESIGN AND SCHEDULINGMULTIPRODUCT BATCH PLANTMULTISITE PRODUCTION PLANTSOPTIMIZATIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2This paper presents a tool for the generation and evaluation of different alternatives of product production. The importance of this approach lies in the integration of synthesis, design, operation, and scheduling decisions. When simultaneously approached, these decisions allow consideration of the relationships and effects between critical elements of the problem that are usually analyzed sequentially. Two different scenarios are modeled in order to evaluate and select which production process is convenient to develop: multipurpose plant and multiplant complex with single-product batch plants. The methodology is illustrated by an industrially motivated case study involving the production of three products: torula yeast, bakery yeast, and brandy. According to different production conditions, both scenarios are solved, and the analysis and conclusions with regards to the most favorable production scheme are reported.Fil: Corsano, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; ArgentinaFil: Montagna, Jorge Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; ArgentinaFil: Iribarren, Oscar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; ArgentinaFil: Aguirre, Pio Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; ArgentinaAmerican Chemical Society2006-06-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/127715Corsano, Gabriela; Montagna, Jorge Marcelo; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto; Aguirre, Pio Antonio; Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment; American Chemical Society; Industrial & Engineering Chemical Research; 45; 12; 6-6-2006; 4256-42690888-58851520-5045CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ie051454dinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1021/ie051454dinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-11-12T09:50:50Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/127715instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-11-12 09:50:50.777CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment |
| title |
Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment |
| spellingShingle |
Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment Corsano, Gabriela DESIGN AND SCHEDULING MULTIPRODUCT BATCH PLANT MULTISITE PRODUCTION PLANTS OPTIMIZATION |
| title_short |
Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment |
| title_full |
Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment |
| title_fullStr |
Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment |
| title_sort |
Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Corsano, Gabriela Montagna, Jorge Marcelo Iribarren, Oscar Alberto Aguirre, Pio Antonio |
| author |
Corsano, Gabriela |
| author_facet |
Corsano, Gabriela Montagna, Jorge Marcelo Iribarren, Oscar Alberto Aguirre, Pio Antonio |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Montagna, Jorge Marcelo Iribarren, Oscar Alberto Aguirre, Pio Antonio |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
DESIGN AND SCHEDULING MULTIPRODUCT BATCH PLANT MULTISITE PRODUCTION PLANTS OPTIMIZATION |
| topic |
DESIGN AND SCHEDULING MULTIPRODUCT BATCH PLANT MULTISITE PRODUCTION PLANTS OPTIMIZATION |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
This paper presents a tool for the generation and evaluation of different alternatives of product production. The importance of this approach lies in the integration of synthesis, design, operation, and scheduling decisions. When simultaneously approached, these decisions allow consideration of the relationships and effects between critical elements of the problem that are usually analyzed sequentially. Two different scenarios are modeled in order to evaluate and select which production process is convenient to develop: multipurpose plant and multiplant complex with single-product batch plants. The methodology is illustrated by an industrially motivated case study involving the production of three products: torula yeast, bakery yeast, and brandy. According to different production conditions, both scenarios are solved, and the analysis and conclusions with regards to the most favorable production scheme are reported. Fil: Corsano, Gabriela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina Fil: Montagna, Jorge Marcelo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina Fil: Iribarren, Oscar Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina Fil: Aguirre, Pio Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina |
| description |
This paper presents a tool for the generation and evaluation of different alternatives of product production. The importance of this approach lies in the integration of synthesis, design, operation, and scheduling decisions. When simultaneously approached, these decisions allow consideration of the relationships and effects between critical elements of the problem that are usually analyzed sequentially. Two different scenarios are modeled in order to evaluate and select which production process is convenient to develop: multipurpose plant and multiplant complex with single-product batch plants. The methodology is illustrated by an industrially motivated case study involving the production of three products: torula yeast, bakery yeast, and brandy. According to different production conditions, both scenarios are solved, and the analysis and conclusions with regards to the most favorable production scheme are reported. |
| publishDate |
2006 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-06-06 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/127715 Corsano, Gabriela; Montagna, Jorge Marcelo; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto; Aguirre, Pio Antonio; Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment; American Chemical Society; Industrial & Engineering Chemical Research; 45; 12; 6-6-2006; 4256-4269 0888-5885 1520-5045 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/127715 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Corsano, Gabriela; Montagna, Jorge Marcelo; Iribarren, Oscar Alberto; Aguirre, Pio Antonio; Processes integration: Multiplant complex vs multipurpose plant assessment; American Chemical Society; Industrial & Engineering Chemical Research; 45; 12; 6-6-2006; 4256-4269 0888-5885 1520-5045 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ie051454d info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1021/ie051454d |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Chemical Society |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Chemical Society |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1848598122568089600 |
| score |
12.976206 |