A third blind test of crystal structure prediction
- Autores
- Day, G.M.; Motherwell, W.D.S.; Ammon, H.L.; Boerrigter, S.X.M.; Della Valle, R.G.; Venuti, E.; Dzyabchenko, A.; Dunitz, J.D.; Schweizer, B.; Van Eijck, B.P.; Erk, P.; Facelli, Julio C.; Bazterra, V.E.; Ferraro, Marta Beatriz; Hofmann, D.W.M.; Leusen, F.J.J.; Liang, C.; Pantelides, C.C.; Karamertzanis, P.G.; Price, S.L.; Lewis, T.C.; Nowell, H.; Torrisi, A.; Scheraga, H.A.; Arnautova, Yelena A.; Schmidt, M.U.; Verwer, P.
- Año de publicación
- 2005
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Following the interest generated by two previous blind tests of crystal structure prediction (CSP1999 and CSP2001), a third such collaborative project (CSP2004) was hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies used in searching for and ranking the likelihood of predicted crystal structures is represented amongst the 18 participating research groups, although most are based on the global minimization of the lattice energy. Initially the participants were given molecular diagrams of three molecules and asked to submit three predictions for the most likely crystal structure of each. Unlike earlier blind tests, no restriction was placed on the possible space group of the target crystal structures. Furthermore, Z′ = 2 structures were allowed. Part-way through the test, a partial structure report was discovered for one of the molecules, which could no longer be considered a blind test. Hence, a second molecule from the same category (small, rigid with common atom types) was offered to the participants as a replacement. Success rates within the three submitted predictions were lower than in the previous tests - there was only one successful prediction for any of the three 'blind' molecules. For the 'simplest' rigid molecule, this lack of success is partly due to the observed structure crystallizing with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. As in the 2001 blind test, there was no success in predicting the structure of the flexible molecule. The results highlight the necessity for better energy models, capable of simultaneously describing conformational and packing energies with high accuracy. There is also a need for improvements in search procedures for crystals with more than one independent molecule, as well as for molecules with conformational flexibility. These are necessary requirements for the prediction of possible thermodynamically favoured polymorphs. Which of these are actually realised is also influenced by as yet insufficiently understood processes of nucleation and crystal growth. © 2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain - All rights reserved.
Fil: Day, G.M.. University of Cambridge; Estados Unidos
Fil: Motherwell, W.D.S.. Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ammon, H.L.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Boerrigter, S.X.M.. Purdue University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Della Valle, R.G.. Universidad de Bologna; Italia
Fil: Venuti, E.. Universidad de Bologna; Italia
Fil: Dzyabchenko, A.. Karpov Institute Of Physical Chemistry;
Fil: Dunitz, J.D.. Eth Zürich;
Fil: Schweizer, B.. Eth Zürich;
Fil: Van Eijck, B.P.. University of Utrecht; Países Bajos. Utrecht University; Países Bajos
Fil: Erk, P.. Basf Se;
Fil: Facelli, Julio C.. University of Utah; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bazterra, V.E.. University of Utah; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ferraro, Marta Beatriz. University of Utah; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Hofmann, D.W.M.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; Alemania
Fil: Leusen, F.J.J.. University Of Bradford;
Fil: Liang, C.. Accelrys Inc.;
Fil: Pantelides, C.C.. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
Fil: Karamertzanis, P.G.. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
Fil: Price, S.L.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Lewis, T.C.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Nowell, H.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Torrisi, A.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Scheraga, H.A.. Cornell University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arnautova, Yelena A.. Cornell University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Schmidt, M.U.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; Alemania
Fil: Verwer, P.. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen; Países Bajos - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73288
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_b7b5ac04dcb97ec5d89a4ea9abf82590 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73288 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
A third blind test of crystal structure predictionDay, G.M.Motherwell, W.D.S.Ammon, H.L.Boerrigter, S.X.M.Della Valle, R.G.Venuti, E.Dzyabchenko, A.Dunitz, J.D.Schweizer, B.Van Eijck, B.P.Erk, P.Facelli, Julio C.Bazterra, V.E.Ferraro, Marta BeatrizHofmann, D.W.M.Leusen, F.J.J.Liang, C.Pantelides, C.C.Karamertzanis, P.G.Price, S.L.Lewis, T.C.Nowell, H.Torrisi, A.Scheraga, H.A.Arnautova, Yelena A.Schmidt, M.U.Verwer, P.https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Following the interest generated by two previous blind tests of crystal structure prediction (CSP1999 and CSP2001), a third such collaborative project (CSP2004) was hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies used in searching for and ranking the likelihood of predicted crystal structures is represented amongst the 18 participating research groups, although most are based on the global minimization of the lattice energy. Initially the participants were given molecular diagrams of three molecules and asked to submit three predictions for the most likely crystal structure of each. Unlike earlier blind tests, no restriction was placed on the possible space group of the target crystal structures. Furthermore, Z′ = 2 structures were allowed. Part-way through the test, a partial structure report was discovered for one of the molecules, which could no longer be considered a blind test. Hence, a second molecule from the same category (small, rigid with common atom types) was offered to the participants as a replacement. Success rates within the three submitted predictions were lower than in the previous tests - there was only one successful prediction for any of the three 'blind' molecules. For the 'simplest' rigid molecule, this lack of success is partly due to the observed structure crystallizing with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. As in the 2001 blind test, there was no success in predicting the structure of the flexible molecule. The results highlight the necessity for better energy models, capable of simultaneously describing conformational and packing energies with high accuracy. There is also a need for improvements in search procedures for crystals with more than one independent molecule, as well as for molecules with conformational flexibility. These are necessary requirements for the prediction of possible thermodynamically favoured polymorphs. Which of these are actually realised is also influenced by as yet insufficiently understood processes of nucleation and crystal growth. © 2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain - All rights reserved.Fil: Day, G.M.. University of Cambridge; Estados UnidosFil: Motherwell, W.D.S.. Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre; Estados UnidosFil: Ammon, H.L.. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Boerrigter, S.X.M.. Purdue University; Estados UnidosFil: Della Valle, R.G.. Universidad de Bologna; ItaliaFil: Venuti, E.. Universidad de Bologna; ItaliaFil: Dzyabchenko, A.. Karpov Institute Of Physical Chemistry;Fil: Dunitz, J.D.. Eth Zürich;Fil: Schweizer, B.. Eth Zürich;Fil: Van Eijck, B.P.. University of Utrecht; Países Bajos. Utrecht University; Países BajosFil: Erk, P.. Basf Se;Fil: Facelli, Julio C.. University of Utah; Estados UnidosFil: Bazterra, V.E.. University of Utah; Estados UnidosFil: Ferraro, Marta Beatriz. University of Utah; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Hofmann, D.W.M.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; AlemaniaFil: Leusen, F.J.J.. University Of Bradford;Fil: Liang, C.. Accelrys Inc.;Fil: Pantelides, C.C.. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Karamertzanis, P.G.. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Price, S.L.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Lewis, T.C.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Nowell, H.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Torrisi, A.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Scheraga, H.A.. Cornell University; Estados UnidosFil: Arnautova, Yelena A.. Cornell University; Estados UnidosFil: Schmidt, M.U.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; AlemaniaFil: Verwer, P.. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen; Países BajosWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2005-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/73288Day, G.M.; Motherwell, W.D.S.; Ammon, H.L.; Boerrigter, S.X.M.; Della Valle, R.G.; et al.; A third blind test of crystal structure prediction; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Acta Crystallographica Section B-Structural Science; 61; 5; 5-2005; 511-5270108-7681CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1107/S0108768105016563info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:35:52Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73288instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:35:52.848CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A third blind test of crystal structure prediction |
title |
A third blind test of crystal structure prediction |
spellingShingle |
A third blind test of crystal structure prediction Day, G.M. |
title_short |
A third blind test of crystal structure prediction |
title_full |
A third blind test of crystal structure prediction |
title_fullStr |
A third blind test of crystal structure prediction |
title_full_unstemmed |
A third blind test of crystal structure prediction |
title_sort |
A third blind test of crystal structure prediction |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Day, G.M. Motherwell, W.D.S. Ammon, H.L. Boerrigter, S.X.M. Della Valle, R.G. Venuti, E. Dzyabchenko, A. Dunitz, J.D. Schweizer, B. Van Eijck, B.P. Erk, P. Facelli, Julio C. Bazterra, V.E. Ferraro, Marta Beatriz Hofmann, D.W.M. Leusen, F.J.J. Liang, C. Pantelides, C.C. Karamertzanis, P.G. Price, S.L. Lewis, T.C. Nowell, H. Torrisi, A. Scheraga, H.A. Arnautova, Yelena A. Schmidt, M.U. Verwer, P. |
author |
Day, G.M. |
author_facet |
Day, G.M. Motherwell, W.D.S. Ammon, H.L. Boerrigter, S.X.M. Della Valle, R.G. Venuti, E. Dzyabchenko, A. Dunitz, J.D. Schweizer, B. Van Eijck, B.P. Erk, P. Facelli, Julio C. Bazterra, V.E. Ferraro, Marta Beatriz Hofmann, D.W.M. Leusen, F.J.J. Liang, C. Pantelides, C.C. Karamertzanis, P.G. Price, S.L. Lewis, T.C. Nowell, H. Torrisi, A. Scheraga, H.A. Arnautova, Yelena A. Schmidt, M.U. Verwer, P. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Motherwell, W.D.S. Ammon, H.L. Boerrigter, S.X.M. Della Valle, R.G. Venuti, E. Dzyabchenko, A. Dunitz, J.D. Schweizer, B. Van Eijck, B.P. Erk, P. Facelli, Julio C. Bazterra, V.E. Ferraro, Marta Beatriz Hofmann, D.W.M. Leusen, F.J.J. Liang, C. Pantelides, C.C. Karamertzanis, P.G. Price, S.L. Lewis, T.C. Nowell, H. Torrisi, A. Scheraga, H.A. Arnautova, Yelena A. Schmidt, M.U. Verwer, P. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Following the interest generated by two previous blind tests of crystal structure prediction (CSP1999 and CSP2001), a third such collaborative project (CSP2004) was hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies used in searching for and ranking the likelihood of predicted crystal structures is represented amongst the 18 participating research groups, although most are based on the global minimization of the lattice energy. Initially the participants were given molecular diagrams of three molecules and asked to submit three predictions for the most likely crystal structure of each. Unlike earlier blind tests, no restriction was placed on the possible space group of the target crystal structures. Furthermore, Z′ = 2 structures were allowed. Part-way through the test, a partial structure report was discovered for one of the molecules, which could no longer be considered a blind test. Hence, a second molecule from the same category (small, rigid with common atom types) was offered to the participants as a replacement. Success rates within the three submitted predictions were lower than in the previous tests - there was only one successful prediction for any of the three 'blind' molecules. For the 'simplest' rigid molecule, this lack of success is partly due to the observed structure crystallizing with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. As in the 2001 blind test, there was no success in predicting the structure of the flexible molecule. The results highlight the necessity for better energy models, capable of simultaneously describing conformational and packing energies with high accuracy. There is also a need for improvements in search procedures for crystals with more than one independent molecule, as well as for molecules with conformational flexibility. These are necessary requirements for the prediction of possible thermodynamically favoured polymorphs. Which of these are actually realised is also influenced by as yet insufficiently understood processes of nucleation and crystal growth. © 2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain - All rights reserved. Fil: Day, G.M.. University of Cambridge; Estados Unidos Fil: Motherwell, W.D.S.. Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre; Estados Unidos Fil: Ammon, H.L.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos Fil: Boerrigter, S.X.M.. Purdue University; Estados Unidos Fil: Della Valle, R.G.. Universidad de Bologna; Italia Fil: Venuti, E.. Universidad de Bologna; Italia Fil: Dzyabchenko, A.. Karpov Institute Of Physical Chemistry; Fil: Dunitz, J.D.. Eth Zürich; Fil: Schweizer, B.. Eth Zürich; Fil: Van Eijck, B.P.. University of Utrecht; Países Bajos. Utrecht University; Países Bajos Fil: Erk, P.. Basf Se; Fil: Facelli, Julio C.. University of Utah; Estados Unidos Fil: Bazterra, V.E.. University of Utah; Estados Unidos Fil: Ferraro, Marta Beatriz. University of Utah; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina Fil: Hofmann, D.W.M.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; Alemania Fil: Leusen, F.J.J.. University Of Bradford; Fil: Liang, C.. Accelrys Inc.; Fil: Pantelides, C.C.. Imperial College London; Reino Unido Fil: Karamertzanis, P.G.. Imperial College London; Reino Unido Fil: Price, S.L.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido Fil: Lewis, T.C.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido Fil: Nowell, H.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido Fil: Torrisi, A.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido Fil: Scheraga, H.A.. Cornell University; Estados Unidos Fil: Arnautova, Yelena A.. Cornell University; Estados Unidos Fil: Schmidt, M.U.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; Alemania Fil: Verwer, P.. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen; Países Bajos |
description |
Following the interest generated by two previous blind tests of crystal structure prediction (CSP1999 and CSP2001), a third such collaborative project (CSP2004) was hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies used in searching for and ranking the likelihood of predicted crystal structures is represented amongst the 18 participating research groups, although most are based on the global minimization of the lattice energy. Initially the participants were given molecular diagrams of three molecules and asked to submit three predictions for the most likely crystal structure of each. Unlike earlier blind tests, no restriction was placed on the possible space group of the target crystal structures. Furthermore, Z′ = 2 structures were allowed. Part-way through the test, a partial structure report was discovered for one of the molecules, which could no longer be considered a blind test. Hence, a second molecule from the same category (small, rigid with common atom types) was offered to the participants as a replacement. Success rates within the three submitted predictions were lower than in the previous tests - there was only one successful prediction for any of the three 'blind' molecules. For the 'simplest' rigid molecule, this lack of success is partly due to the observed structure crystallizing with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. As in the 2001 blind test, there was no success in predicting the structure of the flexible molecule. The results highlight the necessity for better energy models, capable of simultaneously describing conformational and packing energies with high accuracy. There is also a need for improvements in search procedures for crystals with more than one independent molecule, as well as for molecules with conformational flexibility. These are necessary requirements for the prediction of possible thermodynamically favoured polymorphs. Which of these are actually realised is also influenced by as yet insufficiently understood processes of nucleation and crystal growth. © 2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain - All rights reserved. |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-05 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/73288 Day, G.M.; Motherwell, W.D.S.; Ammon, H.L.; Boerrigter, S.X.M.; Della Valle, R.G.; et al.; A third blind test of crystal structure prediction; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Acta Crystallographica Section B-Structural Science; 61; 5; 5-2005; 511-527 0108-7681 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/73288 |
identifier_str_mv |
Day, G.M.; Motherwell, W.D.S.; Ammon, H.L.; Boerrigter, S.X.M.; Della Valle, R.G.; et al.; A third blind test of crystal structure prediction; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Acta Crystallographica Section B-Structural Science; 61; 5; 5-2005; 511-527 0108-7681 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1107/S0108768105016563 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613120920649728 |
score |
13.069144 |