A third blind test of crystal structure prediction

Autores
Day, G.M.; Motherwell, W.D.S.; Ammon, H.L.; Boerrigter, S.X.M.; Della Valle, R.G.; Venuti, E.; Dzyabchenko, A.; Dunitz, J.D.; Schweizer, B.; Van Eijck, B.P.; Erk, P.; Facelli, Julio C.; Bazterra, V.E.; Ferraro, Marta Beatriz; Hofmann, D.W.M.; Leusen, F.J.J.; Liang, C.; Pantelides, C.C.; Karamertzanis, P.G.; Price, S.L.; Lewis, T.C.; Nowell, H.; Torrisi, A.; Scheraga, H.A.; Arnautova, Yelena A.; Schmidt, M.U.; Verwer, P.
Año de publicación
2005
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Following the interest generated by two previous blind tests of crystal structure prediction (CSP1999 and CSP2001), a third such collaborative project (CSP2004) was hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies used in searching for and ranking the likelihood of predicted crystal structures is represented amongst the 18 participating research groups, although most are based on the global minimization of the lattice energy. Initially the participants were given molecular diagrams of three molecules and asked to submit three predictions for the most likely crystal structure of each. Unlike earlier blind tests, no restriction was placed on the possible space group of the target crystal structures. Furthermore, Z′ = 2 structures were allowed. Part-way through the test, a partial structure report was discovered for one of the molecules, which could no longer be considered a blind test. Hence, a second molecule from the same category (small, rigid with common atom types) was offered to the participants as a replacement. Success rates within the three submitted predictions were lower than in the previous tests - there was only one successful prediction for any of the three 'blind' molecules. For the 'simplest' rigid molecule, this lack of success is partly due to the observed structure crystallizing with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. As in the 2001 blind test, there was no success in predicting the structure of the flexible molecule. The results highlight the necessity for better energy models, capable of simultaneously describing conformational and packing energies with high accuracy. There is also a need for improvements in search procedures for crystals with more than one independent molecule, as well as for molecules with conformational flexibility. These are necessary requirements for the prediction of possible thermodynamically favoured polymorphs. Which of these are actually realised is also influenced by as yet insufficiently understood processes of nucleation and crystal growth. © 2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain - All rights reserved.
Fil: Day, G.M.. University of Cambridge; Estados Unidos
Fil: Motherwell, W.D.S.. Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ammon, H.L.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Boerrigter, S.X.M.. Purdue University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Della Valle, R.G.. Universidad de Bologna; Italia
Fil: Venuti, E.. Universidad de Bologna; Italia
Fil: Dzyabchenko, A.. Karpov Institute Of Physical Chemistry;
Fil: Dunitz, J.D.. Eth Zürich;
Fil: Schweizer, B.. Eth Zürich;
Fil: Van Eijck, B.P.. University of Utrecht; Países Bajos. Utrecht University; Países Bajos
Fil: Erk, P.. Basf Se;
Fil: Facelli, Julio C.. University of Utah; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bazterra, V.E.. University of Utah; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ferraro, Marta Beatriz. University of Utah; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Hofmann, D.W.M.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; Alemania
Fil: Leusen, F.J.J.. University Of Bradford;
Fil: Liang, C.. Accelrys Inc.;
Fil: Pantelides, C.C.. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
Fil: Karamertzanis, P.G.. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
Fil: Price, S.L.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Lewis, T.C.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Nowell, H.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Torrisi, A.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Scheraga, H.A.. Cornell University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arnautova, Yelena A.. Cornell University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Schmidt, M.U.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; Alemania
Fil: Verwer, P.. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen; Países Bajos
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73288

id CONICETDig_b7b5ac04dcb97ec5d89a4ea9abf82590
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73288
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling A third blind test of crystal structure predictionDay, G.M.Motherwell, W.D.S.Ammon, H.L.Boerrigter, S.X.M.Della Valle, R.G.Venuti, E.Dzyabchenko, A.Dunitz, J.D.Schweizer, B.Van Eijck, B.P.Erk, P.Facelli, Julio C.Bazterra, V.E.Ferraro, Marta BeatrizHofmann, D.W.M.Leusen, F.J.J.Liang, C.Pantelides, C.C.Karamertzanis, P.G.Price, S.L.Lewis, T.C.Nowell, H.Torrisi, A.Scheraga, H.A.Arnautova, Yelena A.Schmidt, M.U.Verwer, P.https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Following the interest generated by two previous blind tests of crystal structure prediction (CSP1999 and CSP2001), a third such collaborative project (CSP2004) was hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies used in searching for and ranking the likelihood of predicted crystal structures is represented amongst the 18 participating research groups, although most are based on the global minimization of the lattice energy. Initially the participants were given molecular diagrams of three molecules and asked to submit three predictions for the most likely crystal structure of each. Unlike earlier blind tests, no restriction was placed on the possible space group of the target crystal structures. Furthermore, Z′ = 2 structures were allowed. Part-way through the test, a partial structure report was discovered for one of the molecules, which could no longer be considered a blind test. Hence, a second molecule from the same category (small, rigid with common atom types) was offered to the participants as a replacement. Success rates within the three submitted predictions were lower than in the previous tests - there was only one successful prediction for any of the three 'blind' molecules. For the 'simplest' rigid molecule, this lack of success is partly due to the observed structure crystallizing with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. As in the 2001 blind test, there was no success in predicting the structure of the flexible molecule. The results highlight the necessity for better energy models, capable of simultaneously describing conformational and packing energies with high accuracy. There is also a need for improvements in search procedures for crystals with more than one independent molecule, as well as for molecules with conformational flexibility. These are necessary requirements for the prediction of possible thermodynamically favoured polymorphs. Which of these are actually realised is also influenced by as yet insufficiently understood processes of nucleation and crystal growth. © 2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain - All rights reserved.Fil: Day, G.M.. University of Cambridge; Estados UnidosFil: Motherwell, W.D.S.. Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre; Estados UnidosFil: Ammon, H.L.. University of Maryland; Estados UnidosFil: Boerrigter, S.X.M.. Purdue University; Estados UnidosFil: Della Valle, R.G.. Universidad de Bologna; ItaliaFil: Venuti, E.. Universidad de Bologna; ItaliaFil: Dzyabchenko, A.. Karpov Institute Of Physical Chemistry;Fil: Dunitz, J.D.. Eth Zürich;Fil: Schweizer, B.. Eth Zürich;Fil: Van Eijck, B.P.. University of Utrecht; Países Bajos. Utrecht University; Países BajosFil: Erk, P.. Basf Se;Fil: Facelli, Julio C.. University of Utah; Estados UnidosFil: Bazterra, V.E.. University of Utah; Estados UnidosFil: Ferraro, Marta Beatriz. University of Utah; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Hofmann, D.W.M.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; AlemaniaFil: Leusen, F.J.J.. University Of Bradford;Fil: Liang, C.. Accelrys Inc.;Fil: Pantelides, C.C.. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Karamertzanis, P.G.. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Price, S.L.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Lewis, T.C.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Nowell, H.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Torrisi, A.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino UnidoFil: Scheraga, H.A.. Cornell University; Estados UnidosFil: Arnautova, Yelena A.. Cornell University; Estados UnidosFil: Schmidt, M.U.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; AlemaniaFil: Verwer, P.. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen; Países BajosWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2005-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/73288Day, G.M.; Motherwell, W.D.S.; Ammon, H.L.; Boerrigter, S.X.M.; Della Valle, R.G.; et al.; A third blind test of crystal structure prediction; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Acta Crystallographica Section B-Structural Science; 61; 5; 5-2005; 511-5270108-7681CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1107/S0108768105016563info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:35:52Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/73288instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:35:52.848CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A third blind test of crystal structure prediction
title A third blind test of crystal structure prediction
spellingShingle A third blind test of crystal structure prediction
Day, G.M.
title_short A third blind test of crystal structure prediction
title_full A third blind test of crystal structure prediction
title_fullStr A third blind test of crystal structure prediction
title_full_unstemmed A third blind test of crystal structure prediction
title_sort A third blind test of crystal structure prediction
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Day, G.M.
Motherwell, W.D.S.
Ammon, H.L.
Boerrigter, S.X.M.
Della Valle, R.G.
Venuti, E.
Dzyabchenko, A.
Dunitz, J.D.
Schweizer, B.
Van Eijck, B.P.
Erk, P.
Facelli, Julio C.
Bazterra, V.E.
Ferraro, Marta Beatriz
Hofmann, D.W.M.
Leusen, F.J.J.
Liang, C.
Pantelides, C.C.
Karamertzanis, P.G.
Price, S.L.
Lewis, T.C.
Nowell, H.
Torrisi, A.
Scheraga, H.A.
Arnautova, Yelena A.
Schmidt, M.U.
Verwer, P.
author Day, G.M.
author_facet Day, G.M.
Motherwell, W.D.S.
Ammon, H.L.
Boerrigter, S.X.M.
Della Valle, R.G.
Venuti, E.
Dzyabchenko, A.
Dunitz, J.D.
Schweizer, B.
Van Eijck, B.P.
Erk, P.
Facelli, Julio C.
Bazterra, V.E.
Ferraro, Marta Beatriz
Hofmann, D.W.M.
Leusen, F.J.J.
Liang, C.
Pantelides, C.C.
Karamertzanis, P.G.
Price, S.L.
Lewis, T.C.
Nowell, H.
Torrisi, A.
Scheraga, H.A.
Arnautova, Yelena A.
Schmidt, M.U.
Verwer, P.
author_role author
author2 Motherwell, W.D.S.
Ammon, H.L.
Boerrigter, S.X.M.
Della Valle, R.G.
Venuti, E.
Dzyabchenko, A.
Dunitz, J.D.
Schweizer, B.
Van Eijck, B.P.
Erk, P.
Facelli, Julio C.
Bazterra, V.E.
Ferraro, Marta Beatriz
Hofmann, D.W.M.
Leusen, F.J.J.
Liang, C.
Pantelides, C.C.
Karamertzanis, P.G.
Price, S.L.
Lewis, T.C.
Nowell, H.
Torrisi, A.
Scheraga, H.A.
Arnautova, Yelena A.
Schmidt, M.U.
Verwer, P.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Following the interest generated by two previous blind tests of crystal structure prediction (CSP1999 and CSP2001), a third such collaborative project (CSP2004) was hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies used in searching for and ranking the likelihood of predicted crystal structures is represented amongst the 18 participating research groups, although most are based on the global minimization of the lattice energy. Initially the participants were given molecular diagrams of three molecules and asked to submit three predictions for the most likely crystal structure of each. Unlike earlier blind tests, no restriction was placed on the possible space group of the target crystal structures. Furthermore, Z′ = 2 structures were allowed. Part-way through the test, a partial structure report was discovered for one of the molecules, which could no longer be considered a blind test. Hence, a second molecule from the same category (small, rigid with common atom types) was offered to the participants as a replacement. Success rates within the three submitted predictions were lower than in the previous tests - there was only one successful prediction for any of the three 'blind' molecules. For the 'simplest' rigid molecule, this lack of success is partly due to the observed structure crystallizing with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. As in the 2001 blind test, there was no success in predicting the structure of the flexible molecule. The results highlight the necessity for better energy models, capable of simultaneously describing conformational and packing energies with high accuracy. There is also a need for improvements in search procedures for crystals with more than one independent molecule, as well as for molecules with conformational flexibility. These are necessary requirements for the prediction of possible thermodynamically favoured polymorphs. Which of these are actually realised is also influenced by as yet insufficiently understood processes of nucleation and crystal growth. © 2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain - All rights reserved.
Fil: Day, G.M.. University of Cambridge; Estados Unidos
Fil: Motherwell, W.D.S.. Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ammon, H.L.. University of Maryland; Estados Unidos
Fil: Boerrigter, S.X.M.. Purdue University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Della Valle, R.G.. Universidad de Bologna; Italia
Fil: Venuti, E.. Universidad de Bologna; Italia
Fil: Dzyabchenko, A.. Karpov Institute Of Physical Chemistry;
Fil: Dunitz, J.D.. Eth Zürich;
Fil: Schweizer, B.. Eth Zürich;
Fil: Van Eijck, B.P.. University of Utrecht; Países Bajos. Utrecht University; Países Bajos
Fil: Erk, P.. Basf Se;
Fil: Facelli, Julio C.. University of Utah; Estados Unidos
Fil: Bazterra, V.E.. University of Utah; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ferraro, Marta Beatriz. University of Utah; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Hofmann, D.W.M.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; Alemania
Fil: Leusen, F.J.J.. University Of Bradford;
Fil: Liang, C.. Accelrys Inc.;
Fil: Pantelides, C.C.. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
Fil: Karamertzanis, P.G.. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
Fil: Price, S.L.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Lewis, T.C.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Nowell, H.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Torrisi, A.. Colegio Universitario de Londres; Reino Unido
Fil: Scheraga, H.A.. Cornell University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arnautova, Yelena A.. Cornell University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Schmidt, M.U.. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; Alemania
Fil: Verwer, P.. Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen; Países Bajos
description Following the interest generated by two previous blind tests of crystal structure prediction (CSP1999 and CSP2001), a third such collaborative project (CSP2004) was hosted by the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre. A range of methodologies used in searching for and ranking the likelihood of predicted crystal structures is represented amongst the 18 participating research groups, although most are based on the global minimization of the lattice energy. Initially the participants were given molecular diagrams of three molecules and asked to submit three predictions for the most likely crystal structure of each. Unlike earlier blind tests, no restriction was placed on the possible space group of the target crystal structures. Furthermore, Z′ = 2 structures were allowed. Part-way through the test, a partial structure report was discovered for one of the molecules, which could no longer be considered a blind test. Hence, a second molecule from the same category (small, rigid with common atom types) was offered to the participants as a replacement. Success rates within the three submitted predictions were lower than in the previous tests - there was only one successful prediction for any of the three 'blind' molecules. For the 'simplest' rigid molecule, this lack of success is partly due to the observed structure crystallizing with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. As in the 2001 blind test, there was no success in predicting the structure of the flexible molecule. The results highlight the necessity for better energy models, capable of simultaneously describing conformational and packing energies with high accuracy. There is also a need for improvements in search procedures for crystals with more than one independent molecule, as well as for molecules with conformational flexibility. These are necessary requirements for the prediction of possible thermodynamically favoured polymorphs. Which of these are actually realised is also influenced by as yet insufficiently understood processes of nucleation and crystal growth. © 2005 International Union of Crystallography Printed in Great Britain - All rights reserved.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/73288
Day, G.M.; Motherwell, W.D.S.; Ammon, H.L.; Boerrigter, S.X.M.; Della Valle, R.G.; et al.; A third blind test of crystal structure prediction; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Acta Crystallographica Section B-Structural Science; 61; 5; 5-2005; 511-527
0108-7681
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/73288
identifier_str_mv Day, G.M.; Motherwell, W.D.S.; Ammon, H.L.; Boerrigter, S.X.M.; Della Valle, R.G.; et al.; A third blind test of crystal structure prediction; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Acta Crystallographica Section B-Structural Science; 61; 5; 5-2005; 511-527
0108-7681
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1107/S0108768105016563
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613120920649728
score 13.069144