The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship

Autores
Sole, Maria Jimena
Año de publicación
2025
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
The aim of this article is to investigate three aspects under which the figure of the “other” appears in Spinoza’s philosophy. First, I analyze the other as similar, which arises from the imitation of the affections, a mechanism of reproduction of the affections of our peers. This produces a break in the passions that aim at self-preservation, in order to incorporate the intersubjective dimension in one’s own affectivity. Second, I examine the other as useful, which emerges from the rational understanding that another human being living according to the guidance of reason is most beneficial for one’s own self-preservation. The drive for self-preservation leads to uniting with others because this results in an increase of one’s own power to exist, of one’s own conatus. Finally, I analyze Spinoza’s conception of friendship to emphasize that it arises from the active desire to do good to others as an expression of the fact that no human being undertakes their ethical path to freedom and happiness alone. This exploration of the different figures of others makes it possible, on the one hand, to reject interpretations that consider Spinoza’s philosophy as just another expression of modern individualism and ethical egoism. On the other hand, it provides an element to sustain that the subject of Spinozian ethics is not isolated human beings, but always a collective subject.
Fil: Sole, Maria Jimena. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
intersubjectivity,
affects
reason
community
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/273391

id CONICETDig_b2d1331683170fd029f93d6874525897
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/273391
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and FriendshipSole, Maria Jimenaintersubjectivity,affectsreasoncommunityhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6The aim of this article is to investigate three aspects under which the figure of the “other” appears in Spinoza’s philosophy. First, I analyze the other as similar, which arises from the imitation of the affections, a mechanism of reproduction of the affections of our peers. This produces a break in the passions that aim at self-preservation, in order to incorporate the intersubjective dimension in one’s own affectivity. Second, I examine the other as useful, which emerges from the rational understanding that another human being living according to the guidance of reason is most beneficial for one’s own self-preservation. The drive for self-preservation leads to uniting with others because this results in an increase of one’s own power to exist, of one’s own conatus. Finally, I analyze Spinoza’s conception of friendship to emphasize that it arises from the active desire to do good to others as an expression of the fact that no human being undertakes their ethical path to freedom and happiness alone. This exploration of the different figures of others makes it possible, on the one hand, to reject interpretations that consider Spinoza’s philosophy as just another expression of modern individualism and ethical egoism. On the other hand, it provides an element to sustain that the subject of Spinozian ethics is not isolated human beings, but always a collective subject.Fil: Sole, Maria Jimena. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaUniversity of Groeningen2025-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/273391Sole, Maria Jimena; The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship; University of Groeningen; Journal of Spinoza Studies; 4; 1; 7-2025; 66-822773-0107CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://jss.rug.nl/article/view/42728info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.21827/jss.4.1.42728info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:00:19Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/273391instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:00:19.962CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship
title The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship
spellingShingle The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship
Sole, Maria Jimena
intersubjectivity,
affects
reason
community
title_short The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship
title_full The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship
title_fullStr The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship
title_full_unstemmed The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship
title_sort The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sole, Maria Jimena
author Sole, Maria Jimena
author_facet Sole, Maria Jimena
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv intersubjectivity,
affects
reason
community
topic intersubjectivity,
affects
reason
community
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv The aim of this article is to investigate three aspects under which the figure of the “other” appears in Spinoza’s philosophy. First, I analyze the other as similar, which arises from the imitation of the affections, a mechanism of reproduction of the affections of our peers. This produces a break in the passions that aim at self-preservation, in order to incorporate the intersubjective dimension in one’s own affectivity. Second, I examine the other as useful, which emerges from the rational understanding that another human being living according to the guidance of reason is most beneficial for one’s own self-preservation. The drive for self-preservation leads to uniting with others because this results in an increase of one’s own power to exist, of one’s own conatus. Finally, I analyze Spinoza’s conception of friendship to emphasize that it arises from the active desire to do good to others as an expression of the fact that no human being undertakes their ethical path to freedom and happiness alone. This exploration of the different figures of others makes it possible, on the one hand, to reject interpretations that consider Spinoza’s philosophy as just another expression of modern individualism and ethical egoism. On the other hand, it provides an element to sustain that the subject of Spinozian ethics is not isolated human beings, but always a collective subject.
Fil: Sole, Maria Jimena. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description The aim of this article is to investigate three aspects under which the figure of the “other” appears in Spinoza’s philosophy. First, I analyze the other as similar, which arises from the imitation of the affections, a mechanism of reproduction of the affections of our peers. This produces a break in the passions that aim at self-preservation, in order to incorporate the intersubjective dimension in one’s own affectivity. Second, I examine the other as useful, which emerges from the rational understanding that another human being living according to the guidance of reason is most beneficial for one’s own self-preservation. The drive for self-preservation leads to uniting with others because this results in an increase of one’s own power to exist, of one’s own conatus. Finally, I analyze Spinoza’s conception of friendship to emphasize that it arises from the active desire to do good to others as an expression of the fact that no human being undertakes their ethical path to freedom and happiness alone. This exploration of the different figures of others makes it possible, on the one hand, to reject interpretations that consider Spinoza’s philosophy as just another expression of modern individualism and ethical egoism. On the other hand, it provides an element to sustain that the subject of Spinozian ethics is not isolated human beings, but always a collective subject.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/273391
Sole, Maria Jimena; The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship; University of Groeningen; Journal of Spinoza Studies; 4; 1; 7-2025; 66-82
2773-0107
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/273391
identifier_str_mv Sole, Maria Jimena; The Others in Spinoza’s Philosophy: Imitation, Utility, and Friendship; University of Groeningen; Journal of Spinoza Studies; 4; 1; 7-2025; 66-82
2773-0107
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://jss.rug.nl/article/view/42728
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.21827/jss.4.1.42728
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Groeningen
publisher.none.fl_str_mv University of Groeningen
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846781161996550144
score 12.982451