Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’

Autores
Belvedere, Carlos Daniel
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Embree claimed that Schutz did not remain a methodological individualist during all of his academic life since he came to consider the individual as an abstractum abstracted from a concrete collective life. In this view, the socio-historical world cannot be understood as a mere structure of individuals because it also contains groups that are related one to another in diverse ways and which are the concrete subject of the social world. I stress three major contributions of Embree to social phenomenology: to have shown the deficiencies of methodological individualism because it conceals that the social world is a world of groups; to have found a phenomenological way to speak of collective subjects not involving metaphysical mystifications; and to have found a different way to access phenomena by re-specifying the first person perspective as “first person plural.”
Fil: Belvedere, Carlos Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
Collective Subjects
Groups
First Person Plural
Methodological Individualism
Egology
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/76403

id CONICETDig_ae1e8ad5505f4cd463177be97e638510
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/76403
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’Belvedere, Carlos DanielCollective SubjectsGroupsFirst Person PluralMethodological IndividualismEgologyhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Embree claimed that Schutz did not remain a methodological individualist during all of his academic life since he came to consider the individual as an abstractum abstracted from a concrete collective life. In this view, the socio-historical world cannot be understood as a mere structure of individuals because it also contains groups that are related one to another in diverse ways and which are the concrete subject of the social world. I stress three major contributions of Embree to social phenomenology: to have shown the deficiencies of methodological individualism because it conceals that the social world is a world of groups; to have found a phenomenological way to speak of collective subjects not involving metaphysical mystifications; and to have found a different way to access phenomena by re-specifying the first person perspective as “first person plural.”Fil: Belvedere, Carlos Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaZeta Books2017-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/76403Belvedere, Carlos Daniel; Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’; Zeta Books; Schutzian Research; 9; 7-2017; 79-842067-0621CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pdcnet.org/schutz/content/schutz_2017_0009_0079_0084info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5840/schutz201797info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:43:30Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/76403instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:43:30.997CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’
title Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’
spellingShingle Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’
Belvedere, Carlos Daniel
Collective Subjects
Groups
First Person Plural
Methodological Individualism
Egology
title_short Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’
title_full Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’
title_fullStr Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’
title_full_unstemmed Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’
title_sort Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Belvedere, Carlos Daniel
author Belvedere, Carlos Daniel
author_facet Belvedere, Carlos Daniel
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Collective Subjects
Groups
First Person Plural
Methodological Individualism
Egology
topic Collective Subjects
Groups
First Person Plural
Methodological Individualism
Egology
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Embree claimed that Schutz did not remain a methodological individualist during all of his academic life since he came to consider the individual as an abstractum abstracted from a concrete collective life. In this view, the socio-historical world cannot be understood as a mere structure of individuals because it also contains groups that are related one to another in diverse ways and which are the concrete subject of the social world. I stress three major contributions of Embree to social phenomenology: to have shown the deficiencies of methodological individualism because it conceals that the social world is a world of groups; to have found a phenomenological way to speak of collective subjects not involving metaphysical mystifications; and to have found a different way to access phenomena by re-specifying the first person perspective as “first person plural.”
Fil: Belvedere, Carlos Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description Embree claimed that Schutz did not remain a methodological individualist during all of his academic life since he came to consider the individual as an abstractum abstracted from a concrete collective life. In this view, the socio-historical world cannot be understood as a mere structure of individuals because it also contains groups that are related one to another in diverse ways and which are the concrete subject of the social world. I stress three major contributions of Embree to social phenomenology: to have shown the deficiencies of methodological individualism because it conceals that the social world is a world of groups; to have found a phenomenological way to speak of collective subjects not involving metaphysical mystifications; and to have found a different way to access phenomena by re-specifying the first person perspective as “first person plural.”
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/76403
Belvedere, Carlos Daniel; Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’; Zeta Books; Schutzian Research; 9; 7-2017; 79-84
2067-0621
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/76403
identifier_str_mv Belvedere, Carlos Daniel; Lester Embree on ‘Collective Subjects’; Zeta Books; Schutzian Research; 9; 7-2017; 79-84
2067-0621
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.pdcnet.org/schutz/content/schutz_2017_0009_0079_0084
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5840/schutz201797
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Zeta Books
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Zeta Books
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082941045702656
score 13.22299