Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant

Autores
Marey, Macarena
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this article, I analyze an apparent contradiction in Kant´s formulation of the "postulate of public right", in the § 42 of the Doctrine of Right, with the aim of studying Kant´s categorical foundation of the State. Taken at face value, the passage entails a contradiction because it states that [A] the practical necessity of the exeundum follows from private right, that is, from the problems posed by the state of nature, while at the same time it says that [B] the conceptual ground of the exeundum can be developed analytically from the concept of right, which Kant treats in a theoretical level systematically previous to the state of nature. First, I will analyze the statement [A] and try to clear up what "private right in the state of nature" means, reviewing -and rejecting- two possible constructions of it. The next step will be to study statement [B]. I will propose that this latter statement shows that the concept of right and the notion of juridical obligation attached to it are the ground of the inference that goes from "private right in the state of nature" to the "postulate of private right". Finally, I will advance the thesis that "private right in the state of nature" is the a priori condition of the categorical duty to leave the state of nature, as it serves to describe the normative consequences of the "situation of unavoidable coexistence", and that the "concept of right in external relations" is the normative criterion used to analyze that situation. In this way, statements [A] and [B] are both true and Kant´s formulation of the exeundum is no longer contradictory.
Fil: Marey, Macarena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
Materia
Kant
Doctrina del Derecho
Exeundum
Estado
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51867

id CONICETDig_adb76c96d045f2c489ec203f84d53dbd
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51867
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de KantMarey, MacarenaKantDoctrina del DerechoExeundumEstadohttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In this article, I analyze an apparent contradiction in Kant´s formulation of the "postulate of public right", in the § 42 of the Doctrine of Right, with the aim of studying Kant´s categorical foundation of the State. Taken at face value, the passage entails a contradiction because it states that [A] the practical necessity of the exeundum follows from private right, that is, from the problems posed by the state of nature, while at the same time it says that [B] the conceptual ground of the exeundum can be developed analytically from the concept of right, which Kant treats in a theoretical level systematically previous to the state of nature. First, I will analyze the statement [A] and try to clear up what "private right in the state of nature" means, reviewing -and rejecting- two possible constructions of it. The next step will be to study statement [B]. I will propose that this latter statement shows that the concept of right and the notion of juridical obligation attached to it are the ground of the inference that goes from "private right in the state of nature" to the "postulate of private right". Finally, I will advance the thesis that "private right in the state of nature" is the a priori condition of the categorical duty to leave the state of nature, as it serves to describe the normative consequences of the "situation of unavoidable coexistence", and that the "concept of right in external relations" is the normative criterion used to analyze that situation. In this way, statements [A] and [B] are both true and Kant´s formulation of the exeundum is no longer contradictory.Fil: Marey, Macarena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones Filosóficas; ArgentinaFabrizio Serra2014-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/51867Marey, Macarena; Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant; Fabrizio Serra; Historia Philosophica; 12; 12-2014; 33-501724-61211824-095XCONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1400/230765info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://digital.casalini.it/10.1400/230765info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.libraweb.net/riviste.php?chiave=5info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:01:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/51867instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:01:38.375CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant
title Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant
spellingShingle Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant
Marey, Macarena
Kant
Doctrina del Derecho
Exeundum
Estado
title_short Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant
title_full Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant
title_fullStr Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant
title_full_unstemmed Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant
title_sort Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Marey, Macarena
author Marey, Macarena
author_facet Marey, Macarena
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Kant
Doctrina del Derecho
Exeundum
Estado
topic Kant
Doctrina del Derecho
Exeundum
Estado
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this article, I analyze an apparent contradiction in Kant´s formulation of the "postulate of public right", in the § 42 of the Doctrine of Right, with the aim of studying Kant´s categorical foundation of the State. Taken at face value, the passage entails a contradiction because it states that [A] the practical necessity of the exeundum follows from private right, that is, from the problems posed by the state of nature, while at the same time it says that [B] the conceptual ground of the exeundum can be developed analytically from the concept of right, which Kant treats in a theoretical level systematically previous to the state of nature. First, I will analyze the statement [A] and try to clear up what "private right in the state of nature" means, reviewing -and rejecting- two possible constructions of it. The next step will be to study statement [B]. I will propose that this latter statement shows that the concept of right and the notion of juridical obligation attached to it are the ground of the inference that goes from "private right in the state of nature" to the "postulate of private right". Finally, I will advance the thesis that "private right in the state of nature" is the a priori condition of the categorical duty to leave the state of nature, as it serves to describe the normative consequences of the "situation of unavoidable coexistence", and that the "concept of right in external relations" is the normative criterion used to analyze that situation. In this way, statements [A] and [B] are both true and Kant´s formulation of the exeundum is no longer contradictory.
Fil: Marey, Macarena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires; Argentina. Centro de Investigaciones Filosóficas; Argentina
description In this article, I analyze an apparent contradiction in Kant´s formulation of the "postulate of public right", in the § 42 of the Doctrine of Right, with the aim of studying Kant´s categorical foundation of the State. Taken at face value, the passage entails a contradiction because it states that [A] the practical necessity of the exeundum follows from private right, that is, from the problems posed by the state of nature, while at the same time it says that [B] the conceptual ground of the exeundum can be developed analytically from the concept of right, which Kant treats in a theoretical level systematically previous to the state of nature. First, I will analyze the statement [A] and try to clear up what "private right in the state of nature" means, reviewing -and rejecting- two possible constructions of it. The next step will be to study statement [B]. I will propose that this latter statement shows that the concept of right and the notion of juridical obligation attached to it are the ground of the inference that goes from "private right in the state of nature" to the "postulate of private right". Finally, I will advance the thesis that "private right in the state of nature" is the a priori condition of the categorical duty to leave the state of nature, as it serves to describe the normative consequences of the "situation of unavoidable coexistence", and that the "concept of right in external relations" is the normative criterion used to analyze that situation. In this way, statements [A] and [B] are both true and Kant´s formulation of the exeundum is no longer contradictory.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/51867
Marey, Macarena; Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant; Fabrizio Serra; Historia Philosophica; 12; 12-2014; 33-50
1724-6121
1824-095X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/51867
identifier_str_mv Marey, Macarena; Una contradicción aparente en la formulación del exeundum en el § 42 de la Doctrina del derecho de Kant; Fabrizio Serra; Historia Philosophica; 12; 12-2014; 33-50
1724-6121
1824-095X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1400/230765
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://digital.casalini.it/10.1400/230765
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.libraweb.net/riviste.php?chiave=5
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fabrizio Serra
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fabrizio Serra
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269708532842496
score 13.13397