Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system
- Autores
- Oliva, Diego Gabriel; Francesconi, Javier Andres; Mussati, Miguel Ceferino; Aguirre, Pio Antonio
- Año de publicación
- 2010
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The aim of this work is to analyze energetically the use of glycerin as the primary hydrogen source to operate a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. A glycerin processor system based on its steam reforming is described departing from a previous process model developed for ethanol processing. Since about 10% w/w of glycerin is produced as a byproduct when vegetable oils are converted into biodiesel, and due to the later is increasing its production abruptly, a large glycerin excess is expected to oversaturate the market. The reformed stream contains mainly H2 but also CO, CO2, H2O and CH4. As CO is a poison for PEM fuel cell type, a stream purification step is previously required. The purification subsystem consists of two water gas shift reactors and a CO preferential oxidation reactor to reduce the CO levels below 10 ppm. The reforming process is governed by endothermic reactions, requiring thus energy to proceed. Depending on the system operation point, the energy requirements can be fulfilled by burning an extra glycerin amount (to be determined), which is the minimal that meets the energy requirements. In addition a self-sufficient operation region can be distinguished. In this context, the water/glycerin molar ratio, the glycerin steam reformer temperature, the system pressure, and the extra glycerin amount to be burned (if necessary) are the main decision variables subject to analysis. Process variables are calculated simultaneously, updating the composite curves at each iteration to obtain the best possible energy integration of the process. The highest net system efficiency value computed is 38.56% based on the lower heating value, and 34.71% based on the higher heating value. These efficiency values correspond to a pressure of 2 atm, a water/glycerin molar ratio of 5, a glycerin steam reformer temperature of 953 K, and an extra glycerin amount burned of 0.27 mol h-1. Based on the main process variables, suitable system operation zones are identified. As in practice, most PEM fuel cells operate at 3 atm, optimal variable values obtained at this condition are also reported. Finally, some results and aspects on the system performance of both glycerin and ethanol processors operated at 3 atm are compared and discussed.
Fil: Oliva, Diego Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina
Fil: Francesconi, Javier Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina
Fil: Mussati, Miguel Ceferino. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina
Fil: Aguirre, Pio Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina - Materia
-
Energy integration
Glycerin reforming
Hydrogen production
PEM fuel cell
Process integration - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
.jpg)
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/281360
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
| id |
CONICETDig_a8de3379a375a3f8b1ae67c3e8e7a326 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/281360 |
| network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
| repository_id_str |
3498 |
| network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| spelling |
Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based systemOliva, Diego GabrielFrancesconi, Javier AndresMussati, Miguel CeferinoAguirre, Pio AntonioEnergy integrationGlycerin reformingHydrogen productionPEM fuel cellProcess integrationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2The aim of this work is to analyze energetically the use of glycerin as the primary hydrogen source to operate a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. A glycerin processor system based on its steam reforming is described departing from a previous process model developed for ethanol processing. Since about 10% w/w of glycerin is produced as a byproduct when vegetable oils are converted into biodiesel, and due to the later is increasing its production abruptly, a large glycerin excess is expected to oversaturate the market. The reformed stream contains mainly H2 but also CO, CO2, H2O and CH4. As CO is a poison for PEM fuel cell type, a stream purification step is previously required. The purification subsystem consists of two water gas shift reactors and a CO preferential oxidation reactor to reduce the CO levels below 10 ppm. The reforming process is governed by endothermic reactions, requiring thus energy to proceed. Depending on the system operation point, the energy requirements can be fulfilled by burning an extra glycerin amount (to be determined), which is the minimal that meets the energy requirements. In addition a self-sufficient operation region can be distinguished. In this context, the water/glycerin molar ratio, the glycerin steam reformer temperature, the system pressure, and the extra glycerin amount to be burned (if necessary) are the main decision variables subject to analysis. Process variables are calculated simultaneously, updating the composite curves at each iteration to obtain the best possible energy integration of the process. The highest net system efficiency value computed is 38.56% based on the lower heating value, and 34.71% based on the higher heating value. These efficiency values correspond to a pressure of 2 atm, a water/glycerin molar ratio of 5, a glycerin steam reformer temperature of 953 K, and an extra glycerin amount burned of 0.27 mol h-1. Based on the main process variables, suitable system operation zones are identified. As in practice, most PEM fuel cells operate at 3 atm, optimal variable values obtained at this condition are also reported. Finally, some results and aspects on the system performance of both glycerin and ethanol processors operated at 3 atm are compared and discussed.Fil: Oliva, Diego Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; ArgentinaFil: Francesconi, Javier Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; ArgentinaFil: Mussati, Miguel Ceferino. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; ArgentinaFil: Aguirre, Pio Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; ArgentinaPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd2010-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/281360Oliva, Diego Gabriel; Francesconi, Javier Andres; Mussati, Miguel Ceferino; Aguirre, Pio Antonio; Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; International Journal of Hydrogen Energy; 35; 2; 1-2010; 709-7240360-3199CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.082info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2026-02-26T10:24:00Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/281360instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982026-02-26 10:24:00.65CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system |
| title |
Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system |
| spellingShingle |
Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system Oliva, Diego Gabriel Energy integration Glycerin reforming Hydrogen production PEM fuel cell Process integration |
| title_short |
Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system |
| title_full |
Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system |
| title_fullStr |
Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system |
| title_sort |
Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Oliva, Diego Gabriel Francesconi, Javier Andres Mussati, Miguel Ceferino Aguirre, Pio Antonio |
| author |
Oliva, Diego Gabriel |
| author_facet |
Oliva, Diego Gabriel Francesconi, Javier Andres Mussati, Miguel Ceferino Aguirre, Pio Antonio |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Francesconi, Javier Andres Mussati, Miguel Ceferino Aguirre, Pio Antonio |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Energy integration Glycerin reforming Hydrogen production PEM fuel cell Process integration |
| topic |
Energy integration Glycerin reforming Hydrogen production PEM fuel cell Process integration |
| purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2.11 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/2 |
| dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The aim of this work is to analyze energetically the use of glycerin as the primary hydrogen source to operate a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. A glycerin processor system based on its steam reforming is described departing from a previous process model developed for ethanol processing. Since about 10% w/w of glycerin is produced as a byproduct when vegetable oils are converted into biodiesel, and due to the later is increasing its production abruptly, a large glycerin excess is expected to oversaturate the market. The reformed stream contains mainly H2 but also CO, CO2, H2O and CH4. As CO is a poison for PEM fuel cell type, a stream purification step is previously required. The purification subsystem consists of two water gas shift reactors and a CO preferential oxidation reactor to reduce the CO levels below 10 ppm. The reforming process is governed by endothermic reactions, requiring thus energy to proceed. Depending on the system operation point, the energy requirements can be fulfilled by burning an extra glycerin amount (to be determined), which is the minimal that meets the energy requirements. In addition a self-sufficient operation region can be distinguished. In this context, the water/glycerin molar ratio, the glycerin steam reformer temperature, the system pressure, and the extra glycerin amount to be burned (if necessary) are the main decision variables subject to analysis. Process variables are calculated simultaneously, updating the composite curves at each iteration to obtain the best possible energy integration of the process. The highest net system efficiency value computed is 38.56% based on the lower heating value, and 34.71% based on the higher heating value. These efficiency values correspond to a pressure of 2 atm, a water/glycerin molar ratio of 5, a glycerin steam reformer temperature of 953 K, and an extra glycerin amount burned of 0.27 mol h-1. Based on the main process variables, suitable system operation zones are identified. As in practice, most PEM fuel cells operate at 3 atm, optimal variable values obtained at this condition are also reported. Finally, some results and aspects on the system performance of both glycerin and ethanol processors operated at 3 atm are compared and discussed. Fil: Oliva, Diego Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina Fil: Francesconi, Javier Andres. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina Fil: Mussati, Miguel Ceferino. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina Fil: Aguirre, Pio Antonio. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño. Universidad Tecnológica Nacional. Facultad Regional Santa Fe. Instituto de Desarrollo y Diseño; Argentina |
| description |
The aim of this work is to analyze energetically the use of glycerin as the primary hydrogen source to operate a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. A glycerin processor system based on its steam reforming is described departing from a previous process model developed for ethanol processing. Since about 10% w/w of glycerin is produced as a byproduct when vegetable oils are converted into biodiesel, and due to the later is increasing its production abruptly, a large glycerin excess is expected to oversaturate the market. The reformed stream contains mainly H2 but also CO, CO2, H2O and CH4. As CO is a poison for PEM fuel cell type, a stream purification step is previously required. The purification subsystem consists of two water gas shift reactors and a CO preferential oxidation reactor to reduce the CO levels below 10 ppm. The reforming process is governed by endothermic reactions, requiring thus energy to proceed. Depending on the system operation point, the energy requirements can be fulfilled by burning an extra glycerin amount (to be determined), which is the minimal that meets the energy requirements. In addition a self-sufficient operation region can be distinguished. In this context, the water/glycerin molar ratio, the glycerin steam reformer temperature, the system pressure, and the extra glycerin amount to be burned (if necessary) are the main decision variables subject to analysis. Process variables are calculated simultaneously, updating the composite curves at each iteration to obtain the best possible energy integration of the process. The highest net system efficiency value computed is 38.56% based on the lower heating value, and 34.71% based on the higher heating value. These efficiency values correspond to a pressure of 2 atm, a water/glycerin molar ratio of 5, a glycerin steam reformer temperature of 953 K, and an extra glycerin amount burned of 0.27 mol h-1. Based on the main process variables, suitable system operation zones are identified. As in practice, most PEM fuel cells operate at 3 atm, optimal variable values obtained at this condition are also reported. Finally, some results and aspects on the system performance of both glycerin and ethanol processors operated at 3 atm are compared and discussed. |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-01 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/281360 Oliva, Diego Gabriel; Francesconi, Javier Andres; Mussati, Miguel Ceferino; Aguirre, Pio Antonio; Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; International Journal of Hydrogen Energy; 35; 2; 1-2010; 709-724 0360-3199 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/281360 |
| identifier_str_mv |
Oliva, Diego Gabriel; Francesconi, Javier Andres; Mussati, Miguel Ceferino; Aguirre, Pio Antonio; Energy efficiency analysis of an integrated glycerin processor for PEM fuel cells: Comparison with an ethanol-based system; Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd; International Journal of Hydrogen Energy; 35; 2; 1-2010; 709-724 0360-3199 CONICET Digital CONICET |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.10.082 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
| _version_ |
1858305732505501696 |
| score |
13.176822 |