What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective

Autores
Unterfrauner, Elisabeth; Fabian, Claudia Magdalena; Hemming, Gary; Garcia, Beatriz Elena
Año de publicación
2024
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Citizen science projects optimise the democratisation of theproduction of scientific knowledge. In these initiatives, researchprocesses do not rely solely on scientists’ but on citizens’ engagementlikewise with benefits on both sides. As previous work shows, thedemocratisation perspective of citizen science projects might beviewed critically as some groups of citizens tend to beoverrepresented in these initiatives while other are left out. This paperexplores the claim of democratisation and the citizens’ benefits basedon four citizen science projects in the fields of astrophysics andparticle physics on the citizen science platform Zooniverse. Besides ageneral engagement strategy, the citizen science projects addressedtwo groups specifically, the elderly and people with visualimpairments. The claim for democratisation is reflected in the analysisof citizens’ demographic variables as an indicator for accessibility ofthe research projects. We used a pre-post design with questionnaireson science attitudes, motivations, skills, self-efficacy, and knowledgeto assess what citizen scientists gained from participating in theproject. The demographic analysis of the data reveals that participantswere quite heterogeneous and that people who feel that they belongto a group that is discriminated against are particularly motivated toparticipate in citizen science projects. In terms of benefits, the resultsindicate knowledge and scientific skills gains, but no changes on other evaluative dimensions. Their attitude towards science was, in general,already rather positive when joining the projects, thus not leavingmuch room for change. These results confirm the importance of andcall for a diversified citizen science engagement strategy and showthat even in citizen science projects where the citizens’ task is limitedto classifying data lead to scientific knowledge and skills gains.
Fil: Unterfrauner, Elisabeth. Zentrum Fur Soziale Innovation; Austria
Fil: Fabian, Claudia Magdalena. Zentrum Fur Soziale Innovation; Austria
Fil: Hemming, Gary. Osservatorio Gravitazionale Europeo; Italia
Fil: Garcia, Beatriz Elena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina
Materia
CITIZEN SCIENCES
EVALUATIO
PRE-POS DESIGN
DIVERSITY
INCLUSION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/247115
Acceder
id CONICETDig_a6bdcf9f8e26aeb4f304f064c044c5b8
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/247115
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspectiveUnterfrauner, ElisabethFabian, Claudia MagdalenaHemming, GaryGarcia, Beatriz ElenaCITIZEN SCIENCESEVALUATIOPRE-POS DESIGNDIVERSITYINCLUSIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Citizen science projects optimise the democratisation of theproduction of scientific knowledge. In these initiatives, researchprocesses do not rely solely on scientists’ but on citizens’ engagementlikewise with benefits on both sides. As previous work shows, thedemocratisation perspective of citizen science projects might beviewed critically as some groups of citizens tend to beoverrepresented in these initiatives while other are left out. This paperexplores the claim of democratisation and the citizens’ benefits basedon four citizen science projects in the fields of astrophysics andparticle physics on the citizen science platform Zooniverse. Besides ageneral engagement strategy, the citizen science projects addressedtwo groups specifically, the elderly and people with visualimpairments. The claim for democratisation is reflected in the analysisof citizens’ demographic variables as an indicator for accessibility ofthe research projects. We used a pre-post design with questionnaireson science attitudes, motivations, skills, self-efficacy, and knowledgeto assess what citizen scientists gained from participating in theproject. The demographic analysis of the data reveals that participantswere quite heterogeneous and that people who feel that they belongto a group that is discriminated against are particularly motivated toparticipate in citizen science projects. In terms of benefits, the resultsindicate knowledge and scientific skills gains, but no changes on other evaluative dimensions. Their attitude towards science was, in general,already rather positive when joining the projects, thus not leavingmuch room for change. These results confirm the importance of andcall for a diversified citizen science engagement strategy and showthat even in citizen science projects where the citizens’ task is limitedto classifying data lead to scientific knowledge and skills gains.Fil: Unterfrauner, Elisabeth. Zentrum Fur Soziale Innovation; AustriaFil: Fabian, Claudia Magdalena. Zentrum Fur Soziale Innovation; AustriaFil: Hemming, Gary. Osservatorio Gravitazionale Europeo; ItaliaFil: Garcia, Beatriz Elena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; ArgentinaF1000 Research2024-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/247115Unterfrauner, Elisabeth; Fabian, Claudia Magdalena; Hemming, Gary; Garcia, Beatriz Elena; What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective; F1000 Research; Open Research Europe; 4; 14-10-2024; 1-262732-5121CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu/articles/4-124/v2info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12688/openreseurope.17436.2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:03:05Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/247115instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:03:05.731CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective
title What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective
spellingShingle What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective
Unterfrauner, Elisabeth
CITIZEN SCIENCES
EVALUATIO
PRE-POS DESIGN
DIVERSITY
INCLUSION
title_short What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective
title_full What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective
title_fullStr What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective
title_full_unstemmed What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective
title_sort What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Unterfrauner, Elisabeth
Fabian, Claudia Magdalena
Hemming, Gary
Garcia, Beatriz Elena
author Unterfrauner, Elisabeth
author_facet Unterfrauner, Elisabeth
Fabian, Claudia Magdalena
Hemming, Gary
Garcia, Beatriz Elena
author_role author
author2 Fabian, Claudia Magdalena
Hemming, Gary
Garcia, Beatriz Elena
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CITIZEN SCIENCES
EVALUATIO
PRE-POS DESIGN
DIVERSITY
INCLUSION
topic CITIZEN SCIENCES
EVALUATIO
PRE-POS DESIGN
DIVERSITY
INCLUSION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.9
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Citizen science projects optimise the democratisation of theproduction of scientific knowledge. In these initiatives, researchprocesses do not rely solely on scientists’ but on citizens’ engagementlikewise with benefits on both sides. As previous work shows, thedemocratisation perspective of citizen science projects might beviewed critically as some groups of citizens tend to beoverrepresented in these initiatives while other are left out. This paperexplores the claim of democratisation and the citizens’ benefits basedon four citizen science projects in the fields of astrophysics andparticle physics on the citizen science platform Zooniverse. Besides ageneral engagement strategy, the citizen science projects addressedtwo groups specifically, the elderly and people with visualimpairments. The claim for democratisation is reflected in the analysisof citizens’ demographic variables as an indicator for accessibility ofthe research projects. We used a pre-post design with questionnaireson science attitudes, motivations, skills, self-efficacy, and knowledgeto assess what citizen scientists gained from participating in theproject. The demographic analysis of the data reveals that participantswere quite heterogeneous and that people who feel that they belongto a group that is discriminated against are particularly motivated toparticipate in citizen science projects. In terms of benefits, the resultsindicate knowledge and scientific skills gains, but no changes on other evaluative dimensions. Their attitude towards science was, in general,already rather positive when joining the projects, thus not leavingmuch room for change. These results confirm the importance of andcall for a diversified citizen science engagement strategy and showthat even in citizen science projects where the citizens’ task is limitedto classifying data lead to scientific knowledge and skills gains.
Fil: Unterfrauner, Elisabeth. Zentrum Fur Soziale Innovation; Austria
Fil: Fabian, Claudia Magdalena. Zentrum Fur Soziale Innovation; Austria
Fil: Hemming, Gary. Osservatorio Gravitazionale Europeo; Italia
Fil: Garcia, Beatriz Elena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza; Argentina
description Citizen science projects optimise the democratisation of theproduction of scientific knowledge. In these initiatives, researchprocesses do not rely solely on scientists’ but on citizens’ engagementlikewise with benefits on both sides. As previous work shows, thedemocratisation perspective of citizen science projects might beviewed critically as some groups of citizens tend to beoverrepresented in these initiatives while other are left out. This paperexplores the claim of democratisation and the citizens’ benefits basedon four citizen science projects in the fields of astrophysics andparticle physics on the citizen science platform Zooniverse. Besides ageneral engagement strategy, the citizen science projects addressedtwo groups specifically, the elderly and people with visualimpairments. The claim for democratisation is reflected in the analysisof citizens’ demographic variables as an indicator for accessibility ofthe research projects. We used a pre-post design with questionnaireson science attitudes, motivations, skills, self-efficacy, and knowledgeto assess what citizen scientists gained from participating in theproject. The demographic analysis of the data reveals that participantswere quite heterogeneous and that people who feel that they belongto a group that is discriminated against are particularly motivated toparticipate in citizen science projects. In terms of benefits, the resultsindicate knowledge and scientific skills gains, but no changes on other evaluative dimensions. Their attitude towards science was, in general,already rather positive when joining the projects, thus not leavingmuch room for change. These results confirm the importance of andcall for a diversified citizen science engagement strategy and showthat even in citizen science projects where the citizens’ task is limitedto classifying data lead to scientific knowledge and skills gains.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-14
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/247115
Unterfrauner, Elisabeth; Fabian, Claudia Magdalena; Hemming, Gary; Garcia, Beatriz Elena; What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective; F1000 Research; Open Research Europe; 4; 14-10-2024; 1-26
2732-5121
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/247115
identifier_str_mv Unterfrauner, Elisabeth; Fabian, Claudia Magdalena; Hemming, Gary; Garcia, Beatriz Elena; What’s in it for citizen scientists? An analysis of participant’s gains from a democratisation perspective; F1000 Research; Open Research Europe; 4; 14-10-2024; 1-26
2732-5121
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://open-research-europe.ec.europa.eu/articles/4-124/v2
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.12688/openreseurope.17436.2
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv F1000 Research
publisher.none.fl_str_mv F1000 Research
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613842582110208
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares