Sellars on perceptual knowledge
- Autores
- Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique
- Año de publicación
- 2017
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, after criticizing one of the forms that the Myth of the Given adopts, Sellars presents his own conception of epistemic justification. This conception, along with his criticism of the framework of the Given, has had a great impact on the analytic philosophy of the second half of twentieth century, an impact that still persists today. In this article, I aim to examine Sellars’s theory of epistemic justification in order to highlight two important problems with it. The first concerns the justification of observation reports; the second concerns the understanding of those reports. I argue that those problems do not find a suitable solution within Sellars’s theory of observational knowledge. My diagnosis is that the root cause of those problems lies in an inadequate conception of perceptual experience. This prevents Sellars from realizing the essential epistemic role that experience plays in the justification and understanding of such particular statements.
Fil: Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina - Materia
-
DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE
EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION
JOHN MCDOWELL
OBSERVATION REPORTS
PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE
WILFRID SELLARS - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65000
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_a4b62c2948f55c779784a46ec68bb61d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65000 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Sellars on perceptual knowledgeKalpokas, Daniel EnriqueDEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCEEPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATIONJOHN MCDOWELLOBSERVATION REPORTSPERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCEWILFRID SELLARShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, after criticizing one of the forms that the Myth of the Given adopts, Sellars presents his own conception of epistemic justification. This conception, along with his criticism of the framework of the Given, has had a great impact on the analytic philosophy of the second half of twentieth century, an impact that still persists today. In this article, I aim to examine Sellars’s theory of epistemic justification in order to highlight two important problems with it. The first concerns the justification of observation reports; the second concerns the understanding of those reports. I argue that those problems do not find a suitable solution within Sellars’s theory of observational knowledge. My diagnosis is that the root cause of those problems lies in an inadequate conception of perceptual experience. This prevents Sellars from realizing the essential epistemic role that experience plays in the justification and understanding of such particular statements.Fil: Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; ArgentinaIndiana University2017-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/65000Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique; Sellars on perceptual knowledge; Indiana University; Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society; 53; 3; 6-2017; 425-4460009-1774CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.04info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.04info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:05:19Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65000instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:05:20.157CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sellars on perceptual knowledge |
title |
Sellars on perceptual knowledge |
spellingShingle |
Sellars on perceptual knowledge Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION JOHN MCDOWELL OBSERVATION REPORTS PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE WILFRID SELLARS |
title_short |
Sellars on perceptual knowledge |
title_full |
Sellars on perceptual knowledge |
title_fullStr |
Sellars on perceptual knowledge |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sellars on perceptual knowledge |
title_sort |
Sellars on perceptual knowledge |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique |
author |
Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique |
author_facet |
Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION JOHN MCDOWELL OBSERVATION REPORTS PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE WILFRID SELLARS |
topic |
DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION JOHN MCDOWELL OBSERVATION REPORTS PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE WILFRID SELLARS |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, after criticizing one of the forms that the Myth of the Given adopts, Sellars presents his own conception of epistemic justification. This conception, along with his criticism of the framework of the Given, has had a great impact on the analytic philosophy of the second half of twentieth century, an impact that still persists today. In this article, I aim to examine Sellars’s theory of epistemic justification in order to highlight two important problems with it. The first concerns the justification of observation reports; the second concerns the understanding of those reports. I argue that those problems do not find a suitable solution within Sellars’s theory of observational knowledge. My diagnosis is that the root cause of those problems lies in an inadequate conception of perceptual experience. This prevents Sellars from realizing the essential epistemic role that experience plays in the justification and understanding of such particular statements. Fil: Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina |
description |
In Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, after criticizing one of the forms that the Myth of the Given adopts, Sellars presents his own conception of epistemic justification. This conception, along with his criticism of the framework of the Given, has had a great impact on the analytic philosophy of the second half of twentieth century, an impact that still persists today. In this article, I aim to examine Sellars’s theory of epistemic justification in order to highlight two important problems with it. The first concerns the justification of observation reports; the second concerns the understanding of those reports. I argue that those problems do not find a suitable solution within Sellars’s theory of observational knowledge. My diagnosis is that the root cause of those problems lies in an inadequate conception of perceptual experience. This prevents Sellars from realizing the essential epistemic role that experience plays in the justification and understanding of such particular statements. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-06 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/65000 Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique; Sellars on perceptual knowledge; Indiana University; Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society; 53; 3; 6-2017; 425-446 0009-1774 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/65000 |
identifier_str_mv |
Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique; Sellars on perceptual knowledge; Indiana University; Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society; 53; 3; 6-2017; 425-446 0009-1774 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.04 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.04 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Indiana University |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Indiana University |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842980193175601152 |
score |
12.993085 |