Sellars on perceptual knowledge

Autores
Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, after criticizing one of the forms that the Myth of the Given adopts, Sellars presents his own conception of epistemic justification. This conception, along with his criticism of the framework of the Given, has had a great impact on the analytic philosophy of the second half of twentieth century, an impact that still persists today. In this article, I aim to examine Sellars’s theory of epistemic justification in order to highlight two important problems with it. The first concerns the justification of observation reports; the second concerns the understanding of those reports. I argue that those problems do not find a suitable solution within Sellars’s theory of observational knowledge. My diagnosis is that the root cause of those problems lies in an inadequate conception of perceptual experience. This prevents Sellars from realizing the essential epistemic role that experience plays in the justification and understanding of such particular statements.
Fil: Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina
Materia
DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE
EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION
JOHN MCDOWELL
OBSERVATION REPORTS
PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE
WILFRID SELLARS
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65000

id CONICETDig_a4b62c2948f55c779784a46ec68bb61d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65000
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Sellars on perceptual knowledgeKalpokas, Daniel EnriqueDEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCEEPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATIONJOHN MCDOWELLOBSERVATION REPORTSPERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCEWILFRID SELLARShttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, after criticizing one of the forms that the Myth of the Given adopts, Sellars presents his own conception of epistemic justification. This conception, along with his criticism of the framework of the Given, has had a great impact on the analytic philosophy of the second half of twentieth century, an impact that still persists today. In this article, I aim to examine Sellars’s theory of epistemic justification in order to highlight two important problems with it. The first concerns the justification of observation reports; the second concerns the understanding of those reports. I argue that those problems do not find a suitable solution within Sellars’s theory of observational knowledge. My diagnosis is that the root cause of those problems lies in an inadequate conception of perceptual experience. This prevents Sellars from realizing the essential epistemic role that experience plays in the justification and understanding of such particular statements.Fil: Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; ArgentinaIndiana University2017-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/65000Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique; Sellars on perceptual knowledge; Indiana University; Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society; 53; 3; 6-2017; 425-4460009-1774CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.04info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.04info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:05:19Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/65000instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:05:20.157CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sellars on perceptual knowledge
title Sellars on perceptual knowledge
spellingShingle Sellars on perceptual knowledge
Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique
DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE
EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION
JOHN MCDOWELL
OBSERVATION REPORTS
PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE
WILFRID SELLARS
title_short Sellars on perceptual knowledge
title_full Sellars on perceptual knowledge
title_fullStr Sellars on perceptual knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Sellars on perceptual knowledge
title_sort Sellars on perceptual knowledge
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique
author Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique
author_facet Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE
EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION
JOHN MCDOWELL
OBSERVATION REPORTS
PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE
WILFRID SELLARS
topic DEMONSTRATIVE REFERENCE
EPISTEMIC JUSTIFICATION
JOHN MCDOWELL
OBSERVATION REPORTS
PERCEPTUAL EXPERIENCE
WILFRID SELLARS
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, after criticizing one of the forms that the Myth of the Given adopts, Sellars presents his own conception of epistemic justification. This conception, along with his criticism of the framework of the Given, has had a great impact on the analytic philosophy of the second half of twentieth century, an impact that still persists today. In this article, I aim to examine Sellars’s theory of epistemic justification in order to highlight two important problems with it. The first concerns the justification of observation reports; the second concerns the understanding of those reports. I argue that those problems do not find a suitable solution within Sellars’s theory of observational knowledge. My diagnosis is that the root cause of those problems lies in an inadequate conception of perceptual experience. This prevents Sellars from realizing the essential epistemic role that experience plays in the justification and understanding of such particular statements.
Fil: Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Humanidades; Argentina
description In Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, after criticizing one of the forms that the Myth of the Given adopts, Sellars presents his own conception of epistemic justification. This conception, along with his criticism of the framework of the Given, has had a great impact on the analytic philosophy of the second half of twentieth century, an impact that still persists today. In this article, I aim to examine Sellars’s theory of epistemic justification in order to highlight two important problems with it. The first concerns the justification of observation reports; the second concerns the understanding of those reports. I argue that those problems do not find a suitable solution within Sellars’s theory of observational knowledge. My diagnosis is that the root cause of those problems lies in an inadequate conception of perceptual experience. This prevents Sellars from realizing the essential epistemic role that experience plays in the justification and understanding of such particular statements.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/65000
Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique; Sellars on perceptual knowledge; Indiana University; Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society; 53; 3; 6-2017; 425-446
0009-1774
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/65000
identifier_str_mv Kalpokas, Daniel Enrique; Sellars on perceptual knowledge; Indiana University; Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society; 53; 3; 6-2017; 425-446
0009-1774
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.04
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.53.3.04
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Indiana University
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Indiana University
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980193175601152
score 12.993085