Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura

Autores
Sole, Maria Jimena
Año de publicación
2010
Idioma
español castellano
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
This article deals with F. H. Jacobi´s criticism of Fichte´s thought, just as it is exposed it in his Briefe an Fichte, of 1799. In order to offer the context of the discussion between them, we analyze, in the first place, the connection that existed between both philosophers before the Atheismusstreit. Then, we expose Jacobi´s interpretation of the Wissenschaftslehre as the most accomplished system in the history of rationalist philosophy -for which Fichte is designated as the Messiah of speculative reason. To conclude, we analyze briefly Fichte?s reaction to these criticisms.  The article shows that, just as Fichte claims and contrary to what Jacobi affirms, there are some coincidences between them concerning their philosophical views. They agree, among others things, in their appraisal of Spinozism; but fundamentally they concur in that they both dethrone speculative reason and set above it a not demonstrative, not discursive power that can be in both cases considered as nicht-Wissen.
Fil: Sole, Maria Jimena. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
JACOBI
FICHTE
RACIONALISMO
ATEÍSMO
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/190721

id CONICETDig_a4a6b20065e522484c34dc8d5c7a2063
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/190721
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón puraSole, Maria JimenaJACOBIFICHTERACIONALISMOATEÍSMOhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6This article deals with F. H. Jacobi´s criticism of Fichte´s thought, just as it is exposed it in his Briefe an Fichte, of 1799. In order to offer the context of the discussion between them, we analyze, in the first place, the connection that existed between both philosophers before the Atheismusstreit. Then, we expose Jacobi´s interpretation of the Wissenschaftslehre as the most accomplished system in the history of rationalist philosophy -for which Fichte is designated as the Messiah of speculative reason. To conclude, we analyze briefly Fichte?s reaction to these criticisms.  The article shows that, just as Fichte claims and contrary to what Jacobi affirms, there are some coincidences between them concerning their philosophical views. They agree, among others things, in their appraisal of Spinozism; but fundamentally they concur in that they both dethrone speculative reason and set above it a not demonstrative, not discursive power that can be in both cases considered as nicht-Wissen.Fil: Sole, Maria Jimena. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaEuroPhilosophie Editions2010-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/190721Sole, Maria Jimena; Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura; EuroPhilosophie Editions; Estudios sobre Fichte; 1; 8-2010; 174-1902258-014XCONICET DigitalCONICETspainfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.openedition.org/ref/332info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/ref.332info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T10:09:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/190721instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 10:09:26.103CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura
title Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura
spellingShingle Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura
Sole, Maria Jimena
JACOBI
FICHTE
RACIONALISMO
ATEÍSMO
title_short Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura
title_full Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura
title_fullStr Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura
title_full_unstemmed Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura
title_sort Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sole, Maria Jimena
author Sole, Maria Jimena
author_facet Sole, Maria Jimena
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv JACOBI
FICHTE
RACIONALISMO
ATEÍSMO
topic JACOBI
FICHTE
RACIONALISMO
ATEÍSMO
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv This article deals with F. H. Jacobi´s criticism of Fichte´s thought, just as it is exposed it in his Briefe an Fichte, of 1799. In order to offer the context of the discussion between them, we analyze, in the first place, the connection that existed between both philosophers before the Atheismusstreit. Then, we expose Jacobi´s interpretation of the Wissenschaftslehre as the most accomplished system in the history of rationalist philosophy -for which Fichte is designated as the Messiah of speculative reason. To conclude, we analyze briefly Fichte?s reaction to these criticisms.  The article shows that, just as Fichte claims and contrary to what Jacobi affirms, there are some coincidences between them concerning their philosophical views. They agree, among others things, in their appraisal of Spinozism; but fundamentally they concur in that they both dethrone speculative reason and set above it a not demonstrative, not discursive power that can be in both cases considered as nicht-Wissen.
Fil: Sole, Maria Jimena. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Filosofía "Dr. Alejandro Korn"; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description This article deals with F. H. Jacobi´s criticism of Fichte´s thought, just as it is exposed it in his Briefe an Fichte, of 1799. In order to offer the context of the discussion between them, we analyze, in the first place, the connection that existed between both philosophers before the Atheismusstreit. Then, we expose Jacobi´s interpretation of the Wissenschaftslehre as the most accomplished system in the history of rationalist philosophy -for which Fichte is designated as the Messiah of speculative reason. To conclude, we analyze briefly Fichte?s reaction to these criticisms.  The article shows that, just as Fichte claims and contrary to what Jacobi affirms, there are some coincidences between them concerning their philosophical views. They agree, among others things, in their appraisal of Spinozism; but fundamentally they concur in that they both dethrone speculative reason and set above it a not demonstrative, not discursive power that can be in both cases considered as nicht-Wissen.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/190721
Sole, Maria Jimena; Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura; EuroPhilosophie Editions; Estudios sobre Fichte; 1; 8-2010; 174-190
2258-014X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/190721
identifier_str_mv Sole, Maria Jimena; Jacobi contra Fichte, el Mesías de la razón pura; EuroPhilosophie Editions; Estudios sobre Fichte; 1; 8-2010; 174-190
2258-014X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://journals.openedition.org/ref/332
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.4000/ref.332
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EuroPhilosophie Editions
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EuroPhilosophie Editions
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842270080521469952
score 13.13397