Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition

Autores
Lezama, Felipe; Paruelo, José
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Questions: Do the effects of grazing components on vegetation structure differ in their relative importance? Do components interact in their effect on vegetation?. Location: San Jose department, Southern Campos, Uruguay. Methods: In a manipulative field experiment we simulated three different grazing components: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition, over 3 yr in a natural grassland. Defoliation was analysed through two intensity levels and two procedures: uniform and selective cutting. We evaluated the effects of grazing components on species diversity and composition, and frequency of plant functional types. Results: All simulated grazing components had at least some effect on vegetation structure. Additionally, both individual and interactive effects on vegetation attributes were detected. Our study indicates that the relative influence of each grazing component varied according to the attribute considered. N addition was the only treatment that affected plant diversity. Plant functional type composition, in turn, was affected mainly by trampling. N addition and trampling were the component that affected the frequency of the largest number of species. Defoliation selectivity showed effects both in terms of plant functional type and species composition. Exclosure treatment and defoliation intensity had slight effects on grassland structure. Conclusions: This study provides insight on the underlying mechanisms of some observed patterns of grazing on the Campos grasslands. Our results lead us to conclude that all grazing components have to be taken into account to understand vegetation dynamics subjected to grazing. Prevention of woody encroachment by grazing can be attributed to direct and indirect effects of trampling. Trampling should be taken into account to explain increaser species responses. However, mechanisms responsible for other general patterns remain less clear. The importance of selective defoliation in species replacement induced by grazing in these grasslands has yet to be clarified.
Fil: Lezama, Felipe. Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias; Uruguay
Fil: Paruelo, José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
Materia
Campos
Increaser-Decreaser
Nitrogen
Plant Functional Types
Productivity
Selectivity
Soil Compaction
Species Richness
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/50916

id CONICETDig_a3d1e09d10e31ac490f68a3830296fa2
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/50916
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine depositionLezama, FelipeParuelo, JoséCamposIncreaser-DecreaserNitrogenPlant Functional TypesProductivitySelectivitySoil CompactionSpecies Richnesshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Questions: Do the effects of grazing components on vegetation structure differ in their relative importance? Do components interact in their effect on vegetation?. Location: San Jose department, Southern Campos, Uruguay. Methods: In a manipulative field experiment we simulated three different grazing components: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition, over 3 yr in a natural grassland. Defoliation was analysed through two intensity levels and two procedures: uniform and selective cutting. We evaluated the effects of grazing components on species diversity and composition, and frequency of plant functional types. Results: All simulated grazing components had at least some effect on vegetation structure. Additionally, both individual and interactive effects on vegetation attributes were detected. Our study indicates that the relative influence of each grazing component varied according to the attribute considered. N addition was the only treatment that affected plant diversity. Plant functional type composition, in turn, was affected mainly by trampling. N addition and trampling were the component that affected the frequency of the largest number of species. Defoliation selectivity showed effects both in terms of plant functional type and species composition. Exclosure treatment and defoliation intensity had slight effects on grassland structure. Conclusions: This study provides insight on the underlying mechanisms of some observed patterns of grazing on the Campos grasslands. Our results lead us to conclude that all grazing components have to be taken into account to understand vegetation dynamics subjected to grazing. Prevention of woody encroachment by grazing can be attributed to direct and indirect effects of trampling. Trampling should be taken into account to explain increaser species responses. However, mechanisms responsible for other general patterns remain less clear. The importance of selective defoliation in species replacement induced by grazing in these grasslands has yet to be clarified.Fil: Lezama, Felipe. Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias; UruguayFil: Paruelo, José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2016-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/50916Lezama, Felipe; Paruelo, José; Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Applied Vegetation Science; 19; 4; 10-2016; 557-5661402-2001CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/avsc.12250info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/avsc.12250info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:40:50Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/50916instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:40:51.065CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition
title Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition
spellingShingle Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition
Lezama, Felipe
Campos
Increaser-Decreaser
Nitrogen
Plant Functional Types
Productivity
Selectivity
Soil Compaction
Species Richness
title_short Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition
title_full Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition
title_fullStr Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition
title_full_unstemmed Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition
title_sort Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lezama, Felipe
Paruelo, José
author Lezama, Felipe
author_facet Lezama, Felipe
Paruelo, José
author_role author
author2 Paruelo, José
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Campos
Increaser-Decreaser
Nitrogen
Plant Functional Types
Productivity
Selectivity
Soil Compaction
Species Richness
topic Campos
Increaser-Decreaser
Nitrogen
Plant Functional Types
Productivity
Selectivity
Soil Compaction
Species Richness
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.4
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Questions: Do the effects of grazing components on vegetation structure differ in their relative importance? Do components interact in their effect on vegetation?. Location: San Jose department, Southern Campos, Uruguay. Methods: In a manipulative field experiment we simulated three different grazing components: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition, over 3 yr in a natural grassland. Defoliation was analysed through two intensity levels and two procedures: uniform and selective cutting. We evaluated the effects of grazing components on species diversity and composition, and frequency of plant functional types. Results: All simulated grazing components had at least some effect on vegetation structure. Additionally, both individual and interactive effects on vegetation attributes were detected. Our study indicates that the relative influence of each grazing component varied according to the attribute considered. N addition was the only treatment that affected plant diversity. Plant functional type composition, in turn, was affected mainly by trampling. N addition and trampling were the component that affected the frequency of the largest number of species. Defoliation selectivity showed effects both in terms of plant functional type and species composition. Exclosure treatment and defoliation intensity had slight effects on grassland structure. Conclusions: This study provides insight on the underlying mechanisms of some observed patterns of grazing on the Campos grasslands. Our results lead us to conclude that all grazing components have to be taken into account to understand vegetation dynamics subjected to grazing. Prevention of woody encroachment by grazing can be attributed to direct and indirect effects of trampling. Trampling should be taken into account to explain increaser species responses. However, mechanisms responsible for other general patterns remain less clear. The importance of selective defoliation in species replacement induced by grazing in these grasslands has yet to be clarified.
Fil: Lezama, Felipe. Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias; Uruguay
Fil: Paruelo, José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina
description Questions: Do the effects of grazing components on vegetation structure differ in their relative importance? Do components interact in their effect on vegetation?. Location: San Jose department, Southern Campos, Uruguay. Methods: In a manipulative field experiment we simulated three different grazing components: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition, over 3 yr in a natural grassland. Defoliation was analysed through two intensity levels and two procedures: uniform and selective cutting. We evaluated the effects of grazing components on species diversity and composition, and frequency of plant functional types. Results: All simulated grazing components had at least some effect on vegetation structure. Additionally, both individual and interactive effects on vegetation attributes were detected. Our study indicates that the relative influence of each grazing component varied according to the attribute considered. N addition was the only treatment that affected plant diversity. Plant functional type composition, in turn, was affected mainly by trampling. N addition and trampling were the component that affected the frequency of the largest number of species. Defoliation selectivity showed effects both in terms of plant functional type and species composition. Exclosure treatment and defoliation intensity had slight effects on grassland structure. Conclusions: This study provides insight on the underlying mechanisms of some observed patterns of grazing on the Campos grasslands. Our results lead us to conclude that all grazing components have to be taken into account to understand vegetation dynamics subjected to grazing. Prevention of woody encroachment by grazing can be attributed to direct and indirect effects of trampling. Trampling should be taken into account to explain increaser species responses. However, mechanisms responsible for other general patterns remain less clear. The importance of selective defoliation in species replacement induced by grazing in these grasslands has yet to be clarified.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/50916
Lezama, Felipe; Paruelo, José; Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Applied Vegetation Science; 19; 4; 10-2016; 557-566
1402-2001
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/50916
identifier_str_mv Lezama, Felipe; Paruelo, José; Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Applied Vegetation Science; 19; 4; 10-2016; 557-566
1402-2001
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/avsc.12250
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/avsc.12250
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613292377505792
score 13.070432