Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition
- Autores
- Lezama, Felipe; Paruelo, José
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Questions: Do the effects of grazing components on vegetation structure differ in their relative importance? Do components interact in their effect on vegetation?. Location: San Jose department, Southern Campos, Uruguay. Methods: In a manipulative field experiment we simulated three different grazing components: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition, over 3 yr in a natural grassland. Defoliation was analysed through two intensity levels and two procedures: uniform and selective cutting. We evaluated the effects of grazing components on species diversity and composition, and frequency of plant functional types. Results: All simulated grazing components had at least some effect on vegetation structure. Additionally, both individual and interactive effects on vegetation attributes were detected. Our study indicates that the relative influence of each grazing component varied according to the attribute considered. N addition was the only treatment that affected plant diversity. Plant functional type composition, in turn, was affected mainly by trampling. N addition and trampling were the component that affected the frequency of the largest number of species. Defoliation selectivity showed effects both in terms of plant functional type and species composition. Exclosure treatment and defoliation intensity had slight effects on grassland structure. Conclusions: This study provides insight on the underlying mechanisms of some observed patterns of grazing on the Campos grasslands. Our results lead us to conclude that all grazing components have to be taken into account to understand vegetation dynamics subjected to grazing. Prevention of woody encroachment by grazing can be attributed to direct and indirect effects of trampling. Trampling should be taken into account to explain increaser species responses. However, mechanisms responsible for other general patterns remain less clear. The importance of selective defoliation in species replacement induced by grazing in these grasslands has yet to be clarified.
Fil: Lezama, Felipe. Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias; Uruguay
Fil: Paruelo, José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina - Materia
-
Campos
Increaser-Decreaser
Nitrogen
Plant Functional Types
Productivity
Selectivity
Soil Compaction
Species Richness - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/50916
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_a3d1e09d10e31ac490f68a3830296fa2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/50916 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine depositionLezama, FelipeParuelo, JoséCamposIncreaser-DecreaserNitrogenPlant Functional TypesProductivitySelectivitySoil CompactionSpecies Richnesshttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.4https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Questions: Do the effects of grazing components on vegetation structure differ in their relative importance? Do components interact in their effect on vegetation?. Location: San Jose department, Southern Campos, Uruguay. Methods: In a manipulative field experiment we simulated three different grazing components: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition, over 3 yr in a natural grassland. Defoliation was analysed through two intensity levels and two procedures: uniform and selective cutting. We evaluated the effects of grazing components on species diversity and composition, and frequency of plant functional types. Results: All simulated grazing components had at least some effect on vegetation structure. Additionally, both individual and interactive effects on vegetation attributes were detected. Our study indicates that the relative influence of each grazing component varied according to the attribute considered. N addition was the only treatment that affected plant diversity. Plant functional type composition, in turn, was affected mainly by trampling. N addition and trampling were the component that affected the frequency of the largest number of species. Defoliation selectivity showed effects both in terms of plant functional type and species composition. Exclosure treatment and defoliation intensity had slight effects on grassland structure. Conclusions: This study provides insight on the underlying mechanisms of some observed patterns of grazing on the Campos grasslands. Our results lead us to conclude that all grazing components have to be taken into account to understand vegetation dynamics subjected to grazing. Prevention of woody encroachment by grazing can be attributed to direct and indirect effects of trampling. Trampling should be taken into account to explain increaser species responses. However, mechanisms responsible for other general patterns remain less clear. The importance of selective defoliation in species replacement induced by grazing in these grasslands has yet to be clarified.Fil: Lezama, Felipe. Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias; UruguayFil: Paruelo, José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; ArgentinaWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2016-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documentapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/50916Lezama, Felipe; Paruelo, José; Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Applied Vegetation Science; 19; 4; 10-2016; 557-5661402-2001CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/avsc.12250info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/avsc.12250info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:40:50Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/50916instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:40:51.065CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition |
title |
Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition |
spellingShingle |
Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition Lezama, Felipe Campos Increaser-Decreaser Nitrogen Plant Functional Types Productivity Selectivity Soil Compaction Species Richness |
title_short |
Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition |
title_full |
Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition |
title_fullStr |
Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition |
title_full_unstemmed |
Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition |
title_sort |
Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Lezama, Felipe Paruelo, José |
author |
Lezama, Felipe |
author_facet |
Lezama, Felipe Paruelo, José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Paruelo, José |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Campos Increaser-Decreaser Nitrogen Plant Functional Types Productivity Selectivity Soil Compaction Species Richness |
topic |
Campos Increaser-Decreaser Nitrogen Plant Functional Types Productivity Selectivity Soil Compaction Species Richness |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.4 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Questions: Do the effects of grazing components on vegetation structure differ in their relative importance? Do components interact in their effect on vegetation?. Location: San Jose department, Southern Campos, Uruguay. Methods: In a manipulative field experiment we simulated three different grazing components: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition, over 3 yr in a natural grassland. Defoliation was analysed through two intensity levels and two procedures: uniform and selective cutting. We evaluated the effects of grazing components on species diversity and composition, and frequency of plant functional types. Results: All simulated grazing components had at least some effect on vegetation structure. Additionally, both individual and interactive effects on vegetation attributes were detected. Our study indicates that the relative influence of each grazing component varied according to the attribute considered. N addition was the only treatment that affected plant diversity. Plant functional type composition, in turn, was affected mainly by trampling. N addition and trampling were the component that affected the frequency of the largest number of species. Defoliation selectivity showed effects both in terms of plant functional type and species composition. Exclosure treatment and defoliation intensity had slight effects on grassland structure. Conclusions: This study provides insight on the underlying mechanisms of some observed patterns of grazing on the Campos grasslands. Our results lead us to conclude that all grazing components have to be taken into account to understand vegetation dynamics subjected to grazing. Prevention of woody encroachment by grazing can be attributed to direct and indirect effects of trampling. Trampling should be taken into account to explain increaser species responses. However, mechanisms responsible for other general patterns remain less clear. The importance of selective defoliation in species replacement induced by grazing in these grasslands has yet to be clarified. Fil: Lezama, Felipe. Universidad de la República. Facultad de Ciencias; Uruguay Fil: Paruelo, José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Parque Centenario. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Agronomía. Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura; Argentina |
description |
Questions: Do the effects of grazing components on vegetation structure differ in their relative importance? Do components interact in their effect on vegetation?. Location: San Jose department, Southern Campos, Uruguay. Methods: In a manipulative field experiment we simulated three different grazing components: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition, over 3 yr in a natural grassland. Defoliation was analysed through two intensity levels and two procedures: uniform and selective cutting. We evaluated the effects of grazing components on species diversity and composition, and frequency of plant functional types. Results: All simulated grazing components had at least some effect on vegetation structure. Additionally, both individual and interactive effects on vegetation attributes were detected. Our study indicates that the relative influence of each grazing component varied according to the attribute considered. N addition was the only treatment that affected plant diversity. Plant functional type composition, in turn, was affected mainly by trampling. N addition and trampling were the component that affected the frequency of the largest number of species. Defoliation selectivity showed effects both in terms of plant functional type and species composition. Exclosure treatment and defoliation intensity had slight effects on grassland structure. Conclusions: This study provides insight on the underlying mechanisms of some observed patterns of grazing on the Campos grasslands. Our results lead us to conclude that all grazing components have to be taken into account to understand vegetation dynamics subjected to grazing. Prevention of woody encroachment by grazing can be attributed to direct and indirect effects of trampling. Trampling should be taken into account to explain increaser species responses. However, mechanisms responsible for other general patterns remain less clear. The importance of selective defoliation in species replacement induced by grazing in these grasslands has yet to be clarified. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/50916 Lezama, Felipe; Paruelo, José; Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Applied Vegetation Science; 19; 4; 10-2016; 557-566 1402-2001 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/50916 |
identifier_str_mv |
Lezama, Felipe; Paruelo, José; Disentangling grazing effects: trampling, defoliation and urine deposition; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Applied Vegetation Science; 19; 4; 10-2016; 557-566 1402-2001 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/avsc.12250 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/avsc.12250 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613292377505792 |
score |
13.070432 |