The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis

Autores
Folguera, Guillermo; Lombardi, Olimpia Iris
Año de publicación
2012
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In this article we will focus on the relationship between microevolution and macroevolution. Our main purpose is to argue that, since the consolidation of the evolutionary synthesis up to now, macroevolution has been always conceived as dependent on microevolution. Such dependence was very clear in the synthesis, but seems to have been left aside by later authors. Nevertheless, we will show that the criticisms to the synthesis, broken forth since the decade of the 1970s, did not modify that general trend: the new perspectives reproduced the dependence of macroevolution on microevolution by means of strategies different than those appealed to by the traditional synthesis.
Fil: Folguera, Guillermo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
Fil: Lombardi, Olimpia Iris. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina
Materia
ALTENBERG 16
EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS
MACROEVOLUTION
MICROEVOLUTION
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/200267
Acceder
id CONICETDig_a309a49273901ec2d60f113c2c8ba0d3
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/200267
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesisFolguera, GuillermoLombardi, Olimpia IrisALTENBERG 16EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESISMACROEVOLUTIONMICROEVOLUTIONhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In this article we will focus on the relationship between microevolution and macroevolution. Our main purpose is to argue that, since the consolidation of the evolutionary synthesis up to now, macroevolution has been always conceived as dependent on microevolution. Such dependence was very clear in the synthesis, but seems to have been left aside by later authors. Nevertheless, we will show that the criticisms to the synthesis, broken forth since the decade of the 1970s, did not modify that general trend: the new perspectives reproduced the dependence of macroevolution on microevolution by means of strategies different than those appealed to by the traditional synthesis.Fil: Folguera, Guillermo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; ArgentinaFil: Lombardi, Olimpia Iris. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; ArgentinaStazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn2012-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/200267Folguera, Guillermo; Lombardi, Olimpia Iris; The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis; Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn; History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences; 34; 5-2012; 539-5590391-97141742-6316CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:03:26Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/200267instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:03:26.833CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis
title The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis
spellingShingle The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis
Folguera, Guillermo
ALTENBERG 16
EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS
MACROEVOLUTION
MICROEVOLUTION
title_short The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis
title_full The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis
title_fullStr The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis
title_sort The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Folguera, Guillermo
Lombardi, Olimpia Iris
author Folguera, Guillermo
author_facet Folguera, Guillermo
Lombardi, Olimpia Iris
author_role author
author2 Lombardi, Olimpia Iris
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ALTENBERG 16
EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS
MACROEVOLUTION
MICROEVOLUTION
topic ALTENBERG 16
EVOLUTIONARY SYNTHESIS
MACROEVOLUTION
MICROEVOLUTION
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In this article we will focus on the relationship between microevolution and macroevolution. Our main purpose is to argue that, since the consolidation of the evolutionary synthesis up to now, macroevolution has been always conceived as dependent on microevolution. Such dependence was very clear in the synthesis, but seems to have been left aside by later authors. Nevertheless, we will show that the criticisms to the synthesis, broken forth since the decade of the 1970s, did not modify that general trend: the new perspectives reproduced the dependence of macroevolution on microevolution by means of strategies different than those appealed to by the traditional synthesis.
Fil: Folguera, Guillermo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
Fil: Lombardi, Olimpia Iris. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales; Argentina
description In this article we will focus on the relationship between microevolution and macroevolution. Our main purpose is to argue that, since the consolidation of the evolutionary synthesis up to now, macroevolution has been always conceived as dependent on microevolution. Such dependence was very clear in the synthesis, but seems to have been left aside by later authors. Nevertheless, we will show that the criticisms to the synthesis, broken forth since the decade of the 1970s, did not modify that general trend: the new perspectives reproduced the dependence of macroevolution on microevolution by means of strategies different than those appealed to by the traditional synthesis.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/200267
Folguera, Guillermo; Lombardi, Olimpia Iris; The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis; Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn; History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences; 34; 5-2012; 539-559
0391-9714
1742-6316
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/200267
identifier_str_mv Folguera, Guillermo; Lombardi, Olimpia Iris; The relationship between microevolution and macroevolution, and the structure of the extended synthesis; Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn; History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences; 34; 5-2012; 539-559
0391-9714
1742-6316
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846781267107905536
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares