Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation

Autores
Farfan, Fernando Daniel; Soto Sanchez, Cristina; Pizá, Alvaro Gabriel; Albarracin, Ana Lia; Soletta, Jorge Humberto; Lucianna, Facundo Adrián; Fernandez, Esteve
Año de publicación
2019
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: Physiological studies of sensorial systems often require the acquisition and processing of data extracted from their multiple components to evaluate how the neural information changes in relation to the environment changes. In this work, a comparative study about methodological aspects of two electrophysiological approaches is described. New method: Extracellular recordings from deep vibrissal nerves were obtained by using a customized microelectrode Utah array during passive mechanical stimulation of rat´s whiskers. These recordings were compared with those obtained with bipolar electrodes. We also propose here a simplified empirical model of the electrophysiological activity obtained from a bundle of myelinated nerve fibers. Results: The peripheral activity of the vibrissal system was characterized through the temporal and spectral features obtained with both recording methods. The empirical model not only allows the correlation between anatomical structures and functional features, but also allows to predict changes in the CAPs morphology when the arrangement and the geometry of the electrodes changes. Comparison with existing method(s): This study compares two extracellular recording methods based on analysis techniques, empirical modeling and data processing of vibrissal sensory information. Conclusions: This comparative study reveals a close relationship between the electrophysiological techniques and the processing methods necessary to extract sensory information. This relationship is the result of maximizing the extraction of information from recordings of sensory activity.
Fil: Farfan, Fernando Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; Argentina
Fil: Soto Sanchez, Cristina. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España. Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina; España
Fil: Pizá, Alvaro Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; Argentina
Fil: Albarracin, Ana Lia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; Argentina
Fil: Soletta, Jorge Humberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; Argentina
Fil: Lucianna, Facundo Adrián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; Argentina
Fil: Fernandez, Esteve. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España. Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina; España
Materia
EXTRACELLULAR RECORDING
BIPOLAR ELECTRODES
MICROELECTRODE ARRAY
DATA PROCESSING
EMPIRICAL MODELING
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121558

id CONICETDig_a2e196470fa812faae26c72ba77872f4
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121558
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretationFarfan, Fernando DanielSoto Sanchez, CristinaPizá, Alvaro GabrielAlbarracin, Ana LiaSoletta, Jorge HumbertoLucianna, Facundo AdriánFernandez, EsteveEXTRACELLULAR RECORDINGBIPOLAR ELECTRODESMICROELECTRODE ARRAYDATA PROCESSINGEMPIRICAL MODELINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Background: Physiological studies of sensorial systems often require the acquisition and processing of data extracted from their multiple components to evaluate how the neural information changes in relation to the environment changes. In this work, a comparative study about methodological aspects of two electrophysiological approaches is described. New method: Extracellular recordings from deep vibrissal nerves were obtained by using a customized microelectrode Utah array during passive mechanical stimulation of rat´s whiskers. These recordings were compared with those obtained with bipolar electrodes. We also propose here a simplified empirical model of the electrophysiological activity obtained from a bundle of myelinated nerve fibers. Results: The peripheral activity of the vibrissal system was characterized through the temporal and spectral features obtained with both recording methods. The empirical model not only allows the correlation between anatomical structures and functional features, but also allows to predict changes in the CAPs morphology when the arrangement and the geometry of the electrodes changes. Comparison with existing method(s): This study compares two extracellular recording methods based on analysis techniques, empirical modeling and data processing of vibrissal sensory information. Conclusions: This comparative study reveals a close relationship between the electrophysiological techniques and the processing methods necessary to extract sensory information. This relationship is the result of maximizing the extraction of information from recordings of sensory activity.Fil: Farfan, Fernando Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; ArgentinaFil: Soto Sanchez, Cristina. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España. Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina; EspañaFil: Pizá, Alvaro Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; ArgentinaFil: Albarracin, Ana Lia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; ArgentinaFil: Soletta, Jorge Humberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; ArgentinaFil: Lucianna, Facundo Adrián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; ArgentinaFil: Fernandez, Esteve. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España. Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina; EspañaElsevier B.V.2019-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/121558Farfan, Fernando Daniel; Soto Sanchez, Cristina; Pizá, Alvaro Gabriel; Albarracin, Ana Lia; Soletta, Jorge Humberto; et al.; Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation; Elsevier B.V.; Journal of Neuroscience Methods; 320; 5-2019; 116-1270165-02701872-678XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.03.004info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165027019300767info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:42:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/121558instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:42:38.576CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation
title Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation
spellingShingle Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation
Farfan, Fernando Daniel
EXTRACELLULAR RECORDING
BIPOLAR ELECTRODES
MICROELECTRODE ARRAY
DATA PROCESSING
EMPIRICAL MODELING
title_short Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation
title_full Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation
title_fullStr Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation
title_sort Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Farfan, Fernando Daniel
Soto Sanchez, Cristina
Pizá, Alvaro Gabriel
Albarracin, Ana Lia
Soletta, Jorge Humberto
Lucianna, Facundo Adrián
Fernandez, Esteve
author Farfan, Fernando Daniel
author_facet Farfan, Fernando Daniel
Soto Sanchez, Cristina
Pizá, Alvaro Gabriel
Albarracin, Ana Lia
Soletta, Jorge Humberto
Lucianna, Facundo Adrián
Fernandez, Esteve
author_role author
author2 Soto Sanchez, Cristina
Pizá, Alvaro Gabriel
Albarracin, Ana Lia
Soletta, Jorge Humberto
Lucianna, Facundo Adrián
Fernandez, Esteve
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv EXTRACELLULAR RECORDING
BIPOLAR ELECTRODES
MICROELECTRODE ARRAY
DATA PROCESSING
EMPIRICAL MODELING
topic EXTRACELLULAR RECORDING
BIPOLAR ELECTRODES
MICROELECTRODE ARRAY
DATA PROCESSING
EMPIRICAL MODELING
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: Physiological studies of sensorial systems often require the acquisition and processing of data extracted from their multiple components to evaluate how the neural information changes in relation to the environment changes. In this work, a comparative study about methodological aspects of two electrophysiological approaches is described. New method: Extracellular recordings from deep vibrissal nerves were obtained by using a customized microelectrode Utah array during passive mechanical stimulation of rat´s whiskers. These recordings were compared with those obtained with bipolar electrodes. We also propose here a simplified empirical model of the electrophysiological activity obtained from a bundle of myelinated nerve fibers. Results: The peripheral activity of the vibrissal system was characterized through the temporal and spectral features obtained with both recording methods. The empirical model not only allows the correlation between anatomical structures and functional features, but also allows to predict changes in the CAPs morphology when the arrangement and the geometry of the electrodes changes. Comparison with existing method(s): This study compares two extracellular recording methods based on analysis techniques, empirical modeling and data processing of vibrissal sensory information. Conclusions: This comparative study reveals a close relationship between the electrophysiological techniques and the processing methods necessary to extract sensory information. This relationship is the result of maximizing the extraction of information from recordings of sensory activity.
Fil: Farfan, Fernando Daniel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; Argentina
Fil: Soto Sanchez, Cristina. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España. Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina; España
Fil: Pizá, Alvaro Gabriel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; Argentina
Fil: Albarracin, Ana Lia. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; Argentina
Fil: Soletta, Jorge Humberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; Argentina
Fil: Lucianna, Facundo Adrián. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Instituto Superior de Investigaciones Biológicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Tecnología. Departamento de Bioingeniería. Laboratorio de Medios e Interfases; Argentina
Fil: Fernandez, Esteve. Universidad de Miguel Hernández; España. Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Bioingeniería, Biomateriales y Nanomedicina; España
description Background: Physiological studies of sensorial systems often require the acquisition and processing of data extracted from their multiple components to evaluate how the neural information changes in relation to the environment changes. In this work, a comparative study about methodological aspects of two electrophysiological approaches is described. New method: Extracellular recordings from deep vibrissal nerves were obtained by using a customized microelectrode Utah array during passive mechanical stimulation of rat´s whiskers. These recordings were compared with those obtained with bipolar electrodes. We also propose here a simplified empirical model of the electrophysiological activity obtained from a bundle of myelinated nerve fibers. Results: The peripheral activity of the vibrissal system was characterized through the temporal and spectral features obtained with both recording methods. The empirical model not only allows the correlation between anatomical structures and functional features, but also allows to predict changes in the CAPs morphology when the arrangement and the geometry of the electrodes changes. Comparison with existing method(s): This study compares two extracellular recording methods based on analysis techniques, empirical modeling and data processing of vibrissal sensory information. Conclusions: This comparative study reveals a close relationship between the electrophysiological techniques and the processing methods necessary to extract sensory information. This relationship is the result of maximizing the extraction of information from recordings of sensory activity.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121558
Farfan, Fernando Daniel; Soto Sanchez, Cristina; Pizá, Alvaro Gabriel; Albarracin, Ana Lia; Soletta, Jorge Humberto; et al.; Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation; Elsevier B.V.; Journal of Neuroscience Methods; 320; 5-2019; 116-127
0165-0270
1872-678X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/121558
identifier_str_mv Farfan, Fernando Daniel; Soto Sanchez, Cristina; Pizá, Alvaro Gabriel; Albarracin, Ana Lia; Soletta, Jorge Humberto; et al.; Comparative study of extracellular recording methods for analysis of afferent sensory information: Empirical modeling, data analysis and interpretation; Elsevier B.V.; Journal of Neuroscience Methods; 320; 5-2019; 116-127
0165-0270
1872-678X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.03.004
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165027019300767
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier B.V.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613342973394944
score 13.070432