Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea)

Autores
Santoferrara, Luciana Fernanda; McManus, George B.; Alder, Viviana Andrea
Año de publicación
2013
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We evaluated the small- and large-subunit rDNA (SSU and LSU, respectively) for their ability to discriminate morphospecies of tintinnid ciliates. Multiple individuals from 29 morphospecies were identified according to microscopically-observed characteristics of the lorica, and then sequenced for both loci (21 new species for SSU and all of them new for LSU). Sequences from public databases were included in our analyses, and two hypervariable SSU regions (V4 and V9) were separately examined. Of the four regions, LSU is the most useful as a potential barcoding tool. It showed a gap in distances within and between species, and discriminated the maximum number of phylotypes (86% at 1% cut-off). SSU and V4 were less consistent, sometimes lumping together very distinctive morphospecies, even at the 1% level of sequence divergence. V9 was the least reliable marker in delimitating morphospecies. The agreement in sequences and morphology suggests that the lorica is useful for species discrimination, even in agglomerated forms. However, the observation of both genetically constant yet polymorphic groups of species, as well as similar morphospecies with divergent sequences, indicates that previous taxonomic schemes are complementary to the emerging molecular database.
Fil: Santoferrara, Luciana Fernanda. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina. University of Connecticut; Estados Unidos
Fil: McManus, George B.. University of Connecticut; Estados Unidos
Fil: Alder, Viviana Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Comercio Interno y Culto. Dirección Nacional del Antártico. Instituto Antártico Argentino; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina
Materia
Barcoding
Ciliophora
Lsu Rdna
Ssu Rdna
V4
V9
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/77825
Acceder
id CONICETDig_a1b22b4a5efc412a39f1cd9ba94e6369
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/77825
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea)Santoferrara, Luciana FernandaMcManus, George B.Alder, Viviana AndreaBarcodingCiliophoraLsu RdnaSsu RdnaV4V9https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1We evaluated the small- and large-subunit rDNA (SSU and LSU, respectively) for their ability to discriminate morphospecies of tintinnid ciliates. Multiple individuals from 29 morphospecies were identified according to microscopically-observed characteristics of the lorica, and then sequenced for both loci (21 new species for SSU and all of them new for LSU). Sequences from public databases were included in our analyses, and two hypervariable SSU regions (V4 and V9) were separately examined. Of the four regions, LSU is the most useful as a potential barcoding tool. It showed a gap in distances within and between species, and discriminated the maximum number of phylotypes (86% at 1% cut-off). SSU and V4 were less consistent, sometimes lumping together very distinctive morphospecies, even at the 1% level of sequence divergence. V9 was the least reliable marker in delimitating morphospecies. The agreement in sequences and morphology suggests that the lorica is useful for species discrimination, even in agglomerated forms. However, the observation of both genetically constant yet polymorphic groups of species, as well as similar morphospecies with divergent sequences, indicates that previous taxonomic schemes are complementary to the emerging molecular database.Fil: Santoferrara, Luciana Fernanda. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina. University of Connecticut; Estados UnidosFil: McManus, George B.. University of Connecticut; Estados UnidosFil: Alder, Viviana Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Comercio Interno y Culto. Dirección Nacional del Antártico. Instituto Antártico Argentino; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; ArgentinaElsevier Gmbh2013-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/77825Santoferrara, Luciana Fernanda; McManus, George B.; Alder, Viviana Andrea; Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea); Elsevier Gmbh; Protist; 164; 1; 1-2013; 24-361434-4610CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.protis.2011.12.002info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1434461011001295info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T14:20:29Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/77825instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 14:20:29.473CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea)
title Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea)
spellingShingle Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea)
Santoferrara, Luciana Fernanda
Barcoding
Ciliophora
Lsu Rdna
Ssu Rdna
V4
V9
title_short Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea)
title_full Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea)
title_fullStr Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea)
title_full_unstemmed Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea)
title_sort Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea)
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Santoferrara, Luciana Fernanda
McManus, George B.
Alder, Viviana Andrea
author Santoferrara, Luciana Fernanda
author_facet Santoferrara, Luciana Fernanda
McManus, George B.
Alder, Viviana Andrea
author_role author
author2 McManus, George B.
Alder, Viviana Andrea
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Barcoding
Ciliophora
Lsu Rdna
Ssu Rdna
V4
V9
topic Barcoding
Ciliophora
Lsu Rdna
Ssu Rdna
V4
V9
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We evaluated the small- and large-subunit rDNA (SSU and LSU, respectively) for their ability to discriminate morphospecies of tintinnid ciliates. Multiple individuals from 29 morphospecies were identified according to microscopically-observed characteristics of the lorica, and then sequenced for both loci (21 new species for SSU and all of them new for LSU). Sequences from public databases were included in our analyses, and two hypervariable SSU regions (V4 and V9) were separately examined. Of the four regions, LSU is the most useful as a potential barcoding tool. It showed a gap in distances within and between species, and discriminated the maximum number of phylotypes (86% at 1% cut-off). SSU and V4 were less consistent, sometimes lumping together very distinctive morphospecies, even at the 1% level of sequence divergence. V9 was the least reliable marker in delimitating morphospecies. The agreement in sequences and morphology suggests that the lorica is useful for species discrimination, even in agglomerated forms. However, the observation of both genetically constant yet polymorphic groups of species, as well as similar morphospecies with divergent sequences, indicates that previous taxonomic schemes are complementary to the emerging molecular database.
Fil: Santoferrara, Luciana Fernanda. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina. University of Connecticut; Estados Unidos
Fil: McManus, George B.. University of Connecticut; Estados Unidos
Fil: Alder, Viviana Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Ministerio de Relaciones Exteriores, Comercio Interno y Culto. Dirección Nacional del Antártico. Instituto Antártico Argentino; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina
description We evaluated the small- and large-subunit rDNA (SSU and LSU, respectively) for their ability to discriminate morphospecies of tintinnid ciliates. Multiple individuals from 29 morphospecies were identified according to microscopically-observed characteristics of the lorica, and then sequenced for both loci (21 new species for SSU and all of them new for LSU). Sequences from public databases were included in our analyses, and two hypervariable SSU regions (V4 and V9) were separately examined. Of the four regions, LSU is the most useful as a potential barcoding tool. It showed a gap in distances within and between species, and discriminated the maximum number of phylotypes (86% at 1% cut-off). SSU and V4 were less consistent, sometimes lumping together very distinctive morphospecies, even at the 1% level of sequence divergence. V9 was the least reliable marker in delimitating morphospecies. The agreement in sequences and morphology suggests that the lorica is useful for species discrimination, even in agglomerated forms. However, the observation of both genetically constant yet polymorphic groups of species, as well as similar morphospecies with divergent sequences, indicates that previous taxonomic schemes are complementary to the emerging molecular database.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/77825
Santoferrara, Luciana Fernanda; McManus, George B.; Alder, Viviana Andrea; Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea); Elsevier Gmbh; Protist; 164; 1; 1-2013; 24-36
1434-4610
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/77825
identifier_str_mv Santoferrara, Luciana Fernanda; McManus, George B.; Alder, Viviana Andrea; Utility of Genetic Markers and Morphology for Species Discrimination within the Order Tintinnida (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea); Elsevier Gmbh; Protist; 164; 1; 1-2013; 24-36
1434-4610
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.protis.2011.12.002
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1434461011001295
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Gmbh
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier Gmbh
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846082580931149824
score 13.22299

Publicaciones similares