Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices

Autores
Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.; Colombo, Laura Marina
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Peer response writing groups present several benefits in language learning classrooms. However, they are usually supervised by the instructor and thus become time consuming when carried out in class. This descriptive case study offers a model for extramural peer feedback and analyzes 12 meeting transcriptions of four undergraduate EFL writing groups implemented outside class time as support for an academic writing course with limited time for student interaction. These peer response groups were organized to: 1) provide participants with an additional audience, 2) open a space to practice the L2 in an authentic communicative situation, and 3) engage in peer review activities, a literacy practice associated with scientific-academic writing. Based on the data analysis of participant interactions, three main themes emerged according to what the members talked about: interacting as authors and reviewers of research articles, using the L2 in authentic communicative situations, and talking about and enacting literacy practices Although the experience of these writing groups was mainly positive, one of the limitations was their short lifespan, which prevented additional training to model peer response that would help facilitate the interaction among the participants, an important consideration to achieve beneficial peer feedback and to scaffold the process.
Fil: Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.. Universidad de Cuenca; Ecuador
Fil: Colombo, Laura Marina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
PEER FEEDBACK
EFL
UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
ACADEMIC WRITING
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/164814

id CONICETDig_9b91c05dbde9bc20339f804d39058d44
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/164814
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practicesRodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.Colombo, Laura MarinaPEER FEEDBACKEFLUNDERGRADUATE STUDENTSACADEMIC WRITINGhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Peer response writing groups present several benefits in language learning classrooms. However, they are usually supervised by the instructor and thus become time consuming when carried out in class. This descriptive case study offers a model for extramural peer feedback and analyzes 12 meeting transcriptions of four undergraduate EFL writing groups implemented outside class time as support for an academic writing course with limited time for student interaction. These peer response groups were organized to: 1) provide participants with an additional audience, 2) open a space to practice the L2 in an authentic communicative situation, and 3) engage in peer review activities, a literacy practice associated with scientific-academic writing. Based on the data analysis of participant interactions, three main themes emerged according to what the members talked about: interacting as authors and reviewers of research articles, using the L2 in authentic communicative situations, and talking about and enacting literacy practices Although the experience of these writing groups was mainly positive, one of the limitations was their short lifespan, which prevented additional training to model peer response that would help facilitate the interaction among the participants, an important consideration to achieve beneficial peer feedback and to scaffold the process.Fil: Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.. Universidad de Cuenca; EcuadorFil: Colombo, Laura Marina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaTESL-EJ2021-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/164814Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.; Colombo, Laura Marina; Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices; TESL-EJ; TESL-EJ; 24; 4; 2-2021; 1-221072-4303CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume24/ej96/ej96a7/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:14:25Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/164814instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:14:26.196CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices
title Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices
spellingShingle Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices
Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.
PEER FEEDBACK
EFL
UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
ACADEMIC WRITING
title_short Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices
title_full Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices
title_fullStr Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices
title_full_unstemmed Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices
title_sort Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.
Colombo, Laura Marina
author Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.
author_facet Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.
Colombo, Laura Marina
author_role author
author2 Colombo, Laura Marina
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv PEER FEEDBACK
EFL
UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
ACADEMIC WRITING
topic PEER FEEDBACK
EFL
UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS
ACADEMIC WRITING
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Peer response writing groups present several benefits in language learning classrooms. However, they are usually supervised by the instructor and thus become time consuming when carried out in class. This descriptive case study offers a model for extramural peer feedback and analyzes 12 meeting transcriptions of four undergraduate EFL writing groups implemented outside class time as support for an academic writing course with limited time for student interaction. These peer response groups were organized to: 1) provide participants with an additional audience, 2) open a space to practice the L2 in an authentic communicative situation, and 3) engage in peer review activities, a literacy practice associated with scientific-academic writing. Based on the data analysis of participant interactions, three main themes emerged according to what the members talked about: interacting as authors and reviewers of research articles, using the L2 in authentic communicative situations, and talking about and enacting literacy practices Although the experience of these writing groups was mainly positive, one of the limitations was their short lifespan, which prevented additional training to model peer response that would help facilitate the interaction among the participants, an important consideration to achieve beneficial peer feedback and to scaffold the process.
Fil: Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.. Universidad de Cuenca; Ecuador
Fil: Colombo, Laura Marina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Peer response writing groups present several benefits in language learning classrooms. However, they are usually supervised by the instructor and thus become time consuming when carried out in class. This descriptive case study offers a model for extramural peer feedback and analyzes 12 meeting transcriptions of four undergraduate EFL writing groups implemented outside class time as support for an academic writing course with limited time for student interaction. These peer response groups were organized to: 1) provide participants with an additional audience, 2) open a space to practice the L2 in an authentic communicative situation, and 3) engage in peer review activities, a literacy practice associated with scientific-academic writing. Based on the data analysis of participant interactions, three main themes emerged according to what the members talked about: interacting as authors and reviewers of research articles, using the L2 in authentic communicative situations, and talking about and enacting literacy practices Although the experience of these writing groups was mainly positive, one of the limitations was their short lifespan, which prevented additional training to model peer response that would help facilitate the interaction among the participants, an important consideration to achieve beneficial peer feedback and to scaffold the process.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/164814
Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.; Colombo, Laura Marina; Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices; TESL-EJ; TESL-EJ; 24; 4; 2-2021; 1-22
1072-4303
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/164814
identifier_str_mv Rodas Brosam, Elisabeth L.; Colombo, Laura Marina; Self-managed peer writing groups for the development of EFL students literacy practices; TESL-EJ; TESL-EJ; 24; 4; 2-2021; 1-22
1072-4303
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume24/ej96/ej96a7/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv TESL-EJ
publisher.none.fl_str_mv TESL-EJ
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842980770784739328
score 12.993085