Violence risk assessment practices in Spain

Autores
Arbach, Karin; Andrés Pueyo, Antonio
Año de publicación
2016
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
parte de libro
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
While practitioners are routinely faced with the task of assessing the risk of violence, the use of structured methods is neither mandatory nor widespread among mental health, correctional, and law enforcement professionals in Spain. That said, the dichotomous construct of dangerousness that had once been widely accepted by both practitioners and the judiciary has largely been replaced over the course of the 21st century by the continuous construct of risk (Andrés-Pueyo & Redondo-Illescas, 2007). This shift can mainly be attributed to the recognition that unstructured judgments of dangerousness produce poor levels of both predictive validity as well as inter-rater reliability (for a thorough discussion see Andrés-Pueyo & Arbach-Lucioni, 2014). The aim of the present chapter is to consider the history of this conceptual shift, including a discussion of risk assessment tools developed in Spain as well as the identification of future directions for research and practice in the country.
Fil: Arbach, Karin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; Argentina
Fil: Andrés Pueyo, Antonio. Universidad de Barcelona; España
Materia
VIOLENCE
RISK ASSESSMENT
INTERNATIONAL
SPAIN
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/118001
Acceder
id CONICETDig_9749cab044524baddef4f8b4d4567ade
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/118001
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Violence risk assessment practices in SpainArbach, KarinAndrés Pueyo, AntonioVIOLENCERISK ASSESSMENTINTERNATIONALSPAINhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5While practitioners are routinely faced with the task of assessing the risk of violence, the use of structured methods is neither mandatory nor widespread among mental health, correctional, and law enforcement professionals in Spain. That said, the dichotomous construct of dangerousness that had once been widely accepted by both practitioners and the judiciary has largely been replaced over the course of the 21st century by the continuous construct of risk (Andrés-Pueyo & Redondo-Illescas, 2007). This shift can mainly be attributed to the recognition that unstructured judgments of dangerousness produce poor levels of both predictive validity as well as inter-rater reliability (for a thorough discussion see Andrés-Pueyo & Arbach-Lucioni, 2014). The aim of the present chapter is to consider the history of this conceptual shift, including a discussion of risk assessment tools developed in Spain as well as the identification of future directions for research and practice in the country.Fil: Arbach, Karin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; ArgentinaFil: Andrés Pueyo, Antonio. Universidad de Barcelona; EspañaOxford University PressSingh, JayBjorkly, StahlFazel, Seena2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bookParthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibroapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/118001Arbach, Karin; Andrés Pueyo, Antonio; Violence risk assessment practices in Spain; Oxford University Press; 2016; 200-2409780199386291CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199386291.001.0001info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:53:58Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/118001instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:53:58.944CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Violence risk assessment practices in Spain
title Violence risk assessment practices in Spain
spellingShingle Violence risk assessment practices in Spain
Arbach, Karin
VIOLENCE
RISK ASSESSMENT
INTERNATIONAL
SPAIN
title_short Violence risk assessment practices in Spain
title_full Violence risk assessment practices in Spain
title_fullStr Violence risk assessment practices in Spain
title_full_unstemmed Violence risk assessment practices in Spain
title_sort Violence risk assessment practices in Spain
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Arbach, Karin
Andrés Pueyo, Antonio
author Arbach, Karin
author_facet Arbach, Karin
Andrés Pueyo, Antonio
author_role author
author2 Andrés Pueyo, Antonio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Singh, Jay
Bjorkly, Stahl
Fazel, Seena
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv VIOLENCE
RISK ASSESSMENT
INTERNATIONAL
SPAIN
topic VIOLENCE
RISK ASSESSMENT
INTERNATIONAL
SPAIN
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv While practitioners are routinely faced with the task of assessing the risk of violence, the use of structured methods is neither mandatory nor widespread among mental health, correctional, and law enforcement professionals in Spain. That said, the dichotomous construct of dangerousness that had once been widely accepted by both practitioners and the judiciary has largely been replaced over the course of the 21st century by the continuous construct of risk (Andrés-Pueyo & Redondo-Illescas, 2007). This shift can mainly be attributed to the recognition that unstructured judgments of dangerousness produce poor levels of both predictive validity as well as inter-rater reliability (for a thorough discussion see Andrés-Pueyo & Arbach-Lucioni, 2014). The aim of the present chapter is to consider the history of this conceptual shift, including a discussion of risk assessment tools developed in Spain as well as the identification of future directions for research and practice in the country.
Fil: Arbach, Karin. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas. - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones Psicológicas; Argentina
Fil: Andrés Pueyo, Antonio. Universidad de Barcelona; España
description While practitioners are routinely faced with the task of assessing the risk of violence, the use of structured methods is neither mandatory nor widespread among mental health, correctional, and law enforcement professionals in Spain. That said, the dichotomous construct of dangerousness that had once been widely accepted by both practitioners and the judiciary has largely been replaced over the course of the 21st century by the continuous construct of risk (Andrés-Pueyo & Redondo-Illescas, 2007). This shift can mainly be attributed to the recognition that unstructured judgments of dangerousness produce poor levels of both predictive validity as well as inter-rater reliability (for a thorough discussion see Andrés-Pueyo & Arbach-Lucioni, 2014). The aim of the present chapter is to consider the history of this conceptual shift, including a discussion of risk assessment tools developed in Spain as well as the identification of future directions for research and practice in the country.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
info:ar-repo/semantics/parteDeLibro
status_str publishedVersion
format bookPart
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/118001
Arbach, Karin; Andrés Pueyo, Antonio; Violence risk assessment practices in Spain; Oxford University Press; 2016; 200-240
9780199386291
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/118001
identifier_str_mv Arbach, Karin; Andrés Pueyo, Antonio; Violence risk assessment practices in Spain; Oxford University Press; 2016; 200-240
9780199386291
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199386291.001.0001
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Oxford University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1844613643527782400
score 13.070432

Publicaciones similares