International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries
- Autores
- Singh, Jay P.; Desmarais, Sarah L.; Hurducas, Cristina; Arbach, Karin; Condemarin, Carolina; Dean, Kimberlie; Doyle, Michael; Folino, Jorge Oscar; Godoy Cervera, Verónica; Grann, Martin; Ho, Robyn Mei Yee; Large, Matthew M.; Nielsen, Louise Hjort; Pham, Thierry H.; Rebocho, Maria Francisca; Reeves, Kim A.; Rettenberger, Martin; de Ruiter, Corine; Seewald, Katharina; Otto, Randy K.
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Mental health professionals are routinely called upon to assess the risk of violence presented by their patients. Prior surveys of risk assessment methods have been largely circumscribed to individual countries and have not compared the practices of different professional disciplines. Therefore, a Web-based survey was developed to examine methods of violence risk assessment across six continents, and to compare the perceived utility of these methods by psychologists, psychiatrists, and nurses. The survey was translated into nine languages and distributed to members of 59 national and international organizations. Surveys were completed by 2135 respondents from 44 countries. Respondents in all six continents reported using instruments to assess, manage, and monitor violence risk, with over half of risk assessments in the past 12 months conducted using such an instrument. Respondents in Asia and South America reported conducting fewer structured assessments, and psychologists reported using instruments more than psychiatrists or nurses. Feedback regarding outcomes was not common: respondents who conducted structured risk assessments reported receiving feedback on accuracy in under 40% of cases, and those who used instruments to develop management plans reported feedback on whether plans were implemented in under 50% of cases. When information on the latter was obtained, risk management plans were not implemented in over a third of cases. Results suggest that violence risk assessment is a global phenomenon, as is the use of instruments to assist in this task. Improved feedback following risk assessments and the development of risk management plans could improve the efficacy of health services. © 2014 Copyright International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services.
Fil: Singh, Jay P.. Global Institute Of Forensic Research; . Universitat Konstanz; Alemania. Molde University College; Noruega
Fil: Desmarais, Sarah L.. North Carolina State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hurducas, Cristina. University Of South Florida Tampa; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arbach, Karin. Universidad de Barcelona; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad; Argentina
Fil: Condemarin, Carolina. Ministerio de Justicia; Chile
Fil: Dean, Kimberlie. University of New South Wales; Australia. Justice Health & Forensic Mental Health Network; Australia
Fil: Doyle, Michael. University of Manchester; Reino Unido
Fil: Folino, Jorge Oscar. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Godoy Cervera, Verónica. Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan; México
Fil: Grann, Martin. Karolinska Huddinge Hospital. Karolinska Institutet; Suecia
Fil: Ho, Robyn Mei Yee. Castle Peak Hospital Hong Kong; China
Fil: Large, Matthew M.. University of New South Wales; Australia
Fil: Nielsen, Louise Hjort. University of Southern Denmark; Dinamarca
Fil: Pham, Thierry H.. Umons; Bélgica. Centre de Recherche En Défense Sociale; Bélgica
Fil: Rebocho, Maria Francisca. Universidade Fernando Pessoa; Portugal
Fil: Reeves, Kim A.. University Fraser Simon; Canadá
Fil: Rettenberger, Martin. University Mainz. Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg; Alemania
Fil: de Ruiter, Corine. Maastricht University; Países Bajos
Fil: Seewald, Katharina. Universitat Konstanz; Alemania
Fil: Otto, Randy K.. University of South Florida Tampa; Estados Unidos - Materia
-
Violence Risk Assessment
Survey
International
Mental Health - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/38251
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_73bbd15843dd35a6aad7ffa0e6369b75 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/38251 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 CountriesSingh, Jay P.Desmarais, Sarah L.Hurducas, CristinaArbach, KarinCondemarin, CarolinaDean, KimberlieDoyle, MichaelFolino, Jorge OscarGodoy Cervera, VerónicaGrann, MartinHo, Robyn Mei YeeLarge, Matthew M.Nielsen, Louise HjortPham, Thierry H.Rebocho, Maria FranciscaReeves, Kim A.Rettenberger, Martinde Ruiter, CorineSeewald, KatharinaOtto, Randy K.Violence Risk AssessmentSurveyInternationalMental Healthhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Mental health professionals are routinely called upon to assess the risk of violence presented by their patients. Prior surveys of risk assessment methods have been largely circumscribed to individual countries and have not compared the practices of different professional disciplines. Therefore, a Web-based survey was developed to examine methods of violence risk assessment across six continents, and to compare the perceived utility of these methods by psychologists, psychiatrists, and nurses. The survey was translated into nine languages and distributed to members of 59 national and international organizations. Surveys were completed by 2135 respondents from 44 countries. Respondents in all six continents reported using instruments to assess, manage, and monitor violence risk, with over half of risk assessments in the past 12 months conducted using such an instrument. Respondents in Asia and South America reported conducting fewer structured assessments, and psychologists reported using instruments more than psychiatrists or nurses. Feedback regarding outcomes was not common: respondents who conducted structured risk assessments reported receiving feedback on accuracy in under 40% of cases, and those who used instruments to develop management plans reported feedback on whether plans were implemented in under 50% of cases. When information on the latter was obtained, risk management plans were not implemented in over a third of cases. Results suggest that violence risk assessment is a global phenomenon, as is the use of instruments to assist in this task. Improved feedback following risk assessments and the development of risk management plans could improve the efficacy of health services. © 2014 Copyright International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services.Fil: Singh, Jay P.. Global Institute Of Forensic Research; . Universitat Konstanz; Alemania. Molde University College; NoruegaFil: Desmarais, Sarah L.. North Carolina State University; Estados UnidosFil: Hurducas, Cristina. University Of South Florida Tampa; Estados UnidosFil: Arbach, Karin. Universidad de Barcelona; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad; ArgentinaFil: Condemarin, Carolina. Ministerio de Justicia; ChileFil: Dean, Kimberlie. University of New South Wales; Australia. Justice Health & Forensic Mental Health Network; AustraliaFil: Doyle, Michael. University of Manchester; Reino UnidoFil: Folino, Jorge Oscar. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Godoy Cervera, Verónica. Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan; MéxicoFil: Grann, Martin. Karolinska Huddinge Hospital. Karolinska Institutet; SueciaFil: Ho, Robyn Mei Yee. Castle Peak Hospital Hong Kong; ChinaFil: Large, Matthew M.. University of New South Wales; AustraliaFil: Nielsen, Louise Hjort. University of Southern Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Pham, Thierry H.. Umons; Bélgica. Centre de Recherche En Défense Sociale; BélgicaFil: Rebocho, Maria Francisca. Universidade Fernando Pessoa; PortugalFil: Reeves, Kim A.. University Fraser Simon; CanadáFil: Rettenberger, Martin. University Mainz. Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg; AlemaniaFil: de Ruiter, Corine. Maastricht University; Países BajosFil: Seewald, Katharina. Universitat Konstanz; AlemaniaFil: Otto, Randy K.. University of South Florida Tampa; Estados UnidosRoutledge2014-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/38251Singh, Jay P.; Desmarais, Sarah L.; Hurducas, Cristina; Arbach, Karin; Condemarin, Carolina; et al.; International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries; Routledge; International Journal of Forensic Mental Health; 13; 3; 9-2014; 193-2061499-9013CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/14999013.2014.922141info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:34Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/38251instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:34.718CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries |
title |
International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries |
spellingShingle |
International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries Singh, Jay P. Violence Risk Assessment Survey International Mental Health |
title_short |
International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries |
title_full |
International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries |
title_fullStr |
International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries |
title_full_unstemmed |
International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries |
title_sort |
International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Singh, Jay P. Desmarais, Sarah L. Hurducas, Cristina Arbach, Karin Condemarin, Carolina Dean, Kimberlie Doyle, Michael Folino, Jorge Oscar Godoy Cervera, Verónica Grann, Martin Ho, Robyn Mei Yee Large, Matthew M. Nielsen, Louise Hjort Pham, Thierry H. Rebocho, Maria Francisca Reeves, Kim A. Rettenberger, Martin de Ruiter, Corine Seewald, Katharina Otto, Randy K. |
author |
Singh, Jay P. |
author_facet |
Singh, Jay P. Desmarais, Sarah L. Hurducas, Cristina Arbach, Karin Condemarin, Carolina Dean, Kimberlie Doyle, Michael Folino, Jorge Oscar Godoy Cervera, Verónica Grann, Martin Ho, Robyn Mei Yee Large, Matthew M. Nielsen, Louise Hjort Pham, Thierry H. Rebocho, Maria Francisca Reeves, Kim A. Rettenberger, Martin de Ruiter, Corine Seewald, Katharina Otto, Randy K. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Desmarais, Sarah L. Hurducas, Cristina Arbach, Karin Condemarin, Carolina Dean, Kimberlie Doyle, Michael Folino, Jorge Oscar Godoy Cervera, Verónica Grann, Martin Ho, Robyn Mei Yee Large, Matthew M. Nielsen, Louise Hjort Pham, Thierry H. Rebocho, Maria Francisca Reeves, Kim A. Rettenberger, Martin de Ruiter, Corine Seewald, Katharina Otto, Randy K. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Violence Risk Assessment Survey International Mental Health |
topic |
Violence Risk Assessment Survey International Mental Health |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Mental health professionals are routinely called upon to assess the risk of violence presented by their patients. Prior surveys of risk assessment methods have been largely circumscribed to individual countries and have not compared the practices of different professional disciplines. Therefore, a Web-based survey was developed to examine methods of violence risk assessment across six continents, and to compare the perceived utility of these methods by psychologists, psychiatrists, and nurses. The survey was translated into nine languages and distributed to members of 59 national and international organizations. Surveys were completed by 2135 respondents from 44 countries. Respondents in all six continents reported using instruments to assess, manage, and monitor violence risk, with over half of risk assessments in the past 12 months conducted using such an instrument. Respondents in Asia and South America reported conducting fewer structured assessments, and psychologists reported using instruments more than psychiatrists or nurses. Feedback regarding outcomes was not common: respondents who conducted structured risk assessments reported receiving feedback on accuracy in under 40% of cases, and those who used instruments to develop management plans reported feedback on whether plans were implemented in under 50% of cases. When information on the latter was obtained, risk management plans were not implemented in over a third of cases. Results suggest that violence risk assessment is a global phenomenon, as is the use of instruments to assist in this task. Improved feedback following risk assessments and the development of risk management plans could improve the efficacy of health services. © 2014 Copyright International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services. Fil: Singh, Jay P.. Global Institute Of Forensic Research; . Universitat Konstanz; Alemania. Molde University College; Noruega Fil: Desmarais, Sarah L.. North Carolina State University; Estados Unidos Fil: Hurducas, Cristina. University Of South Florida Tampa; Estados Unidos Fil: Arbach, Karin. Universidad de Barcelona; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad; Argentina Fil: Condemarin, Carolina. Ministerio de Justicia; Chile Fil: Dean, Kimberlie. University of New South Wales; Australia. Justice Health & Forensic Mental Health Network; Australia Fil: Doyle, Michael. University of Manchester; Reino Unido Fil: Folino, Jorge Oscar. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina Fil: Godoy Cervera, Verónica. Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan; México Fil: Grann, Martin. Karolinska Huddinge Hospital. Karolinska Institutet; Suecia Fil: Ho, Robyn Mei Yee. Castle Peak Hospital Hong Kong; China Fil: Large, Matthew M.. University of New South Wales; Australia Fil: Nielsen, Louise Hjort. University of Southern Denmark; Dinamarca Fil: Pham, Thierry H.. Umons; Bélgica. Centre de Recherche En Défense Sociale; Bélgica Fil: Rebocho, Maria Francisca. Universidade Fernando Pessoa; Portugal Fil: Reeves, Kim A.. University Fraser Simon; Canadá Fil: Rettenberger, Martin. University Mainz. Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg; Alemania Fil: de Ruiter, Corine. Maastricht University; Países Bajos Fil: Seewald, Katharina. Universitat Konstanz; Alemania Fil: Otto, Randy K.. University of South Florida Tampa; Estados Unidos |
description |
Mental health professionals are routinely called upon to assess the risk of violence presented by their patients. Prior surveys of risk assessment methods have been largely circumscribed to individual countries and have not compared the practices of different professional disciplines. Therefore, a Web-based survey was developed to examine methods of violence risk assessment across six continents, and to compare the perceived utility of these methods by psychologists, psychiatrists, and nurses. The survey was translated into nine languages and distributed to members of 59 national and international organizations. Surveys were completed by 2135 respondents from 44 countries. Respondents in all six continents reported using instruments to assess, manage, and monitor violence risk, with over half of risk assessments in the past 12 months conducted using such an instrument. Respondents in Asia and South America reported conducting fewer structured assessments, and psychologists reported using instruments more than psychiatrists or nurses. Feedback regarding outcomes was not common: respondents who conducted structured risk assessments reported receiving feedback on accuracy in under 40% of cases, and those who used instruments to develop management plans reported feedback on whether plans were implemented in under 50% of cases. When information on the latter was obtained, risk management plans were not implemented in over a third of cases. Results suggest that violence risk assessment is a global phenomenon, as is the use of instruments to assist in this task. Improved feedback following risk assessments and the development of risk management plans could improve the efficacy of health services. © 2014 Copyright International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/38251 Singh, Jay P.; Desmarais, Sarah L.; Hurducas, Cristina; Arbach, Karin; Condemarin, Carolina; et al.; International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries; Routledge; International Journal of Forensic Mental Health; 13; 3; 9-2014; 193-206 1499-9013 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/38251 |
identifier_str_mv |
Singh, Jay P.; Desmarais, Sarah L.; Hurducas, Cristina; Arbach, Karin; Condemarin, Carolina; et al.; International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries; Routledge; International Journal of Forensic Mental Health; 13; 3; 9-2014; 193-206 1499-9013 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/14999013.2014.922141 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Routledge |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Routledge |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269103127003136 |
score |
13.13397 |