International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries

Autores
Singh, Jay P.; Desmarais, Sarah L.; Hurducas, Cristina; Arbach, Karin; Condemarin, Carolina; Dean, Kimberlie; Doyle, Michael; Folino, Jorge Oscar; Godoy Cervera, Verónica; Grann, Martin; Ho, Robyn Mei Yee; Large, Matthew M.; Nielsen, Louise Hjort; Pham, Thierry H.; Rebocho, Maria Francisca; Reeves, Kim A.; Rettenberger, Martin; de Ruiter, Corine; Seewald, Katharina; Otto, Randy K.
Año de publicación
2014
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Mental health professionals are routinely called upon to assess the risk of violence presented by their patients. Prior surveys of risk assessment methods have been largely circumscribed to individual countries and have not compared the practices of different professional disciplines. Therefore, a Web-based survey was developed to examine methods of violence risk assessment across six continents, and to compare the perceived utility of these methods by psychologists, psychiatrists, and nurses. The survey was translated into nine languages and distributed to members of 59 national and international organizations. Surveys were completed by 2135 respondents from 44 countries. Respondents in all six continents reported using instruments to assess, manage, and monitor violence risk, with over half of risk assessments in the past 12 months conducted using such an instrument. Respondents in Asia and South America reported conducting fewer structured assessments, and psychologists reported using instruments more than psychiatrists or nurses. Feedback regarding outcomes was not common: respondents who conducted structured risk assessments reported receiving feedback on accuracy in under 40% of cases, and those who used instruments to develop management plans reported feedback on whether plans were implemented in under 50% of cases. When information on the latter was obtained, risk management plans were not implemented in over a third of cases. Results suggest that violence risk assessment is a global phenomenon, as is the use of instruments to assist in this task. Improved feedback following risk assessments and the development of risk management plans could improve the efficacy of health services. © 2014 Copyright International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services.
Fil: Singh, Jay P.. Global Institute Of Forensic Research; . Universitat Konstanz; Alemania. Molde University College; Noruega
Fil: Desmarais, Sarah L.. North Carolina State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hurducas, Cristina. University Of South Florida Tampa; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arbach, Karin. Universidad de Barcelona; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad; Argentina
Fil: Condemarin, Carolina. Ministerio de Justicia; Chile
Fil: Dean, Kimberlie. University of New South Wales; Australia. Justice Health & Forensic Mental Health Network; Australia
Fil: Doyle, Michael. University of Manchester; Reino Unido
Fil: Folino, Jorge Oscar. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Godoy Cervera, Verónica. Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan; México
Fil: Grann, Martin. Karolinska Huddinge Hospital. Karolinska Institutet; Suecia
Fil: Ho, Robyn Mei Yee. Castle Peak Hospital Hong Kong; China
Fil: Large, Matthew M.. University of New South Wales; Australia
Fil: Nielsen, Louise Hjort. University of Southern Denmark; Dinamarca
Fil: Pham, Thierry H.. Umons; Bélgica. Centre de Recherche En Défense Sociale; Bélgica
Fil: Rebocho, Maria Francisca. Universidade Fernando Pessoa; Portugal
Fil: Reeves, Kim A.. University Fraser Simon; Canadá
Fil: Rettenberger, Martin. University Mainz. Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg; Alemania
Fil: de Ruiter, Corine. Maastricht University; Países Bajos
Fil: Seewald, Katharina. Universitat Konstanz; Alemania
Fil: Otto, Randy K.. University of South Florida Tampa; Estados Unidos
Materia
Violence Risk Assessment
Survey
International
Mental Health
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/38251

id CONICETDig_73bbd15843dd35a6aad7ffa0e6369b75
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/38251
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 CountriesSingh, Jay P.Desmarais, Sarah L.Hurducas, CristinaArbach, KarinCondemarin, CarolinaDean, KimberlieDoyle, MichaelFolino, Jorge OscarGodoy Cervera, VerónicaGrann, MartinHo, Robyn Mei YeeLarge, Matthew M.Nielsen, Louise HjortPham, Thierry H.Rebocho, Maria FranciscaReeves, Kim A.Rettenberger, Martinde Ruiter, CorineSeewald, KatharinaOtto, Randy K.Violence Risk AssessmentSurveyInternationalMental Healthhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Mental health professionals are routinely called upon to assess the risk of violence presented by their patients. Prior surveys of risk assessment methods have been largely circumscribed to individual countries and have not compared the practices of different professional disciplines. Therefore, a Web-based survey was developed to examine methods of violence risk assessment across six continents, and to compare the perceived utility of these methods by psychologists, psychiatrists, and nurses. The survey was translated into nine languages and distributed to members of 59 national and international organizations. Surveys were completed by 2135 respondents from 44 countries. Respondents in all six continents reported using instruments to assess, manage, and monitor violence risk, with over half of risk assessments in the past 12 months conducted using such an instrument. Respondents in Asia and South America reported conducting fewer structured assessments, and psychologists reported using instruments more than psychiatrists or nurses. Feedback regarding outcomes was not common: respondents who conducted structured risk assessments reported receiving feedback on accuracy in under 40% of cases, and those who used instruments to develop management plans reported feedback on whether plans were implemented in under 50% of cases. When information on the latter was obtained, risk management plans were not implemented in over a third of cases. Results suggest that violence risk assessment is a global phenomenon, as is the use of instruments to assist in this task. Improved feedback following risk assessments and the development of risk management plans could improve the efficacy of health services. © 2014 Copyright International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services.Fil: Singh, Jay P.. Global Institute Of Forensic Research; . Universitat Konstanz; Alemania. Molde University College; NoruegaFil: Desmarais, Sarah L.. North Carolina State University; Estados UnidosFil: Hurducas, Cristina. University Of South Florida Tampa; Estados UnidosFil: Arbach, Karin. Universidad de Barcelona; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad; ArgentinaFil: Condemarin, Carolina. Ministerio de Justicia; ChileFil: Dean, Kimberlie. University of New South Wales; Australia. Justice Health & Forensic Mental Health Network; AustraliaFil: Doyle, Michael. University of Manchester; Reino UnidoFil: Folino, Jorge Oscar. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Godoy Cervera, Verónica. Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan; MéxicoFil: Grann, Martin. Karolinska Huddinge Hospital. Karolinska Institutet; SueciaFil: Ho, Robyn Mei Yee. Castle Peak Hospital Hong Kong; ChinaFil: Large, Matthew M.. University of New South Wales; AustraliaFil: Nielsen, Louise Hjort. University of Southern Denmark; DinamarcaFil: Pham, Thierry H.. Umons; Bélgica. Centre de Recherche En Défense Sociale; BélgicaFil: Rebocho, Maria Francisca. Universidade Fernando Pessoa; PortugalFil: Reeves, Kim A.. University Fraser Simon; CanadáFil: Rettenberger, Martin. University Mainz. Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg; AlemaniaFil: de Ruiter, Corine. Maastricht University; Países BajosFil: Seewald, Katharina. Universitat Konstanz; AlemaniaFil: Otto, Randy K.. University of South Florida Tampa; Estados UnidosRoutledge2014-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/38251Singh, Jay P.; Desmarais, Sarah L.; Hurducas, Cristina; Arbach, Karin; Condemarin, Carolina; et al.; International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries; Routledge; International Journal of Forensic Mental Health; 13; 3; 9-2014; 193-2061499-9013CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/14999013.2014.922141info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:34Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/38251instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:34.718CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries
title International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries
spellingShingle International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries
Singh, Jay P.
Violence Risk Assessment
Survey
International
Mental Health
title_short International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries
title_full International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries
title_fullStr International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries
title_full_unstemmed International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries
title_sort International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Singh, Jay P.
Desmarais, Sarah L.
Hurducas, Cristina
Arbach, Karin
Condemarin, Carolina
Dean, Kimberlie
Doyle, Michael
Folino, Jorge Oscar
Godoy Cervera, Verónica
Grann, Martin
Ho, Robyn Mei Yee
Large, Matthew M.
Nielsen, Louise Hjort
Pham, Thierry H.
Rebocho, Maria Francisca
Reeves, Kim A.
Rettenberger, Martin
de Ruiter, Corine
Seewald, Katharina
Otto, Randy K.
author Singh, Jay P.
author_facet Singh, Jay P.
Desmarais, Sarah L.
Hurducas, Cristina
Arbach, Karin
Condemarin, Carolina
Dean, Kimberlie
Doyle, Michael
Folino, Jorge Oscar
Godoy Cervera, Verónica
Grann, Martin
Ho, Robyn Mei Yee
Large, Matthew M.
Nielsen, Louise Hjort
Pham, Thierry H.
Rebocho, Maria Francisca
Reeves, Kim A.
Rettenberger, Martin
de Ruiter, Corine
Seewald, Katharina
Otto, Randy K.
author_role author
author2 Desmarais, Sarah L.
Hurducas, Cristina
Arbach, Karin
Condemarin, Carolina
Dean, Kimberlie
Doyle, Michael
Folino, Jorge Oscar
Godoy Cervera, Verónica
Grann, Martin
Ho, Robyn Mei Yee
Large, Matthew M.
Nielsen, Louise Hjort
Pham, Thierry H.
Rebocho, Maria Francisca
Reeves, Kim A.
Rettenberger, Martin
de Ruiter, Corine
Seewald, Katharina
Otto, Randy K.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Violence Risk Assessment
Survey
International
Mental Health
topic Violence Risk Assessment
Survey
International
Mental Health
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Mental health professionals are routinely called upon to assess the risk of violence presented by their patients. Prior surveys of risk assessment methods have been largely circumscribed to individual countries and have not compared the practices of different professional disciplines. Therefore, a Web-based survey was developed to examine methods of violence risk assessment across six continents, and to compare the perceived utility of these methods by psychologists, psychiatrists, and nurses. The survey was translated into nine languages and distributed to members of 59 national and international organizations. Surveys were completed by 2135 respondents from 44 countries. Respondents in all six continents reported using instruments to assess, manage, and monitor violence risk, with over half of risk assessments in the past 12 months conducted using such an instrument. Respondents in Asia and South America reported conducting fewer structured assessments, and psychologists reported using instruments more than psychiatrists or nurses. Feedback regarding outcomes was not common: respondents who conducted structured risk assessments reported receiving feedback on accuracy in under 40% of cases, and those who used instruments to develop management plans reported feedback on whether plans were implemented in under 50% of cases. When information on the latter was obtained, risk management plans were not implemented in over a third of cases. Results suggest that violence risk assessment is a global phenomenon, as is the use of instruments to assist in this task. Improved feedback following risk assessments and the development of risk management plans could improve the efficacy of health services. © 2014 Copyright International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services.
Fil: Singh, Jay P.. Global Institute Of Forensic Research; . Universitat Konstanz; Alemania. Molde University College; Noruega
Fil: Desmarais, Sarah L.. North Carolina State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Hurducas, Cristina. University Of South Florida Tampa; Estados Unidos
Fil: Arbach, Karin. Universidad de Barcelona; España. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios sobre Cultura y Sociedad; Argentina
Fil: Condemarin, Carolina. Ministerio de Justicia; Chile
Fil: Dean, Kimberlie. University of New South Wales; Australia. Justice Health & Forensic Mental Health Network; Australia
Fil: Doyle, Michael. University of Manchester; Reino Unido
Fil: Folino, Jorge Oscar. Universidad Nacional de La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Godoy Cervera, Verónica. Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan; México
Fil: Grann, Martin. Karolinska Huddinge Hospital. Karolinska Institutet; Suecia
Fil: Ho, Robyn Mei Yee. Castle Peak Hospital Hong Kong; China
Fil: Large, Matthew M.. University of New South Wales; Australia
Fil: Nielsen, Louise Hjort. University of Southern Denmark; Dinamarca
Fil: Pham, Thierry H.. Umons; Bélgica. Centre de Recherche En Défense Sociale; Bélgica
Fil: Rebocho, Maria Francisca. Universidade Fernando Pessoa; Portugal
Fil: Reeves, Kim A.. University Fraser Simon; Canadá
Fil: Rettenberger, Martin. University Mainz. Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg; Alemania
Fil: de Ruiter, Corine. Maastricht University; Países Bajos
Fil: Seewald, Katharina. Universitat Konstanz; Alemania
Fil: Otto, Randy K.. University of South Florida Tampa; Estados Unidos
description Mental health professionals are routinely called upon to assess the risk of violence presented by their patients. Prior surveys of risk assessment methods have been largely circumscribed to individual countries and have not compared the practices of different professional disciplines. Therefore, a Web-based survey was developed to examine methods of violence risk assessment across six continents, and to compare the perceived utility of these methods by psychologists, psychiatrists, and nurses. The survey was translated into nine languages and distributed to members of 59 national and international organizations. Surveys were completed by 2135 respondents from 44 countries. Respondents in all six continents reported using instruments to assess, manage, and monitor violence risk, with over half of risk assessments in the past 12 months conducted using such an instrument. Respondents in Asia and South America reported conducting fewer structured assessments, and psychologists reported using instruments more than psychiatrists or nurses. Feedback regarding outcomes was not common: respondents who conducted structured risk assessments reported receiving feedback on accuracy in under 40% of cases, and those who used instruments to develop management plans reported feedback on whether plans were implemented in under 50% of cases. When information on the latter was obtained, risk management plans were not implemented in over a third of cases. Results suggest that violence risk assessment is a global phenomenon, as is the use of instruments to assist in this task. Improved feedback following risk assessments and the development of risk management plans could improve the efficacy of health services. © 2014 Copyright International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/38251
Singh, Jay P.; Desmarais, Sarah L.; Hurducas, Cristina; Arbach, Karin; Condemarin, Carolina; et al.; International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries; Routledge; International Journal of Forensic Mental Health; 13; 3; 9-2014; 193-206
1499-9013
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/38251
identifier_str_mv Singh, Jay P.; Desmarais, Sarah L.; Hurducas, Cristina; Arbach, Karin; Condemarin, Carolina; et al.; International Perspectives on the Practical Application of Violence Risk Assessment: A Global Survey of 44 Countries; Routledge; International Journal of Forensic Mental Health; 13; 3; 9-2014; 193-206
1499-9013
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1080/14999013.2014.922141
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Routledge
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Routledge
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269103127003136
score 13.13397