AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models

Autores
Florez, Jonathan; Jogee, Shardha; Guo, Yuchen; Cora, Sofia Alejandra; Weinberger, Rainer; Davé, Romeel; Hernquist, Lars; Vogelsberger, Mark; Ciardullo, Robin; Finkelstein, Steven L.; Gronwall, Caryl; Kawinwanichakij, Lalitwadee; Leung, Gene C. K.; LaMassa, Stephanie; Papovich, Casey; Stevans, Matthew L.; Wold, Isak
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In theoretical models of galaxy evolution, active galactic nucleus (AGN) and star formation (SF) activity are closely linked and AGN feedback is routinely invoked to regulate galaxy growth. In order to constrain such models, we compare the hydrodynamical simulations IllustrisTNG and SIMBA, and the semi-analytical model SAG to the empirical results on AGN and SF at cosmic noon (0.75 < z < 2.25) reported in Florez et al. (2020). The empirical results are based on a large mass-complete sample drawn from 93 307 galaxies with and without high X-ray luminosity AGN (LX ≳ 1044 erg s−1), selected from a 11.8 deg2 area (∼0.18 Gpc3 comoving volume at z = 0.75?2.25). The main results of our comparisons are: (i) SAG and IllustrisTNG both qualitatively reproduce the empirical result that galaxies with high X-ray luminosity AGN have higher mean SFR, at a given stellar mass, than galaxies without such AGN. SAG, however, strongly overproduces the number density of high X-ray luminosity AGN by a factor of 10?100, while IllustrisTNG shows a lack of high X-ray luminosity AGN at high stellar mass (⁠M∗>1011M⊙⁠) at z ∼ 2. (ii) In SIMBA, the mean SFR of galaxies with high X-ray luminosity AGN is lower than the SFR of galaxies without such AGN. Contrary to the data, many high X-ray luminosity AGN in SIMBA have quenched SF, suggesting that AGN feedback, or other feedback modes in galaxies with such AGN, might be too efficient in SIMBA.
Fil: Florez, Jonathan. University of Texas at Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jogee, Shardha. University of Texas at Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Guo, Yuchen. University of Texas at Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cora, Sofia Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica La Plata. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas. Instituto de Astrofísica La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Weinberger, Rainer. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; Estados Unidos
Fil: Davé, Romeel. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unido
Fil: Hernquist, Lars. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; Estados Unidos
Fil: Vogelsberger, Mark. Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ciardullo, Robin. The Pennsylvania State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Finkelstein, Steven L.. The University Of Texas At Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gronwall, Caryl. The Pennsylvania State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kawinwanichakij, Lalitwadee. The University of Tokyo; Japón
Fil: Leung, Gene C. K.. The University Of Texas At Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: LaMassa, Stephanie. Space Telescope Science Institute; Estados Unidos
Fil: Papovich, Casey. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Stevans, Matthew L.. The University Of Texas At Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Wold, Isak. Nasa Goddard Space Flight Center; Estados Unidos
Materia
galaxies: evolution
galaxies: star formation
galaxies: general
quasars: general
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152749

id CONICETDig_9749b126d18b3b8a6f186870cdcb2749
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152749
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical modelsFlorez, JonathanJogee, ShardhaGuo, YuchenCora, Sofia AlejandraWeinberger, RainerDavé, RomeelHernquist, LarsVogelsberger, MarkCiardullo, RobinFinkelstein, Steven L.Gronwall, CarylKawinwanichakij, LalitwadeeLeung, Gene C. K.LaMassa, StephaniePapovich, CaseyStevans, Matthew L.Wold, Isakgalaxies: evolutiongalaxies: star formationgalaxies: generalquasars: generalhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1In theoretical models of galaxy evolution, active galactic nucleus (AGN) and star formation (SF) activity are closely linked and AGN feedback is routinely invoked to regulate galaxy growth. In order to constrain such models, we compare the hydrodynamical simulations IllustrisTNG and SIMBA, and the semi-analytical model SAG to the empirical results on AGN and SF at cosmic noon (0.75 < z < 2.25) reported in Florez et al. (2020). The empirical results are based on a large mass-complete sample drawn from 93 307 galaxies with and without high X-ray luminosity AGN (LX ≳ 1044 erg s−1), selected from a 11.8 deg2 area (∼0.18 Gpc3 comoving volume at z = 0.75?2.25). The main results of our comparisons are: (i) SAG and IllustrisTNG both qualitatively reproduce the empirical result that galaxies with high X-ray luminosity AGN have higher mean SFR, at a given stellar mass, than galaxies without such AGN. SAG, however, strongly overproduces the number density of high X-ray luminosity AGN by a factor of 10?100, while IllustrisTNG shows a lack of high X-ray luminosity AGN at high stellar mass (⁠M∗>1011M⊙⁠) at z ∼ 2. (ii) In SIMBA, the mean SFR of galaxies with high X-ray luminosity AGN is lower than the SFR of galaxies without such AGN. Contrary to the data, many high X-ray luminosity AGN in SIMBA have quenched SF, suggesting that AGN feedback, or other feedback modes in galaxies with such AGN, might be too efficient in SIMBA.Fil: Florez, Jonathan. University of Texas at Austin; Estados UnidosFil: Jogee, Shardha. University of Texas at Austin; Estados UnidosFil: Guo, Yuchen. University of Texas at Austin; Estados UnidosFil: Cora, Sofia Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica La Plata. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas. Instituto de Astrofísica La Plata; ArgentinaFil: Weinberger, Rainer. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; Estados UnidosFil: Davé, Romeel. University of Edinburgh; Reino UnidoFil: Hernquist, Lars. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; Estados UnidosFil: Vogelsberger, Mark. Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research; Estados UnidosFil: Ciardullo, Robin. The Pennsylvania State University; Estados UnidosFil: Finkelstein, Steven L.. The University Of Texas At Austin; Estados UnidosFil: Gronwall, Caryl. The Pennsylvania State University; Estados UnidosFil: Kawinwanichakij, Lalitwadee. The University of Tokyo; JapónFil: Leung, Gene C. K.. The University Of Texas At Austin; Estados UnidosFil: LaMassa, Stephanie. Space Telescope Science Institute; Estados UnidosFil: Papovich, Casey. Texas A&M University; Estados UnidosFil: Stevans, Matthew L.. The University Of Texas At Austin; Estados UnidosFil: Wold, Isak. Nasa Goddard Space Flight Center; Estados UnidosWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2021-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/152749Florez, Jonathan; Jogee, Shardha; Guo, Yuchen; Cora, Sofia Alejandra; Weinberger, Rainer; et al.; AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society; 508; 1; 11-2021; 762-7800035-8711CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/508/1/762/6372912info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/mnras/stab2593info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:48:12Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/152749instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:48:12.288CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models
title AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models
spellingShingle AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models
Florez, Jonathan
galaxies: evolution
galaxies: star formation
galaxies: general
quasars: general
title_short AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models
title_full AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models
title_fullStr AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models
title_full_unstemmed AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models
title_sort AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Florez, Jonathan
Jogee, Shardha
Guo, Yuchen
Cora, Sofia Alejandra
Weinberger, Rainer
Davé, Romeel
Hernquist, Lars
Vogelsberger, Mark
Ciardullo, Robin
Finkelstein, Steven L.
Gronwall, Caryl
Kawinwanichakij, Lalitwadee
Leung, Gene C. K.
LaMassa, Stephanie
Papovich, Casey
Stevans, Matthew L.
Wold, Isak
author Florez, Jonathan
author_facet Florez, Jonathan
Jogee, Shardha
Guo, Yuchen
Cora, Sofia Alejandra
Weinberger, Rainer
Davé, Romeel
Hernquist, Lars
Vogelsberger, Mark
Ciardullo, Robin
Finkelstein, Steven L.
Gronwall, Caryl
Kawinwanichakij, Lalitwadee
Leung, Gene C. K.
LaMassa, Stephanie
Papovich, Casey
Stevans, Matthew L.
Wold, Isak
author_role author
author2 Jogee, Shardha
Guo, Yuchen
Cora, Sofia Alejandra
Weinberger, Rainer
Davé, Romeel
Hernquist, Lars
Vogelsberger, Mark
Ciardullo, Robin
Finkelstein, Steven L.
Gronwall, Caryl
Kawinwanichakij, Lalitwadee
Leung, Gene C. K.
LaMassa, Stephanie
Papovich, Casey
Stevans, Matthew L.
Wold, Isak
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv galaxies: evolution
galaxies: star formation
galaxies: general
quasars: general
topic galaxies: evolution
galaxies: star formation
galaxies: general
quasars: general
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In theoretical models of galaxy evolution, active galactic nucleus (AGN) and star formation (SF) activity are closely linked and AGN feedback is routinely invoked to regulate galaxy growth. In order to constrain such models, we compare the hydrodynamical simulations IllustrisTNG and SIMBA, and the semi-analytical model SAG to the empirical results on AGN and SF at cosmic noon (0.75 < z < 2.25) reported in Florez et al. (2020). The empirical results are based on a large mass-complete sample drawn from 93 307 galaxies with and without high X-ray luminosity AGN (LX ≳ 1044 erg s−1), selected from a 11.8 deg2 area (∼0.18 Gpc3 comoving volume at z = 0.75?2.25). The main results of our comparisons are: (i) SAG and IllustrisTNG both qualitatively reproduce the empirical result that galaxies with high X-ray luminosity AGN have higher mean SFR, at a given stellar mass, than galaxies without such AGN. SAG, however, strongly overproduces the number density of high X-ray luminosity AGN by a factor of 10?100, while IllustrisTNG shows a lack of high X-ray luminosity AGN at high stellar mass (⁠M∗>1011M⊙⁠) at z ∼ 2. (ii) In SIMBA, the mean SFR of galaxies with high X-ray luminosity AGN is lower than the SFR of galaxies without such AGN. Contrary to the data, many high X-ray luminosity AGN in SIMBA have quenched SF, suggesting that AGN feedback, or other feedback modes in galaxies with such AGN, might be too efficient in SIMBA.
Fil: Florez, Jonathan. University of Texas at Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Jogee, Shardha. University of Texas at Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Guo, Yuchen. University of Texas at Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Cora, Sofia Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - La Plata. Instituto de Astrofísica La Plata. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas. Instituto de Astrofísica La Plata; Argentina
Fil: Weinberger, Rainer. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; Estados Unidos
Fil: Davé, Romeel. University of Edinburgh; Reino Unido
Fil: Hernquist, Lars. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics; Estados Unidos
Fil: Vogelsberger, Mark. Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research; Estados Unidos
Fil: Ciardullo, Robin. The Pennsylvania State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Finkelstein, Steven L.. The University Of Texas At Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Gronwall, Caryl. The Pennsylvania State University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kawinwanichakij, Lalitwadee. The University of Tokyo; Japón
Fil: Leung, Gene C. K.. The University Of Texas At Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: LaMassa, Stephanie. Space Telescope Science Institute; Estados Unidos
Fil: Papovich, Casey. Texas A&M University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Stevans, Matthew L.. The University Of Texas At Austin; Estados Unidos
Fil: Wold, Isak. Nasa Goddard Space Flight Center; Estados Unidos
description In theoretical models of galaxy evolution, active galactic nucleus (AGN) and star formation (SF) activity are closely linked and AGN feedback is routinely invoked to regulate galaxy growth. In order to constrain such models, we compare the hydrodynamical simulations IllustrisTNG and SIMBA, and the semi-analytical model SAG to the empirical results on AGN and SF at cosmic noon (0.75 < z < 2.25) reported in Florez et al. (2020). The empirical results are based on a large mass-complete sample drawn from 93 307 galaxies with and without high X-ray luminosity AGN (LX ≳ 1044 erg s−1), selected from a 11.8 deg2 area (∼0.18 Gpc3 comoving volume at z = 0.75?2.25). The main results of our comparisons are: (i) SAG and IllustrisTNG both qualitatively reproduce the empirical result that galaxies with high X-ray luminosity AGN have higher mean SFR, at a given stellar mass, than galaxies without such AGN. SAG, however, strongly overproduces the number density of high X-ray luminosity AGN by a factor of 10?100, while IllustrisTNG shows a lack of high X-ray luminosity AGN at high stellar mass (⁠M∗>1011M⊙⁠) at z ∼ 2. (ii) In SIMBA, the mean SFR of galaxies with high X-ray luminosity AGN is lower than the SFR of galaxies without such AGN. Contrary to the data, many high X-ray luminosity AGN in SIMBA have quenched SF, suggesting that AGN feedback, or other feedback modes in galaxies with such AGN, might be too efficient in SIMBA.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-11
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/152749
Florez, Jonathan; Jogee, Shardha; Guo, Yuchen; Cora, Sofia Alejandra; Weinberger, Rainer; et al.; AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society; 508; 1; 11-2021; 762-780
0035-8711
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/152749
identifier_str_mv Florez, Jonathan; Jogee, Shardha; Guo, Yuchen; Cora, Sofia Alejandra; Weinberger, Rainer; et al.; AGN and star formation at cosmic noon: comparison of data to theoretical models; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society; 508; 1; 11-2021; 762-780
0035-8711
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/508/1/762/6372912
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1093/mnras/stab2593
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268909465501696
score 13.13397