How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America
- Autores
- Diaz Hermelo, Francisco; Vassolo, Roberto Santiago
- Año de publicación
- 2012
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The purpose of this paper is to examine the magnitude of country, industry and firm-specific effects for firms competing in emerging economies and also explore differences between high and low performers. The authors use ANOVA methodologies on samples from firms competing in Latin America between 1990-2006. It was found that the firm-specific effect is the most important one, and relatively equivalent in magnitude to the firm-specific effects found in developed countries. Country and industry effects are less important than the firm-specific effect. Contrary to previous studies that indicate that the country effect is relatively more important in emerging economies, the authors found that it is even less important than the industry effect, a result that has important implications for strategic management and international business theory. The source behind the strong firm-specific effects might stem from their resources and capabilities to manage and take advantage of the institutional and macroeconomic environments. Further analysis indicates that the firm-specific effect is relatively more important for firms showing high performance than for those firms showing low performance. Through these findings the authors feel that further research is needed so as to arm future managers with a more clear and comprehensive strategy when doing business in a Latin American country. The paper's findings are specific for large public corporations in Latin America. The paper allows managers to think about sources of competitive advantages in emerging economies. The paper shows that, despite weak institutional contexts and highly volatile macroeconomic environments, managers in the region should be able to obtain substantial differences in economic performances within the region. Activities needed for such differentiation might differ from those carried out in developed countries, with more emphasis on managing institutional voids and periods of economic and political cycles but the result should be the same.
Fil: Diaz Hermelo, Francisco. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina
Fil: Vassolo, Roberto Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina - Materia
-
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY
EMERGING ECONOMIES
INSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT
LATIN AMERICA - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195165
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_96fdc88197311420faa98ac89dcb78ae |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195165 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin AmericaDiaz Hermelo, FranciscoVassolo, Roberto SantiagoCOMPETITIVE STRATEGYEMERGING ECONOMIESINSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENTLATIN AMERICAhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5The purpose of this paper is to examine the magnitude of country, industry and firm-specific effects for firms competing in emerging economies and also explore differences between high and low performers. The authors use ANOVA methodologies on samples from firms competing in Latin America between 1990-2006. It was found that the firm-specific effect is the most important one, and relatively equivalent in magnitude to the firm-specific effects found in developed countries. Country and industry effects are less important than the firm-specific effect. Contrary to previous studies that indicate that the country effect is relatively more important in emerging economies, the authors found that it is even less important than the industry effect, a result that has important implications for strategic management and international business theory. The source behind the strong firm-specific effects might stem from their resources and capabilities to manage and take advantage of the institutional and macroeconomic environments. Further analysis indicates that the firm-specific effect is relatively more important for firms showing high performance than for those firms showing low performance. Through these findings the authors feel that further research is needed so as to arm future managers with a more clear and comprehensive strategy when doing business in a Latin American country. The paper's findings are specific for large public corporations in Latin America. The paper allows managers to think about sources of competitive advantages in emerging economies. The paper shows that, despite weak institutional contexts and highly volatile macroeconomic environments, managers in the region should be able to obtain substantial differences in economic performances within the region. Activities needed for such differentiation might differ from those carried out in developed countries, with more emphasis on managing institutional voids and periods of economic and political cycles but the result should be the same.Fil: Diaz Hermelo, Francisco. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; ArgentinaFil: Vassolo, Roberto Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; ArgentinaEmerald2012-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/195165Diaz Hermelo, Francisco; Vassolo, Roberto Santiago; How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America; Emerald; International Journal of Emerging Markets; 7; 3; 7-2012; 263-2881746-88091746-8817CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1108/17468801211237009info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17468801211237009/full/htmlinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:42:38Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/195165instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:42:38.485CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America |
title |
How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America |
spellingShingle |
How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America Diaz Hermelo, Francisco COMPETITIVE STRATEGY EMERGING ECONOMIES INSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT LATIN AMERICA |
title_short |
How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America |
title_full |
How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America |
title_fullStr |
How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America |
title_full_unstemmed |
How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America |
title_sort |
How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Diaz Hermelo, Francisco Vassolo, Roberto Santiago |
author |
Diaz Hermelo, Francisco |
author_facet |
Diaz Hermelo, Francisco Vassolo, Roberto Santiago |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vassolo, Roberto Santiago |
author2_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY EMERGING ECONOMIES INSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT LATIN AMERICA |
topic |
COMPETITIVE STRATEGY EMERGING ECONOMIES INSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT LATIN AMERICA |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.2 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The purpose of this paper is to examine the magnitude of country, industry and firm-specific effects for firms competing in emerging economies and also explore differences between high and low performers. The authors use ANOVA methodologies on samples from firms competing in Latin America between 1990-2006. It was found that the firm-specific effect is the most important one, and relatively equivalent in magnitude to the firm-specific effects found in developed countries. Country and industry effects are less important than the firm-specific effect. Contrary to previous studies that indicate that the country effect is relatively more important in emerging economies, the authors found that it is even less important than the industry effect, a result that has important implications for strategic management and international business theory. The source behind the strong firm-specific effects might stem from their resources and capabilities to manage and take advantage of the institutional and macroeconomic environments. Further analysis indicates that the firm-specific effect is relatively more important for firms showing high performance than for those firms showing low performance. Through these findings the authors feel that further research is needed so as to arm future managers with a more clear and comprehensive strategy when doing business in a Latin American country. The paper's findings are specific for large public corporations in Latin America. The paper allows managers to think about sources of competitive advantages in emerging economies. The paper shows that, despite weak institutional contexts and highly volatile macroeconomic environments, managers in the region should be able to obtain substantial differences in economic performances within the region. Activities needed for such differentiation might differ from those carried out in developed countries, with more emphasis on managing institutional voids and periods of economic and political cycles but the result should be the same. Fil: Diaz Hermelo, Francisco. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina Fil: Vassolo, Roberto Santiago. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral. Instituto de Altos Estudios; Argentina |
description |
The purpose of this paper is to examine the magnitude of country, industry and firm-specific effects for firms competing in emerging economies and also explore differences between high and low performers. The authors use ANOVA methodologies on samples from firms competing in Latin America between 1990-2006. It was found that the firm-specific effect is the most important one, and relatively equivalent in magnitude to the firm-specific effects found in developed countries. Country and industry effects are less important than the firm-specific effect. Contrary to previous studies that indicate that the country effect is relatively more important in emerging economies, the authors found that it is even less important than the industry effect, a result that has important implications for strategic management and international business theory. The source behind the strong firm-specific effects might stem from their resources and capabilities to manage and take advantage of the institutional and macroeconomic environments. Further analysis indicates that the firm-specific effect is relatively more important for firms showing high performance than for those firms showing low performance. Through these findings the authors feel that further research is needed so as to arm future managers with a more clear and comprehensive strategy when doing business in a Latin American country. The paper's findings are specific for large public corporations in Latin America. The paper allows managers to think about sources of competitive advantages in emerging economies. The paper shows that, despite weak institutional contexts and highly volatile macroeconomic environments, managers in the region should be able to obtain substantial differences in economic performances within the region. Activities needed for such differentiation might differ from those carried out in developed countries, with more emphasis on managing institutional voids and periods of economic and political cycles but the result should be the same. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195165 Diaz Hermelo, Francisco; Vassolo, Roberto Santiago; How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America; Emerald; International Journal of Emerging Markets; 7; 3; 7-2012; 263-288 1746-8809 1746-8817 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/195165 |
identifier_str_mv |
Diaz Hermelo, Francisco; Vassolo, Roberto Santiago; How much does country matter in emerging economies?: Evidence from Latin America; Emerald; International Journal of Emerging Markets; 7; 3; 7-2012; 263-288 1746-8809 1746-8817 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1108/17468801211237009 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/17468801211237009/full/html |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Emerald |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Emerald |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613342926209024 |
score |
13.070432 |