Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Autores
Contreras, Alejandro Ernesto; Ledesma, Facundo; Peirone, Alejandro R.; Juaneda, Ernesto Mario; Defagó, Víctor Hugo; Cuestas, Eduardo
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and adverse events of percutaneous occlusion among patients with sufficient and deficient rims. Methods: A systematic review of all articles published in the Pubmed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases was performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were used as a measure of effect of the combination of studies. I2 with 95% CI was estimated to assess study heterogeneity. For the meta-analysis, a random effects model was used. Results: The systematic search identified ten studies which included 4355 patients; 2661 of those had sufficient rim and the remaining 1694 patients showed some rim deficiency. Implant failure rate was 4.13% CI 95% 3.53–4.72%. Compared to frequency of failures in the group with a deficient rim (5.43% CI 95% 4.35–6.50%), implant failure in patients with a sufficient rim was significantly lower (3.30% CI 95% 2.62–3.97%), OR 2.27 CI 1.34–3.83 (p 0.002). The combined adverse events were 5.19% CI 95% 4.22–6.35% vs 2.7% CI 95% 2.08–3.31% in the deficient vs sufficient rim groups respectively (OR 2.21 CI 0.93–5.29; p 0.07). Implant failures and adverse events were more frequent in patients with posterior inferior rim deficiency. Conclusion: Patients presenting a posteroinferior rim deficiency are associated to both, an increased incidence of closure failure and a combined adverse events occurrence. More studies on posterior rim deficiency are necessary to ensure the feasibility and safety of the percutaneous approach.
Fil: Contreras, Alejandro Ernesto. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina. Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Biomédicas de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Ledesma, Facundo. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Peirone, Alejandro R.. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Juaneda, Ernesto Mario. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Defagó, Víctor Hugo. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Cuestas, Eduardo. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud; Argentina
Materia
ADVERSE EVENTS
ATRIAL SEPTAL DEFECT
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
EFFICACY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/226717
Acceder
id CONICETDig_943280917d33f2f00d495e8fff789300
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/226717
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysisContreras, Alejandro ErnestoLedesma, FacundoPeirone, Alejandro R.Juaneda, Ernesto MarioDefagó, Víctor HugoCuestas, EduardoADVERSE EVENTSATRIAL SEPTAL DEFECTECHOCARDIOGRAPHYEFFICACYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and adverse events of percutaneous occlusion among patients with sufficient and deficient rims. Methods: A systematic review of all articles published in the Pubmed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases was performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were used as a measure of effect of the combination of studies. I2 with 95% CI was estimated to assess study heterogeneity. For the meta-analysis, a random effects model was used. Results: The systematic search identified ten studies which included 4355 patients; 2661 of those had sufficient rim and the remaining 1694 patients showed some rim deficiency. Implant failure rate was 4.13% CI 95% 3.53–4.72%. Compared to frequency of failures in the group with a deficient rim (5.43% CI 95% 4.35–6.50%), implant failure in patients with a sufficient rim was significantly lower (3.30% CI 95% 2.62–3.97%), OR 2.27 CI 1.34–3.83 (p 0.002). The combined adverse events were 5.19% CI 95% 4.22–6.35% vs 2.7% CI 95% 2.08–3.31% in the deficient vs sufficient rim groups respectively (OR 2.21 CI 0.93–5.29; p 0.07). Implant failures and adverse events were more frequent in patients with posterior inferior rim deficiency. Conclusion: Patients presenting a posteroinferior rim deficiency are associated to both, an increased incidence of closure failure and a combined adverse events occurrence. More studies on posterior rim deficiency are necessary to ensure the feasibility and safety of the percutaneous approach.Fil: Contreras, Alejandro Ernesto. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina. Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Biomédicas de Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Ledesma, Facundo. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Peirone, Alejandro R.. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Juaneda, Ernesto Mario. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Defagó, Víctor Hugo. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; ArgentinaFil: Cuestas, Eduardo. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud; ArgentinaElsevier2023-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/226717Contreras, Alejandro Ernesto; Ledesma, Facundo; Peirone, Alejandro R.; Juaneda, Ernesto Mario; Defagó, Víctor Hugo; et al.; Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis; Elsevier; Indian Heart Journal; 75; 2; 3-2023; 145-1520019-48322213-3763CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ihj.2023.01.008info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483223000196info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:45:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/226717instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:45:59.282CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Contreras, Alejandro Ernesto
ADVERSE EVENTS
ATRIAL SEPTAL DEFECT
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
EFFICACY
title_short Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Contreras, Alejandro Ernesto
Ledesma, Facundo
Peirone, Alejandro R.
Juaneda, Ernesto Mario
Defagó, Víctor Hugo
Cuestas, Eduardo
author Contreras, Alejandro Ernesto
author_facet Contreras, Alejandro Ernesto
Ledesma, Facundo
Peirone, Alejandro R.
Juaneda, Ernesto Mario
Defagó, Víctor Hugo
Cuestas, Eduardo
author_role author
author2 Ledesma, Facundo
Peirone, Alejandro R.
Juaneda, Ernesto Mario
Defagó, Víctor Hugo
Cuestas, Eduardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ADVERSE EVENTS
ATRIAL SEPTAL DEFECT
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
EFFICACY
topic ADVERSE EVENTS
ATRIAL SEPTAL DEFECT
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
EFFICACY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and adverse events of percutaneous occlusion among patients with sufficient and deficient rims. Methods: A systematic review of all articles published in the Pubmed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases was performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were used as a measure of effect of the combination of studies. I2 with 95% CI was estimated to assess study heterogeneity. For the meta-analysis, a random effects model was used. Results: The systematic search identified ten studies which included 4355 patients; 2661 of those had sufficient rim and the remaining 1694 patients showed some rim deficiency. Implant failure rate was 4.13% CI 95% 3.53–4.72%. Compared to frequency of failures in the group with a deficient rim (5.43% CI 95% 4.35–6.50%), implant failure in patients with a sufficient rim was significantly lower (3.30% CI 95% 2.62–3.97%), OR 2.27 CI 1.34–3.83 (p 0.002). The combined adverse events were 5.19% CI 95% 4.22–6.35% vs 2.7% CI 95% 2.08–3.31% in the deficient vs sufficient rim groups respectively (OR 2.21 CI 0.93–5.29; p 0.07). Implant failures and adverse events were more frequent in patients with posterior inferior rim deficiency. Conclusion: Patients presenting a posteroinferior rim deficiency are associated to both, an increased incidence of closure failure and a combined adverse events occurrence. More studies on posterior rim deficiency are necessary to ensure the feasibility and safety of the percutaneous approach.
Fil: Contreras, Alejandro Ernesto. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina. Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Biomédicas de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Ledesma, Facundo. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Peirone, Alejandro R.. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Juaneda, Ernesto Mario. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Defagó, Víctor Hugo. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina
Fil: Cuestas, Eduardo. Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias de la Salud; Argentina
description Background: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and adverse events of percutaneous occlusion among patients with sufficient and deficient rims. Methods: A systematic review of all articles published in the Pubmed, MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases was performed. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% CI were used as a measure of effect of the combination of studies. I2 with 95% CI was estimated to assess study heterogeneity. For the meta-analysis, a random effects model was used. Results: The systematic search identified ten studies which included 4355 patients; 2661 of those had sufficient rim and the remaining 1694 patients showed some rim deficiency. Implant failure rate was 4.13% CI 95% 3.53–4.72%. Compared to frequency of failures in the group with a deficient rim (5.43% CI 95% 4.35–6.50%), implant failure in patients with a sufficient rim was significantly lower (3.30% CI 95% 2.62–3.97%), OR 2.27 CI 1.34–3.83 (p 0.002). The combined adverse events were 5.19% CI 95% 4.22–6.35% vs 2.7% CI 95% 2.08–3.31% in the deficient vs sufficient rim groups respectively (OR 2.21 CI 0.93–5.29; p 0.07). Implant failures and adverse events were more frequent in patients with posterior inferior rim deficiency. Conclusion: Patients presenting a posteroinferior rim deficiency are associated to both, an increased incidence of closure failure and a combined adverse events occurrence. More studies on posterior rim deficiency are necessary to ensure the feasibility and safety of the percutaneous approach.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/226717
Contreras, Alejandro Ernesto; Ledesma, Facundo; Peirone, Alejandro R.; Juaneda, Ernesto Mario; Defagó, Víctor Hugo; et al.; Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis; Elsevier; Indian Heart Journal; 75; 2; 3-2023; 145-152
0019-4832
2213-3763
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/226717
identifier_str_mv Contreras, Alejandro Ernesto; Ledesma, Facundo; Peirone, Alejandro R.; Juaneda, Ernesto Mario; Defagó, Víctor Hugo; et al.; Sufficient versus deficient rims during percutaneous closure of ostium secundum type atrial septal defect: A systematic review and meta-analysis; Elsevier; Indian Heart Journal; 75; 2; 3-2023; 145-152
0019-4832
2213-3763
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ihj.2023.01.008
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483223000196
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782159333883904
score 12.982451

Publicaciones similares