Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View
- Autores
- Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian
- Año de publicación
- 2021
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- F -systems are useful digraphs to model sentences that predicate the falsity of other sentences. Paradoxes like the Liar and the one of Yablo can be analyzed with that tool to find graph-theoretic patterns. In this paper we studied this general model consisting of a set of sentences and the binary relation ‘... affirms the falsity of...’ among them. The possible existence of non-referential sentences was also considered. To model the sets of all the sentences that can jointly be valued as true we introduced the notion of conglomerate, the existence of which guarantees the absence of paradox. Conglomerates also enabled us to characterize referential contradictions, i.e., sentences that can only be false under a classical valuation due to the interactions with other sentences in the model. A Kripke-style fixed-point characterization of groundedness was offered, and complete (meaning that every sentence is deemed either true or false) and consistent (meaning that no sentence is deemed true and false) fixed points were put in correspondence with conglomerates. Furthermore, argumentation frameworks are special cases of F -systems. We showed the relation between local conglomerates and admissible sets of arguments and argued about the usefulness of the concept for the argumentation theory.
Fil: Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Economía. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur; Argentina - Materia
-
F-systems
Semantical paradoxes
The Liar
Yablo's paradox - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/211868
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_9284e7c1fae45372c4cfa658739bff3d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/211868 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of ViewBodanza, Gustavo AdrianF-systemsSemantical paradoxesThe LiarYablo's paradoxhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6F -systems are useful digraphs to model sentences that predicate the falsity of other sentences. Paradoxes like the Liar and the one of Yablo can be analyzed with that tool to find graph-theoretic patterns. In this paper we studied this general model consisting of a set of sentences and the binary relation ‘... affirms the falsity of...’ among them. The possible existence of non-referential sentences was also considered. To model the sets of all the sentences that can jointly be valued as true we introduced the notion of conglomerate, the existence of which guarantees the absence of paradox. Conglomerates also enabled us to characterize referential contradictions, i.e., sentences that can only be false under a classical valuation due to the interactions with other sentences in the model. A Kripke-style fixed-point characterization of groundedness was offered, and complete (meaning that every sentence is deemed either true or false) and consistent (meaning that no sentence is deemed true and false) fixed points were put in correspondence with conglomerates. Furthermore, argumentation frameworks are special cases of F -systems. We showed the relation between local conglomerates and admissible sets of arguments and argued about the usefulness of the concept for the argumentation theory.Fil: Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Economía. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur; ArgentinaSociedad Filosófica de San Petersburgo2021-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/211868Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View; Sociedad Filosófica de San Petersburgo; Logiko-filosofskie študii; 19; 1; 9-2021; 101-1042223-3954CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ojs.philosophy.spbu.ru/index.php/lphs/article/view/703info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.52119/LPHS.2021.32.43.005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:15:26Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/211868instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:15:26.949CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View |
title |
Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View |
spellingShingle |
Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian F-systems Semantical paradoxes The Liar Yablo's paradox |
title_short |
Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View |
title_full |
Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View |
title_fullStr |
Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View |
title_full_unstemmed |
Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View |
title_sort |
Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian |
author |
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian |
author_facet |
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
F-systems Semantical paradoxes The Liar Yablo's paradox |
topic |
F-systems Semantical paradoxes The Liar Yablo's paradox |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
F -systems are useful digraphs to model sentences that predicate the falsity of other sentences. Paradoxes like the Liar and the one of Yablo can be analyzed with that tool to find graph-theoretic patterns. In this paper we studied this general model consisting of a set of sentences and the binary relation ‘... affirms the falsity of...’ among them. The possible existence of non-referential sentences was also considered. To model the sets of all the sentences that can jointly be valued as true we introduced the notion of conglomerate, the existence of which guarantees the absence of paradox. Conglomerates also enabled us to characterize referential contradictions, i.e., sentences that can only be false under a classical valuation due to the interactions with other sentences in the model. A Kripke-style fixed-point characterization of groundedness was offered, and complete (meaning that every sentence is deemed either true or false) and consistent (meaning that no sentence is deemed true and false) fixed points were put in correspondence with conglomerates. Furthermore, argumentation frameworks are special cases of F -systems. We showed the relation between local conglomerates and admissible sets of arguments and argued about the usefulness of the concept for the argumentation theory. Fil: Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Bahía Blanca. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Economía. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales del Sur; Argentina |
description |
F -systems are useful digraphs to model sentences that predicate the falsity of other sentences. Paradoxes like the Liar and the one of Yablo can be analyzed with that tool to find graph-theoretic patterns. In this paper we studied this general model consisting of a set of sentences and the binary relation ‘... affirms the falsity of...’ among them. The possible existence of non-referential sentences was also considered. To model the sets of all the sentences that can jointly be valued as true we introduced the notion of conglomerate, the existence of which guarantees the absence of paradox. Conglomerates also enabled us to characterize referential contradictions, i.e., sentences that can only be false under a classical valuation due to the interactions with other sentences in the model. A Kripke-style fixed-point characterization of groundedness was offered, and complete (meaning that every sentence is deemed either true or false) and consistent (meaning that no sentence is deemed true and false) fixed points were put in correspondence with conglomerates. Furthermore, argumentation frameworks are special cases of F -systems. We showed the relation between local conglomerates and admissible sets of arguments and argued about the usefulness of the concept for the argumentation theory. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/211868 Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View; Sociedad Filosófica de San Petersburgo; Logiko-filosofskie študii; 19; 1; 9-2021; 101-104 2223-3954 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/211868 |
identifier_str_mv |
Bodanza, Gustavo Adrian; Yablo's Paradox, the Liar, and Referential Contradictions from a Graph Theory Point of View; Sociedad Filosófica de San Petersburgo; Logiko-filosofskie študii; 19; 1; 9-2021; 101-104 2223-3954 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ojs.philosophy.spbu.ru/index.php/lphs/article/view/703 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.52119/LPHS.2021.32.43.005 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Filosófica de San Petersburgo |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedad Filosófica de San Petersburgo |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842980832754532352 |
score |
12.993085 |