Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis
- Autores
- Vanney, Claudia Estela; Mesurado, Maria Belen; Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio; Richaud, María Cristina
- Año de publicación
- 2023
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Through a qualitative approach, this study identified a specific subgroup of intellectual virtues necessary for developing interdisciplinary research. Cognitive science was initially conceived as a new discipline emerging from various fields, including philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, and anthropology. Thus, a frequent debate among cognitive scientists is whether the initial multidisciplinary program successfully developed into a mature interdisciplinary field or evolved into a set of independent sciences of cognition. For several years, interdisciplinarity has been an aspiration for the academy, although the difficulties limiting the success of interdisciplinary collaborations have begun to erode that initial optimism. Our analysis suggests that the problems hindering the success of interdisciplinarity can be overcome by fostering certain intellectual character strengths in scholars. The Consensual Qualitative Research method was used to analyze nine semi-structured interviews involving researchers with a long personal trajectory of interdisciplinary research between the sciences and the humanities. Three virtue domains emerged from the interviews’ analysis: (i) intellectual virtues, (ii) social virtues, and (iii) interpersonal intellectual virtues. The virtues of the third domain intersect with intellectual and social ones. They are intellectual because they pursue epistemic goods. But, unlike other intellectual virtues, they only develop in interpersonal settings, so they can also be considered to have a social component. Interpersonal intellectual virtues can be thus defined as intellectual character traits that facilitate the acquisition of knowledge (intellectual motivation) with and through other people in a reciprocal way (social environment). These virtues are essential for developing any successful collective epistemic enterprise, interdisciplinary research being a privileged context where these qualities manifest themselves in a relevant way.
Fil: Vanney, Claudia Estela. Universidad Austral; Argentina
Fil: Mesurado, Maria Belen. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral; Argentina
Fil: Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio. Universidad Austral; Argentina
Fil: Richaud, María Cristina. Universidad Austral; Argentina - Materia
-
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH
EPISTEMIC VIRTUES
INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY
INTERDISCIPLINARITY
INTERPERSONAL INTELLECTUAL VIRTUES
OPEN-MINDEDNESS
SOCIAL COGNITION
VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/220478
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_924d461f7309004c20de35c3bb052b4d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/220478 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative AnalysisVanney, Claudia EstelaMesurado, Maria BelenAguinalde Sáenz, José IgnacioRichaud, María CristinaCOLLABORATIVE RESEARCHEPISTEMIC VIRTUESINTELLECTUAL HUMILITYINTERDISCIPLINARITYINTERPERSONAL INTELLECTUAL VIRTUESOPEN-MINDEDNESSSOCIAL COGNITIONVIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Through a qualitative approach, this study identified a specific subgroup of intellectual virtues necessary for developing interdisciplinary research. Cognitive science was initially conceived as a new discipline emerging from various fields, including philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, and anthropology. Thus, a frequent debate among cognitive scientists is whether the initial multidisciplinary program successfully developed into a mature interdisciplinary field or evolved into a set of independent sciences of cognition. For several years, interdisciplinarity has been an aspiration for the academy, although the difficulties limiting the success of interdisciplinary collaborations have begun to erode that initial optimism. Our analysis suggests that the problems hindering the success of interdisciplinarity can be overcome by fostering certain intellectual character strengths in scholars. The Consensual Qualitative Research method was used to analyze nine semi-structured interviews involving researchers with a long personal trajectory of interdisciplinary research between the sciences and the humanities. Three virtue domains emerged from the interviews’ analysis: (i) intellectual virtues, (ii) social virtues, and (iii) interpersonal intellectual virtues. The virtues of the third domain intersect with intellectual and social ones. They are intellectual because they pursue epistemic goods. But, unlike other intellectual virtues, they only develop in interpersonal settings, so they can also be considered to have a social component. Interpersonal intellectual virtues can be thus defined as intellectual character traits that facilitate the acquisition of knowledge (intellectual motivation) with and through other people in a reciprocal way (social environment). These virtues are essential for developing any successful collective epistemic enterprise, interdisciplinary research being a privileged context where these qualities manifest themselves in a relevant way.Fil: Vanney, Claudia Estela. Universidad Austral; ArgentinaFil: Mesurado, Maria Belen. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral; ArgentinaFil: Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio. Universidad Austral; ArgentinaFil: Richaud, María Cristina. Universidad Austral; ArgentinaJohn Wiley & Sons2023-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/220478Vanney, Claudia Estela; Mesurado, Maria Belen; Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio; Richaud, María Cristina; Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis; John Wiley & Sons; Cognitive Science; 47; 9; 9-2023; 1-300364-02131551-6709CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.13348info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/cogs.13348info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:05Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/220478instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:05.773CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis |
title |
Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis |
spellingShingle |
Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis Vanney, Claudia Estela COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH EPISTEMIC VIRTUES INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY INTERDISCIPLINARITY INTERPERSONAL INTELLECTUAL VIRTUES OPEN-MINDEDNESS SOCIAL COGNITION VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY |
title_short |
Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis |
title_full |
Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis |
title_sort |
Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Vanney, Claudia Estela Mesurado, Maria Belen Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio Richaud, María Cristina |
author |
Vanney, Claudia Estela |
author_facet |
Vanney, Claudia Estela Mesurado, Maria Belen Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio Richaud, María Cristina |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Mesurado, Maria Belen Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio Richaud, María Cristina |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH EPISTEMIC VIRTUES INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY INTERDISCIPLINARITY INTERPERSONAL INTELLECTUAL VIRTUES OPEN-MINDEDNESS SOCIAL COGNITION VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY |
topic |
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH EPISTEMIC VIRTUES INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY INTERDISCIPLINARITY INTERPERSONAL INTELLECTUAL VIRTUES OPEN-MINDEDNESS SOCIAL COGNITION VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Through a qualitative approach, this study identified a specific subgroup of intellectual virtues necessary for developing interdisciplinary research. Cognitive science was initially conceived as a new discipline emerging from various fields, including philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, and anthropology. Thus, a frequent debate among cognitive scientists is whether the initial multidisciplinary program successfully developed into a mature interdisciplinary field or evolved into a set of independent sciences of cognition. For several years, interdisciplinarity has been an aspiration for the academy, although the difficulties limiting the success of interdisciplinary collaborations have begun to erode that initial optimism. Our analysis suggests that the problems hindering the success of interdisciplinarity can be overcome by fostering certain intellectual character strengths in scholars. The Consensual Qualitative Research method was used to analyze nine semi-structured interviews involving researchers with a long personal trajectory of interdisciplinary research between the sciences and the humanities. Three virtue domains emerged from the interviews’ analysis: (i) intellectual virtues, (ii) social virtues, and (iii) interpersonal intellectual virtues. The virtues of the third domain intersect with intellectual and social ones. They are intellectual because they pursue epistemic goods. But, unlike other intellectual virtues, they only develop in interpersonal settings, so they can also be considered to have a social component. Interpersonal intellectual virtues can be thus defined as intellectual character traits that facilitate the acquisition of knowledge (intellectual motivation) with and through other people in a reciprocal way (social environment). These virtues are essential for developing any successful collective epistemic enterprise, interdisciplinary research being a privileged context where these qualities manifest themselves in a relevant way. Fil: Vanney, Claudia Estela. Universidad Austral; Argentina Fil: Mesurado, Maria Belen. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral; Argentina Fil: Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio. Universidad Austral; Argentina Fil: Richaud, María Cristina. Universidad Austral; Argentina |
description |
Through a qualitative approach, this study identified a specific subgroup of intellectual virtues necessary for developing interdisciplinary research. Cognitive science was initially conceived as a new discipline emerging from various fields, including philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, and anthropology. Thus, a frequent debate among cognitive scientists is whether the initial multidisciplinary program successfully developed into a mature interdisciplinary field or evolved into a set of independent sciences of cognition. For several years, interdisciplinarity has been an aspiration for the academy, although the difficulties limiting the success of interdisciplinary collaborations have begun to erode that initial optimism. Our analysis suggests that the problems hindering the success of interdisciplinarity can be overcome by fostering certain intellectual character strengths in scholars. The Consensual Qualitative Research method was used to analyze nine semi-structured interviews involving researchers with a long personal trajectory of interdisciplinary research between the sciences and the humanities. Three virtue domains emerged from the interviews’ analysis: (i) intellectual virtues, (ii) social virtues, and (iii) interpersonal intellectual virtues. The virtues of the third domain intersect with intellectual and social ones. They are intellectual because they pursue epistemic goods. But, unlike other intellectual virtues, they only develop in interpersonal settings, so they can also be considered to have a social component. Interpersonal intellectual virtues can be thus defined as intellectual character traits that facilitate the acquisition of knowledge (intellectual motivation) with and through other people in a reciprocal way (social environment). These virtues are essential for developing any successful collective epistemic enterprise, interdisciplinary research being a privileged context where these qualities manifest themselves in a relevant way. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-09 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/220478 Vanney, Claudia Estela; Mesurado, Maria Belen; Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio; Richaud, María Cristina; Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis; John Wiley & Sons; Cognitive Science; 47; 9; 9-2023; 1-30 0364-0213 1551-6709 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/220478 |
identifier_str_mv |
Vanney, Claudia Estela; Mesurado, Maria Belen; Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio; Richaud, María Cristina; Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis; John Wiley & Sons; Cognitive Science; 47; 9; 9-2023; 1-30 0364-0213 1551-6709 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.13348 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/cogs.13348 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
John Wiley & Sons |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269072501243904 |
score |
13.13397 |