Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis

Autores
Vanney, Claudia Estela; Mesurado, Maria Belen; Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio; Richaud, María Cristina
Año de publicación
2023
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Through a qualitative approach, this study identified a specific subgroup of intellectual virtues necessary for developing interdisciplinary research. Cognitive science was initially conceived as a new discipline emerging from various fields, including philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, and anthropology. Thus, a frequent debate among cognitive scientists is whether the initial multidisciplinary program successfully developed into a mature interdisciplinary field or evolved into a set of independent sciences of cognition. For several years, interdisciplinarity has been an aspiration for the academy, although the difficulties limiting the success of interdisciplinary collaborations have begun to erode that initial optimism. Our analysis suggests that the problems hindering the success of interdisciplinarity can be overcome by fostering certain intellectual character strengths in scholars. The Consensual Qualitative Research method was used to analyze nine semi-structured interviews involving researchers with a long personal trajectory of interdisciplinary research between the sciences and the humanities. Three virtue domains emerged from the interviews’ analysis: (i) intellectual virtues, (ii) social virtues, and (iii) interpersonal intellectual virtues. The virtues of the third domain intersect with intellectual and social ones. They are intellectual because they pursue epistemic goods. But, unlike other intellectual virtues, they only develop in interpersonal settings, so they can also be considered to have a social component. Interpersonal intellectual virtues can be thus defined as intellectual character traits that facilitate the acquisition of knowledge (intellectual motivation) with and through other people in a reciprocal way (social environment). These virtues are essential for developing any successful collective epistemic enterprise, interdisciplinary research being a privileged context where these qualities manifest themselves in a relevant way.
Fil: Vanney, Claudia Estela. Universidad Austral; Argentina
Fil: Mesurado, Maria Belen. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral; Argentina
Fil: Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio. Universidad Austral; Argentina
Fil: Richaud, María Cristina. Universidad Austral; Argentina
Materia
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH
EPISTEMIC VIRTUES
INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY
INTERDISCIPLINARITY
INTERPERSONAL INTELLECTUAL VIRTUES
OPEN-MINDEDNESS
SOCIAL COGNITION
VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/220478

id CONICETDig_924d461f7309004c20de35c3bb052b4d
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/220478
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative AnalysisVanney, Claudia EstelaMesurado, Maria BelenAguinalde Sáenz, José IgnacioRichaud, María CristinaCOLLABORATIVE RESEARCHEPISTEMIC VIRTUESINTELLECTUAL HUMILITYINTERDISCIPLINARITYINTERPERSONAL INTELLECTUAL VIRTUESOPEN-MINDEDNESSSOCIAL COGNITIONVIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGYhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5Through a qualitative approach, this study identified a specific subgroup of intellectual virtues necessary for developing interdisciplinary research. Cognitive science was initially conceived as a new discipline emerging from various fields, including philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, and anthropology. Thus, a frequent debate among cognitive scientists is whether the initial multidisciplinary program successfully developed into a mature interdisciplinary field or evolved into a set of independent sciences of cognition. For several years, interdisciplinarity has been an aspiration for the academy, although the difficulties limiting the success of interdisciplinary collaborations have begun to erode that initial optimism. Our analysis suggests that the problems hindering the success of interdisciplinarity can be overcome by fostering certain intellectual character strengths in scholars. The Consensual Qualitative Research method was used to analyze nine semi-structured interviews involving researchers with a long personal trajectory of interdisciplinary research between the sciences and the humanities. Three virtue domains emerged from the interviews’ analysis: (i) intellectual virtues, (ii) social virtues, and (iii) interpersonal intellectual virtues. The virtues of the third domain intersect with intellectual and social ones. They are intellectual because they pursue epistemic goods. But, unlike other intellectual virtues, they only develop in interpersonal settings, so they can also be considered to have a social component. Interpersonal intellectual virtues can be thus defined as intellectual character traits that facilitate the acquisition of knowledge (intellectual motivation) with and through other people in a reciprocal way (social environment). These virtues are essential for developing any successful collective epistemic enterprise, interdisciplinary research being a privileged context where these qualities manifest themselves in a relevant way.Fil: Vanney, Claudia Estela. Universidad Austral; ArgentinaFil: Mesurado, Maria Belen. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral; ArgentinaFil: Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio. Universidad Austral; ArgentinaFil: Richaud, María Cristina. Universidad Austral; ArgentinaJohn Wiley & Sons2023-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/220478Vanney, Claudia Estela; Mesurado, Maria Belen; Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio; Richaud, María Cristina; Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis; John Wiley & Sons; Cognitive Science; 47; 9; 9-2023; 1-300364-02131551-6709CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.13348info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/cogs.13348info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:51:05Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/220478instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:51:05.773CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis
title Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis
spellingShingle Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis
Vanney, Claudia Estela
COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH
EPISTEMIC VIRTUES
INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY
INTERDISCIPLINARITY
INTERPERSONAL INTELLECTUAL VIRTUES
OPEN-MINDEDNESS
SOCIAL COGNITION
VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY
title_short Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis
title_full Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis
title_fullStr Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis
title_sort Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Vanney, Claudia Estela
Mesurado, Maria Belen
Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio
Richaud, María Cristina
author Vanney, Claudia Estela
author_facet Vanney, Claudia Estela
Mesurado, Maria Belen
Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio
Richaud, María Cristina
author_role author
author2 Mesurado, Maria Belen
Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio
Richaud, María Cristina
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH
EPISTEMIC VIRTUES
INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY
INTERDISCIPLINARITY
INTERPERSONAL INTELLECTUAL VIRTUES
OPEN-MINDEDNESS
SOCIAL COGNITION
VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY
topic COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH
EPISTEMIC VIRTUES
INTELLECTUAL HUMILITY
INTERDISCIPLINARITY
INTERPERSONAL INTELLECTUAL VIRTUES
OPEN-MINDEDNESS
SOCIAL COGNITION
VIRTUE EPISTEMOLOGY
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.1
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Through a qualitative approach, this study identified a specific subgroup of intellectual virtues necessary for developing interdisciplinary research. Cognitive science was initially conceived as a new discipline emerging from various fields, including philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, and anthropology. Thus, a frequent debate among cognitive scientists is whether the initial multidisciplinary program successfully developed into a mature interdisciplinary field or evolved into a set of independent sciences of cognition. For several years, interdisciplinarity has been an aspiration for the academy, although the difficulties limiting the success of interdisciplinary collaborations have begun to erode that initial optimism. Our analysis suggests that the problems hindering the success of interdisciplinarity can be overcome by fostering certain intellectual character strengths in scholars. The Consensual Qualitative Research method was used to analyze nine semi-structured interviews involving researchers with a long personal trajectory of interdisciplinary research between the sciences and the humanities. Three virtue domains emerged from the interviews’ analysis: (i) intellectual virtues, (ii) social virtues, and (iii) interpersonal intellectual virtues. The virtues of the third domain intersect with intellectual and social ones. They are intellectual because they pursue epistemic goods. But, unlike other intellectual virtues, they only develop in interpersonal settings, so they can also be considered to have a social component. Interpersonal intellectual virtues can be thus defined as intellectual character traits that facilitate the acquisition of knowledge (intellectual motivation) with and through other people in a reciprocal way (social environment). These virtues are essential for developing any successful collective epistemic enterprise, interdisciplinary research being a privileged context where these qualities manifest themselves in a relevant way.
Fil: Vanney, Claudia Estela. Universidad Austral; Argentina
Fil: Mesurado, Maria Belen. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Austral; Argentina
Fil: Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio. Universidad Austral; Argentina
Fil: Richaud, María Cristina. Universidad Austral; Argentina
description Through a qualitative approach, this study identified a specific subgroup of intellectual virtues necessary for developing interdisciplinary research. Cognitive science was initially conceived as a new discipline emerging from various fields, including philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, and anthropology. Thus, a frequent debate among cognitive scientists is whether the initial multidisciplinary program successfully developed into a mature interdisciplinary field or evolved into a set of independent sciences of cognition. For several years, interdisciplinarity has been an aspiration for the academy, although the difficulties limiting the success of interdisciplinary collaborations have begun to erode that initial optimism. Our analysis suggests that the problems hindering the success of interdisciplinarity can be overcome by fostering certain intellectual character strengths in scholars. The Consensual Qualitative Research method was used to analyze nine semi-structured interviews involving researchers with a long personal trajectory of interdisciplinary research between the sciences and the humanities. Three virtue domains emerged from the interviews’ analysis: (i) intellectual virtues, (ii) social virtues, and (iii) interpersonal intellectual virtues. The virtues of the third domain intersect with intellectual and social ones. They are intellectual because they pursue epistemic goods. But, unlike other intellectual virtues, they only develop in interpersonal settings, so they can also be considered to have a social component. Interpersonal intellectual virtues can be thus defined as intellectual character traits that facilitate the acquisition of knowledge (intellectual motivation) with and through other people in a reciprocal way (social environment). These virtues are essential for developing any successful collective epistemic enterprise, interdisciplinary research being a privileged context where these qualities manifest themselves in a relevant way.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/220478
Vanney, Claudia Estela; Mesurado, Maria Belen; Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio; Richaud, María Cristina; Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis; John Wiley & Sons; Cognitive Science; 47; 9; 9-2023; 1-30
0364-0213
1551-6709
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/220478
identifier_str_mv Vanney, Claudia Estela; Mesurado, Maria Belen; Aguinalde Sáenz, José Ignacio; Richaud, María Cristina; Intellectual Virtues for Interdisciplinary Research: A Consensual Qualitative Analysis; John Wiley & Sons; Cognitive Science; 47; 9; 9-2023; 1-30
0364-0213
1551-6709
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.13348
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/cogs.13348
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons
publisher.none.fl_str_mv John Wiley & Sons
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269072501243904
score 13.13397