On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation

Autores
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro; García, Alejandro Javier; Kern Isberner, Gabriele; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Research on the relation between Belief Revision and Argumentation has always been fruitful in both directions: some argumentation formalisms can be used to define belief change operators,and belief change techniques have also been used for modeling the dynamics of beliefs in argumentation formalisms. In this paper, we give a historical perspective on how belief revision has evolved in the last three decades, and how it has been combined with argumentation. First, we will recall the foundational works concerning the links between both areas. On the basis of such insights, we will present a conceptual view on this topic and some further developments. We offer a glimpse into the future of research in this area based on the understanding of argumentation and belief revision as complementary, mutually useful disciplines.
Fil: Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: García, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Kern Isberner, Gabriele. Universitat Dortmund; Alemania
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Belief Revision
Argumentation
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/67010
Acceder
id CONICETDig_8e91858610b74ed238e15dbeb09055d9
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/67010
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentationFalappa, Marcelo AlejandroGarcía, Alejandro JavierKern Isberner, GabrieleSimari, Guillermo RicardoBelief RevisionArgumentationhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Research on the relation between Belief Revision and Argumentation has always been fruitful in both directions: some argumentation formalisms can be used to define belief change operators,and belief change techniques have also been used for modeling the dynamics of beliefs in argumentation formalisms. In this paper, we give a historical perspective on how belief revision has evolved in the last three decades, and how it has been combined with argumentation. First, we will recall the foundational works concerning the links between both areas. On the basis of such insights, we will present a conceptual view on this topic and some further developments. We offer a glimpse into the future of research in this area based on the understanding of argumentation and belief revision as complementary, mutually useful disciplines.Fil: Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: García, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Kern Isberner, Gabriele. Universitat Dortmund; AlemaniaFil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaCambridge University Press2011-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/67010Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro; García, Alejandro Javier; Kern Isberner, Gabriele; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation; Cambridge University Press; Knowledge Engineering Review; 26; 1; 3-2011; 35-430269-8889CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S0269888910000391info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review/article/on-the-evolving-relation-between-belief-revision-and-argumentation/B64E02F11785717579CE0DA94E993BA2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:46:46Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/67010instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:46:47.107CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation
title On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation
spellingShingle On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro
Belief Revision
Argumentation
title_short On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation
title_full On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation
title_fullStr On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation
title_full_unstemmed On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation
title_sort On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro
García, Alejandro Javier
Kern Isberner, Gabriele
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro
author_facet Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro
García, Alejandro Javier
Kern Isberner, Gabriele
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author_role author
author2 García, Alejandro Javier
Kern Isberner, Gabriele
Simari, Guillermo Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Belief Revision
Argumentation
topic Belief Revision
Argumentation
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Research on the relation between Belief Revision and Argumentation has always been fruitful in both directions: some argumentation formalisms can be used to define belief change operators,and belief change techniques have also been used for modeling the dynamics of beliefs in argumentation formalisms. In this paper, we give a historical perspective on how belief revision has evolved in the last three decades, and how it has been combined with argumentation. First, we will recall the foundational works concerning the links between both areas. On the basis of such insights, we will present a conceptual view on this topic and some further developments. We offer a glimpse into the future of research in this area based on the understanding of argumentation and belief revision as complementary, mutually useful disciplines.
Fil: Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: García, Alejandro Javier. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Kern Isberner, Gabriele. Universitat Dortmund; Alemania
Fil: Simari, Guillermo Ricardo. Universidad Nacional del Sur. Departamento de Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación. Laboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo en Inteligencia Artificial; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description Research on the relation between Belief Revision and Argumentation has always been fruitful in both directions: some argumentation formalisms can be used to define belief change operators,and belief change techniques have also been used for modeling the dynamics of beliefs in argumentation formalisms. In this paper, we give a historical perspective on how belief revision has evolved in the last three decades, and how it has been combined with argumentation. First, we will recall the foundational works concerning the links between both areas. On the basis of such insights, we will present a conceptual view on this topic and some further developments. We offer a glimpse into the future of research in this area based on the understanding of argumentation and belief revision as complementary, mutually useful disciplines.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-03
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/67010
Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro; García, Alejandro Javier; Kern Isberner, Gabriele; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation; Cambridge University Press; Knowledge Engineering Review; 26; 1; 3-2011; 35-43
0269-8889
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/67010
identifier_str_mv Falappa, Marcelo Alejandro; García, Alejandro Javier; Kern Isberner, Gabriele; Simari, Guillermo Ricardo; On the evolving relation between belief revision and argumentation; Cambridge University Press; Knowledge Engineering Review; 26; 1; 3-2011; 35-43
0269-8889
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1017/S0269888910000391
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review/article/on-the-evolving-relation-between-belief-revision-and-argumentation/B64E02F11785717579CE0DA94E993BA2
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cambridge University Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268816189423616
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares