Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests.
- Autores
- Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde; Schindler, Stefan; Lencinas, María Vanessa; Peri, Pablo Luis; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José
- Año de publicación
- 2016
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- Effects of forest harvesting on biodiversity can be varied and complex to understand. We provide a metaanalysisof 553 studies plants, insects and birds to identify the general responses to Variable Retentionharvesting (VR) 1?8 years post-harvest in Nothofagus pumilio forests of southern Patagonia. The analysisis focused on: (i) richness and abundance, (ii) origin and habitat (native forest specialist species, nativespecies of other habitats, alien species), and (iii) temporal trends after harvesting. Our objective was toevaluate why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting, by assessing the effects on (i) speciesrichness and abundance in general, (ii) native forest specialists, native generalist species and alienspecies, and (iii) the recovery of biodiversity toward original conditions. Forests managed with VR supportedhigher overall richness and abundance of plants, insects and birds in aggregate and dispersedretention than unmanaged stands, but with similar values each other. However, origin and habitat of speciesaffected responses to VR. Aggregates support higher native forest specialist plant and lower plants ofhabitats other than dispersed retention. However, both retention treatments increased alien plants,although its richness and abundance was higher in dispersed retention. Native forest specialist insectswere reduced in comparison to unmanaged forest, while insects of other habitats showed a positiveresponse to both aggregate and dispersed retention as well as did for bird species richness and abundancecompared to unmanaged forests. We found evidence for recovery of original conditions for native forestspecialist plants and insects, and plants of other habitats. In contrast, alien plants and native insects ofother habitats increased continuously in the studies included through those representing 8 years postharvest.Major differences among both retention patterns included significantly higher richness andabundance of alien plants and native insects of other habitats in dispersed retention. Our synthesis showsrecovery toward original conditions for some taxa, but demonstrates long-term establishment of alienplants as well as insect species not associated with native N. pumilio forests. These have emerged as amain potential threat to conservation of forests under VR prescription, at least at the stand level.Retention forestry could play a fundamental role for conservation in productive temperate forests, butthe influence of retention pattern and aggregate size are still unclear.
Fil: Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Schindler, Stefan. Universidad de Viena; Austria. Universidad de Porto; Portugal. Environment Agency Austria; Austria
Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina
Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina - Materia
-
RetenciÓN Variable
Manejo Forestal
Silvicultura
Nothofagus Pumilio - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/43739
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_8914d2ed2c2edc58fe9743479bdd54db |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/43739 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests.Soler Esteban, Rosina MatildeSchindler, StefanLencinas, María VanessaPeri, Pablo LuisMartínez Pastur, Guillermo JoséRetenciÓN VariableManejo ForestalSilviculturaNothofagus Pumiliohttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4Effects of forest harvesting on biodiversity can be varied and complex to understand. We provide a metaanalysisof 553 studies plants, insects and birds to identify the general responses to Variable Retentionharvesting (VR) 1?8 years post-harvest in Nothofagus pumilio forests of southern Patagonia. The analysisis focused on: (i) richness and abundance, (ii) origin and habitat (native forest specialist species, nativespecies of other habitats, alien species), and (iii) temporal trends after harvesting. Our objective was toevaluate why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting, by assessing the effects on (i) speciesrichness and abundance in general, (ii) native forest specialists, native generalist species and alienspecies, and (iii) the recovery of biodiversity toward original conditions. Forests managed with VR supportedhigher overall richness and abundance of plants, insects and birds in aggregate and dispersedretention than unmanaged stands, but with similar values each other. However, origin and habitat of speciesaffected responses to VR. Aggregates support higher native forest specialist plant and lower plants ofhabitats other than dispersed retention. However, both retention treatments increased alien plants,although its richness and abundance was higher in dispersed retention. Native forest specialist insectswere reduced in comparison to unmanaged forest, while insects of other habitats showed a positiveresponse to both aggregate and dispersed retention as well as did for bird species richness and abundancecompared to unmanaged forests. We found evidence for recovery of original conditions for native forestspecialist plants and insects, and plants of other habitats. In contrast, alien plants and native insects ofother habitats increased continuously in the studies included through those representing 8 years postharvest.Major differences among both retention patterns included significantly higher richness andabundance of alien plants and native insects of other habitats in dispersed retention. Our synthesis showsrecovery toward original conditions for some taxa, but demonstrates long-term establishment of alienplants as well as insect species not associated with native N. pumilio forests. These have emerged as amain potential threat to conservation of forests under VR prescription, at least at the stand level.Retention forestry could play a fundamental role for conservation in productive temperate forests, butthe influence of retention pattern and aggregate size are still unclear.Fil: Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Schindler, Stefan. Universidad de Viena; Austria. Universidad de Porto; Portugal. Environment Agency Austria; AustriaFil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; ArgentinaFil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaElsevier Science2016-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/43739Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde; Schindler, Stefan; Lencinas, María Vanessa; Peri, Pablo Luis; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests.; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 369; 3-2016; 161-1690378-1127CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.036info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112716300561info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T09:33:01Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/43739instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 09:33:01.893CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests. |
title |
Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests. |
spellingShingle |
Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests. Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde RetenciÓN Variable Manejo Forestal Silvicultura Nothofagus Pumilio |
title_short |
Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests. |
title_full |
Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests. |
title_fullStr |
Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests. |
title_sort |
Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests. |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde Schindler, Stefan Lencinas, María Vanessa Peri, Pablo Luis Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José |
author |
Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde |
author_facet |
Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde Schindler, Stefan Lencinas, María Vanessa Peri, Pablo Luis Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schindler, Stefan Lencinas, María Vanessa Peri, Pablo Luis Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
RetenciÓN Variable Manejo Forestal Silvicultura Nothofagus Pumilio |
topic |
RetenciÓN Variable Manejo Forestal Silvicultura Nothofagus Pumilio |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4.1 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/4 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
Effects of forest harvesting on biodiversity can be varied and complex to understand. We provide a metaanalysisof 553 studies plants, insects and birds to identify the general responses to Variable Retentionharvesting (VR) 1?8 years post-harvest in Nothofagus pumilio forests of southern Patagonia. The analysisis focused on: (i) richness and abundance, (ii) origin and habitat (native forest specialist species, nativespecies of other habitats, alien species), and (iii) temporal trends after harvesting. Our objective was toevaluate why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting, by assessing the effects on (i) speciesrichness and abundance in general, (ii) native forest specialists, native generalist species and alienspecies, and (iii) the recovery of biodiversity toward original conditions. Forests managed with VR supportedhigher overall richness and abundance of plants, insects and birds in aggregate and dispersedretention than unmanaged stands, but with similar values each other. However, origin and habitat of speciesaffected responses to VR. Aggregates support higher native forest specialist plant and lower plants ofhabitats other than dispersed retention. However, both retention treatments increased alien plants,although its richness and abundance was higher in dispersed retention. Native forest specialist insectswere reduced in comparison to unmanaged forest, while insects of other habitats showed a positiveresponse to both aggregate and dispersed retention as well as did for bird species richness and abundancecompared to unmanaged forests. We found evidence for recovery of original conditions for native forestspecialist plants and insects, and plants of other habitats. In contrast, alien plants and native insects ofother habitats increased continuously in the studies included through those representing 8 years postharvest.Major differences among both retention patterns included significantly higher richness andabundance of alien plants and native insects of other habitats in dispersed retention. Our synthesis showsrecovery toward original conditions for some taxa, but demonstrates long-term establishment of alienplants as well as insect species not associated with native N. pumilio forests. These have emerged as amain potential threat to conservation of forests under VR prescription, at least at the stand level.Retention forestry could play a fundamental role for conservation in productive temperate forests, butthe influence of retention pattern and aggregate size are still unclear. Fil: Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Schindler, Stefan. Universidad de Viena; Austria. Universidad de Porto; Portugal. Environment Agency Austria; Austria Fil: Lencinas, María Vanessa. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Peri, Pablo Luis. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral; Argentina. Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria; Argentina Fil: Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina |
description |
Effects of forest harvesting on biodiversity can be varied and complex to understand. We provide a metaanalysisof 553 studies plants, insects and birds to identify the general responses to Variable Retentionharvesting (VR) 1?8 years post-harvest in Nothofagus pumilio forests of southern Patagonia. The analysisis focused on: (i) richness and abundance, (ii) origin and habitat (native forest specialist species, nativespecies of other habitats, alien species), and (iii) temporal trends after harvesting. Our objective was toevaluate why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting, by assessing the effects on (i) speciesrichness and abundance in general, (ii) native forest specialists, native generalist species and alienspecies, and (iii) the recovery of biodiversity toward original conditions. Forests managed with VR supportedhigher overall richness and abundance of plants, insects and birds in aggregate and dispersedretention than unmanaged stands, but with similar values each other. However, origin and habitat of speciesaffected responses to VR. Aggregates support higher native forest specialist plant and lower plants ofhabitats other than dispersed retention. However, both retention treatments increased alien plants,although its richness and abundance was higher in dispersed retention. Native forest specialist insectswere reduced in comparison to unmanaged forest, while insects of other habitats showed a positiveresponse to both aggregate and dispersed retention as well as did for bird species richness and abundancecompared to unmanaged forests. We found evidence for recovery of original conditions for native forestspecialist plants and insects, and plants of other habitats. In contrast, alien plants and native insects ofother habitats increased continuously in the studies included through those representing 8 years postharvest.Major differences among both retention patterns included significantly higher richness andabundance of alien plants and native insects of other habitats in dispersed retention. Our synthesis showsrecovery toward original conditions for some taxa, but demonstrates long-term establishment of alienplants as well as insect species not associated with native N. pumilio forests. These have emerged as amain potential threat to conservation of forests under VR prescription, at least at the stand level.Retention forestry could play a fundamental role for conservation in productive temperate forests, butthe influence of retention pattern and aggregate size are still unclear. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-03 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/43739 Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde; Schindler, Stefan; Lencinas, María Vanessa; Peri, Pablo Luis; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests.; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 369; 3-2016; 161-169 0378-1127 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/43739 |
identifier_str_mv |
Soler Esteban, Rosina Matilde; Schindler, Stefan; Lencinas, María Vanessa; Peri, Pablo Luis; Martínez Pastur, Guillermo José; Why biodiversity increases after variable retention harvesting: A meta-analysis for southern Patagonian forests.; Elsevier Science; Forest Ecology and Management; 369; 3-2016; 161-169 0378-1127 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.036 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112716300561 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier Science |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844613011329777664 |
score |
13.070432 |