Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions

Autores
Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Alvarez, Federico; Paris, Luis Alberto; Wainselboim, Alejandro Javier; Sevilla, Yamila Alejandra; Shalóm, Diego Edgar
Año de publicación
2022
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
We present an eyetracking study that investigates how linking is achieved during real-time comprehension of Spanish sentences with causative psych verbs and alternative case marking. This group of verbs lead to verbs’ argument structures that require direct or inverse syntaxto-semantics linking according to the type of case marking assigned to their object. The study aimed at disentangling whether processing inverse linking was more costly than direct linking, and exploring how incremental argument interpretation takes place when lexemes that accept several case markings are used. Results showed that during incremental comprehension, inverse linking is more difficult than direct linking, irrespective of word order. As for argument interpretation, the current study partially replicated the results of previous studies conducted in this language using different verb types. Findings are discussed under the light of different psycholinguistic models addressing case marking processing and incremental linking.
Fil: Gattei, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Gobierno; Argentina
Fil: Alvarez, Federico. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
Fil: Paris, Luis Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina
Fil: Wainselboim, Alejandro Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina
Fil: Sevilla, Yamila Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Lingüística; Argentina
Fil: Shalóm, Diego Edgar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Materia
SENTENCE PROCESSING
CAUSATIVE PSYCH VERBS
EYE TRACKING
WORD ORDER
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202617
Acceder
id CONICETDig_8515b6ded5ba2ae3112df1315d6ccd23
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202617
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructionsGattei, Carolina AndreaAlvarez, FedericoParis, Luis AlbertoWainselboim, Alejandro JavierSevilla, Yamila AlejandraShalóm, Diego EdgarSENTENCE PROCESSINGCAUSATIVE PSYCH VERBSEYE TRACKINGWORD ORDERhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6We present an eyetracking study that investigates how linking is achieved during real-time comprehension of Spanish sentences with causative psych verbs and alternative case marking. This group of verbs lead to verbs’ argument structures that require direct or inverse syntaxto-semantics linking according to the type of case marking assigned to their object. The study aimed at disentangling whether processing inverse linking was more costly than direct linking, and exploring how incremental argument interpretation takes place when lexemes that accept several case markings are used. Results showed that during incremental comprehension, inverse linking is more difficult than direct linking, irrespective of word order. As for argument interpretation, the current study partially replicated the results of previous studies conducted in this language using different verb types. Findings are discussed under the light of different psycholinguistic models addressing case marking processing and incremental linking.Fil: Gattei, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Gobierno; ArgentinaFil: Alvarez, Federico. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; ArgentinaFil: Paris, Luis Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; ArgentinaFil: Wainselboim, Alejandro Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; ArgentinaFil: Sevilla, Yamila Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Lingüística; ArgentinaFil: Shalóm, Diego Edgar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaeScholarship Publishing2022-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/202617Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Alvarez, Federico; Paris, Luis Alberto; Wainselboim, Alejandro Javier; Sevilla, Yamila Alejandra; et al.; Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions; eScholarship Publishing; Glossa Pycholinguistics; 1; 1; 7-2022; 1-382767-0279CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4b471855info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5070/G601138info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:48:27Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/202617instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:48:27.689CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions
title Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions
spellingShingle Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions
Gattei, Carolina Andrea
SENTENCE PROCESSING
CAUSATIVE PSYCH VERBS
EYE TRACKING
WORD ORDER
title_short Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions
title_full Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions
title_fullStr Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions
title_full_unstemmed Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions
title_sort Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gattei, Carolina Andrea
Alvarez, Federico
Paris, Luis Alberto
Wainselboim, Alejandro Javier
Sevilla, Yamila Alejandra
Shalóm, Diego Edgar
author Gattei, Carolina Andrea
author_facet Gattei, Carolina Andrea
Alvarez, Federico
Paris, Luis Alberto
Wainselboim, Alejandro Javier
Sevilla, Yamila Alejandra
Shalóm, Diego Edgar
author_role author
author2 Alvarez, Federico
Paris, Luis Alberto
Wainselboim, Alejandro Javier
Sevilla, Yamila Alejandra
Shalóm, Diego Edgar
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SENTENCE PROCESSING
CAUSATIVE PSYCH VERBS
EYE TRACKING
WORD ORDER
topic SENTENCE PROCESSING
CAUSATIVE PSYCH VERBS
EYE TRACKING
WORD ORDER
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.2
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv We present an eyetracking study that investigates how linking is achieved during real-time comprehension of Spanish sentences with causative psych verbs and alternative case marking. This group of verbs lead to verbs’ argument structures that require direct or inverse syntaxto-semantics linking according to the type of case marking assigned to their object. The study aimed at disentangling whether processing inverse linking was more costly than direct linking, and exploring how incremental argument interpretation takes place when lexemes that accept several case markings are used. Results showed that during incremental comprehension, inverse linking is more difficult than direct linking, irrespective of word order. As for argument interpretation, the current study partially replicated the results of previous studies conducted in this language using different verb types. Findings are discussed under the light of different psycholinguistic models addressing case marking processing and incremental linking.
Fil: Gattei, Carolina Andrea. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Torcuato Di Tella. Escuela de Gobierno; Argentina
Fil: Alvarez, Federico. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras; Argentina
Fil: Paris, Luis Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina
Fil: Wainselboim, Alejandro Javier. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Ciencias Humanas, Sociales y Ambientales; Argentina
Fil: Sevilla, Yamila Alejandra. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras. Instituto de Lingüística; Argentina
Fil: Shalóm, Diego Edgar. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Física de Buenos Aires; Argentina
description We present an eyetracking study that investigates how linking is achieved during real-time comprehension of Spanish sentences with causative psych verbs and alternative case marking. This group of verbs lead to verbs’ argument structures that require direct or inverse syntaxto-semantics linking according to the type of case marking assigned to their object. The study aimed at disentangling whether processing inverse linking was more costly than direct linking, and exploring how incremental argument interpretation takes place when lexemes that accept several case markings are used. Results showed that during incremental comprehension, inverse linking is more difficult than direct linking, irrespective of word order. As for argument interpretation, the current study partially replicated the results of previous studies conducted in this language using different verb types. Findings are discussed under the light of different psycholinguistic models addressing case marking processing and incremental linking.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202617
Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Alvarez, Federico; Paris, Luis Alberto; Wainselboim, Alejandro Javier; Sevilla, Yamila Alejandra; et al.; Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions; eScholarship Publishing; Glossa Pycholinguistics; 1; 1; 7-2022; 1-38
2767-0279
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/202617
identifier_str_mv Gattei, Carolina Andrea; Alvarez, Federico; Paris, Luis Alberto; Wainselboim, Alejandro Javier; Sevilla, Yamila Alejandra; et al.; Why bother? What our eyes tell about psych verb (non) causative constructions; eScholarship Publishing; Glossa Pycholinguistics; 1; 1; 7-2022; 1-38
2767-0279
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4b471855
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5070/G601138
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv eScholarship Publishing
publisher.none.fl_str_mv eScholarship Publishing
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842268924729622528
score 13.13397

Publicaciones similares