Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment
- Autores
- Azevedo, Guilherme H. F.; Faleiro, Bárbara T.; Fiorini de Magalhaes, Ivan Luiz; Benedetti, Alípio R.; Oliveira, Ubirajara; Pena Barbosa, João P. P.; Santos, Marcus T. T.; Vilela, Paula F.; de Maria, Mário; Santos, Adalberto J.
- Año de publicación
- 2014
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- The current biodiversity crisis makes the quantification of the diversity and the description of organism distribution particularly pressing. Biological inventories are among the most effective ways to improve the knowledge about local biota, but they can be very time and money-consuming. The determination of adequate sampling effort and the selection of cost-effective collecting methods are critical issues. In this article, a spider diversity inventory in an Atlantic semi-deciduous forest fragment in Brazil was used to compare the efficiency of three collecting methods in two different seasons in order to propose an optimised sampling protocol. The worthiness of increasing sampling effort in the target area and similar tropical ecosystems was estimated and evaluated in terms of its cost-effectiveness. For a better sampling of the spider community, it is suggested that a proportion of 55, 29 and 16% of total sampling hours should be dedicated to nocturnal hand collecting (NHC), pitfall traps and beating trays, respectively, in the rainy season. If only one method can be applied, the most efficient in terms of species per sampling is the NHC. A completeness of 70% of the estimated spider species richness (as predicted by the Chao1 estimator) was observed in the complete inventory and increasing sampling effort in the studied area may be highly ineffective when the costs involved are considered. Other studies in similar tropical rainforest areas also presented completeness around 70%, which might be a threshold from which the sampling effort necessary to raise the observed species richness substantially starts to be ineffective.
Fil: Azevedo, Guilherme H. F.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Faleiro, Bárbara T.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Fiorini de Magalhaes, Ivan Luiz. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Fil: Benedetti, Alípio R.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil
Fil: Oliveira, Ubirajara. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Pena Barbosa, João P. P.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil. Governo do Estado de Sao Paulo. Secretaria da Saude. Instituto Butantan; Brasil
Fil: Santos, Marcus T. T.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Vilela, Paula F.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: de Maria, Mário. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil
Fil: Santos, Adalberto J.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil - Materia
-
ARANEAE
BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT
COST-EFFECTIVENESS
FAUNAL INVENTORY
NEOTROPICAL
OPTIMISED SAMPLING PROTOCOL
SAMPLING EFFORT
SEASONALITY
STOPPING-RULE - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/84327
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_8317c818c0d11a1f9500795d3d4c9ab4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/84327 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragmentAzevedo, Guilherme H. F.Faleiro, Bárbara T.Fiorini de Magalhaes, Ivan LuizBenedetti, Alípio R.Oliveira, UbirajaraPena Barbosa, João P. P.Santos, Marcus T. T.Vilela, Paula F.de Maria, MárioSantos, Adalberto J.ARANEAEBIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENTCOST-EFFECTIVENESSFAUNAL INVENTORYNEOTROPICALOPTIMISED SAMPLING PROTOCOLSAMPLING EFFORTSEASONALITYSTOPPING-RULEhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1The current biodiversity crisis makes the quantification of the diversity and the description of organism distribution particularly pressing. Biological inventories are among the most effective ways to improve the knowledge about local biota, but they can be very time and money-consuming. The determination of adequate sampling effort and the selection of cost-effective collecting methods are critical issues. In this article, a spider diversity inventory in an Atlantic semi-deciduous forest fragment in Brazil was used to compare the efficiency of three collecting methods in two different seasons in order to propose an optimised sampling protocol. The worthiness of increasing sampling effort in the target area and similar tropical ecosystems was estimated and evaluated in terms of its cost-effectiveness. For a better sampling of the spider community, it is suggested that a proportion of 55, 29 and 16% of total sampling hours should be dedicated to nocturnal hand collecting (NHC), pitfall traps and beating trays, respectively, in the rainy season. If only one method can be applied, the most efficient in terms of species per sampling is the NHC. A completeness of 70% of the estimated spider species richness (as predicted by the Chao1 estimator) was observed in the complete inventory and increasing sampling effort in the studied area may be highly ineffective when the costs involved are considered. Other studies in similar tropical rainforest areas also presented completeness around 70%, which might be a threshold from which the sampling effort necessary to raise the observed species richness substantially starts to be ineffective.Fil: Azevedo, Guilherme H. F.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: Faleiro, Bárbara T.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: Fiorini de Magalhaes, Ivan Luiz. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Benedetti, Alípio R.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; BrasilFil: Oliveira, Ubirajara. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: Pena Barbosa, João P. P.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil. Governo do Estado de Sao Paulo. Secretaria da Saude. Instituto Butantan; BrasilFil: Santos, Marcus T. T.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: Vilela, Paula F.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: de Maria, Mário. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilFil: Santos, Adalberto J.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; BrasilWiley-liss, Div John Wiley & Sons Inc2014-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/84327Azevedo, Guilherme H. F.; Faleiro, Bárbara T.; Fiorini de Magalhaes, Ivan Luiz; Benedetti, Alípio R.; Oliveira, Ubirajara; et al.; Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment; Wiley-liss, Div John Wiley & Sons Inc; Insect Conservation And Diversity; 7; 4; 7-2014; 381-3911752-458XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/icad.12061info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/icad.12061info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-29T10:33:14Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/84327instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-29 10:33:15.056CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment |
title |
Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment |
spellingShingle |
Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment Azevedo, Guilherme H. F. ARANEAE BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT COST-EFFECTIVENESS FAUNAL INVENTORY NEOTROPICAL OPTIMISED SAMPLING PROTOCOL SAMPLING EFFORT SEASONALITY STOPPING-RULE |
title_short |
Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment |
title_full |
Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment |
title_fullStr |
Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment |
title_sort |
Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Azevedo, Guilherme H. F. Faleiro, Bárbara T. Fiorini de Magalhaes, Ivan Luiz Benedetti, Alípio R. Oliveira, Ubirajara Pena Barbosa, João P. P. Santos, Marcus T. T. Vilela, Paula F. de Maria, Mário Santos, Adalberto J. |
author |
Azevedo, Guilherme H. F. |
author_facet |
Azevedo, Guilherme H. F. Faleiro, Bárbara T. Fiorini de Magalhaes, Ivan Luiz Benedetti, Alípio R. Oliveira, Ubirajara Pena Barbosa, João P. P. Santos, Marcus T. T. Vilela, Paula F. de Maria, Mário Santos, Adalberto J. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Faleiro, Bárbara T. Fiorini de Magalhaes, Ivan Luiz Benedetti, Alípio R. Oliveira, Ubirajara Pena Barbosa, João P. P. Santos, Marcus T. T. Vilela, Paula F. de Maria, Mário Santos, Adalberto J. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
ARANEAE BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT COST-EFFECTIVENESS FAUNAL INVENTORY NEOTROPICAL OPTIMISED SAMPLING PROTOCOL SAMPLING EFFORT SEASONALITY STOPPING-RULE |
topic |
ARANEAE BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT COST-EFFECTIVENESS FAUNAL INVENTORY NEOTROPICAL OPTIMISED SAMPLING PROTOCOL SAMPLING EFFORT SEASONALITY STOPPING-RULE |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
The current biodiversity crisis makes the quantification of the diversity and the description of organism distribution particularly pressing. Biological inventories are among the most effective ways to improve the knowledge about local biota, but they can be very time and money-consuming. The determination of adequate sampling effort and the selection of cost-effective collecting methods are critical issues. In this article, a spider diversity inventory in an Atlantic semi-deciduous forest fragment in Brazil was used to compare the efficiency of three collecting methods in two different seasons in order to propose an optimised sampling protocol. The worthiness of increasing sampling effort in the target area and similar tropical ecosystems was estimated and evaluated in terms of its cost-effectiveness. For a better sampling of the spider community, it is suggested that a proportion of 55, 29 and 16% of total sampling hours should be dedicated to nocturnal hand collecting (NHC), pitfall traps and beating trays, respectively, in the rainy season. If only one method can be applied, the most efficient in terms of species per sampling is the NHC. A completeness of 70% of the estimated spider species richness (as predicted by the Chao1 estimator) was observed in the complete inventory and increasing sampling effort in the studied area may be highly ineffective when the costs involved are considered. Other studies in similar tropical rainforest areas also presented completeness around 70%, which might be a threshold from which the sampling effort necessary to raise the observed species richness substantially starts to be ineffective. Fil: Azevedo, Guilherme H. F.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil Fil: Faleiro, Bárbara T.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil Fil: Fiorini de Magalhaes, Ivan Luiz. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina Fil: Benedetti, Alípio R.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil Fil: Oliveira, Ubirajara. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil Fil: Pena Barbosa, João P. P.. Universidade de Sao Paulo; Brasil. Governo do Estado de Sao Paulo. Secretaria da Saude. Instituto Butantan; Brasil Fil: Santos, Marcus T. T.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil Fil: Vilela, Paula F.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil Fil: de Maria, Mário. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil Fil: Santos, Adalberto J.. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas; Brasil |
description |
The current biodiversity crisis makes the quantification of the diversity and the description of organism distribution particularly pressing. Biological inventories are among the most effective ways to improve the knowledge about local biota, but they can be very time and money-consuming. The determination of adequate sampling effort and the selection of cost-effective collecting methods are critical issues. In this article, a spider diversity inventory in an Atlantic semi-deciduous forest fragment in Brazil was used to compare the efficiency of three collecting methods in two different seasons in order to propose an optimised sampling protocol. The worthiness of increasing sampling effort in the target area and similar tropical ecosystems was estimated and evaluated in terms of its cost-effectiveness. For a better sampling of the spider community, it is suggested that a proportion of 55, 29 and 16% of total sampling hours should be dedicated to nocturnal hand collecting (NHC), pitfall traps and beating trays, respectively, in the rainy season. If only one method can be applied, the most efficient in terms of species per sampling is the NHC. A completeness of 70% of the estimated spider species richness (as predicted by the Chao1 estimator) was observed in the complete inventory and increasing sampling effort in the studied area may be highly ineffective when the costs involved are considered. Other studies in similar tropical rainforest areas also presented completeness around 70%, which might be a threshold from which the sampling effort necessary to raise the observed species richness substantially starts to be ineffective. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-07 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/84327 Azevedo, Guilherme H. F.; Faleiro, Bárbara T.; Fiorini de Magalhaes, Ivan Luiz; Benedetti, Alípio R.; Oliveira, Ubirajara; et al.; Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment; Wiley-liss, Div John Wiley & Sons Inc; Insect Conservation And Diversity; 7; 4; 7-2014; 381-391 1752-458X CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/84327 |
identifier_str_mv |
Azevedo, Guilherme H. F.; Faleiro, Bárbara T.; Fiorini de Magalhaes, Ivan Luiz; Benedetti, Alípio R.; Oliveira, Ubirajara; et al.; Effectiveness of sampling methods and further sampling for accessing spider diversity: A case study in a Brazilian Atlantic rainforest fragment; Wiley-liss, Div John Wiley & Sons Inc; Insect Conservation And Diversity; 7; 4; 7-2014; 381-391 1752-458X CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/icad.12061 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/icad.12061 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-liss, Div John Wiley & Sons Inc |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Wiley-liss, Div John Wiley & Sons Inc |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1844614347379179520 |
score |
13.070432 |