Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT

Autores
Zacho, Helle D.; Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto; Aleksyniene, Ramune; Ejlersen, June A.; Fledelius, Joan; Bertelsen, Henrik; Petersen, Lars J.
Año de publicación
2017
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Background: The aim of this study is to assess whether ultra-fast acquisition SPECT/CT (UF-SPECT/CT) can replace standard SPECT/CT (std-SPECT/CT) as “add-on” to whole-body bone scintigraphy (WB-BS) for the investigation of bone metastases. Consecutive cancer patients referred for WB-BS who underwent SPECT/CT in addition to WB-BS were included. Std-SPECT, UF-SPECT, and low-dose CT were performed (std-SPECT: matrix 128 × 128, zoom factor 1, 20 s/view, 32 views; UF-SPECT: identical parameters except for 10 s/view and 16 views, reducing the acquisition time from 11 to 3 min). A consensus diagnosis was reached by two observers for each set of images (WB-BS + standard SPECT/CT or WB-BS + UF-SPECT/CT) using a three-category evaluation scale: M0: no bone metastases; M1: bone metastases; and Me: equivocal findings. Results: Among the 104 included patients, most presented with prostate cancer (n = 71) or breast cancer (n = 28). Using WB-BS + std-SPECT/CT, 71 (68%) patients were classified as M0, 19 (18%) as M1, and 14 (14%) as Me. Excellent agreement was observed between WB-BS + std-SPECT/CT and WB-BS + UF-SPECT/CT using the three-category scale: kappa = 0.91 (95% CI 0.84–0.97). No difference in observer agreement between cancer types was detected. SPECT/CT provided a definitive classification in 90 of 104 cases in which WB-BS was not entirely diagnostic. Conclusions: To investigate potential bone metastases, UF-SPECT/CT can be conducted as add-on to WB-BS to notably reduce the SPECT acquisition time without compromising diagnostic confidence.
Fil: Zacho, Helle D.. Aalborg University Hospital; Dinamarca
Fil: Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina. Aalborg University Hospital; Dinamarca
Fil: Aleksyniene, Ramune. Aalborg University Hospital; Dinamarca
Fil: Ejlersen, June A.. Regional Hospital West Jutland; Dinamarca
Fil: Fledelius, Joan. Regional Hospital West Jutland; Dinamarca
Fil: Bertelsen, Henrik. Aalborg University Hospital; Dinamarca
Fil: Petersen, Lars J.. Aalborg University Hospital; Dinamarca
Materia
AGREEMENT
BONE METASTASES
BONE SCINTIGRAPHY
FAST ACQUISITION
SPECT/CT
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/77946

id CONICETDig_830a8289acd5478a841d9c5b3b5e22e8
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/77946
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CTZacho, Helle D.Biurrun Manresa, José AlbertoAleksyniene, RamuneEjlersen, June A.Fledelius, JoanBertelsen, HenrikPetersen, Lars J.AGREEMENTBONE METASTASESBONE SCINTIGRAPHYFAST ACQUISITIONSPECT/CThttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3Background: The aim of this study is to assess whether ultra-fast acquisition SPECT/CT (UF-SPECT/CT) can replace standard SPECT/CT (std-SPECT/CT) as “add-on” to whole-body bone scintigraphy (WB-BS) for the investigation of bone metastases. Consecutive cancer patients referred for WB-BS who underwent SPECT/CT in addition to WB-BS were included. Std-SPECT, UF-SPECT, and low-dose CT were performed (std-SPECT: matrix 128 × 128, zoom factor 1, 20 s/view, 32 views; UF-SPECT: identical parameters except for 10 s/view and 16 views, reducing the acquisition time from 11 to 3 min). A consensus diagnosis was reached by two observers for each set of images (WB-BS + standard SPECT/CT or WB-BS + UF-SPECT/CT) using a three-category evaluation scale: M0: no bone metastases; M1: bone metastases; and Me: equivocal findings. Results: Among the 104 included patients, most presented with prostate cancer (n = 71) or breast cancer (n = 28). Using WB-BS + std-SPECT/CT, 71 (68%) patients were classified as M0, 19 (18%) as M1, and 14 (14%) as Me. Excellent agreement was observed between WB-BS + std-SPECT/CT and WB-BS + UF-SPECT/CT using the three-category scale: kappa = 0.91 (95% CI 0.84–0.97). No difference in observer agreement between cancer types was detected. SPECT/CT provided a definitive classification in 90 of 104 cases in which WB-BS was not entirely diagnostic. Conclusions: To investigate potential bone metastases, UF-SPECT/CT can be conducted as add-on to WB-BS to notably reduce the SPECT acquisition time without compromising diagnostic confidence.Fil: Zacho, Helle D.. Aalborg University Hospital; DinamarcaFil: Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina. Aalborg University Hospital; DinamarcaFil: Aleksyniene, Ramune. Aalborg University Hospital; DinamarcaFil: Ejlersen, June A.. Regional Hospital West Jutland; DinamarcaFil: Fledelius, Joan. Regional Hospital West Jutland; DinamarcaFil: Bertelsen, Henrik. Aalborg University Hospital; DinamarcaFil: Petersen, Lars J.. Aalborg University Hospital; DinamarcaSpringer Verlag2017-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/77946Zacho, Helle D.; Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto; Aleksyniene, Ramune; Ejlersen, June A.; Fledelius, Joan; et al.; Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT; Springer Verlag; EJNMMI Research; 7; 1; 12-2017; 1-72191-219XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s13550-016-0252-1info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ejnmmires.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13550-016-0252-1info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-22T11:53:01Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/77946instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-22 11:53:01.762CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT
title Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT
spellingShingle Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT
Zacho, Helle D.
AGREEMENT
BONE METASTASES
BONE SCINTIGRAPHY
FAST ACQUISITION
SPECT/CT
title_short Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT
title_full Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT
title_fullStr Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT
title_full_unstemmed Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT
title_sort Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Zacho, Helle D.
Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto
Aleksyniene, Ramune
Ejlersen, June A.
Fledelius, Joan
Bertelsen, Henrik
Petersen, Lars J.
author Zacho, Helle D.
author_facet Zacho, Helle D.
Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto
Aleksyniene, Ramune
Ejlersen, June A.
Fledelius, Joan
Bertelsen, Henrik
Petersen, Lars J.
author_role author
author2 Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto
Aleksyniene, Ramune
Ejlersen, June A.
Fledelius, Joan
Bertelsen, Henrik
Petersen, Lars J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv AGREEMENT
BONE METASTASES
BONE SCINTIGRAPHY
FAST ACQUISITION
SPECT/CT
topic AGREEMENT
BONE METASTASES
BONE SCINTIGRAPHY
FAST ACQUISITION
SPECT/CT
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Background: The aim of this study is to assess whether ultra-fast acquisition SPECT/CT (UF-SPECT/CT) can replace standard SPECT/CT (std-SPECT/CT) as “add-on” to whole-body bone scintigraphy (WB-BS) for the investigation of bone metastases. Consecutive cancer patients referred for WB-BS who underwent SPECT/CT in addition to WB-BS were included. Std-SPECT, UF-SPECT, and low-dose CT were performed (std-SPECT: matrix 128 × 128, zoom factor 1, 20 s/view, 32 views; UF-SPECT: identical parameters except for 10 s/view and 16 views, reducing the acquisition time from 11 to 3 min). A consensus diagnosis was reached by two observers for each set of images (WB-BS + standard SPECT/CT or WB-BS + UF-SPECT/CT) using a three-category evaluation scale: M0: no bone metastases; M1: bone metastases; and Me: equivocal findings. Results: Among the 104 included patients, most presented with prostate cancer (n = 71) or breast cancer (n = 28). Using WB-BS + std-SPECT/CT, 71 (68%) patients were classified as M0, 19 (18%) as M1, and 14 (14%) as Me. Excellent agreement was observed between WB-BS + std-SPECT/CT and WB-BS + UF-SPECT/CT using the three-category scale: kappa = 0.91 (95% CI 0.84–0.97). No difference in observer agreement between cancer types was detected. SPECT/CT provided a definitive classification in 90 of 104 cases in which WB-BS was not entirely diagnostic. Conclusions: To investigate potential bone metastases, UF-SPECT/CT can be conducted as add-on to WB-BS to notably reduce the SPECT acquisition time without compromising diagnostic confidence.
Fil: Zacho, Helle D.. Aalborg University Hospital; Dinamarca
Fil: Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos. Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos. Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia de Entre Ríos; Argentina. Aalborg University Hospital; Dinamarca
Fil: Aleksyniene, Ramune. Aalborg University Hospital; Dinamarca
Fil: Ejlersen, June A.. Regional Hospital West Jutland; Dinamarca
Fil: Fledelius, Joan. Regional Hospital West Jutland; Dinamarca
Fil: Bertelsen, Henrik. Aalborg University Hospital; Dinamarca
Fil: Petersen, Lars J.. Aalborg University Hospital; Dinamarca
description Background: The aim of this study is to assess whether ultra-fast acquisition SPECT/CT (UF-SPECT/CT) can replace standard SPECT/CT (std-SPECT/CT) as “add-on” to whole-body bone scintigraphy (WB-BS) for the investigation of bone metastases. Consecutive cancer patients referred for WB-BS who underwent SPECT/CT in addition to WB-BS were included. Std-SPECT, UF-SPECT, and low-dose CT were performed (std-SPECT: matrix 128 × 128, zoom factor 1, 20 s/view, 32 views; UF-SPECT: identical parameters except for 10 s/view and 16 views, reducing the acquisition time from 11 to 3 min). A consensus diagnosis was reached by two observers for each set of images (WB-BS + standard SPECT/CT or WB-BS + UF-SPECT/CT) using a three-category evaluation scale: M0: no bone metastases; M1: bone metastases; and Me: equivocal findings. Results: Among the 104 included patients, most presented with prostate cancer (n = 71) or breast cancer (n = 28). Using WB-BS + std-SPECT/CT, 71 (68%) patients were classified as M0, 19 (18%) as M1, and 14 (14%) as Me. Excellent agreement was observed between WB-BS + std-SPECT/CT and WB-BS + UF-SPECT/CT using the three-category scale: kappa = 0.91 (95% CI 0.84–0.97). No difference in observer agreement between cancer types was detected. SPECT/CT provided a definitive classification in 90 of 104 cases in which WB-BS was not entirely diagnostic. Conclusions: To investigate potential bone metastases, UF-SPECT/CT can be conducted as add-on to WB-BS to notably reduce the SPECT acquisition time without compromising diagnostic confidence.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/77946
Zacho, Helle D.; Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto; Aleksyniene, Ramune; Ejlersen, June A.; Fledelius, Joan; et al.; Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT; Springer Verlag; EJNMMI Research; 7; 1; 12-2017; 1-7
2191-219X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/77946
identifier_str_mv Zacho, Helle D.; Biurrun Manresa, José Alberto; Aleksyniene, Ramune; Ejlersen, June A.; Fledelius, Joan; et al.; Three-minute SPECT/CT is sufficient for the assessment of bone metastasis as add-on to planar bone scintigraphy: prospective head-to-head comparison to 11-min SPECT/CT; Springer Verlag; EJNMMI Research; 7; 1; 12-2017; 1-7
2191-219X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1186/s13550-016-0252-1
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://ejnmmires.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s13550-016-0252-1
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Verlag
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Verlag
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846782224586768384
score 12.982451