Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information
- Autores
- Lombardi, Olimpia Iris
- Año de publicación
- 2005
- Idioma
- inglés
- Tipo de recurso
- artículo
- Estado
- versión publicada
- Descripción
- In his well known book, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Fred Dretske (1981) attempts to build a bridge between philosophy and cognitive sciences by introducing the concept of information in the theory of knowledge. He distinguishes between sensory processes (seeing) and cognitive processes (recognizing) in terms of the different ways in which the received information is coded. In the final part of his book, he analyzes the capacity of physical systems to hold beliefs and to develop concepts on an informational basis. For these purposes, Dretske begins by examining the notion of information as characterized in Shannon’s theory. But although this is his starting point, Shannon’s theory has, he argues, two main limitations: first, it is unable to handle the information contained in individual messages and, second, it is a quantitative theory dealing only with amounts of information and ignoring its content. For these reasons, Dretske proposes some formal modifications of the standard theory to make room for individual amounts of information. On the basis of the proposed changes, he elaborates a semantic theory which attempts to capture what he considers to be the nuclear sense of the term ’information’, that is, information as something capable of yielding knowledge. In this article it is shown, first, that Dretske’s modifications suffer from some formal defects. It is then indicated precisely how these defects can be remedied in order to preserve Dretske’s general proposal. In fact, it is shown that, if the changes are introduced in a formally correct way, Shannon’s theory can express much more than what Dretske himself assumes. Finally, it is argued that the semantic character of Dretske’s theory relies neither on the definition of informational content nor on the intentionality of the natural laws underlying the transmission of information. What confers a semantic dimension to Dretske’s theory is a particular interpretation of the very nature of information, which differs widely from the interpretation usually adopted in physical sciences...
Fil: Lombardi, Olimpia Iris. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Centro de Estudios e Investigación. Instituto de Estudios Sobre la Ciencia y Tecnología; Argentina - Materia
-
Fred Dretske
Theory of Shannon
Information
Knowledge - Nivel de accesibilidad
- acceso abierto
- Condiciones de uso
- https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
- Repositorio
- Institución
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- OAI Identificador
- oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/244504
Ver los metadatos del registro completo
id |
CONICETDig_825cf0c5eb2f8b7f076dbaff0daf1b33 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/244504 |
network_acronym_str |
CONICETDig |
repository_id_str |
3498 |
network_name_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
spelling |
Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of InformationLombardi, Olimpia IrisFred DretskeTheory of ShannonInformationKnowledgehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In his well known book, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Fred Dretske (1981) attempts to build a bridge between philosophy and cognitive sciences by introducing the concept of information in the theory of knowledge. He distinguishes between sensory processes (seeing) and cognitive processes (recognizing) in terms of the different ways in which the received information is coded. In the final part of his book, he analyzes the capacity of physical systems to hold beliefs and to develop concepts on an informational basis. For these purposes, Dretske begins by examining the notion of information as characterized in Shannon’s theory. But although this is his starting point, Shannon’s theory has, he argues, two main limitations: first, it is unable to handle the information contained in individual messages and, second, it is a quantitative theory dealing only with amounts of information and ignoring its content. For these reasons, Dretske proposes some formal modifications of the standard theory to make room for individual amounts of information. On the basis of the proposed changes, he elaborates a semantic theory which attempts to capture what he considers to be the nuclear sense of the term ’information’, that is, information as something capable of yielding knowledge. In this article it is shown, first, that Dretske’s modifications suffer from some formal defects. It is then indicated precisely how these defects can be remedied in order to preserve Dretske’s general proposal. In fact, it is shown that, if the changes are introduced in a formally correct way, Shannon’s theory can express much more than what Dretske himself assumes. Finally, it is argued that the semantic character of Dretske’s theory relies neither on the definition of informational content nor on the intentionality of the natural laws underlying the transmission of information. What confers a semantic dimension to Dretske’s theory is a particular interpretation of the very nature of information, which differs widely from the interpretation usually adopted in physical sciences...Fil: Lombardi, Olimpia Iris. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Centro de Estudios e Investigación. Instituto de Estudios Sobre la Ciencia y Tecnología; ArgentinaSpringer2005-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/244504Lombardi, Olimpia Iris; Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information; Springer; Synthese (Dordrecht); 144; 1; 1-2005; 23-390039-7857CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-005-9127-0info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s11229-005-9127-0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:55:34Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/244504instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:55:34.628CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information |
title |
Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information |
spellingShingle |
Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information Lombardi, Olimpia Iris Fred Dretske Theory of Shannon Information Knowledge |
title_short |
Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information |
title_full |
Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information |
title_fullStr |
Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information |
title_sort |
Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Lombardi, Olimpia Iris |
author |
Lombardi, Olimpia Iris |
author_facet |
Lombardi, Olimpia Iris |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Fred Dretske Theory of Shannon Information Knowledge |
topic |
Fred Dretske Theory of Shannon Information Knowledge |
purl_subject.fl_str_mv |
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3 https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6 |
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv |
In his well known book, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Fred Dretske (1981) attempts to build a bridge between philosophy and cognitive sciences by introducing the concept of information in the theory of knowledge. He distinguishes between sensory processes (seeing) and cognitive processes (recognizing) in terms of the different ways in which the received information is coded. In the final part of his book, he analyzes the capacity of physical systems to hold beliefs and to develop concepts on an informational basis. For these purposes, Dretske begins by examining the notion of information as characterized in Shannon’s theory. But although this is his starting point, Shannon’s theory has, he argues, two main limitations: first, it is unable to handle the information contained in individual messages and, second, it is a quantitative theory dealing only with amounts of information and ignoring its content. For these reasons, Dretske proposes some formal modifications of the standard theory to make room for individual amounts of information. On the basis of the proposed changes, he elaborates a semantic theory which attempts to capture what he considers to be the nuclear sense of the term ’information’, that is, information as something capable of yielding knowledge. In this article it is shown, first, that Dretske’s modifications suffer from some formal defects. It is then indicated precisely how these defects can be remedied in order to preserve Dretske’s general proposal. In fact, it is shown that, if the changes are introduced in a formally correct way, Shannon’s theory can express much more than what Dretske himself assumes. Finally, it is argued that the semantic character of Dretske’s theory relies neither on the definition of informational content nor on the intentionality of the natural laws underlying the transmission of information. What confers a semantic dimension to Dretske’s theory is a particular interpretation of the very nature of information, which differs widely from the interpretation usually adopted in physical sciences... Fil: Lombardi, Olimpia Iris. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Centro de Estudios e Investigación. Instituto de Estudios Sobre la Ciencia y Tecnología; Argentina |
description |
In his well known book, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Fred Dretske (1981) attempts to build a bridge between philosophy and cognitive sciences by introducing the concept of information in the theory of knowledge. He distinguishes between sensory processes (seeing) and cognitive processes (recognizing) in terms of the different ways in which the received information is coded. In the final part of his book, he analyzes the capacity of physical systems to hold beliefs and to develop concepts on an informational basis. For these purposes, Dretske begins by examining the notion of information as characterized in Shannon’s theory. But although this is his starting point, Shannon’s theory has, he argues, two main limitations: first, it is unable to handle the information contained in individual messages and, second, it is a quantitative theory dealing only with amounts of information and ignoring its content. For these reasons, Dretske proposes some formal modifications of the standard theory to make room for individual amounts of information. On the basis of the proposed changes, he elaborates a semantic theory which attempts to capture what he considers to be the nuclear sense of the term ’information’, that is, information as something capable of yielding knowledge. In this article it is shown, first, that Dretske’s modifications suffer from some formal defects. It is then indicated precisely how these defects can be remedied in order to preserve Dretske’s general proposal. In fact, it is shown that, if the changes are introduced in a formally correct way, Shannon’s theory can express much more than what Dretske himself assumes. Finally, it is argued that the semantic character of Dretske’s theory relies neither on the definition of informational content nor on the intentionality of the natural laws underlying the transmission of information. What confers a semantic dimension to Dretske’s theory is a particular interpretation of the very nature of information, which differs widely from the interpretation usually adopted in physical sciences... |
publishDate |
2005 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2005-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/244504 Lombardi, Olimpia Iris; Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information; Springer; Synthese (Dordrecht); 144; 1; 1-2005; 23-39 0039-7857 CONICET Digital CONICET |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11336/244504 |
identifier_str_mv |
Lombardi, Olimpia Iris; Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information; Springer; Synthese (Dordrecht); 144; 1; 1-2005; 23-39 0039-7857 CONICET Digital CONICET |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-005-9127-0 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s11229-005-9127-0 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/ |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET) instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
reponame_str |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
collection |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) |
instname_str |
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar |
_version_ |
1842269352867397632 |
score |
13.13397 |