Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information

Autores
Lombardi, Olimpia Iris
Año de publicación
2005
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
In his well known book, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Fred Dretske (1981) attempts to build a bridge between philosophy and cognitive sciences by introducing the concept of information in the theory of knowledge. He distinguishes between sensory processes (seeing) and cognitive processes (recognizing) in terms of the different ways in which the received information is coded. In the final part of his book, he analyzes the capacity of physical systems to hold beliefs and to develop concepts on an informational basis. For these purposes, Dretske begins by examining the notion of information as characterized in Shannon’s theory. But although this is his starting point, Shannon’s theory has, he argues, two main limitations: first, it is unable to handle the information contained in individual messages and, second, it is a quantitative theory dealing only with amounts of information and ignoring its content. For these reasons, Dretske proposes some formal modifications of the standard theory to make room for individual amounts of information. On the basis of the proposed changes, he elaborates a semantic theory which attempts to capture what he considers to be the nuclear sense of the term ’information’, that is, information as something capable of yielding knowledge. In this article it is shown, first, that Dretske’s modifications suffer from some formal defects. It is then indicated precisely how these defects can be remedied in order to preserve Dretske’s general proposal. In fact, it is shown that, if the changes are introduced in a formally correct way, Shannon’s theory can express much more than what Dretske himself assumes. Finally, it is argued that the semantic character of Dretske’s theory relies neither on the definition of informational content nor on the intentionality of the natural laws underlying the transmission of information. What confers a semantic dimension to Dretske’s theory is a particular interpretation of the very nature of information, which differs widely from the interpretation usually adopted in physical sciences...
Fil: Lombardi, Olimpia Iris. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Centro de Estudios e Investigación. Instituto de Estudios Sobre la Ciencia y Tecnología; Argentina
Materia
Fred Dretske
Theory of Shannon
Information
Knowledge
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/244504

id CONICETDig_825cf0c5eb2f8b7f076dbaff0daf1b33
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/244504
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of InformationLombardi, Olimpia IrisFred DretskeTheory of ShannonInformationKnowledgehttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6In his well known book, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Fred Dretske (1981) attempts to build a bridge between philosophy and cognitive sciences by introducing the concept of information in the theory of knowledge. He distinguishes between sensory processes (seeing) and cognitive processes (recognizing) in terms of the different ways in which the received information is coded. In the final part of his book, he analyzes the capacity of physical systems to hold beliefs and to develop concepts on an informational basis. For these purposes, Dretske begins by examining the notion of information as characterized in Shannon’s theory. But although this is his starting point, Shannon’s theory has, he argues, two main limitations: first, it is unable to handle the information contained in individual messages and, second, it is a quantitative theory dealing only with amounts of information and ignoring its content. For these reasons, Dretske proposes some formal modifications of the standard theory to make room for individual amounts of information. On the basis of the proposed changes, he elaborates a semantic theory which attempts to capture what he considers to be the nuclear sense of the term ’information’, that is, information as something capable of yielding knowledge. In this article it is shown, first, that Dretske’s modifications suffer from some formal defects. It is then indicated precisely how these defects can be remedied in order to preserve Dretske’s general proposal. In fact, it is shown that, if the changes are introduced in a formally correct way, Shannon’s theory can express much more than what Dretske himself assumes. Finally, it is argued that the semantic character of Dretske’s theory relies neither on the definition of informational content nor on the intentionality of the natural laws underlying the transmission of information. What confers a semantic dimension to Dretske’s theory is a particular interpretation of the very nature of information, which differs widely from the interpretation usually adopted in physical sciences...Fil: Lombardi, Olimpia Iris. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Centro de Estudios e Investigación. Instituto de Estudios Sobre la Ciencia y Tecnología; ArgentinaSpringer2005-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/244504Lombardi, Olimpia Iris; Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information; Springer; Synthese (Dordrecht); 144; 1; 1-2005; 23-390039-7857CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-005-9127-0info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s11229-005-9127-0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-03T09:55:34Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/244504instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-03 09:55:34.628CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information
title Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information
spellingShingle Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information
Lombardi, Olimpia Iris
Fred Dretske
Theory of Shannon
Information
Knowledge
title_short Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information
title_full Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information
title_fullStr Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information
title_full_unstemmed Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information
title_sort Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Lombardi, Olimpia Iris
author Lombardi, Olimpia Iris
author_facet Lombardi, Olimpia Iris
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Fred Dretske
Theory of Shannon
Information
Knowledge
topic Fred Dretske
Theory of Shannon
Information
Knowledge
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6.3
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/6
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv In his well known book, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Fred Dretske (1981) attempts to build a bridge between philosophy and cognitive sciences by introducing the concept of information in the theory of knowledge. He distinguishes between sensory processes (seeing) and cognitive processes (recognizing) in terms of the different ways in which the received information is coded. In the final part of his book, he analyzes the capacity of physical systems to hold beliefs and to develop concepts on an informational basis. For these purposes, Dretske begins by examining the notion of information as characterized in Shannon’s theory. But although this is his starting point, Shannon’s theory has, he argues, two main limitations: first, it is unable to handle the information contained in individual messages and, second, it is a quantitative theory dealing only with amounts of information and ignoring its content. For these reasons, Dretske proposes some formal modifications of the standard theory to make room for individual amounts of information. On the basis of the proposed changes, he elaborates a semantic theory which attempts to capture what he considers to be the nuclear sense of the term ’information’, that is, information as something capable of yielding knowledge. In this article it is shown, first, that Dretske’s modifications suffer from some formal defects. It is then indicated precisely how these defects can be remedied in order to preserve Dretske’s general proposal. In fact, it is shown that, if the changes are introduced in a formally correct way, Shannon’s theory can express much more than what Dretske himself assumes. Finally, it is argued that the semantic character of Dretske’s theory relies neither on the definition of informational content nor on the intentionality of the natural laws underlying the transmission of information. What confers a semantic dimension to Dretske’s theory is a particular interpretation of the very nature of information, which differs widely from the interpretation usually adopted in physical sciences...
Fil: Lombardi, Olimpia Iris. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Quilmes. Centro de Estudios e Investigación. Instituto de Estudios Sobre la Ciencia y Tecnología; Argentina
description In his well known book, Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Fred Dretske (1981) attempts to build a bridge between philosophy and cognitive sciences by introducing the concept of information in the theory of knowledge. He distinguishes between sensory processes (seeing) and cognitive processes (recognizing) in terms of the different ways in which the received information is coded. In the final part of his book, he analyzes the capacity of physical systems to hold beliefs and to develop concepts on an informational basis. For these purposes, Dretske begins by examining the notion of information as characterized in Shannon’s theory. But although this is his starting point, Shannon’s theory has, he argues, two main limitations: first, it is unable to handle the information contained in individual messages and, second, it is a quantitative theory dealing only with amounts of information and ignoring its content. For these reasons, Dretske proposes some formal modifications of the standard theory to make room for individual amounts of information. On the basis of the proposed changes, he elaborates a semantic theory which attempts to capture what he considers to be the nuclear sense of the term ’information’, that is, information as something capable of yielding knowledge. In this article it is shown, first, that Dretske’s modifications suffer from some formal defects. It is then indicated precisely how these defects can be remedied in order to preserve Dretske’s general proposal. In fact, it is shown that, if the changes are introduced in a formally correct way, Shannon’s theory can express much more than what Dretske himself assumes. Finally, it is argued that the semantic character of Dretske’s theory relies neither on the definition of informational content nor on the intentionality of the natural laws underlying the transmission of information. What confers a semantic dimension to Dretske’s theory is a particular interpretation of the very nature of information, which differs widely from the interpretation usually adopted in physical sciences...
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/244504
Lombardi, Olimpia Iris; Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information; Springer; Synthese (Dordrecht); 144; 1; 1-2005; 23-39
0039-7857
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/244504
identifier_str_mv Lombardi, Olimpia Iris; Dretske, Shannon’s Theory and the Interpretation of Information; Springer; Synthese (Dordrecht); 144; 1; 1-2005; 23-39
0039-7857
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11229-005-9127-0
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s11229-005-9127-0
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842269352867397632
score 13.13397