Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power

Autores
Legarre, Santiago
Año de publicación
2021
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
It is sometimes thought that the police power belongs with the history of constitutional and administrative law. Section I of my contribution to this Symposium on Contemporary Issues of Administrative Law shows that that impression is partly correct. As I explore the historical background of the police power, I invite the reader to join me in an excursion into the past indeed. Pufendorf, Blackstone, Vattel, and other fairly old-fashioned authors, deal with “police” in ways that prefigure the police power of the states in America.1 Nevertheless, the police power is ever present, under different names, in contemporary jurisprudence; the current coronavirus pandemic is unquestionably providing strong regulatory powers an opportunity to shine again in the legal firmament. Section II starts by underlining how “police” landed in the nascent United States, where it became known as “police power,” courtesy of an ever-creative Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall. This section also tracks the evolution of the police power in United States case law, distinguishing a broad from a narrow conception of police power and pointing out how the police power also received other names, such as “power of regulation” or “regulatory power.” Section III of this article explains the ways in which the police power plays a significant role in international law, in particular in what has to do with foreign investment. The distinction between expropriation (including indirect takings) and non-compensable regulatory measures has been clearly accepted in bilateral investment treaties as well as in other sources of international law. Section IV of this Article explores the moral dimension of the police power, with particular focus on the law of overruling necessity, both as a principle concerning the dispensation of rules and as a principle concerning the restriction of rights. Two examples are examined in some detail. The first, coming from Argentina (the author’s country of origin), involves the exceptional dispensation of the principle of separation of powers – a constitutional rule in Argentina, as well as in other countries, including of course the United States. The second, coming from the U.S., involves the restriction of property rights during emergencies, tracking the economic crisis around the great depression of 1930. Section V of this Article emphasizes the importance of having tools that help readers of this Article understand the legal aspects of the present Covid crisis, concluding that the history of the police power and its moral dimensions are of crucial importance with a view to understanding the present.
Fil: Legarre, Santiago. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Derecho. Centro de investigaciones Jurídicas "P. J. J. Llambías" y Doctorado; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
Materia
Emergency
Law
Police Power
Natural Law
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/165470

id CONICETDig_7c20845a447f2aea6740edb04b930f23
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/165470
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police PowerLegarre, SantiagoEmergencyLawPolice PowerNatural Lawhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5It is sometimes thought that the police power belongs with the history of constitutional and administrative law. Section I of my contribution to this Symposium on Contemporary Issues of Administrative Law shows that that impression is partly correct. As I explore the historical background of the police power, I invite the reader to join me in an excursion into the past indeed. Pufendorf, Blackstone, Vattel, and other fairly old-fashioned authors, deal with “police” in ways that prefigure the police power of the states in America.1 Nevertheless, the police power is ever present, under different names, in contemporary jurisprudence; the current coronavirus pandemic is unquestionably providing strong regulatory powers an opportunity to shine again in the legal firmament. Section II starts by underlining how “police” landed in the nascent United States, where it became known as “police power,” courtesy of an ever-creative Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall. This section also tracks the evolution of the police power in United States case law, distinguishing a broad from a narrow conception of police power and pointing out how the police power also received other names, such as “power of regulation” or “regulatory power.” Section III of this article explains the ways in which the police power plays a significant role in international law, in particular in what has to do with foreign investment. The distinction between expropriation (including indirect takings) and non-compensable regulatory measures has been clearly accepted in bilateral investment treaties as well as in other sources of international law. Section IV of this Article explores the moral dimension of the police power, with particular focus on the law of overruling necessity, both as a principle concerning the dispensation of rules and as a principle concerning the restriction of rights. Two examples are examined in some detail. The first, coming from Argentina (the author’s country of origin), involves the exceptional dispensation of the principle of separation of powers – a constitutional rule in Argentina, as well as in other countries, including of course the United States. The second, coming from the U.S., involves the restriction of property rights during emergencies, tracking the economic crisis around the great depression of 1930. Section V of this Article emphasizes the importance of having tools that help readers of this Article understand the legal aspects of the present Covid crisis, concluding that the history of the police power and its moral dimensions are of crucial importance with a view to understanding the present.Fil: Legarre, Santiago. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Derecho. Centro de investigaciones Jurídicas "P. J. J. Llambías" y Doctorado; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaBelmont University2021-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/165470Legarre, Santiago; Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power; Belmont University; Belmont Law Review; 8; 2; 4-2021; 408-4262688-07922688-0792CONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://repository.belmont.edu/lawreview/vol8/iss2/4/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-09-10T13:22:23Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/165470instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-09-10 13:22:24.094CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power
title Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power
spellingShingle Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power
Legarre, Santiago
Emergency
Law
Police Power
Natural Law
title_short Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power
title_full Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power
title_fullStr Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power
title_full_unstemmed Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power
title_sort Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Legarre, Santiago
author Legarre, Santiago
author_facet Legarre, Santiago
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Emergency
Law
Police Power
Natural Law
topic Emergency
Law
Police Power
Natural Law
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5.5
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/5
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv It is sometimes thought that the police power belongs with the history of constitutional and administrative law. Section I of my contribution to this Symposium on Contemporary Issues of Administrative Law shows that that impression is partly correct. As I explore the historical background of the police power, I invite the reader to join me in an excursion into the past indeed. Pufendorf, Blackstone, Vattel, and other fairly old-fashioned authors, deal with “police” in ways that prefigure the police power of the states in America.1 Nevertheless, the police power is ever present, under different names, in contemporary jurisprudence; the current coronavirus pandemic is unquestionably providing strong regulatory powers an opportunity to shine again in the legal firmament. Section II starts by underlining how “police” landed in the nascent United States, where it became known as “police power,” courtesy of an ever-creative Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall. This section also tracks the evolution of the police power in United States case law, distinguishing a broad from a narrow conception of police power and pointing out how the police power also received other names, such as “power of regulation” or “regulatory power.” Section III of this article explains the ways in which the police power plays a significant role in international law, in particular in what has to do with foreign investment. The distinction between expropriation (including indirect takings) and non-compensable regulatory measures has been clearly accepted in bilateral investment treaties as well as in other sources of international law. Section IV of this Article explores the moral dimension of the police power, with particular focus on the law of overruling necessity, both as a principle concerning the dispensation of rules and as a principle concerning the restriction of rights. Two examples are examined in some detail. The first, coming from Argentina (the author’s country of origin), involves the exceptional dispensation of the principle of separation of powers – a constitutional rule in Argentina, as well as in other countries, including of course the United States. The second, coming from the U.S., involves the restriction of property rights during emergencies, tracking the economic crisis around the great depression of 1930. Section V of this Article emphasizes the importance of having tools that help readers of this Article understand the legal aspects of the present Covid crisis, concluding that the history of the police power and its moral dimensions are of crucial importance with a view to understanding the present.
Fil: Legarre, Santiago. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina "Santa María de los Buenos Aires". Facultad de Derecho. Centro de investigaciones Jurídicas "P. J. J. Llambías" y Doctorado; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; Argentina
description It is sometimes thought that the police power belongs with the history of constitutional and administrative law. Section I of my contribution to this Symposium on Contemporary Issues of Administrative Law shows that that impression is partly correct. As I explore the historical background of the police power, I invite the reader to join me in an excursion into the past indeed. Pufendorf, Blackstone, Vattel, and other fairly old-fashioned authors, deal with “police” in ways that prefigure the police power of the states in America.1 Nevertheless, the police power is ever present, under different names, in contemporary jurisprudence; the current coronavirus pandemic is unquestionably providing strong regulatory powers an opportunity to shine again in the legal firmament. Section II starts by underlining how “police” landed in the nascent United States, where it became known as “police power,” courtesy of an ever-creative Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall. This section also tracks the evolution of the police power in United States case law, distinguishing a broad from a narrow conception of police power and pointing out how the police power also received other names, such as “power of regulation” or “regulatory power.” Section III of this article explains the ways in which the police power plays a significant role in international law, in particular in what has to do with foreign investment. The distinction between expropriation (including indirect takings) and non-compensable regulatory measures has been clearly accepted in bilateral investment treaties as well as in other sources of international law. Section IV of this Article explores the moral dimension of the police power, with particular focus on the law of overruling necessity, both as a principle concerning the dispensation of rules and as a principle concerning the restriction of rights. Two examples are examined in some detail. The first, coming from Argentina (the author’s country of origin), involves the exceptional dispensation of the principle of separation of powers – a constitutional rule in Argentina, as well as in other countries, including of course the United States. The second, coming from the U.S., involves the restriction of property rights during emergencies, tracking the economic crisis around the great depression of 1930. Section V of this Article emphasizes the importance of having tools that help readers of this Article understand the legal aspects of the present Covid crisis, concluding that the history of the police power and its moral dimensions are of crucial importance with a view to understanding the present.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-04
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/165470
Legarre, Santiago; Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power; Belmont University; Belmont Law Review; 8; 2; 4-2021; 408-426
2688-0792
2688-0792
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/165470
identifier_str_mv Legarre, Santiago; Emergencies Revisited: The Enduring Legacy of the Police Power; Belmont University; Belmont Law Review; 8; 2; 4-2021; 408-426
2688-0792
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://repository.belmont.edu/lawreview/vol8/iss2/4/
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Belmont University
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Belmont University
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1842981233232969728
score 12.493442