Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems

Autores
Pautasso, Marco; Böhning Gaese, Katrin; Clergeau, Philippe; Cueto, Víctor; Dinetti, Marco; Fernandez Juricic, Esteban; Kaisanlahti Jokimäki, Marja Liisa; Jokimäki, Jukka; Mckinney, Michael L.; Sodhi, Navjot S.; Storch, David; Tomialojc, Ludwik; Weisberg, Peter J.; Woinarski, John; Fuller, Richard A.; Cantarello, Elena
Año de publicación
2011
Idioma
inglés
Tipo de recurso
artículo
Estado
versión publicada
Descripción
Aim Despite the increasing pace of urbanization, little is known about how this process affects biodiversity globally. We investigate macroecological patterns of bird assemblages in urbanized areas relative to semi-natural ecosystems. Location World-wide. Methods We use a database of quantitative bird surveys to compare key assemblage structure parameters for plots in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems controlling for spatial autocorrelation and survey methodology. We use the term 'urbanized' instead of 'urban' ecosystems as many of the plots were not located in the centre of towns but in remnant habitat patches within conurbations. Results Some macroecological relationships were conserved in urbanized landscapes. Species-area, species-abundance and species-biomass relationships did not differ significantly between urbanized and non-urbanized environments. However, there were differences in the relationships between productivity and assemblage structure. In forests, species richness increased with productivity; in both forests and open habitats, the evenness of species abundances declined as productivity increased. Among urbanized plots, instead, both species richness and the evenness of species abundances were independent of variation in productivity. Main conclusions Remnant habitats within urbanized areas are subject to many ecological alterations, yet key macroecological patterns differ remarkably little in urbanized versus non-urbanized plots. Our results support the need for increased conservation activities in urbanized landscapes, particularly given the additional benefits of local experiences of biodiversity for the human population. With increasing urbanization world-wide, broad-scale efforts are needed to understand and manage the effects of this driver of change on biodiversity.
Fil: Pautasso, Marco. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
Fil: Böhning Gaese, Katrin. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; Alemania
Fil: Clergeau, Philippe. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle; Francia
Fil: Cueto, Víctor. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Dinetti, Marco. Ecologia Urbana; Italia
Fil: Fernandez Juricic, Esteban. Purdue University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kaisanlahti Jokimäki, Marja Liisa. University of Lapland; Finlandia
Fil: Jokimäki, Jukka. University of Lapland; Finlandia
Fil: Mckinney, Michael L.. University of Tennessee; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sodhi, Navjot S.. National University Of Singapore; Singapur
Fil: Storch, David. Charles University; República Checa
Fil: Tomialojc, Ludwik. University Of Wroclaw; Polonia
Fil: Weisberg, Peter J.. University Of Nevada; Estados Unidos
Fil: Woinarski, John. Australian Government, Department Of The Environment, Water, Heritage And The Arts; Australia
Fil: Fuller, Richard A.. Csiro Sustainable Ecosystems; Australia
Fil: Cantarello, Elena. University Talbot Campus. School Of Conservation Sciences; Reino Unido
Materia
Birds
Conservation Biogeography
Environmental Impacts
Habitat Heterogeneity
More-Individuals Hypothesis
Rarity
Scale
Species-Energy Relationship
Species-People Coexistence
Urban Ecology
Nivel de accesibilidad
acceso abierto
Condiciones de uso
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
Repositorio
CONICET Digital (CONICET)
Institución
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
OAI Identificador
oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/68650

id CONICETDig_79d1b39664bdd133a310867aae35cbeb
oai_identifier_str oai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/68650
network_acronym_str CONICETDig
repository_id_str 3498
network_name_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
spelling Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystemsPautasso, MarcoBöhning Gaese, KatrinClergeau, PhilippeCueto, VíctorDinetti, MarcoFernandez Juricic, EstebanKaisanlahti Jokimäki, Marja LiisaJokimäki, JukkaMckinney, Michael L.Sodhi, Navjot S.Storch, DavidTomialojc, LudwikWeisberg, Peter J.Woinarski, JohnFuller, Richard A.Cantarello, ElenaBirdsConservation BiogeographyEnvironmental ImpactsHabitat HeterogeneityMore-Individuals HypothesisRarityScaleSpecies-Energy RelationshipSpecies-People CoexistenceUrban Ecologyhttps://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1Aim Despite the increasing pace of urbanization, little is known about how this process affects biodiversity globally. We investigate macroecological patterns of bird assemblages in urbanized areas relative to semi-natural ecosystems. Location World-wide. Methods We use a database of quantitative bird surveys to compare key assemblage structure parameters for plots in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems controlling for spatial autocorrelation and survey methodology. We use the term 'urbanized' instead of 'urban' ecosystems as many of the plots were not located in the centre of towns but in remnant habitat patches within conurbations. Results Some macroecological relationships were conserved in urbanized landscapes. Species-area, species-abundance and species-biomass relationships did not differ significantly between urbanized and non-urbanized environments. However, there were differences in the relationships between productivity and assemblage structure. In forests, species richness increased with productivity; in both forests and open habitats, the evenness of species abundances declined as productivity increased. Among urbanized plots, instead, both species richness and the evenness of species abundances were independent of variation in productivity. Main conclusions Remnant habitats within urbanized areas are subject to many ecological alterations, yet key macroecological patterns differ remarkably little in urbanized versus non-urbanized plots. Our results support the need for increased conservation activities in urbanized landscapes, particularly given the additional benefits of local experiences of biodiversity for the human population. With increasing urbanization world-wide, broad-scale efforts are needed to understand and manage the effects of this driver of change on biodiversity.Fil: Pautasso, Marco. Imperial College London; Reino UnidoFil: Böhning Gaese, Katrin. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; AlemaniaFil: Clergeau, Philippe. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle; FranciaFil: Cueto, Víctor. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; ArgentinaFil: Dinetti, Marco. Ecologia Urbana; ItaliaFil: Fernandez Juricic, Esteban. Purdue University; Estados UnidosFil: Kaisanlahti Jokimäki, Marja Liisa. University of Lapland; FinlandiaFil: Jokimäki, Jukka. University of Lapland; FinlandiaFil: Mckinney, Michael L.. University of Tennessee; Estados UnidosFil: Sodhi, Navjot S.. National University Of Singapore; SingapurFil: Storch, David. Charles University; República ChecaFil: Tomialojc, Ludwik. University Of Wroclaw; PoloniaFil: Weisberg, Peter J.. University Of Nevada; Estados UnidosFil: Woinarski, John. Australian Government, Department Of The Environment, Water, Heritage And The Arts; AustraliaFil: Fuller, Richard A.. Csiro Sustainable Ecosystems; AustraliaFil: Cantarello, Elena. University Talbot Campus. School Of Conservation Sciences; Reino UnidoWiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc2011-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:ar-repo/semantics/articuloapplication/pdfapplication/mswordapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11336/68650Pautasso, Marco; Böhning Gaese, Katrin; Clergeau, Philippe; Cueto, Víctor; Dinetti, Marco; et al.; Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Global Ecology and Biogeography; 20; 3; 5-2011; 426-4361466-822XCONICET DigitalCONICETenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00616.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00616.xinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas2025-10-15T15:19:59Zoai:ri.conicet.gov.ar:11336/68650instacron:CONICETInstitucionalhttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/Organismo científico-tecnológicoNo correspondehttp://ri.conicet.gov.ar/oai/requestdasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.arArgentinaNo correspondeNo correspondeNo correspondeopendoar:34982025-10-15 15:19:59.828CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicasfalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems
title Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems
spellingShingle Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems
Pautasso, Marco
Birds
Conservation Biogeography
Environmental Impacts
Habitat Heterogeneity
More-Individuals Hypothesis
Rarity
Scale
Species-Energy Relationship
Species-People Coexistence
Urban Ecology
title_short Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems
title_full Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems
title_fullStr Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems
title_sort Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pautasso, Marco
Böhning Gaese, Katrin
Clergeau, Philippe
Cueto, Víctor
Dinetti, Marco
Fernandez Juricic, Esteban
Kaisanlahti Jokimäki, Marja Liisa
Jokimäki, Jukka
Mckinney, Michael L.
Sodhi, Navjot S.
Storch, David
Tomialojc, Ludwik
Weisberg, Peter J.
Woinarski, John
Fuller, Richard A.
Cantarello, Elena
author Pautasso, Marco
author_facet Pautasso, Marco
Böhning Gaese, Katrin
Clergeau, Philippe
Cueto, Víctor
Dinetti, Marco
Fernandez Juricic, Esteban
Kaisanlahti Jokimäki, Marja Liisa
Jokimäki, Jukka
Mckinney, Michael L.
Sodhi, Navjot S.
Storch, David
Tomialojc, Ludwik
Weisberg, Peter J.
Woinarski, John
Fuller, Richard A.
Cantarello, Elena
author_role author
author2 Böhning Gaese, Katrin
Clergeau, Philippe
Cueto, Víctor
Dinetti, Marco
Fernandez Juricic, Esteban
Kaisanlahti Jokimäki, Marja Liisa
Jokimäki, Jukka
Mckinney, Michael L.
Sodhi, Navjot S.
Storch, David
Tomialojc, Ludwik
Weisberg, Peter J.
Woinarski, John
Fuller, Richard A.
Cantarello, Elena
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Birds
Conservation Biogeography
Environmental Impacts
Habitat Heterogeneity
More-Individuals Hypothesis
Rarity
Scale
Species-Energy Relationship
Species-People Coexistence
Urban Ecology
topic Birds
Conservation Biogeography
Environmental Impacts
Habitat Heterogeneity
More-Individuals Hypothesis
Rarity
Scale
Species-Energy Relationship
Species-People Coexistence
Urban Ecology
purl_subject.fl_str_mv https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1.6
https://purl.org/becyt/ford/1
dc.description.none.fl_txt_mv Aim Despite the increasing pace of urbanization, little is known about how this process affects biodiversity globally. We investigate macroecological patterns of bird assemblages in urbanized areas relative to semi-natural ecosystems. Location World-wide. Methods We use a database of quantitative bird surveys to compare key assemblage structure parameters for plots in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems controlling for spatial autocorrelation and survey methodology. We use the term 'urbanized' instead of 'urban' ecosystems as many of the plots were not located in the centre of towns but in remnant habitat patches within conurbations. Results Some macroecological relationships were conserved in urbanized landscapes. Species-area, species-abundance and species-biomass relationships did not differ significantly between urbanized and non-urbanized environments. However, there were differences in the relationships between productivity and assemblage structure. In forests, species richness increased with productivity; in both forests and open habitats, the evenness of species abundances declined as productivity increased. Among urbanized plots, instead, both species richness and the evenness of species abundances were independent of variation in productivity. Main conclusions Remnant habitats within urbanized areas are subject to many ecological alterations, yet key macroecological patterns differ remarkably little in urbanized versus non-urbanized plots. Our results support the need for increased conservation activities in urbanized landscapes, particularly given the additional benefits of local experiences of biodiversity for the human population. With increasing urbanization world-wide, broad-scale efforts are needed to understand and manage the effects of this driver of change on biodiversity.
Fil: Pautasso, Marco. Imperial College London; Reino Unido
Fil: Böhning Gaese, Katrin. Goethe Universitat Frankfurt; Alemania
Fil: Clergeau, Philippe. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle; Francia
Fil: Cueto, Víctor. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución; Argentina. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Ciudad Universitaria. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires; Argentina
Fil: Dinetti, Marco. Ecologia Urbana; Italia
Fil: Fernandez Juricic, Esteban. Purdue University; Estados Unidos
Fil: Kaisanlahti Jokimäki, Marja Liisa. University of Lapland; Finlandia
Fil: Jokimäki, Jukka. University of Lapland; Finlandia
Fil: Mckinney, Michael L.. University of Tennessee; Estados Unidos
Fil: Sodhi, Navjot S.. National University Of Singapore; Singapur
Fil: Storch, David. Charles University; República Checa
Fil: Tomialojc, Ludwik. University Of Wroclaw; Polonia
Fil: Weisberg, Peter J.. University Of Nevada; Estados Unidos
Fil: Woinarski, John. Australian Government, Department Of The Environment, Water, Heritage And The Arts; Australia
Fil: Fuller, Richard A.. Csiro Sustainable Ecosystems; Australia
Fil: Cantarello, Elena. University Talbot Campus. School Of Conservation Sciences; Reino Unido
description Aim Despite the increasing pace of urbanization, little is known about how this process affects biodiversity globally. We investigate macroecological patterns of bird assemblages in urbanized areas relative to semi-natural ecosystems. Location World-wide. Methods We use a database of quantitative bird surveys to compare key assemblage structure parameters for plots in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems controlling for spatial autocorrelation and survey methodology. We use the term 'urbanized' instead of 'urban' ecosystems as many of the plots were not located in the centre of towns but in remnant habitat patches within conurbations. Results Some macroecological relationships were conserved in urbanized landscapes. Species-area, species-abundance and species-biomass relationships did not differ significantly between urbanized and non-urbanized environments. However, there were differences in the relationships between productivity and assemblage structure. In forests, species richness increased with productivity; in both forests and open habitats, the evenness of species abundances declined as productivity increased. Among urbanized plots, instead, both species richness and the evenness of species abundances were independent of variation in productivity. Main conclusions Remnant habitats within urbanized areas are subject to many ecological alterations, yet key macroecological patterns differ remarkably little in urbanized versus non-urbanized plots. Our results support the need for increased conservation activities in urbanized landscapes, particularly given the additional benefits of local experiences of biodiversity for the human population. With increasing urbanization world-wide, broad-scale efforts are needed to understand and manage the effects of this driver of change on biodiversity.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-05
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
info:ar-repo/semantics/articulo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/11336/68650
Pautasso, Marco; Böhning Gaese, Katrin; Clergeau, Philippe; Cueto, Víctor; Dinetti, Marco; et al.; Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Global Ecology and Biogeography; 20; 3; 5-2011; 426-436
1466-822X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
url http://hdl.handle.net/11336/68650
identifier_str_mv Pautasso, Marco; Böhning Gaese, Katrin; Clergeau, Philippe; Cueto, Víctor; Dinetti, Marco; et al.; Global macroecology of bird assemblages in urbanized and semi-natural ecosystems; Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc; Global Ecology and Biogeography; 20; 3; 5-2011; 426-436
1466-822X
CONICET Digital
CONICET
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/url/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00616.x
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00616.x
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/ar/
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/msword
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley Blackwell Publishing, Inc
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname:Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
reponame_str CONICET Digital (CONICET)
collection CONICET Digital (CONICET)
instname_str Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.name.fl_str_mv CONICET Digital (CONICET) - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
repository.mail.fl_str_mv dasensio@conicet.gov.ar; lcarlino@conicet.gov.ar
_version_ 1846083348483538944
score 13.22299